logo
'I gave myself cancer': Wellness influencer battling the disease reveals the three factors she thinks triggered it - but experts say her claims are dangerous

'I gave myself cancer': Wellness influencer battling the disease reveals the three factors she thinks triggered it - but experts say her claims are dangerous

Daily Mail​04-08-2025
Experts have today hit back at 'dangerous' claims that stress and mobile phones can cause breast cancer after a wellness influencer controversially said she gave herself the disease.
Stephanie Weeks, from Mississippi in the US, was diagnosed with stage three triple negative breast cancer —one of the deadliest form of the disease—in February 2021 at the age of just 42.
After undertaking gruelling rounds of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery as well as 'healing methods' including acupuncture and alkaline water, she was told she was cancer-free later that year.
Now, in an Instagram video watched more than 750,000 times, she has claimed 'chronic stress', 'not taking sleep seriously enough' and putting her mobile phone in her bra for years 'contributed' to her diagnosis.
But experts have labelled the claims 'absolute nonsense' and 'dangerous' and said there was a 'lack of evidence' to prove any of the claims.
Studies have also long suggested there is no consistent evidence linking stress, mobile phones and poor sleep to an increased risk of breast cancer.
In the Instagram video Ms Weeks said her 'aggressive' and 'invasive' stage three triple negative breast cancer diagnosis was 'devastating'.
She added: 'I think there are several things that contributed, stress. The stress was chronic, it was for years and it was tremendous.
'The second thing was I did not take sleep seriously enough. Sometimes I would work all day, all night and go days without sleeping.
'I was really screwing up my circadian rhythm big time.
'Another thing was my cell phone in my bra for years. The tumour was right on the edge of the skin, right where the cell phone sat.
'So I'm saying these things to empower you and educate you so you can make better choices than I did.'
But experts today said all three factors were 'absolute nonsense'.
Liz O'Riordan, a retired breast surgeon and author of The Cancer Roadmap: Real science to guide your treatment path, told the Daily Mail: 'It's absolute nonsense. And bloody dangerous and very persuasive.
'Mobile phones and WiFi do not cause breast cancer.
'Whilst a stressful life and lack of sleep can lead to poor lifestyle choices, gaining weight, alcohol and no exercise stress and lack of sleep by themselves do not cause breast cancer.
'This is dangerous. If she did want to empower women she should be quoting the source she got this information from.
'There are some small studies that suggest they might be a factor but they've all been disproved due to lack of evidence.'
Dr Mangesh Thorat, a consultant breast surgeon at Homerton University Hospital, added: 'Existing evidence does not show any association between breast cancer and stress, sleep deprivation or organ proximity to mobile phone signal.
'Avoiding or minimising stress and ensuring adequate sleep is however a common-sense advice that helps at least improve quality of life.
'Everyone should aim to achieve these objectives.'
Indeed, studies have noted that some women wonder whether stress caused their breast cancer. But the evidence for this is poor.
One of the largest study's to date by British researchers in 2016 did not show any consistent evidence that linked stress to breast cancer.
Another European analysis published in the BMJ, which looked at 12 studies involving more than 100,000 people who were followed up for several years, did not find a link between stress at work and breast or colorectal, lung and prostate cancers.
It can be harder to maintain a healthy lifestyle, such as not smoking and drinking, during stressful situations. These habits can lead to an increased cancer risk, warns Cancer Research UK.
But the agency insists 'no evidence' shows 'those who are more stressed are more likely to get cancer'.
While sleep deprivation can lead to various health issues, including inflammation and insulin resistance, The Institute of Cancer Research says there is direct link between lack of sleep and an increased risk of breast cancer.
Studies, including a large meta-analysis from the Million Women Study, have found no significant association between sleep duration and breast cancer risk.
Meanwhile, rumours that electromagnetic radiation or waves from mobile phones can cause cancer, have spread for decades.
But researchers say there is no good evidence that this is the case, despite many fearing that keeping their phone close to their body will put them at risk.
Mobiles work by sending and receiving electromagnetic waves to and from phone masts.
While high energy radiation can cause cancer by damaging DNA, the version emitted by phones is so weak that it does not have this effect, says Cancer Research UK.
The charity adds that although 4G and 5G networks rely on higher frequency radio waves to work in comparison to phones made a decade ago, it's still not enough energy to damage DNA.
But, because the technology is still relatively new, scientists continue to monitor research in this field to track any potential long-term effects.
One in seven women in the UK are diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime—around 56,000 a year—making it the most common cancer in the UK.
The figure stands at roughly 300,000 annually in the US.
Around 85 per cent of women diagnosed with breast cancer survive more than five years.
However, triple negative breast cancer—which accounts for around 15 per cent of all breast cancers in the UK and US—is far more challenging.
Typically, it grows and spreads faster than other breast cancer types and has fewer treatment options.
It is also more difficult to treat because it doesn't interact with hormones such as oestrogen—for which there are targeted therapies.
On average around 77 per cent of women with triple negative breast cancer will survive their cancer for five years or more after they are diagnosed, but depending on the stage this can fall as low as 12 per cent.
This is compared to around 90 per cent of women with other forms of breast cancer who will survive for at least five years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr denies 2028 presidential ambitions after attacks from Trump influencer Laura Loomer
RFK Jr denies 2028 presidential ambitions after attacks from Trump influencer Laura Loomer

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

RFK Jr denies 2028 presidential ambitions after attacks from Trump influencer Laura Loomer

The US health and human services (HHS) secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, has fended off an attack by conservative firebrand and Donald Trump influencer Laura Loomer by issuing a statement of fealty to the president which calls it 'a flat-out lie' that he is running for the White House in 2028. Kennedy, 71, had been under pressure since Loomer, 32, expressed concern in a recent Politico interview that Stefanie Spear, a top aide of the HHS secretary, was trying to 'utilize her position to try to lay the groundwork for a 2028 RFK presidential run'. Loomer's vigilante pressure campaigns within the White House have cost a number of Trump administration figures their jobs, including customs and border protection official Monte Hawkins as well as Food and Drug Administration vaccine regulator Vinay Prasad. Hawkins had been accused by Loomer of having an 'anti-Trump, pro-open borders and pro-[diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI] bias'. And she had labelled Prasad a 'progressive leftist saboteur' before he was later reinstated by the White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles. Loomer told Politico that while she is realistic about neutralizing Kennedy, his deputies were vulnerable. 'I'm not naive enough to think that the president is going to get rid of RFK, but I will say that … there are concerns about some of the staffing decisions over at HHS,' she remarked. A White House official told the outlet that they 'would not be surprised if [Kennedy is] thinking about' running again after his 2024 candidacy prior to aligning himself with Trump. But the official claimed they 'don't think anyone thinks it's a real threat'. Kennedy responded on Friday, saying he would not strive for the presidency in 2028. The Kennedy family scion ran in 2024 for the Democratic party nomination before switching to become an independent candidate – and then cast his lot with Trump. Trump – who in the run-up to his second presidential election victory dismissed Kennedy as a 'radical left liberal' – rewarded him with a cabinet level post as well as his 'make America healthy again' (Maha) mandate. 'The swamp is in full panic mode,' Kennedy Jr said in an X post. 'DC lobby shops are laboring fiercely to drive a wedge between President Trump and me, hoping to thwart our team from dismantling the status quo and advancing [the Maha] agenda.' Kennedy added that the so-called swamp, a Republican term for an entrenched Washington bureaucracy, was 'pushing the flat-out lie that I'm running for president in 2028'. 'Let me be clear: I am not running for president in 2028,' he added. 'My loyalty is to President Trump and the mission we've started.' And he defended Spear. He said 'attacks on my staff, especially Stefanie Spear – a fierce, loyal warrior for Maha who proudly serves in the Trump administration and works every day to advance President Trump's vision for a healthier, stronger America – are proof we're over the target.' Kennedy also offered an overt expression of obeisance to his White House boss and political patron. 'We'll keep moving forward, we'll keep delivering wins, and no smear campaign will stop us,' he wrote. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion In July, the Wall Street Journal reported that Kennedy was planning to remove all the members of an advisory panel that determines what preventive health measures insurers are obliged to cover, reportedly viewing them as too 'woke', a pejorative Republican term for progressive. The crossover of the administration's anti-DEI campaign into healthcare came after an essay in the American Conservative magazine recommended the removal of taskforce members, saying it was embedded 'left-wing ideological orthodoxy'. Among the points it raised was the taskforce's use of term 'pregnant persons' and mention of a 'lasting psychological impact and stigma of enslaved Black women being forced to act as wet nurses'. HHS announced earlier in August it was halting $500m in mRNA vaccine research. And it has also moved to revive a taskforce on childhood vaccine safety, though vaccine injuries are known to be extremely rare. Known as 'Trump's Rasputin' in some circles, Loomer views Kennedy's vaccine skepticism as surging from the left – and not in pure ideological terms. She disputes that he views the issue correctly as a rightwing one, though the two may act in confluence. She has previously labelled Kennedy, in the New York Times, as 'a very problematic person' who 'is running a shadow presidential campaign' from his office. 'There's been some things that have happened,' Loomer told Politico. 'There's been several things that have happened at HHS that are contradictory to the initial promises made.'

US records more cases of Chikungunya virus
US records more cases of Chikungunya virus

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

US records more cases of Chikungunya virus

Cases of the debilitating chikungunya virus sweeping through China are also surging in the US, health officials have warned. CDC officials have reported four more cases this week, bringing the total to 50 cases of chikungunya in the US, all of which are in people who traveled to areas where it is more common like Asia and South America. It is unclear how many are linked to China's outbreak. The virus, which is spread by the Aedes mosquito, can cause sudden, agonizing joint pain in the hands and feet that can be so severe that it leaves sufferers unable to move normally for months. Chikungunya is tearing through China with more than 10,000 cases, leaving the nation battling its largest outbreak ever. The outbreak has prompted the CDC to issue a level 2 travel warning for China, which urges Americans to take extra precautions when visiting the area. The notice also applies to Brazil, Colombia, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines and Thailand. Chikungunya is a 'nationally notifiable' condition in the US, meaning health authorities can voluntarily report cases to the agency for national tracking and monitoring. While a handful of cases pop up in the US every year from people traveling to high-risk areas, it hasn't experienced local transmission since 2019. But with 1.6million people traveling between the US and China every year, mosquitoes in America could bite an infected traveler and begin transmitting the virus locally to Americans. Dr Louisa Messenger, a mosquito researcher in Nevada , previously told : 'This outbreak in China is very concerning. It [the virus] could already be here in the US; and really it's just one plane flight away.' Along with the CDC, travel agencies and cruise lines have also issued warnings about preventing mosquito-borne diseases, including chikungunya, dengue and Lyme disease, all of which have been detected in the US so far this year. Chikungunya is spread to humans from a bite from the Aedes mosquito, which also spread dengue fever, yellow fever and Zika virus. The infection does not spread from person to person through bodily contact or saliva. However, pregnant women who become infected near the time of delivery can pass the virus to their baby during birth, which can result in severe illness in the newborn. About 15 to 35 percent of people infected with the virus are asymptomatic, the CDC reports. The incubation period is typically three to seven days and the most common symptom is a sudden onset of a fever over 102 degrees Fahrenheit (39 degrees Celsius). Other symptoms of chikungunya virus include headache, nausea, rash, muscle aches, swelling and redness of the conjunctiva (the white part of the eye and inner eyelids) and joint pain that is sometimes severe and debilitating in the hands or feet. In severe cases, life-threatening complications involving the heart and brain can occur such as inflammation, irregular heartbeats and organ failure. Symptoms usually last seven to 10 days, but patients may experience lifelong complications such as persistent joint pain. There is no specific treatment for chikungunya, and doctors mostly focus on easing symptoms like over-the-counter pain and fever medications. However, there are two vaccines available for people visiting an area with an outbreak.

Most run-down NHS hospitals named and shamed - as staggering £14billion is needed to fix crumbling wards that pose a 'catastrophic' risk to patients
Most run-down NHS hospitals named and shamed - as staggering £14billion is needed to fix crumbling wards that pose a 'catastrophic' risk to patients

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Most run-down NHS hospitals named and shamed - as staggering £14billion is needed to fix crumbling wards that pose a 'catastrophic' risk to patients

Crumbling hospitals pose a 'catastrophic' risk to patients, top experts warned today as the Daily Mail names and shames Britain's most run-down NHS hospitals. Exposing the ballooning £13.8billion maintenance backlog, our investigation reveals that five sites urgently need at least £100m of work. Airedale General Hospital in West Yorkshire needs to fork out £316m just to fix 'high risk' issues, although the total bill sits just below £340m when accounting for other necessary repairs. Burst pipes, crumbling ceilings and broken lifts are among the problems that plague NHS hospitals up and down the country. MPs and influential voices in the NHS sphere have demanded ministers invest extra cash to finally end the 'shameful neglect' laid bare in our audit of the health service's entire estate, covering almost 2,900 facilities. Helen Morgan, Lib Dem health and social care spokesperson, said: 'When someone goes into hospital their only focus should be on getting better, not fearing the roof is going to cave in on them. 'Countless patients who should be focusing on their health are instead grappling with crumbling masonry, burst pipes and water leaking through the ceiling.' Ms Morgan added: 'Ministers need to step up and grasp this nettle before we see yet more buildings falling apart and patients put at risk.' She urged ministers to bring forward plans to construct new hospitals, many of which were originally built in the 1960s or before. Some are even nearly 180 years old. Deriding the 'squalid, unsafe and degrading' settings that patients have become used to, she said: 'The Conservatives' shameful neglect of our NHS brought us to this point – but Labour have kicked rebuilding our hospitals into the long grass. 'By delaying vital new hospital projects they these issues will only get worse.' To repair the crumbling estate and carry out day-to-day maintenance, Rachel Reeves this summer vowed to invest £30bn over the next five years as she said the the NHS was 'on its knees'. Critical building repairs, such as those highlighted in our audit, will be targeted with a specific £5bn pot, the Chancellor announced. Dr Layla McCay, director of policy at NHS Confederation, said: 'More than a decade of being starved of capital investment has left NHS leaders struggling to deal with a host of estate problems, including leaking roofs, sewage leaks and broken lifts, causing misery for patients and staff. 'Having fit for purpose hospitals is vital to improving patient care and boosting productivity – getting better value for taxpayers' money. 'We know that dilapidated buildings and faulty equipment can pose a risk to patient safety as well as hamper efforts to reduce waiting lists.' Even with the Government's ramped up funding, Dr McCay said the NHS still needs an extra £3.3bn a year over the next three years to tackle the maintenance backlog. The NHS already gets around £180bn per year. Our investigation found three of the five hospitals with the biggest bills for high risk work were in London. Behind Airedale General Hospital ranked Charing Cross Hospital (estimated cost of £186m) and St Mary's Hospital (£152m), both of which are in the capital. Wycombe Hospital (£139m) and Croydon University Hospital (£113m) rounded out the top five. Trusts are asked to assess their own maintenance backlog each year. As per the NHS's own definition, high risk means: 'Where repairs/replacements must be addressed with urgent priority.' This is 'in order to prevent catastrophic failure, major disruption to clinical services or deficiencies in safety liable to cause serious injury or prosecution'. In one ward that usually holds six beds at Withybush Hospital (pictured), roof support was needed to prop up the ceiling Definitions of repairs needed High risk - where repairs/replacement must be addressed with urgent priority in order to prevent catastrophic failure, major disruption to clinical services or deficiencies in safety liable to cause serious injury and/or prosecution. Significant risk - where repairs/replacement require priority management and expenditure in the short term so as not to cause undue concern to statutory enforcement bodies or risk to healthcare delivery or safety. Moderate risk - where repairs/replacement require effective management and expenditure in the medium term through close monitoring so as not to cause undue concern to statutory enforcement bodies or risk to healthcare delivery or safety. Low - where repairs/replacement require to be addressed through agreed maintenance programmes or included in the later years of an estates strategy. In total, the NHS's overall bill for high risk issues stood at £2.7bn in 2023/24 – nearly three times higher than the £1bn in 2015/16. The backlog at eleven medical sites is entirely categorised as 'high risk'. The largest of these was University Hospital of North Durham, which treats over one million patients per year. Its estimated bill stood at nearly £2.6m. When counting all four types of backlog monitored centrally by NHS bosses, Charing Cross Hospital had the biggest maintenance bill (£412m). It was followed by Airedale (£339m), St Thomas' Hospital in central London (£293m), St Mary's Hospital (£287m) and Northwick Park and St Mark's in Harrow (£239m). Financial data for hundreds of the 2,900 facilities was not available. Sites with no recorded maintenance backlogs were also excluded from our analysis. Dennis Reed, director of the senior citizen campaign organisation Silver Voices, told the Daily Mail that the NHS estate did not meet 21st century standards. He said: 'Money due to be spent on buildings has been used for current spending and pressures on staff and services, so it's very shortsighted budgeting by the NHS and now they're in a critical position. 'Some wards closed because they're not sufficiently funded and some have buckets lying around the place to collect water when it rains. 'We hear this a lot of talk from this Government about timeframes that extend into the next Parliament but it needs urgent treatment now because the NHS is in a state of accident and emergency.' One of the primary concerns around the collapsing NHS estate is that of the presence of reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC). Builders used it extensively in roofing between the 1950s and 1990s, when dozens of hospitals were built or upgraded. The material is structurally weaker than traditional concrete and has been likened to a 'chocolate Aero bar'. Being prone to moisture absorption and collapse has led to fears ceilings could collapse. Schools with RAAC present have already been forced to shut buildings over fears that ceilings could collapse. While in charge, the Tories vowed to eradicate RAAC from the NHS estate by 2035 in a pledge backed by an extra £700m. Seven hospitals most affected by RAAC, including Airedale, were put under the New Hospital Programme (NHP) over fears they were 'structurally unsound'. The scheme – first launched under Boris Johnson in 2020 – vowed they would get a 'full replacement' by 2030. Forty new hospitals were also promised in the NHP, although the definition of 'new' was later clarified to mean upgraded. But Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves said last year that they would need to set out a 'thorough, realistic and costed timetable' for delivering the scheme. Health Secretary Wes Streeting in January accused the Tories of failing to fund their original plan, saying it had been 'built on the shaky foundation of false hope'. He said: 'To put it simply – there were not 40 of them, they were not all new and many were not even hospitals.' Setting out a new timetable to complete a reviewed list of work encompassing both repairs and new projects, Mr Streeting said construction would proceed in four 'waves'. The first wave is already under construction, set to be completed within three years. Under Department of Health and Social Care plans, construction work won't start at Charing Cross Hospital until 2035 at the earliest. Upgrades there will cost up to £2bn, it is expected, with plans for a new 800-bed site and redevelopments of the wider campus. Some repair work is already ongoing, said the trust which runs the hospital. Eric Munro, director of estates and facilities at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, said: 'Much of our estate pre-dates the NHS – some of our buildings are nearly 180 years old. 'We're spending £115m this year to reduce estate risks and make improvements, and we're working hard with partners to try to accelerate our redevelopment programme, with all three of our main hospitals in the Government's NHP.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'The NHS estate we inherited is crumbling but repairing and rebuilding our hospitals is a key part of our ambition to create a health service fit for the future. 'This Government has confirmed a funding plan and an honest, realistic timetable to deliver all schemes in the NHP, ensuring schemes are ready to enter construction as quickly as possible and that taxpayers get maximum value for money.' What the hospitals said A spokesperson for London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust said: 'LNWH Trust has an ongoing programme of works to make sure our buildings remain safe for patients, but maintaining a large estate, much of which dates back to the 1970s, is a considerable drain on resources. Managing this challenge requires a constant cycle of monitoring, maintenance and prioritisation of works. We will continue to seek additional investment for our sites wherever we can, with recent new builds including a 32-bed ward to improve patient flow at Northwick Park Hospital and the community diagnostic centre at Ealing Hospital, which offers rapid access to a wide range of tests and scans.' A spokesperson for Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust said: 'Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust is committed to the redevelopment of Wycombe Hospital. Unfortunately, Wycombe has not been included in the New Hospital Programme, so we are looking at alternative ways of delivering the changes that are so desperately needed. This will probably mean that any new building to replace the Tower will need to be constructed in a phased way, as and when funding becomes available. We have already completed the first stage of preparatory work, including things like ground investigations and utilities surveys, and are now working on detailed designs ahead of submitting a planning application at the end of this month. In the meantime, we are continuing to undertake essential maintenance work to ensure the safety of our patients and our colleagues. We would like to thank everyone for their patience as we continue to do our best to deliver outstanding care in an environment that we know is less than ideal.' A spokesperson for Croydon Health Services NHS Trust said: 'We are working hard to improve our estate to support the delivery of high-quality care, and through a planned maintenance regime we continuously monitor our buildings and infrastructure to ensure these remain safe and compliant with the required standards for healthcare settings. We know that there are parts of our estate that require significant investment to bring their condition to a satisfactory standard and we are continuing to explore all possible funding routes to secure the investment we need to make these improvements.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store