Can dementia be prevented? Experts say yes - here's how to protect your brain
Image: Anna Shvets /pexels
Imagine waking up one morning and forgetting the route to your favourite coffee shop. Or struggling to remember the name of someone you love.
It's a frightening thought, but for millions worldwide, it's a daily reality called dementia. Ahead of World Brain Day on July 22, experts are urging all of us to rethink what we know about brain health.
Forget the myth that dementia is simply an inevitable part of getting older.
According to Dr Patty Francis, president of the Neurological Association of South Africa (NASA), dementia is increasingly the result of decades of exposure to risk factors we can do something about
'Dementia doesn't just arrive overnight,' says Francis. 'It's often rooted in unmanaged issues like high blood pressure, obesity, smoking, depression, diabetes and even chronic stress starting as early as our 30s.'
The statistics from the World Health Organisation (WHO) make it clear why this matters. Right now, around 57 million people live with dementia globally.
By 2030, this number could jump to 78 million, and by 2050, a staggering 153 million. Sub-Saharan Africa, already facing high rates of HIV and stroke (both linked to dementia), is expected to see cases rise from 2.13 million to over 7.6 million in just 25 years.
Yet experts say up to 45% of dementia cases could be prevented by making changes we often underestimate, from staying socially connected to managing medical conditions. Your everyday choices shape your future brain health.
It's tempting to think dementia only concerns older people. But the science shows otherwise. What you do in your 20s, 30s and 40s, diet, exercise, sleep, and even how often you catch up with friends, can dramatically change your risk.
A major Lancet Commission report found that tackling 14 modifiable risk factors, including hearing loss, depression, social isolation, obesity, and diabetes, could prevent or delay almost half of dementia cases worldwide.
Even something as everyday as finishing secondary education, quitting smoking, or getting regular exercise matters.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
experts say up to 45% of dementia cases could be prevented by making changes we often underestimate, from staying socially connected to managing medical conditions.
Image: Google DeepMind /pexels
'Every stage of life offers a chance to protect your brain,' says Francis. 'From maternal nutrition and childhood vaccines to managing stress and staying active in midlife."
Warning signs to watch for and why you shouldn't ignore them. Many people dismiss memory lapses or confusion as 'just ageing.'
But spotting symptoms early could change lives. Some common early warning signs include Memory loss that disrupts daily life.
Difficulty doing familiar tasks.
Problems finding words.
Confusion about time or place.
Trouble understanding visual cues.
Losing things and struggling to retrace steps.
Mood swings or personality changes.
Withdrawing from work or social life.
Problems planning or solving problems.
If you or someone you care about notices these, it's vital to see a neurologist or specialist. Some types of dementia, like those linked to vitamin B12 deficiency or HIV, can be treated or even reversed if caught early.
The everyday choices you make influence the future health of your brain.
Image: cottonbro studio /pexels
Beyond medication: the lifestyle power of prevention
While there's currently no cure for Alzheimer's disease, which is the most common type of dementia, experts highlight that early diagnosis, lifestyle changes, and treatment can slow its progression.
Medication to help with thinking and behaviour: Cognitive rehabilitation and occupational therapy
Controlling conditions like high blood pressure or diabetes
'New drugs like anti-amyloid therapies show promise,' Dr Francis explains, 'but they're expensive and not widely available, especially in lower-income countries.'
For most South Africans, early screening, education, and support remain the most powerful tools we have. In many communities, dementia is still stigmatised.
Families often keep quiet, fearing judgment. But Francis believes change starts with conversation.
'We need to see brain health the same way we see heart health,' she says. 'Prioritising it isn't just for later life, it's a lifelong investment.'
The call this World Brain Day is clear: small steps matter. Eating well, getting active, staying connected, and treating medical conditions aren't just about living longer; they're about living better, with minds that stay sharp.
Brain health isn't only for the elderly. It's for everyone, every day. By making simple lifestyle changes today, no matter your age, you could lower your risk tomorrow. Healthy brains build healthy families, healthy communities and a brighter, clearer tomorrow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
16 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Health department takes charge in quest for global TB vaccine in SA
If the clinical trials that are now under way succeed, the world may have a vaccine that can prevent tuberculosis (TB) in adults and adolescents within the next few years, says health minister Aaron Motsoaledi. Motsoaledi was giving the keynote address at a national workshop in Sandton on Wednesday on the creation of a TB vaccine for children and adults. 'This is a beginning of a new chapter where prevention of TB through vaccination will become the order of the day and a groundbreaking innovation,' Motsoaledi said. The workshop was hosted by the department of health in partnership with the World Health Organisation (WHO). 'For over 100 years, we have relied on the BCG vaccine to protect our children from TB. But we have not had a tool that can protect adolescents and adults', he said. Motsoaledi said the day when an announcement is made on the availability of the vaccine will be a revolutionary and would be like freedom from slavery for citizens. 'The slavery of poverty, which is exacerbated by tuberculosis, premature death of young adults, people losing jobs because of tuberculosis, will come to an end', he said. Motsoaledi emphasised that the key areas that will make the system ready for implementation and rollout of the vaccine will be generating evidence for policy and investments, reliable delivery systems, and production and supply of the TB vaccine. 'These new vaccines will be a game changer for prevention and for reducing the need for TB preventive treatment in health systems', he said. Motsoaledi said the advent of Covid-19 taught the world when urgency met preparation. 'We saw how vaccines could be developed, approved and distributed at record speed but we also learnt that science alone is not enough. Public trust, strong systems, clear communication and equitable access are just as essential,' Motsoaledi said.
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Israeli strike kills hungry Gaza family in their sleep
The Al-Shaer family went to bed hungry at their home in Gaza City. An Israeli air strike killed them in their sleep. The family — freelance journalist Wala al-Jaabari, her husband and their five children — were among more than 100 people killed in 24 hours of Israeli strikes or gunfire, according to health officials. Their corpses lay in white shrouds outside their bombed home on Wednesday with their names scribbled in pen. Blood seeped through the shrouds as they lay there, staining them red. 'This is my cousin. He was 10. We dug them out of the rubble,' Amr al-Shaer, holding one of the bodies after retrieving it. Iman al-Shaer, another relative who lives nearby, said the family hadn't eaten anything before the bombs came down. 'The children slept without food,' he said. The Israeli military did not immediately comment on the strike at the family's home, but said its air force had struck 120 targets throughout Gaza in the past day, including 'terrorist cells, military structures, tunnels, booby-trapped structures, and additional terrorist infrastructure sites'. Relatives said some neighbours were spared only because they had been out searching for food at the time of the strike. Ten more Palestinians died overnight from starvation, the Gaza health ministry said, bringing the total number of people who have starved to death to 111, most of them in recent weeks as a wave of hunger crashes on the Palestinian enclave. The World Health Organisation said on Wednesday 21 children under the age of five were among those who died of malnutrition so far this year. It said it had been unable to deliver any food for nearly 80 days between March and May and that a resumption of food deliveries was still far below what is needed.
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Small win for activists, but SA's HIV projects won't get reopened
The $400m that US Congress hasn't cut with the rest of its funding programme doesn't undo the blow to global HIV and TB programmes By The $400m that the US Congress took off a list of programmes from which the Trump administration will now take back previously approved but unspent funds, doesn't mean the cuts to global HIV and TB programmes in February, including those in South Africa, are now reversed. HIV projects that have closed in South Africa, which were formerly funded by the US government, won't restart as a result of this decision. In fact, quite the opposite. The 'limited Pepfar waiver' that President Donald Trump announced in February remains in place. That means no HIV prevention activities, unless they intend to stop pregnant and breastfeeding women from infecting their babies, can be paid for with US government money, and projects that make it easier for teen girls and young women in Africa, trans people, sex workers, injecting drug users and gay and bisexual men — groups of people that have a higher chance to get HIV than the general population — cannot be funded. Without a proper explanation for it, the $400m seems to be a random amount that Trump's administration picked to take back from Pepfar, a US government programme that funds Aids projects in poorer countries with high HIV infection rates, such as South Africa. The amount is about 8.5% of Pepfar's $4.725bn budget for this financial year and was part of a larger $9.4bn 'rescissions package' — that has now been reduced to $9bn and passed as the H.R.4 Rescissions Act of 2025. Rescissions happen when the presidential administration wants to cancel funding that was approved by Congress and then use it for something else. What the decision to remove the $400m from the package does, however, mean is that activism could finally be starting to pay off. Activists have had hundreds of meetings with US senators and Congress committee chairs. There have been 'Save Pepfar' social media campaigns, and plenty of media coverage about the devastating consequences of the funding cuts. Tens of modelling studies have also projected what could happen if the lost funds are not replaced. Opposition from within Trump's Republican Party against nonevidence-based cuts to a programme that has, for two decades, been supported by both the Democrats and Republicans and has saved over 25-million lives, is now at last emerging. 'It's a small win within the bigger context, but nonetheless, a huge win for advocacy, and a reminder that activism is powerful and alive, and making an impact,' Jirair Ratevosian, a former head of staff at Pepfar and fellow at Duke University's Global Health Institute, told Bhekisisa at last week's Conference on HIV Science in Kigali. Around $8bn of the money was for foreign aid and development programmes, including global health, and just over $1bn for public broadcast stations that the Trump administration has accused of being biased because they're too liberal. But the Rescissions Act is, in itself, bad news. 'It opens the floodgates for the Trump administration to say 'we don't want this or that in the budget that Congress approved',' says Mitchell Warren, the head of international advocacy organisation Avac. 'It's trying to take the congressional power of the purse and put it in the executive branch to usurp the role of Congress in deciding how much money — and on what to spend it.' So how did this all happen, and does it hold any good in the long term for South Africa? We break it down. 1. How did we get here? In the US, Congress — it consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives — decides how much government money goes to who, just like parliament does in South Africa. Both the Senate and the House have to pass budgets. But, as analysts at the Centre for Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, DC point out, President Trump wants more control over how his administration's money is spent. In March, he signed the 2025 budget that Congress approved into law. Three months later, in June, he decided he wanted to change some of that and submitted a $9.4bn rescission request, which the House of Representatives (it has five more Republican than Democrat members) passed on June 12. When it was the Senate's turn to vote on this, some Republican senators weren't happy with the $400m Pepfar cut, signalling they wouldn't sign off on the deal unless the Pepfar part was removed. Because there was a danger of them swinging the vote, the Republicans removed the $400m from the Rescissions Bill and got the House to pass that too. All that's left is for Trump to now sign the Act. 2. What was the $400m that was removed from the Rescissions Act for? In short, no one really knows, because the Trump administration hasn't said what it was for — or what it plans to do with it. But what we do know is that the US law that governs rescissions, the Impoundment Control Act, says that the president can only request that Congress takes back funding that it previously approved, if the money has not yet been obligated — that means funds hadn't yet been given to a particular recipient, for instance, an HIV project in South Africa. We also know that the $400m was part of the financial budget for 2025, says Warren, but because the law gives Pepfar permission to spend money over five years, that money doesn't have to be legally spent until 2029. 3. What will the $400m now be used for? Again, no one knows. We don't even know if it will be used, because over the past few months, the Trump administration's main strategy has 'simply been to illegally impound funds — by announcing a 'funding freeze' or 'programmatic review' with no public notice at all — and force those harmed by the impoundments to pursue relief in court', the Centre on Budget and Policy Priorities explains in an analysis. But we do know what the money can't be used for. Unless the rules of Trump's 'limited waiver' are changed, Pepfar funds can mostly not be spent on any of the evidence-based strategies it paid for before Trump was elected in January. Pepfar used to focus on groups of people and areas where people have the highest chance of getting infected with HIV — that way, the programme got the biggest bang for its buck. In South Africa, for instance, Pepfar worked in the 27 districts with the highest infection rates and groups known as 'key populations' — sex workers, gay and bisexual men, trans people, injecting drug users and African women between the ages of 15 and 24 — that are much more likely to get newly infected with HIV than other South Africans. Now those projects, which studies show stopped many new infections, have been closed down and the Trump administration says it's not prepared to buy HIV prevention medicine for any group other than pregnant and breastfeeding women. 'It used to be all about evidence,' Warren says. 'Now it's all about ideology.' 4. What do scientists and activists want the $400m to be used for? Ratevosian says this moment should be used to gain Republican support to change the waiver rules, so that Pepfar money can cover more of the populations and services needed for HIV prevention. Lenacapavir, a pricey twice-a-year anti-HIV jab, which scientists believe could help to stop HIV in its tracks if it's rolled out properly, could be used to convince Republican Congress members, says Ratevosian. 'Pepfar has long wanted to get countries to transition to taking more ownership [read: pay more] for their HIV responses. So now activists are arguing: 'Preventing more new infections with the jab, will make it easier for countries to take ownership because the pandemic will be easier to manage.'' In December, Pepfar said it would join another organisation, the Global Fund for HIV, TB and Malaria to buy enough lenacapavir for two-million people over three years. But in July, the Global Fund had to go ahead with the deal by itself, because Pepfar seemed to no longer be on board. Warren says: 'If I were in charge, I would take the $400m and double the two million people the Global Fund is planning to cover, because that's how you build a market, prevent new infections more quickly and drive the price down.' 5. What will Pepfar look like in future? Trump's funding cuts didn't kill Pepfar — at least not in theory, but it's a shell of its former self. What it will look like, will depend on the size of its next budget (the Trump administration wants to cut it by 40% but, so far, the House hasn't agreed to that, (the Senate still needs to sit on it) and how much support Republicans who believe in Pepfar can gain to have waiver rules changed. But, Warren points out, 'we're not going to get pre-January projects back; we have to build something different. 'This has been the most seismic shift in democracy. We didn't think we lived in an earthquake zone, but January 20 [when Trump retook office] taught us: you need to be prepared for that earthquake and you therefore need a different infrastructure. 'In an earthquake you don't build back the same thing. You build better, something that is more resilient.' This story was produced by the Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism. Sign up for the
