logo
Antarctica's brief gain in ice mass fuels climate denial

Antarctica's brief gain in ice mass fuels climate denial

Yahoo2 days ago

"In a development that's leaving climate alarmists scrambling, new data shows that Antarctic ice has increased in size for the first time in decades -- reversing the long-touted trend of mass loss and environmental collapse," reads a May 28, 2025 Facebook post from The Hodgetwins, US conservative commentators whom AFP has previously fact-checked.
Similar narratives dismissing the impact of climate change popped up on social media after traditional media reported in early May on a study's findings about Antarctic ice sheet (archived here).
The study, from March, found that between 2021 and 2023, Antarctica's ice sheet expanded and therefore did not add to global mean sea level rise.
The gain did not, however, counter the overall rise observed over those years because of ice loss and warming elsewhere (archived here and here).
And weather conditions -- specifically unusual precipitations, including snow and some rain in east Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula -- were the primary reason the ice sheet gained mass, the study's corresponding author and other scientists told AFP.
This short-lived, partial gain does not disprove the impact of climate change on the continent, they said.
Yunzhong Shen, the study's corresponding author, told AFP May 19 that the increase observed between 2021 and 2023 occurred on a "too short timescale" to be treated as a trend reversal -- or to deny the impacts of climate change in the region (archived here).
The gain witnessed in Antarctica's ice sheets also seems "to stop after 2024, which needs to be determined by further study," he said.
James Kirkham, a scientist with the International Cryosphere Climate Initiative scientist, concurred (archived here): "The most recent levels reported by NASA thus far in 2025 look similar to what they were back in 2020, just before the abrupt gain."
When looking at Antarctic total mass balance, NASA's dataset shows a net loss in mass since 2002.
In fact, that "Antarctica would experience increased snowfall in a warmer climate is entirely expected as in a warmer climate the atmosphere can hold more moisture," Kirkham said in a May 27 email.
"This means that the likelihood of extreme weather (such as the heavy snowfall which caused the recent mass gain in east Antarctica) increases."
Brandon Daly, who studies glaciers and ice sheets, agreed (archived here).
"When climate change deniers talk about the glaciers in Antarctica, they will usually only focus on the surface of the ice sheet," he said May 28, explaining that they ignore other ice loss.
"Ice in contact with the ocean is what is melting, and it will continue to melt even if precipitation over the ice sheet increases," he said. "And it is the ocean-forced melting that is currently risking ice sheet instability and sea level rise."
University of Minnesota climate scientist Peter Neff said May 27 that human climate change impacts in Antarctica are already widely seen around the Antarctic Peninsula and coastal Antarctica, but have been slower to penetrate inland (archived here).
The continent is "like a giant pancake with very steep edges that slow the north to south penetration of warmer air over the southern ocean," he said.
Almost all of Antarctica's ice losses come from glaciers, largely in west Antarctica and the peninsula (archived here and here).
Robert McKay, director of Victoria University of Wellington's Antarctic Research Centre, told AFP May 15 that scientists are mostly concerned with these sectors because they may be "near a tipping point" that could lead to greatly accelerated sea level rise (archived here).
Environmental change thus takes different forms in different regions.
Brief temporary offsets of overall losses through recent regional snowfalls, such as the one observed between 2021 and 2023, are unlikely to change the long-term trajectory of continent-wide ice losses, with continued warming.
Additionally, weather stations -- whose data network remains scarce in the continent -- have observed long-term warming and impacts on sea level rise, albeit with very large year-to-year variability given that Antarctica holds the most variable climate in the world (archived here and here).
Satellite data has recently revealed that ice sheets with enough frozen water to lift oceans some 65 metres are far more sensitive to climate change than previously suspected (archived here).
The amount of ice melting or breaking off into the ocean from Greenland and west Antarctica, now averaging about 400 billion tonnes a year, has quadrupled over the last three decades, eclipsing runoff from mountain glaciers.
Both polar oceans are warming, with the "Southern Ocean being disproportionately and increasingly important in global ocean heat increase," according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the leading international consortium of climate scientists (archived here).
AFP has debunked other claims about the Poles, including here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cynthia Nixon Speaks Out After Fatal Shooting of Jonathan Joss: 'We Will Not Let This Stand'
Cynthia Nixon Speaks Out After Fatal Shooting of Jonathan Joss: 'We Will Not Let This Stand'

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cynthia Nixon Speaks Out After Fatal Shooting of Jonathan Joss: 'We Will Not Let This Stand'

Cynthia Nixon is mourning the loss of Jonathan Joss while demanding answers for his death in an Instagram post shared on Tuesday, June 3 According to the police report obtained by PEOPLE, Joss was allegedly "intentionally and knowingly" shot during a dispute with his neighbor on Sunday, June 1 The Sex and the City star posted, "We will not let this stand," in response to the incidentCynthia Nixon is mourning the loss of Jonathan Joss and calling for answers after the actor was allegedly shot and killed in San Antonio on Sunday, June 1. In a post shared to Instagram on Tuesday, June 3, the Sex and the City actress, 59, said she was 'devastated' to learn that Joss, whom she described as a 'wonderfully talented actor and musician,' was fatally shot on Sunday, June 1. She added that she and her family were big fans of Parks and Recreation. Joss, also 59, had a recurring role as Chief Ken Hotate on the sitcom. 'He and his husband had been repeatedly harassed and worse by homophobic neighbors who recently burned their house to the ground,' Nixon's post continued. Hours after the news broke on Sunday, his spouse, Tristan Kern de Gonzales, took to Joss' Facebook page to reveal that he was present when Joss was shot, and claimed the issue was rooted in homophobia. 'The men were collecting mail at their old address when a former neighbor came at them shouting homophobic hate and shot Jonathan to death,' the Gilded Age actress wrote. Nixon said Joss died protecting the person he loved: 'His husband says he would also have been shot had Jonathan not pushed him out of the way.' She ended her post calling out local authorities. 'The San Antonio police force is saying there is 'no evidence' that this was a hate crime,' Nixon wrote. 'We will not let this stand.' PEOPLE did not immediately receive a response from the San Antonio Police Department. In a statement shared to the SAPD's Facebook account on Monday, June 2, the department said there was 'no evidence' to support the theory of Joss' death being the result of a hate crime. 'SAPD Homicide is currently investigating the murder of Mr. Jonathan Joss. Despite online claims of this being a hate crime, currently the investigation has found no evidence to indicate that the Mr. Joss's murder was related to his sexual orientation. SAPD investigators handle these allegations very seriously and have thoroughly reviewed all available information. Should any new evidence come to light, the suspect will be charged accordingly,' their statement read. Sigfredo Alvarez Cejam, 56, who fled the scene in a vehicle, was later detained by police and named as a suspect. He was subsequently booked for murder, and the investigation is still ongoing, per police. A police report obtained by PEOPLE on Tuesday, June 3, details that Ceja admitted that he 'intentionally and knowingly discharged a weapon' at Joss. According to Kern de Gonzales, before Joss was killed, their former home was "burned down after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire.' 'We reported these threats to law enforcement multiple times, and nothing was done,' he said in his online statement. He also claimed they were 'regularly' harassed by people ​​who made it clear they "did not accept our relationship.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Joss, who was of Native American ancestry, was also known for his voice role as John Redcorn in King of the Hill, which aired in the late '90s and early 2000s. Hours before his death, he shared an Instagram video discussing how the 'reboot is up and moving' as he walked around Austin, Texas. Read the original article on People

University head steps down 'by mutual agreement'
University head steps down 'by mutual agreement'

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

University head steps down 'by mutual agreement'

The University for the Creative Arts has announced its vice-chancellor is stepping down. The university, which has campuses and facilities in Canterbury and Maidstone in Kent and Epsom and Farnham in Surrey, said in a statement Prof Jane Roscoe had left "by mutual consent" on 30 May. The role will be filled temporarily by deputy vice-chancellor Melanie Gray and chief operating officer Mark Ellul. Prof Roscoe, who joined from the University of Greenwich in February 2024, also acted as the university's president. Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. University helps to build Jane Austen AI character University plan to boost Surrey's gaming sector Dame Zandra Rhodes' work to be digitally archived Banksy to be made honorary professor New arts degrees for Medway after UCA site closure University for the Creative Arts

What to know about the Meta trial as judge weighs decision
What to know about the Meta trial as judge weighs decision

The Hill

time32 minutes ago

  • The Hill

What to know about the Meta trial as judge weighs decision

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Meta have wrapped up a six-week trial over the Facebook and Instagram parent's alleged social networking monopoly, leaving the final decision in the hands of the judge. The trial, which came to a close last week, seeks to determine whether Meta has a monopoly over personal social networking that the company entrenched with its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Here's what to know about the trial and what comes next: The FTC's trial with Meta represented a full-circle moment for the second Trump administration, after the agency originally brought the case at the tail end of President Trump's first administration. The agency sued Meta, then known as Facebook, in December 2020. The case came as part of a push by the Trump administration to take aim at major tech firms, following the Department of Justice's (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit against Google. Big Tech scrutiny has been an area of rare continuity between both Trump administrations and the Biden administration. Under former President Biden, the DOJ brought a second antitrust case against Google, as well as a lawsuit against Apple. The FTC also sued Amazon. While Trump's firing of two Democratic FTC commissioners has raised questions about his commitment to aggressive antitrust enforcement, the agency notably did not step away from the Meta trial in the face of CEO Mark Zuckerberg's lobbying for a settlement. The Meta CEO reportedly courted Trump and White House officials to settle the case in the weeks leading up to the trial. Zuckerberg, who had a contentious relationship with the president in the wake of Meta's decision to ban Trump from its platforms following the Jan. 6 riots, seemed eager to mend fences after November's election. Like numerous other tech leaders, Zuckerberg traveled to Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., to visit Trump before he took office, contributed $1 million to his inaugural fund and received a front-row seat at his inauguration. However, these efforts don't appear to have paid dividends. The Meta CEO's initial offer of $450 million was brushed aside, with the FTC demanding at least $18 billion and a consent decree, according to The Wall Street Journal. Zuckerberg reportedly upped his offer to $1 billion, but to no avail. The Meta trial began mid-April, and the FTC immediately called Zuckerberg to the stand, where he spent three days facing questions. At the heart of the trial is the FTC's claim that Meta has a monopoly over personal social networking — a market that includes Meta's apps, Snapchat and MeWe and is centered on sharing between family and friends. Meta has pushed back on this market definition, arguing it faces competition from a much broader swath of social media platforms, including TikTok, YouTube, X and iMessage. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg has seemed skeptical of the FTC's proposed market, noted Geoffrey Manne, president and founder of the International Center for Law & Economics. 'The judge has expressed some reservations about the way the FTC is trying to demonstrate its market definition, but obviously the underlying issue is monopoly power,' Manne told The Hill. 'It's a really tough case in this regard because … there seems to be no qualitative evidence that's really going to answer the question,' he added. Boasberg's concerns about the market have been a 'recurring theme' in his comments going back to November, when he refused to dismiss the case, said former FTC Commissioner William Kovacic. 'He nonetheless cautioned that the government had important hurdles to clear, and one of them was the relevant market,' Kovacic said. 'It's always a little bit risky to infer a specific point of view from questions that are posed or comments that are made in the courtroom, but it seems to me that the judge still has doubts about the delineation of the relevant market, and the FTC has to defend its definition or the case founders,' he continued. Because most social media platforms are free, it's not possible to identify Meta's competitors using price data, as antitrust cases often do, Manne noted. Instead, the FTC and Meta have had to rely on other forms of evidence to back up their claims. The government has used advertising load, contending Meta has placed more advertisements on Instagram than it would otherwise, degrading the user experience. Meta, on the other hand, has relied on user data, showing that users move between TikTok and Meta's platforms interchangeably. For instance, the company pointed to data finding that when TikTok briefly went dark in January, it drove users to Facebook and Instagram. 'After six weeks trying their case to undo acquisitions made over a decade ago and show that no deal is ever truly final, the only thing the FTC showed was the dynamic, hyper-competitive nature of the past, present and future of the technology industry,' a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. 'Meta is a proud American success story, and we look forward to continuing to innovate and serve the people and businesses who love our services,' they continued. The FTC has accused Meta of violating antitrust law by attempting to eliminate potential competitors with two key acquisitions — its purchases of Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014. The focus on Meta's acquisitions creates a real risk for the social media giant that a loss could result in a breakup. However, the FTC may also be facing an uphill battle as it tries to prove the Instagram and WhatsApp purchases were anticompetitive, blocking the two once independent companies from developing into Facebook competitors. This results in a 'highly speculative world' that relies heavily on Meta's intent at the time, Manne said. 'You have an entity like Instagram that may or may not have been in any way successful, that may or may not have evolved in a way to actually be a challenge to Facebook, that may or may not have evolved in any way to become bigger than it was when Facebook bought it,' he told The Hill. 'It's never going to be dispositive, and I guess I'm afraid, from the FTC perspective, that they don't have a lot more than that,' he added. The FTC has presented numerous emails and messages from Meta executives, including Zuckerberg, suggesting they had real concerns about Instagram and WhatsApp becoming threats to Facebook prior to the acquisition. 'I thought The FTC did a good job of … reconstructing Facebook's state of mind when the mergers took place, and I think they did a good job of underscoring Meta's anxiety that the transactions were necessary in order to forestall the emergence of competitive rivals,' Kovacic said. 'Yet, even so, it seemed to me that the real core issue in the case is not so much what Meta has perceived at the time, but rather the actual consequence of the mergers as they unfold throughout the decade,' he added. The trial has wrapped, but the two sides have a post-trial briefing schedule that stretches into September, meaning any decision is unlikely before the fall. If the judge rules against Meta, the case would progress to a second phase to determine the proper remedies. Google, which was found last August to have an illegal monopoly over online search, overlapped with Meta at the Washington courthouse in April and May, where it appeared for a three-week remedies hearing. The search giant is seeking to keep its company together as the DOJ pushes for a breakup that would split off its Chrome browser.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store