Cost of probe into Nama's Northern Ireland sale tops €10m
Taxpayers paid €10.3 million for an investigation into a controversial property sale by the
National Asset Management Agency
(Nama), including €2.4 million paid to the State organisation itself.
The Government recently published a report by solicitor Susan Gilvarry into Project Eagle, Nama's €1.6 billion sale of Northern Ireland properties to US firm Cerberus in 2014.
Her commission of investigation cost €10.34 million, figures that Ms Gilvarry has given the Oireachtas show. That includes €4.64 million in legal fees.
The commission paid €2.44 million to Nama to cover legal advice given to witnesses for the agency.
READ MORE
[
Nama criticised over handling of 'success fee' in €1.6 billion Project Eagle sale after seven-year inquiry
Opens in new window
]
Nama provided 36 witnesses. Its total legal bill approached €7.5 million, but the body paid €5 million of this itself.
Guidelines for such commissions of investigation only allow witnesses to claim legal costs where evidence calls their conduct or good name into question, or where it jeopardises personal or property rights.
Ms Gilvarry and others working on the inquiry were paid €1.76 million, while administration costs fell just short of €1.5 million.
Her investigation found no evidence that another bidder was willing to pay more for the Project Eagle assets than the price that Nama secured from Cerberus.
However, she noted that the agency failed to properly clarify questions over a potential £5 million (€5.9 million) success fee promised to Frank Cushnahan, a former member of its Northern Ireland advisory committee, if another bidder, US business Pimco, had succeeded in buying the assets.
After he resigned from the Nama committee, Mr Cushnahan worked as an adviser to Pimco, along with Belfast solicitors Tughan's and US lawyers, Brown Rudnick.
Project Eagle consisted of €6 billion in loans to leading developers in Northern Ireland secured on properties there, in the Republic and Britain.
Nama acquired them in 2010 when it took over property loans from Irish banks as part of the State's bid to save the Republic's financial system from collapse after a property speculation bubble burst.
Ownership of the loans conferred the right to seek their repayment or take control of the properties against which they were secured.
Nama sold them to Cerberus in April 2014. Controversy over the deal erupted in 2015, when it emerged that Tughan's managing partner, Ian Coulter, transferred €7 million in fees from the transaction to an Isle of Man bank account without his firm's knowledge.
Mr Coulter transferred the cash back to the firm and resigned, leading to claims that political and business figures in the North were to benefit from the cash.
The row led to a criminal investigation in the North, while separately the Republic's Comptroller and Auditor General found that Nama could have secured €220 million more for the loans.
Government established Ms Gilvarry's commission, with her as its sole member, following the comptroller's findings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
TCD's Israeli boycott draws criticism from Ireland's Jewish community
Trinity College Dublin 's decision to boycott Israeli institutions and universities will 'detrimentally impact' the college's global standing, particularly in the US, the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland has warned. In an open letter to the chair of TCD's board Paul Farrell, Maurice Cohen, a senior figure in Ireland's Jewish community, accused the university of a 'blatant violation' of the Equal Status Acts. In the letter, which was co-written with former minister for justice Alan Shatter , Mr Cohen also accused Trinity of violations of the Universities Act and relevant EU regulations, including those governing the Erasmus student exchange programme Trinity's board voted on Wednesday to cut all ties with Israeli universities and companies based in Israel over the conflict in Gaza in what is the first move by an Irish university to agree on the full divestment of interests in Israeli companies. READ MORE The boycott includes ending all academic and research collaborations and Erasmus student exchange programmes with Israeli universities. Trinity has two Erasmus+ exchange agreements with Israeli universities - one with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which ends next month, and the other with Bar Ilan University, which ends in July 2026. Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter said in their letter that boycotting Israeli academics, a majority of whom are Jewish and who include prominent critics of the Israeli government, amounts to 'anti-Semitism', according to the definition laid out by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. 'It also constitutes discrimination against non-Jewish Israeli academics, of whom there are many in Israel's universities and research bodies,' they wrote. They argued that by boycotting Israeli academics and Israeli research institutions, Trinity is 'holding them collectively responsible for actions of the Israeli state'. The letter also criticised Trinity's board for failing to address 'Iran's sponsorship of the Houthis attacking international shipping and daily targeting Israel with ballistic missiles, its sponsorship of Hamas, Hizbullah and other terrorists groups'. The boycott vote followed a series of meetings of a taskforce set up between staff and student representatives at the university. The meetings were arranged as part of an agreement to end a five-day encampment that was set up on campus in May of last year in protest over the university's ties to Israel. The letter from Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter requests that the board immediately publish the report of the task force and 'cancel its premature decisions'. It also requests that before any further decisions, 'representatives of Ireland's Jewish community should be given the opportunity to consider and respond to the report' alongside Government and relevant departments. The Irish Times contacted Mr Farrell seeking his comment on the letter from Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter. Jenny Maguire, outgoing president of TCD' students' union, called the decision a 'historic win' that 'must be a catalyst for action across this island'.
Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
‘Crampgate' tells us rugby's code of dignity counts for little when lucrative online views are at stake
There was indignation, outrage, pique and scorn emanating from Durban's Shark Tank last week . Huff went viral. Umbrage took off. Rage and resentment flooded the zone when the effrontery of Jaden Hendrikse was broadcast from Kings Park. The knowing smile and the wee wink from the Sharks' place kicker as he lay on the ground having his hamstring stretched and happily obstructing the disbelieving Jack Crowley's attempt at goal. Fans in Limerick were livid . Cork was on the cusp of rebellion again. We thought it might prompt some kind of a scathing rebuke from the United Rugby Championship in a Zoom call on Wednesday with chief executive Martin Anayi. But, no. READ MORE This week, platforms and eyeballs, YouTube figures and broadcast peaks – and the URC brand raking in 150 million viewers since it started in 2021 – were the main talking points. Anayi then freely skated over Hendrikse's antics and Crowley gamely effing the Sharks officials and players as an emotional tsunami washed over Irish rugby. Instead, he pivoted to the benefits to the URC of the whining Irish, the underhand South Africans and some of the merits of Crampgate. The URC attitude seemed more shaped by the payload of page impressions and scroll depth it delivered than by the shamelessness of the act itself . 'Ultimately, we want characters in the sport and when you have characters and when you encourage people to show their character, that can be positive and negative,' said Anayi. 'There are heroes and villains in all stories, great sporting stories. I think that's kind of what is emerging here, isn't it? Needless to say, it certainly spiked an interest in the league.' Well, that's it, isn't it? Spiking interest in the championship, gaining greater purchase in the market. Still, the URC are only picking up on what the World Rugby website told them when they clicked on the About Us icon. It wasn't Maradona's Hand of God goal against England in the 1986 World Cup 'World Rugby recognises that rugby union is competing for the public's attention in an ever more varied and complex media and entertainment-driven world, but also that the federation properly embrace matters touching on social responsibility,' it begins. What langers we were for living in the old world of respect and integrity and not stepping into the new rugby vista of broadcast viewership, YouTube, X and Instagram. The match and its acrimonious end was the most viewed highlights over two days that the URC has ever had. In terms of turning a negative into a positive, this was a stunning performance by the URC chief, with the unsaid part being that we can park the rugby values piece and talk about that another day. And of course, he had a point. United Rugby Championship CEO Martin Anayi was not overly concerned about the fallout from the Sharks-Munster match. Photograph: Dan Sheridan/Inpho Reducing the number of Welsh clubs in the league to two or three, the emergence of the Club World Cup and Italian rugby's place in the European game were 10-fold more important talking points for the URC to consider. It wasn't like it was Bloodgate, where Tom Williams used a blood capsule to feign injury and be replaced by a better kicker against Leinster. It wasn't Maradona's Hand of God goal against England in the 1986 World Cup, nor was it USA figure skater Tonya Harding's plot to attack and injure her arch-rival Nancy Kerrigan. It certainly wasn't Lance Armstrong's entire career or Dr Eufemiano Fuentes's 211 blood bags with 35 athletes' names attached. The Hendrikse cramp and wink malarkey wasn't a full-frontal assault on rugby's regulations and it didn't fundamentally threaten the innate integrity of the game. But the idea that rugby is a righteous and honest sport was damaged in a way that enhanced viewership figures can't paper over. It also excited a lot of people in the wrong kind of way because the act was fraudulent and deceitful. It is not difficult to understand why the URC preferred to concentrate on the perks attached to the controversial incident than deride the gamesmanship involved, as the latter benefits the former with more attention and engagement. It is also not hard to understand why the business of rugby leans heavily into figures. Understandably, it swooned at 2022, the year the URC league set a record high of 34.6 million for its broadcast audience. It went weak at the knees in 2023, when the figure rose to 37.2 million. It was better again in the 2023-24 campaign, with 47.7 million. In the light of players' wages and vanishing clubs like Wasps, London Irish and Worcester, it is the numbers that move the dial more than anything. But blurring the lines about what is legal and illegal and what belongs in the game and what doesn't is important. It is particularly important in a sport like rugby because it is played along the thin boundaries of thuggery and fair play. In that scenario, any kind of erosion of behaviour is problematic. The URC choosing to see Crampgate as 'intrigue' is the modern take. They view gamesmanship as 'the rivalry between Ireland and South Africa, which is really bubbling along'. While the URC might choose to embrace the inflated numbers that rage and distain deliver, there are those who believe rugby must be as much about the unwritten rules and codes that the Sharks shattered as the established laws of the game.
Irish Times
40 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Israeli foreign minister finds shifting moods as he visits Berlin
Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar was greeted by protest chants of 'blood on your hands' during a tense Berlin visit on Thursday. Amid a shifting political and public mood in Germany on Gaza , Mr Sa'ar held talks and laid a wreath at Berlin's Holocaust memorial alongside his German counterpart Johann Wadephul. In recent days the new German foreign minister has sent mixed signals, saying at the weekend that further German arms exports to Israel would be conditional on a review of their compliance with international law, indicating this could reduce deliveries. 'We have changed our tone and will likely change our political actions next,' said Mr Wadephul, echoing a more critical tone from chancellor Friedrich Merz . On Wednesday, Mr Wadephul appeared to shift again, promising further arms deliveries and telling the Bundestag that 'Germany must know where it stands: at Israel's side'. READ MORE The value of German arms exports to Israel spiked in 2023 to €326.5 million, then dropped by half last year amid rising pressure and public disquiet. At their joint press conference on Thursday, Mr Wadephul flagged ongoing attacks on Israel from its neighbours and said Germany would continue to support Israel's right to defend itself. But he criticised Israel's new Gaza aid distribution programme , saying it forced people to walk long distances often to 'come back empty-handed or, in the worst case, they don't come back at all because they've been killed'. Israel's permission for 22 new West Bank settlements, according to Mr Wadephul, was 'contrary to international law ... and a literal block to a two-state solution'. [ Gaza aid group halts distribution due to civilian safety concerns after dozens killed seeking aid Opens in new window ] Mr Sa'ar thanked Germany for standing at Israel's side on the international stage and asked for more time for a new aid distribution push by the US-backed Israeli foundation to establish itself. 'This effort has the potential to free the Palestinian population from Hamas ' stranglehold and end this war,' he said. Mr Sa'ar denounced growing international calls to halt arms deliveries to his country, saying that would leave 'Israel, the most attacked and threatened country in the world, deprived of its right to self-defence'. Participants display Palestinian flags and flash the victory sign during a demonstration in support of Palestinians outside the foreign office in Berlin, during a visit by Israel's foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar to the German capital. Photograph: Odd Andersen/AFP via Getty Images Outside Berlin's foreign ministry, protesters accused the Israeli visitor of 'co-responsibility for crimes against humanity and genocide'. They demanded an end to German arms exports to Israel, 'not as a pipe dream but as a legal obligation'. 'This visit legitimises aggression and gives political cover for a people's extinction,' said one German speaker. An Israeli speaker said Mr Sa'ar was in Berlin 'to buy more time for Israel because he knows the tide is turning'. The German public mood towards Israel and its war in Gaza has cooled in recent weeks, according to a public television poll, with almost two thirds (63 per cent) saying that Israel's military response in Gaza has gone too far. [ Trinity College Dublin board votes to cut ties with Israeli universities and companies Opens in new window ] Almost three quarters (73 per cent) did not consider the military action against Hamas justified if the Palestinian civilian population suffers. Meanwhile, 77 per cent of respondents approved of the more critical tone from Berlin towards Israel, which just 16 per cent viewed as a trusted partner of Germany. During his visit, Mr Sa'ar expressed concern about a study logging more than 8,627 anti-Semitic incidents in Germany last year, the equivalent of one an hour. The numbers mark a 76 per cent rise on 2023, the report said, and a 341 per cent increase since 2020. Among the documented cases was a swastika drawn on the wall outside the apartment of a Jewish couple in Hamburg; a Jewish schoolchild held down by two men and called a 'dirty Jew'; and a sign at a Düsseldorf protest reading: 'Yesterday Holocaust Victims. Today Perpetrators in Gaza.' The fallout from the October 7th, 2023, attacks by Hamas on Israel has supercharged anti-Semitism in Germany, the report found, with 68 per cent of cases categorised as 'Israel-related anti-Semitism'. Two per cent of the cases related to extreme violence or attacks, while 87 per cent were categorised as 'injurious behaviour'. [ Israeli military recovers bodies of two hostages held by Hamas, says Netanyahu Opens in new window ] 'The risk of being persecuted as a Jew in Germany has increased since October 7th, 2023,' said Benjamin Steinitz, co-author of the report from the Federal Research and Information Point for Antisemitism (RIAS). 'But debates about what counts as an expression of anti-Semitism seem to take up more space than empathy for the victims.' He was responding to a critical report arguing that the RIAS methodology equated criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism. 'RIAS statistics and publications indicate a bias in favour of the Israeli right, reinforced by opaque methods,' wrote Itay Mashiach, an Israeli journalist, in the report by the international Diaspora Alliance titled Biased. He said RIAS's 'flawed approach and resulting alarmist reporting have significant repercussions, including the stigmatisation of migrant communities, the restriction of political expression and the suppression of human rights activists'. Back at Berlin's Holocaust memorial, a school group waited to visit after the foreign ministers departed. Benjamin, an 18-year-old student from Hanover, said he followed the Middle East closely – in particular the aid blockade and resulting outcry. 'I understand that Israel doesn't want aid to go in that feeds Hamas fighters first and civilians second,' he said. 'But I don't agree with what looks like an effort to smoke out the Palestinians from Gaza.'
