Moeller won't run for Congressional seat, announces House reelection bid
State Rep. Anna Moeller, D-Elgin, says she will not run for the 8th District U.S. House seat, opting instead to seek reelection to her District 43 House post.
The Congressional seat is open because U.S Rep. Raja Krishnmoorthi, D-Schaumburg, is making a bid to succeed U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, a Democrat not seeking a sixth term next year. Two other candidates also have announced Senate run plans: Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton and U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Matteson.
'While I am honored by the encouragement I have received and deeply humbled by the support of so many, I believe I can continue making the greatest impact right where I am — in the Illinois House of Representatives,' Moeller announced in a statement Monday. 'I remain fully committed to representing the people of the 43rd District and to advancing the values we share.'
Moeller's seat is also open in 2026 election, and she said her goals if reelected are to 'continue fighting for our seniors, advocating for high quality affordable health care, protecting our children's future, creating good-paying jobs, and standing up for working families' as well as 'defending women's reproductive freedom.'
She used her statement to pledge that she will be a 'relentless opponent of Donald Trump's dangerous agenda' and to fight to 'never allow MAGA extremism to take hold in our state.'
District 43 includes portions of Elgin, Carpentersville, East Dundee, Hoffman Estates and Streamwood.
Moeller has been its representative since March 2014. She currently serves as the chair of the Human Services Committee, vice chair of the Human Services, Appropriations Committee, and is a member of the Public Utilities, Energy and Environment, Education, K-12 Licensing and Charter School and Healthcare Licensing committees, according to her website.
Prior to her House election, she was the founding executive director of the McHenry County Council of Governments and assistant village administrator for the Village of Lake in the Hills. She was elected to the Elgin City Council in 2011.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former Republican David Jolly launches longshot bid for Florida governor as a Democrat
Democrats face a huge uphill climb in 2026 to retake Florida's governorship for the first time in more than two decades, but David Jolly says he is up to the challenge. Jolly, a former Republican congressman who left the party in large part because of his opposition to President Donald Trump, is announcing Thursday that he is running for governor, making him the first notable Democrat to get into the race. 'Let's end the politics of division and return Florida to voters who simply want an economy that works, the best education system in the world, safe communities and a government that stays out of their doctor's offices and family decisions,' Jolly said. He said he wants to focus on lowering housing and insurance costs, boosting public education funding and 'implementing new gun safety measures.' Jolly was a Republican member of Congress from the Tampa area from 2014 to 2017. In a bit of political irony, he lost his seat to former Gov. Charlie Crist. Crist, like Jolly, left the Republican Party to run as a Democrat. He made failed Democratic bids for governor in 2014 and 2022. It's a connection Republicans in the state have already been making, comparing Jolly's Republican-turned-Democrat bid for governor to Crist's own failed political evolution. 'No matter the issue, David Jolly has been on all sides of it,' Florida GOP Chairman Evan Power said in a statement last month when Jolly first floated a campaign. 'Floridians won't be swayed. Under Republican leadership, Florida enjoys low inflation, fiscal responsibility, and a thriving economy. School choice and parental rights are prioritized, and support for the rule of law is unmatched. We aren't going backward with a flip-flopping political relic.' Since he left the Republican Party, Jolly has become a vocal anti-Trump voice and has boosted his national profile as a regular commentator on MSNBC. Jolly is not only the first major Democrat to enter the 2026 race; he may have a somewhat easy path to the nomination. Former state Sen. Jason Pizzo, who has considerable personal wealth, recently left the party and has said he is running for governor as an independent, removing a potential obstacle who had been considered one of the top-tier potential Jolly opponents in a primary. After having spent years as one of the country's most tightly divided swing states, Florida has become an overwhelmingly GOP-dominated state. Republicans control all levers of power in state government, and Democrats have not held the Governor's Mansion since the late 1990s. Jolly, however, thinks a focus away from the sort of culture war-driven, sharp-elbowed politics that has defined Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' two terms in office is a way to break through. 'This is a different type of issue-driven, results-focused campaign, and it will be driven not by anger and division but by optimism and solutions,' Jolly said. 'We are building a new coalition of Floridians who deeply care about their state and are desperate for real answers to real problems that are putting our quality of life at risk.' On the Republican side, U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds has already announced he is running for governor, and he quickly picked up an endorsement from Trump. He has raised over $15 million and is considered the front-runner on the GOP said, even as DeSantis' wife, Casey, considers her own campaign for governor. Despite Republicans' many advantages, Jolly says the state, after more than 20 years of GOP leadership, is ready for a change. 'We can champion the Democratic values of an economy where everyone has the opportunity to succeed, and we can create a government that actually serves seniors, veterans, and those in need,' he said. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Candidates for California governor face off about affordability, high cost of living in first bipartisan clash
In a largely courteous gathering of a half dozen of California's top gubernatorial candidates, four Democrats and two Republicans agreed that despite the state boasting one of the world's largest economies, too many of its residents are suffering because of the affordability crisis in the state. Their strategies on how to improve the state's economy, however, largely embraced the divergent views of their respective political parties as they discussed housing costs, high-speed rail, tariffs, climate change and homelessness on Wednesday evening at the first bipartisan event in the 2026 governor race to replace termed-out Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Californians are innovators. They are builders, they are designers, they are creators, and that is the reason that we have the fourth largest economy in the world," said former Rep. Katie Porter., a Democrat from Irvine "But businesses and workers are being held back by the same thing. It is too expensive to do things here. It is too expensive to raise a family. It is too expensive to run a business." Conservative commentator Steve Hilton, a Republican, argued that state leaders need to end the "stranglehold" of unions, lawyers and climate change activists on California policy. "I've been traveling this state. Everywhere I go, it's the same story, this heartbreaking word that I get from every business I meet, every family is in such a struggle in California," he said, with a raspy voice he explained immediately upon taking the stage was caused by a sore throat. The candidates spoke to about 800 people at a California Chamber of Commerce dinner at an 80-minute panel at the convention center in Sacramento. The chamber's decision on who to invite to the forum was based on which ones were leaders in public opinion surveys and fundraising. Making the cut were former Senate President Pro Tem Toni Atkins, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, Hilton, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, Porter and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. The sharpest exchange of the evening was between Kounalakis, a Democrat, and Bianco, a Republican. After the candidates were asked about President Trump's erratic tariff policies, Kounalakis cited her experience working for her father's reat estate company as she criticized Bianco for arguing for a wait-and-see approach about the president's undulating plans. "You're not a businessman, you're a government employee," she said to Bianco. "You've got a pension, you're going to do just fine. Small businesses are suffering from this, and it's only going to get worse, and it's driven, by the way, it is driven by Donald Trump's vindictiveness toward countries he doesn't like, countries he wants to annex, or states he doesn't like, people he doesn't like. This is hurting California, hurting our people, and it's only going to make things worse, until we can get him out of the White House." Bianco countered that Kounalakis and the other Democrat gubernatorial candidates are directly responsible for the economic woes facing Californians because they have an "unquenchable thirst" for money to fund their liberal agenda. "I just feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone. I have a billionaire telling me that my 32 years of public service is okay for my retirement," he said. "It's taxes and regulations that are driving every single thing in California up. We pay the highest taxes, we pay the highest gas, we pay the highest housing, we pay the highest energy." The Democrats on stage, though largely agreeing about policy, sought to differentiate themselves. The sharpest divide was about whether to raise the minimum wage. On Monday, labor advocates in Los Angeles proposed raising it in Los Angeles County Read more: Labor groups, officials push for a minimum wage of at least $25 an hour in L.A. County Atkins reflected most of her fellow Democrats' views, saying that while she wanted to see higher wages for workers, "now is not the time." Villaraigosa said that while he believes in a higher minimum wage, "we can't just keep raising the minimum wage." Kounalakis, though, said not increasing the minimum wage would be inhumane. "I think we should be working for that number, yes I do," she said. "You want to throw poor people under the bus." California's high cost of living is a pressing concern among the state's voters, and the issue is expected to play a major role in the 2026 governor's face. Nearly half feel worse off now compared with last year, and more than half felt less hopeful about their economic well-being, according to a poll released in May by the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies that was co-sponsored by The Times. Read more: Despite political promises, Californians are stressed about their finances Nearly exactly a year before the gubernatorial primary next year, the event was the first time Democratic and Republican candidates have shared a stage. It was also the first time GOP candidates Bianco and Hilton have appeared together. Although the state's leftward electoral tilt makes it challenging for a Republican to win the race – Californians last elected GOP politicians to statewide office in 2006 — Bianco and Hilton are battling to win one of the top two spots in next year's primary election. The pair expressed similar views about broadly ending liberal policies in the state, such as stopping the state's high-speed rail project and reducing environmental restrictions such as the state's climate-change efforts that they argue have increased costs while making no meaningful impact on the consumption of fossil fuels. Read more: Who is running for California governor in 2026? Meet the candidates A crucial question is whether President Trump, who both Bianco and Hilton fully support, will eventually endorse one of the Republican candidates. The gubernatorial candidates, some of whom have been running more than a year, have largely focused on fundraising since entering the race. But the contest to replace termed-out Gov. Gavin Newsom is growing more public and heated, as seen at last weekend's California Democratic Party convention. Several of the party's candidates scurried around the Anaheim convention center, trying to curry favor with the state's most liberal activists while also drawing contrasts with their rivals. Read more: With Harris on the sideline, top Democratic candidates for California governor woo party loyalists But the Democratic field is partially frozen as former Vice President Kamala Harris weighs entering the race, a decision she is expected to make by the end of the summer. Harris' name did not come up during the forum. There were a handful of light moments. Porter expressed a common concern among the state's residents when they talk about the cost of living in the state. "What really keeps me up at night, why I'm running for governor, is whether my children are going to be able to afford to live here, whether they're going to ever get off my couch and have their own home," she said. Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NC Senate panel approves bill expanding ICE detention requirements for sheriffs
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Service Processing Center in El Centro, Calif. (Stock photo by) The North Carolina Senate Judiciary Committee voted in favor of a bill Wednesday that would expand state requirements for sheriffs to detain undocumented immigrants for retrieval by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The bill, known as House Bill 318 or 'the Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act,' passed the North Carolina House in April and is now set for a vote by the Senate Rules Committee Thursday morning. It represents a continuation of the detention requirements passed in November under House Bill 10. Rep. Carson Smith (R-Pender), a former sheriff, described the bill as an attempt to 'clarify and make a few changes' to the law after seeing it in effect. HB 318 would expand the requirement for verifying immigration status from a specific set of felonies to all felonies as well as any impaired driving offenses. It also modifies the requirements for releasing individuals in custody under ICE detention orders. Under the proposed law, a judge or magistrate would inquire into the immigration status of any defendant charged with a felony or impaired driving offense at their pretrial release hearing. If their status cannot be determined, they would be held for an additional two hours after an inquiry to ICE on whether they are subject to any detention orders. 'If an ICE detainer and warrant is received, they're taken to the judicial official, probably the magistrate, to determine that they are the person that is subject to that detainer and that administrative warrant,' Smith said. 'If they are, they will be held up to 48 hours after whatever point they would otherwise be released for ICE to come pick them up.' Democrats and members of the public spoke out against the bill, arguing that it damages rather than furthers public safety. Sen. Lisa Grafstein (D-Wake) said she believes the requirements violate the U.S. Constitution, given that they would require sheriffs to carry out the ICE hold even when the individual in question has been exonerated or had their charges dismissed. 'We're talking about keeping people where the state has no constitutional interest in holding them,' Grafstein said. Under the terms of the existing law, sheriffs must only hold individuals in custody for 48 hours after the ICE detention order is received. The new proposal would require a 48-hour hold beginning when they would otherwise be released from custody. Sen. Sydney Batch (D-Wake) said the proposal also violates the rights of crime victims, preventing them from getting justice if the offender is subject to deportation. 'As a victim myself, I wanted my day in court to testify against my offender, which I had the ability to do,' Batch said. 'This new change would mean that if he were here and there was an ICE detainer, he would then be deported prior to the time of which I would have my day in court.' Mary Ross, an activist with Democracy Out Loud who spoke during the public comment period, said deporting someone based only on allegations of a crime is 'a really cruel way to treat people.' 'They're people who are our neighbors, and most of whom are working hard, doing great work with us,' Ross said. 'I just object to, essentially, judge and jury — the police officer arrests somebody and, boom, they're a convicted criminal and a prisoner and they're gone.' The bill passed the Judiciary Committee hours before another bill on immigration, Senate Bill 153, passed the House. That measure, the 'North Carolina Border Protection Act,' now heads to Gov. Josh Stein's desk for his consideration. In a press release Wednesday, House Republicans announced an ad campaign targeting four Democratic lawmakers who voted against one or both bills.
