The CEO Turnover Surge Is A Wake-Up Call For Infrastructure Leaders
A record number of CEOs have exited their posts in the past year, and the implications go far beyond boardrooms and shareholder calls. This isn't a coincidence but a clear signal. And for those of us leading infrastructure organizations, it's a direct challenge: Evolve how you lead or risk becoming part of the next statistic.
The headlines paint a sobering picture: rising stakeholder scrutiny, political complexity, economic uncertainty and the unrelenting pressure to deliver transformation on fixed budgets.
And the infrastructure sector, often considered stable and slow-moving, is not immune to this churn. In fact, we may be more vulnerable than we think. This turnover doesn't just affect leadership; it ripples through long-term projects and public trust. Infrastructure initiatives span years, even decades, and frequent CEO changes can disrupt momentum, delay critical timelines and raise concerns among government partners and communities alike. For an industry where consistency underpins success, leadership volatility is a real risk to delivering public outcomes.
We sit at the intersection of government, capital markets and public trust. While commercial CEOs face market fluctuations, infrastructure executives wrestle with aging systems, public scrutiny and the paradox of being asked to do more with less—and do it much faster.
Meanwhile, the American Society of Civil Engineers' 2025 National Infrastructure Report reminds us how much is still at stake: a C average across U.S. infrastructure sectors and an estimated $3.7 trillion funding gap by 2033 if Congress continues current funding levels. Infrastructure leaders don't just manage assets; we manage public outcomes.
So why the sudden spike in turnover? For leaders in the infrastructure space, I believe the answer lies in a convergence of forces:
• Funding volatility: Shifting federal priorities, tighter municipal budgets and a patchwork of public-private financing are creating unpredictable fiscal environments, where time is of the essence and delays are costly.
• Sectoral disruption: Many infrastructure CEOs lead diversified enterprises where each sector faces its own unique pressures and political cycles.
• Time compression: New administrations and stakeholders want results fast. The traditional five-year runway to show ROI no longer exists. Many boards and governments expect visible momentum within months.
On top of that, infrastructure organizations face a significant talent challenge, including aging workforces, difficulty attracting younger talent and the complexity in sustaining strong leadership pipelines. Infrastructure CEOs must lead culture transformations that build resilient teams ready to innovate and adapt in this evolving landscape.
To navigate this moment, infrastructure leaders need a new playbook—one built on clarity, adaptability and team empowerment. Here are five strategic moves that can make the difference between enduring leadership and an early exit:
1. Redefine the role around agility, not tenure.
Infrastructure CEOs must lead like entrepreneurs, not caretakers. In today's environment, I believe the ability to catalyze action, pivot decisively and create momentum matters more than riding out a full term. The organizations that thrive will be led by those who drive transformation, not just manage complexity. From my observations, boards are no longer rewarding longevity; they are rewarding the ability to create measurable, near-term progress toward long-range goals.
2. Empower teams with real authority.
Transformation cannot be centralized. True leadership now means equipping teams with the autonomy to act, innovate and take calculated risks. This isn't about organization charts but about culture. The infrastructure sector has long rewarded command-and-control models. But today's complexity demands decentralized decision-making and investment in mid-level leadership capacity.
3. Treat outside help as strategic leverage.
Boards bring in executive advisors during crises; smart CEOs do it before. Whether it is to challenge stale assumptions, unlock stalled initiatives or explore new models, executive advisors can offer support. If you're working with one, use them as a force multiplier, not a band-aid.
4. Lead with transparency, especially upstream.
The most dangerous communication gap is the one between the CEO and the board. Don't wait to be asked. Proactively share challenges, course corrections and strategic pivots. You don't just manage projects, and now more importantly, expectations.
5. Make innovation a leadership discipline, not a department.
Innovation can't be relegated to a division or a department, and it shouldn't. Embed it in your decision-making. Ask different questions. Incentivize creativity. Create space for ideas that don't yet have a sponsor. Unlike CEOs in sectors rich in real-time data, infrastructure leaders must actively build their own insight engines to stay competitive.
Additionally, infrastructure CEOs must master the increasingly volatile funding landscape. Navigating shifting federal priorities, complex public-private partnerships and global supply chain risks requires proactive engagement across governments, private investors and communities to secure sustainable capital and manage geopolitical uncertainties.
This moment isn't just about survival; it's redefining leadership. The CEOs stepping down aren't all failing. Some are fleeing outdated systems. Some are ahead of the curve. But for those of us in infrastructure, where capital meets community, staying in the seat requires more than resilience. It now demands reinvention. We are not just managing projects; we are shaping the communities and economies of tomorrow.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
BlackRock's GIP Leads $11 Billion Deal for Saudi Gas Assets
A BlackRock Inc. -led group signed an $11 billion lease deal involving Saudi Aramco natural gas facilities as the state producer seeks to raise cash from infrastructure assets. A group led by BlackRock's Global Infrastructure Partners unit will lease infrastructure that serves the Jafurah gas project and lease them back to Aramco for 20 years, according to a statement. Aramco is developing the over $100 billion Jafurah project to supply fuel to domestic power plants as well as for export.
Entrepreneur
an hour ago
- Entrepreneur
How to Rewrite the Mental Scripts That Limit Your Potential
Even top-performing executives are held back by silent internal scripts — learn how to spot them, rewrite them and lead with renewed clarity and confidence. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Executive pressure has never been higher, and neither has the silence. CEOs today are navigating complex, fast-changing markets while projecting absolute certainty. But behind the boardroom polish, many are quietly wrestling with a deeper challenge: the inner belief that they're not enough. I must have all the answers. I'm too technical to lead. I'm not the kind of leader they expect. These thoughts rarely make it into headlines or investor calls, but they shape behavior, stifle confidence and quietly limit growth. The truth is, even the most capable leaders carry these mental scripts. And real leadership transformation begins when they learn to confront and rewrite them. Related: 15 Ways to Drown Out the Destructive Voices in Your Head The hidden cost of invisible scripts During a recent client session, an accomplished CTO admitted to avoiding board presentations. His reason? I'm not the charismatic type. That belief, rooted in an early-career speaking misstep, had become a silent limiter. Despite his deep expertise and required influence on innovation, he let others speak for him when it mattered most. These moments aren't rare. From CEO-peer conversations to our client's executive coaching engagements, I've seen how beliefs forged decades ago can shape behavior for years — until they're challenged. These internal narratives rarely present as loud doubts. More often, they subtly guide behavior, such as declining a stretch role, holding back in meetings and micromanaging instead of delegating. Confidence, then, becomes less about bravado and more about clarity and knowing where your belief system helps you lead and where it holds you back. When mindset becomes the inflection point One of the most impressive executives I worked with, a proven product leader, once confided, I don't present well. Despite leading high-impact initiatives and being trusted across the organization, she consistently declined speaking roles at board meetings. That belief, rooted in one early presentation misstep, had shaped years of behavior. Through coaching, she realized it was a limiting script. We reframed it by focusing on her ability to connect ideas, spark curiosity and distill complex information with clarity. Soon after, she led a product launch presentation that redefined her visibility in the organization. Within six months, she led a new division. Her growth began the moment she challenged the narrative that had quietly shaped her decisions for years. Consider Microsoft under Satya Nadella. When he became CEO in 2014, the company was seen as stagnant and internally competitive. Nadella introduced a growth mindset culture — shifting from "know‑it‑all" to "learn‑it‑all" — by encouraging curiosity, collaboration and openness to failure. That shift in mindset helped fuel Microsoft's rise in cloud, innovation and market leadership. Mindset shifts like this require courage, the kind that doesn't just spot familiar patterns but interrupts them. Executives must slow down enough to question long-held beliefs and consider alternatives that feel unfamiliar but necessary. Related: How Mindset Plays a Role in Your Entrepreneurial Success How limiting beliefs show up in career moments Many otherwise qualified executives self-select out of conversations too early. A 2024 Korn Ferry survey found that 71% of U.S. CEOs experience symptoms of imposter syndrome, a clear reminder that even the most seasoned leaders struggle with self-doubt even after success. While imposter syndrome and limiting beliefs aren't identical, they often overlap. One might sound like: I'm not ready yet. Another: They're going to realize I have no idea what I'm doing. Here's what that can look like in reality: What's the voice in your head saying when you walk into a boardroom? Have you ever dismissed a win because it felt like "luck?" Do you still secretly think someone will find out you're winging it? Have you hit a huge milestone and immediately felt panic, like you were going to blow it? The best leaders treat their careers like strategic assets. They stay open, engage with curiosity and evaluate options based on fit and value, not fear or assumption. And organizations notice. Confidence, rooted in reflection rather than ego, signals coachability, adaptability and readiness to lead. Rewriting the narrative with reflection and repetition Here's the truth: Mental scripts aren't erased overnight. Like grooves in a well-worn trail, they take time to reshape. But there is a process: Name the script. Awareness is the first breakthrough. What belief are you carrying that may no longer serve you? Test its origin. When did you first start believing this? Was it based on one moment, or repeated feedback? Find counterevidence. Reflect on times you succeeded despite this belief and on other limiting beliefs you've overcome in the past. What changed? What support did you have? Reframe with intention. Turn "I'm not strategic" into "I've made strategic decisions — here's what worked." Replace "I can't speak well" with "When I'm passionate, I connect deeply." Reinforce the new belief. Do this through small, visible actions. Speak in a team meeting. Accept the next stretch role. Ask for feedback on your presence — not just your performance. Motivational slogans won't get you there. Rewriting internal scripts requires the same discipline and intentionality as any core leadership strategy. The executives who do this consistently inspire change in themselves and across their teams and organizations. Related: How to Overcome Imposter Syndrome and Tame Your Inner Critic What organizations should look for What signals that a leader is ready to grow? According to Shawn Cole, who helps companies vet and place senior executives, organizations should focus on traits like curiosity, adaptability and openness to feedback. "The ability to self-reflect, ask questions, and seek out coaching are strong indicators that a leader is coachable and ready to move beyond limiting beliefs," he says. Culture plays a major role, too. Coachability often hinges on permission. Leaders grow when they operate in environments that welcome questions and reward feedback. However, culture can either reinforce limiting scripts or help dissolve them. Companies evaluating leadership potential should pay close attention to the following traits: Curiosity: Does the leader ask thoughtful questions, even when answers are uncertain? Resilience: Do they recover and learn after challenges or retreat? Openness: Do they seek coaching and integrate feedback, or deflect and defend? These qualities signal a growth mindset that will outlast technical skills and drive long-term impact. The most powerful leadership growth doesn't start with a new title or strategy. It begins when a leader pauses long enough to question the story they've been telling themselves and dares to write a better one. Sometimes, the real transformation isn't about becoming something new. It's about unbecoming the limitations you no longer need.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: Why Trump is waging war on economists
President Trump knows something he doesn't want to admit publicly — the economy is weakening, largely because of his own policies. What to do? Trump obviously loves tariffs, because slapping taxes on imports gives him leverage over countries, companies, and CEOs. Trump can sway foreign economies, US corporate profits, and even voter well-being by dialing tariffs up or down, a form of power he must find thrilling. But Trump's import taxes are bound to take a toll on the US economy because they raise costs, destroy efficiencies, and add uncertainty. When you raise the cost of doing business in a free-market economy, you simply get less economic activity. That data is now starting to show that, just as hundreds of economists have forecast. Hiring has slowed sharply, probably because CEOs are suddenly more cautious about whether sales and profit margins will hold up. Some companies are already suffering and others are likely to join them. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Wholesale prices surged in the latest monthly data, exactly what you'd expect given that tariffs are a consumption tax that directly raises the cost of imported goods. There are signs that tariff-related price hikes are hitting consumers too, which also makes sense because wholesalers try to pass on as much of the added cost as they can. "Businesses, for now, are bearing the tariff brunt," David Rosenberg of Rosenberg Research wrote in an Aug. 14 analysis. The cost impact is spreading across the supply chain. Goods shipments to the United States are plunging, which suggests there will be future shortages and even higher prices. Consumers are likely to start noticing in the back-to-school shopping season and when they do holiday shopping toward the end of the year. Trump and his supporters argue that the tariffs haven't had any of the dire effects critics have predicted, such as a recession or a stockmarket wipeout. But that defense is premature. The timing of the tariff impacts is hard to predict because much depends on how thousands of individual companies react to higher costs. But a slowing economy is virtually certain, as volumes of research into tariff effects show. This, Trump knows. While surrounded by many preening sycophants, Trump's advisers also include econoliterates such as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House economist Kevin Hassett. Sure, a big part of their job is to tout Trump's policies, no matter what. But it's also their job to prep Trump for bad news and help him get ahead of is doing that now, laying the groundwork for a propaganda blitz that he hopes will offset some bad economic news that's likely to get worse. On Aug. 1, he fired the top economist overseeing the monthly jobs report, falsely claiming that the weak numbers for July were 'rigged.' On Aug. 12, Trump said investing titan Goldman Sachs should 'get … a new economist' after the firm published a report forecasting that consumers would bear 67% of the cost of Trump's tariffs. Trump has repeatedly lambasted Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell (who's a banker, not an economist) for refusing to cut interest rates. Many economists think the Fed is right to stand pat, given that Trump's tariffs are stoking inflation and lower rates would make inflation worse. Trump is seeking some friendlier economists who might be inclined to tilt the data in Trump's favor. He nominated conservative economist EJ Antoni to run the agency overseeing the jobs and inflation reports, a move widely booed by the economic establishment. Trump appointed White House economist Stephen Miran to a temporary opening on the Fed's rate-setting committee, and next year Trump will be able to appoint a new Fed chair as Powell finishes out his term. Read more: How jobs, inflation, and the Fed are all related The battle lines forming will pit most mainstream economists against the alternative narrative Trump's own forecasters are likely to weave. Trump will never attain critical mass. Most economic forecasts and analyses are within decimal points of each other, and sometimes the only big variation is timing. While Goldman Sachs thinks consumers will bear most of the cost of Trump's tariffs, for example, so do researchers at just about every other investing firm, forecasting outfit, and think tank. There's no political cost to Trump's war on economists, who aren't exactly populist heroes toiling in the trenches with the common man. But ordinary people don't need economists to tell them if the economy is good or bad, if it's a boom or a recession. They feel it in their own lives based on how much their paycheck can buy, opportunities to get ahead, and what they see happening to other people in their communities. Trump might be able to fudge some data, but he can't convince struggling people they're better off than they are. A year or two into Trump's presidency, the impact of tariffs and other policies will no longer be mysterious. We'll know how damaging they are through grocery store prices, rising or falling unemployment, and the value of 401(k) plans. What economists say might not matter, but what they're telling us now is that more pain is coming. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
