3 women in Gambia are charged in the death of one-month-old in female genital mutilation case
The West African nation banned female genital cutting in 2015, but the country was rocked by a renewed debate about the practice last year following the first prosecutions of female cutters. It was the first time the practice — also known as female circumcision and outlawed in many nations — was publicly discussed.
Eventually, the Gambian parliament upheld the ban, but many say the practice continues in secrecy.
Three women were charged Tuesday under the ban, the Women's (Amendment) Act, 2015, the Gambian police said in a statement published Wednesday on social media. One woman is facing life imprisonment, and the other two were charged as accomplices.
'Preliminary findings indicate the child was allegedly subjected to circumcision and later developed severe bleeding,' the police said in a separate statement published Sunday, following the infant's death. 'She was rushed to Bundung Maternal and Child Health Hospital, where she was pronounced dead on arrival.'
The United Nations estimates that about 75% of women in Gambia have been subjected as young girls to the procedure known by its initials FGM, which includes partial or full removal of a girl's external genitalia. The World Health Organization says it's a form of torture.
More than 200 million women and girls across the world are survivors of FGM, most of them in sub-Saharan Africa, according to U.N. estimates. In the past eight years alone, some 30 million women globally have been cut, most of them in Africa but also in Asia and the Middle East, UNICEF said last year.
The procedure, typically performed by older women or traditional community practitioners, is often done with tools such as razor blades and can cause serious bleeding, death and complications later in life, including in childbirth.
Supporters of the procedure argue that cutting is rooted in Gambia's culture and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad. Religious conservatives behind the campaign to reverse the ban described cutting as 'one of the virtues of Islam.' Those against FGM said its supporters are seeking to curtail women's rights in the name of tradition.
The chair of the National Human Rights Commission, Emmanuel Daniel Joof, called the incident 'a national wake-up call and added: 'Our task now is clear: enforce it (the law) fully and fairly, without fear or favor.'
Civil society groups expressed 'sorrow and outrage' over the death of the one-month-old girl.
' Justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done, to send a strong message that the rights and lives of girls in The Gambia are not negotiable,' the Banjul-based Edward Francis Small Centre for Rights and Justice said in a statement.
However, the collective Concerned Citizens called on Gambia government to stop targeting female circumcisers.
'The people of The Gambia have consistently expressed, through various lawful means, their opposition to the ban and have instructed their elected Members of Parliament to repeal the said prohibition,' they said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on regulating cosmetic procedures: rogue operators must be tackled, but aren't the only problem
The enormous popularity of beauty treatments, including dermatological fillers and Botox injections, is not solely an issue for health regulators. Changing norms and aspirations about appearances, and the way that these are marketed mainly to women and girls, are a cultural and economic phenomenon that requires wider consideration. While attitudes to these procedures and aesthetics vary, many people – including some cosmetic surgeons – are concerned that younger women account for a growing share of a highly lucrative and growing market. The death last year of 33-year-old Alice Webb in Gloucestershire, after a non-surgical Brazilian butt lift, as well as multiple reports of injuries, and the deaths of at least 28 women who have travelled to Turkey for cosmetic treatments, have increased the pressure on ministers to tighten the law. Wes Streeting's announcement of new licence requirements for UK businesses, and tighter regulation of higher-risk treatments, is probably overdue. The Chartered Trading Standards Institute recently warned that untrained people have given cosmetic injections in public toilets and hotels. Altering the law in order to exclude such 'rogue operators' ought to make high streets and the internet – where many clinics advertise – safer. Talking about the risks, as the health secretary has been doing, and holding a consultation on proposed changes, may have the beneficial effect of raising awareness even before changes are introduced. But councils will need resources if they are to be expected to enforce new rules by issuing licences, checking premises and so on. As in many other areas of economic activity, the law on its own is unlikely to be enough. Mechanisms are needed to ensure that businesses comply. It is already illegal to administer Botox or dermal fillers to children in England – although, worryingly, it is still allowed in Wales and Scotland. Mr Streeting's announcement that rules regarding children will be tightened further is particularly welcome. Strenuous efforts should be made to place them off limits for the industry as a whole. The reported preoccupation of some children with anti-ageing products is not healthy and should be discouraged. Mr Streeting did not refer to the cost to the NHS if cosmetic procedures go wrong, when announcing plans to tighten the law. But Karin Smyth, one of his ministers, has raised this. And Prof Sir Stephen Powis, who was NHS England's national medical director until last month, made the same point specifically in relation to butt lifts – the cosmetic procedure with the highest death rate of all. Ministers should expect pushback even though many experts, including plastic surgeons, favour tighter rules. The pro-growth mood of the Treasury means proposals for new regulations are unlikely to be smiled upon there. The more restrictive approach being proposed for England will also do nothing to prevent surgical tourism and could even increase it, if tighter regulation of the domestic industry results in higher prices. The gap in safeguards that allows foreign cosmetic surgery providers to market directly to the public needs to be addressed separately, which the government has begun to recognise. There is no single or instant fix. But by cracking down on cowboy operators, ministers will send a message that appearance-altering injections and other invasive treatments must be treated seriously. They are a different order of activity from applying makeup or painting nails. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on regulating cosmetic procedures: rogue operators must be tackled, but aren't the only problem
The enormous popularity of beauty treatments, including dermatological fillers and Botox injections, is not solely an issue for health regulators. Changing norms and aspirations about appearances, and the way that these are marketed mainly to women and girls, are a cultural and economic phenomenon that requires wider consideration. While attitudes to these procedures and aesthetics vary, many people – including some cosmetic surgeons – are concerned that younger women account for a growing share of a highly lucrative and growing market. The death last year of 33-year-old Alice Webb in Gloucestershire, after a non-surgical Brazilian butt lift, as well as multiple reports of injuries, and the deaths of at least 28 women who have travelled to Turkey for cosmetic treatments, have increased the pressure on ministers to tighten the law. Wes Streeting's announcement of new licence requirements for UK businesses, and tighter regulation of higher-risk treatments, is probably overdue. The Chartered Trading Standards Institute recently warned that untrained people have given cosmetic injections in public toilets and hotels. Altering the law in order to exclude such 'rogue operators' ought to make high streets and the internet – where many clinics advertise – safer. Talking about the risks, as the health secretary has been doing, and holding a consultation on proposed changes, may have the beneficial effect of raising awareness even before changes are introduced. But councils will need resources if they are to be expected to enforce new rules by issuing licences, checking premises and so on. As in many other areas of economic activity, the law on its own is unlikely to be enough. Mechanisms are needed to ensure that businesses comply. It is already illegal to administer Botox or dermal fillers to children in England – although, worryingly, it is still allowed in Wales and Scotland. Mr Streeting's announcement that rules regarding children will be tightened further is particularly welcome. Strenuous efforts should be made to place them off limits for the industry as a whole. The reported preoccupation of some children with anti-ageing products is not healthy and should be discouraged. Mr Streeting did not refer to the cost to the NHS if cosmetic procedures go wrong, when announcing plans to tighten the law. But Karin Smyth, one of his ministers, has raised this. And Prof Sir Stephen Powis, who was NHS England's national medical director until last month, made the same point specifically in relation to butt lifts – the cosmetic procedure with the highest death rate of all. Ministers should expect pushback even though many experts, including plastic surgeons, favour tighter rules. The pro-growth mood of the Treasury means proposals for new regulations are unlikely to be smiled upon there. The more restrictive approach being proposed for England will also do nothing to prevent surgical tourism and could even increase it, if tighter regulation of the domestic industry results in higher prices. The gap in safeguards that allows foreign cosmetic surgery providers to market directly to the public needs to be addressed separately, which the government has begun to recognise. There is no single or instant fix. But by cracking down on cowboy operators, ministers will send a message that appearance-altering injections and other invasive treatments must be treated seriously. They are a different order of activity from applying makeup or painting nails. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
BreakingNews.ie
15 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
More than third of women playing football and camogie experience urinary leakage
More than one third of women playing Gaelic football and camogie experience urinary leakage during training and match play, research has found. Urinary leakage – a form of incontinence – remains a hidden struggle for many female athletes, largely due to embarrassment and stigma, a report found. Advertisement Dublin City University's research, published in Science and Medicine in Football, explores how menstrual cycle-related symptoms, hormonal contraceptive use, and indicators of pelvic floor dysfunction affect players of ladies Gaelic football and camogie. Among players not using hormonal contraceptives, 97.7 per cent reported menstrual cycle–related symptoms, most commonly abdominal cramping (84 per cent) and fatigue (82.2 per cent). Around 85 per cent believe their menstrual cycle affects onfield performance, with 59 per cent indicating a negative impact. Dr David Nolan (DCU/PA) Approximately 37 per cent of athletes experienced urinary leakage during training or matches, suggesting potential pelvic floor concerns. A high proportion also experience urinary urgency (47.8 per cent) and genital pain (43.4 per cent). Advertisement Dr David Nolan, assistant professor of Sport and Exercise Sciences at the DCU School of Health and Human Performance, said urinary leakage is a current taboo in women's sports. He said: 'There's more and more data being gathered, more studies coming out showing that active young sports women are experiencing urinary leakage at a significant rate, very high prevalence in gymnastics, in strength sports. 'But now in field sports, you get more data that it's affecting up to one third of our players. 'From working in female sport myself, I knew there was a prevalence of it, but I didn't expect it to be that high. This is probably the issue of why it's not spoken about more, and why players probably don't speak about it as much as they themselves probably don't realise that it's as commonplace. Advertisement 'If they think that it's something that's not affecting their teammates as much as them, they're probably less likely to speak because they don't know how common it actually is.' He added: 'The common symptoms are the urinary leakage, then urinary urgency, so the strong desire to go to the bathroom. You can have prolapse within the vagina, and then you can have anal incontinence linked to it. 'The most common symptoms, though, would be the urine leakage and the urinary urgency. The sad and frustrating thing about them suffering in silence is with physiotherapy and just exercise interventions, we can significantly reduce those symptoms.' He said the effects can lead to women dropping out of their sport. Advertisement He added: 'We do have evidence to show that it's linked to drop out in sport and again, because there can be potential shame or stigma around it and a source of embarrassment. 'So players might, in extreme cases, drop out of sports, or be less motivated to train. It can occur mostly in high impact, high kind of stress sports and performance – so they might be hesitant to push themselves hard or to engage in intense activities for fear of of this embarrassment.' The new peer-reviewed study of ladies' Gaelic footballers and camogie players in Ireland has thrown new light on the issue. Some 455 female Gaelic games athletes across both club and inter-county level were surveyed. Advertisement The study asked players about their menstrual cycles, use of hormonal contraceptives, like the contraceptive pill, and any pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms. Firstly, the survey confirmed that menstrual-related symptoms are highly prevalent. Among players not using hormonal contraceptives, 97.7 per cent reported at least one menstrual-related symptom each month. The most common complaints were abdominal cramping (experienced by 84 per cent of players) and fatigue or low energy (82 per cent). Perhaps not surprisingly, a large proportion – about 59 per cent perceived a mostly negative impact on how they play, citing issues like pain, heavy bleeding, or sluggishness during certain cycle phases. The study also looked at hormonal contraceptives. Just over half of the Gaelic players (51.7 per cent) were on some form of hormonal contraception, with the pill by far the most popular choice (used by about 69 per cent). Some 62 per cent of the athletes using hormonal contraceptives reported side effects, including fatigue (37.2 per cent) and experiencing mood swings or low mood (35.0 per cent). About one in three contraceptive-users (31.6 per cent) even felt that their contraception was impacting their athletic performance. However, issues around the pelvic floor is an aspect of women's health that athletes and coaches rarely discuss, the research found. 'Pelvic floor dysfunction' is an umbrella term for problems like urinary incontinence (leakage), urgency (sudden intense need to go), or pelvic organ prolapse. The stereotype is that these issues only impact older women or those who have had children. In this research, the average age of players surveyed was just 23.6 years old, and most had likely never given birth as the average first-time mother in Ireland is 31.5. Despite this, a considerable number of these young athletes reported troubling pelvic floor symptoms. The authors behind the report recommend enhanced education and support for athletes, coaches, and support staff on menstrual health, contraceptives, and pelvic floor health – as well as individualised symptom management strategies, integrating physiological monitoring with athlete feedback.
