logo
Isolated and confused: How a granddad 'vanished' from his family

Isolated and confused: How a granddad 'vanished' from his family

BBC News29-03-2025

David remembers the moment he found his elderly stepfather, John, unkempt and suffering from dementia, living alone in an unclean hotel room."I didn't think you'd leave an animal in the state that room was in," he says. " There was no care at all. You would not leave a vulnerable old man like that."Months earlier, John had vanished. His eldest granddaughter, Amy, had taken control of his welfare and his finances, and stopped any contact between John and the rest of his family, including Barbara, his wife of many years.With Amy's help, John had changed his will, making her the sole beneficiary, and had then been left to live by himself in a single room, confused and isolated.John's family was one of hundreds who contacted the BBC after hearing The Willpower Detectives last year. The series revealed how a partner at an Essex-based law firm was using what's known as Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) to take over the finances of vulnerable clients.In June, Parliament will debate a private member's bill to provide extra safeguards to LPA. The bill - introduced by the MP Fabian Hamilton - has cross-party support, and is shaped in part by the BBC's investigations and the huge public response to the cases raised.
The story of John Wilcox demonstrates how, in handing over responsibility for their financial assets, vulnerable people can sometimes be put at risk by members of their own family.After many years of running a successful office-furnishing business in Leeds, John and Barbara Wilcox had retired and were living comfortably in mid-Wales.Both had been married before. John had no children of his own, but he loved Barbara's son and daughter as his own, as well as her three grandchildren. To each of these, he had given enough money to buy their first homes.However, everything changed in 2020 when John was diagnosed with dementia.The condition caused a personality change, and John became delusional and paranoid. He started to accuse Barbara and his own brother Desmond of plotting against him.Following a collapse at home John was taken to hospital, where - because of Covid restrictions - nobody was allowed to visit.This isolation fed John's feelings of paranoia, and the suspicion that he had been abandoned by his family.It was during this time that John's eldest granddaughter, Amy - the one person he still seemed to trust - began to take charge of his life.At first, no-one in the family was suspicious. John had always been close to Amy.Unknown to them, John had requested and signed a form banning contact between anyone involved in his care and anyone in his family, apart from Amy.Even though his medical notes describe him as paranoid and delusional, John was declared as having "mental capacity" - this was significant because it meant he could legally grant someone lasting power of attorney over his finances.Barbara says her efforts to raise concerns with social services were blanked: "They just didn't want to know. They weren't interested in the letters that we wrote."
After three months in hospital, John was discharged into Amy's care. She suggested he could recuperate at a care home at Paignton in Devon, near where she lived, while she readied her house for him to stay there.At this stage, the other family members thought this was just a temporary arrangement in everyone's best interests. Amy said that it was what John wanted, and it would be a respite for Barbara.However, Barbara recalls: "As soon as she got him down there, the vitriol started." Amy told the rest of the family they no longer had any say about John's welfare, and they were not to try to contact him.In response to their pleas, it was agreed that a niece of John's would call him once a week to check that he was alright.But six weeks after he was admitted to the care home, the niece made her regular call, only to be told that John had left.The family was devastated - John had disappeared.They went to the police but were told he had signed a form in hospital instructing that no information should be shared with them. They were only told that John was not living with Amy.The family discovered that John had signed an LPA document giving Amy power of attorney over all his property and finances.Meanwhile, a solicitor in Devon contacted Barbara asking about their home and joint assets. Barbara later found out about John's new will, which named Amy as the sole beneficiary.This development had immediate and stressful consequences. The solicitor asked Barbara to begin the process of selling the home she had shared with John, in order to release his share of their assets.
John's brother, Desmond, took the lead in trying to find out where John now was. It took him several weeks.He says he rang 50 care homes, trying to track John down. He and Barbara also wrote to Amy asking her to at least tell them how her grandfather was, but they say they never received a reply.Eventually, Amy's aunt confronted her in person, and found out that John was in a hotel in Torquay.Desmond knew that in the past, John had lent £100,000 to a friend who owned several hotels in south-west England.It appeared that John had been put up at one of these hotels. The owner had made a deal to offset John's bill (a nightly rate of £265) against his outstanding debt.Amy's father, David, drove to the hotel. He was horrified by what he found: "The conditions he was living in were appalling. I was absolutely astounded."John was renting the room only - with no cleaning services or food. There was a fridge and a microwave oven - in which he would heat ready meals supplied by Amy.For David, it was the ultimate betrayal of a vulnerable man. He says that John was dishevelled and confused: "He was just abandoned. He hardly went out of that room and it was in a terrible state."
Having found John, his family decided they needed to tread carefully. They say they wanted him to understand the truth about what had been done to him, and they were also worried that Amy might try to move him again.At first, John refused to see Barbara, claiming she had tried to kill him, and that she had never come to see him in hospital.And then one day, Barbara drove to John's hotel with her son David and his partner Julie. She stayed outside in the car but gave David a tin of flapjacks to take to John in his room.The touch and smell of a faded everyday item - an old cake tin with some homemade flapjacks inside - seemed to have an effect on him."I know what's in there," he said to his stepson."Do you know who made them?" David remembers asking John. John replied: "Yes I do."David then offered to bring Barbara into the hotel room and John agreed.Barbara says she was heartbroken by her husband's physical and mental deterioration. He weighed only seven-and-a-half stone, and he was so weak that she thinks he would have died if he had been left much longer.
It was a "very, very emotional" reunion, she remembers. Before long, they were holding hands and John had agreed to come home with her.The next day, Barbara and her brother Mike came back to the hotel to pick John up. Mike says it felt like they were "planning a heist". He recalls that "as we drove away and started to get out of Torquay, I said: 'Oh gosh, we got away with that.'"Back in Wales, Barbara was able to see John's bank accounts, and discovered that Amy had taken more than £5,000 - there was just 16p left in his account.But John's story had a happy ending of sorts. He managed to get the power of attorney and the new will cast aside, and lived for nine months with Barbara in Wales, before dying peacefully at home.His tale highlights the difficulties involved when it comes to deciding who has control of what's often seen as "family money", and who will inherit it.Issues of mental capacity have to be considered in situations like these, according to James Warner, a consultant in old-age psychiatry."Dementia makes people susceptible to manipulation and those involved with overseeing important changes need to be extra-vigilant," he says.The elderly and vulnerable can quickly find themselves in situations where they are extremely vulnerable, he says, and more needs to be done to protect them.The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) holds power of attorney records for more than eight million people in England and Wales, but last year it investigated less than 1% of the cases brought to its attention.Labour MP Fabian Hamilton says the OPG can be "toothless" for vulnerable elderly people and their families.Mr Hamilton says changes are needed to provide greater safeguards, and his private member's bill on attorney powers is due for its second reading in June.The bill - which has cross-party support - would compel banks and regulators to check for issues such as cognitive decline, and greater scrutiny over whether an attorney is abusing their LPA powers.Barbara thinks that the proposed legislation could have helped in her situation. "In cases like John's, where you have this kind of paranoia, solicitors involved with a power of attorney should be making enquiries of the family and verifying," she says.
Meanwhile, John's family have had no contact with Amy, unable to forgive the hurt she caused them and what she put her grandfather through.They say they still do not understand why Amy acted in the way she did. She (along with John's other grandchildren) had already been given money enough to buy a house each, and she stood to inherit more eventually.In May 2024, Amy accepted a police caution for fraud - which in law is an admission of guilt - specifically because she had taken money from John's account after he had returned to Wales, and was no longer in her care.When I wrote to Amy about this, she replied that she had only accepted the caution to lift the stress from herself and her family, and didn't regard it as just.She told me that there were two sides to every story and that all of John's decisions were made by him in the company of his solicitor. She added that the decision not to tell John's family anything was at his request.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Farage's proposal is just the latest undermining of the Barnett system
Farage's proposal is just the latest undermining of the Barnett system

The National

time36 minutes ago

  • The National

Farage's proposal is just the latest undermining of the Barnett system

This, according to senior criminologists and ex-police officers, is not just a failure of admin, it's the result of austerity-era cuts that stripped police forces of capacity, dismantled the state-run Forensic Science Service in 2012, and left fragmented, underfunded systems to cope with ballooning evidence demands. Austerity didn't just weaken institutions; it disassembled infrastructure. READ MORE: Nigel Farage could cut the Barnett Formula. Here's what devolution experts think of that While these failings may seem like an English and Welsh concern, they tell a broader UK-wide story. Because when public services are cut in England, the Barnett formula translates those cuts into reduced budget allocations for Holyrood, too. Scotland has long borne the dual burden of being denied full fiscal autonomy while also seeing its devolved budget squeezed by decisions made for entirely different priorities south of the Border. Cuts to police, criminal courts, housing, public health, and local government in England have systematically eroded the spending floor on which Scottish services rest. So when justice collapses in England, it affects Scotland financially – even if the governance is separate. And now, against this backdrop of UK-wide budgetary degradation, Nigel Farage has called for the scrapping of the Barnett formula entirely. It's a move that's politically convenient, historically illiterate, and economically reckless. But more than anything, it's a distillation of what's already happening by stealth. Successive UK governments have undermined the foundations of the Barnett system – and devolution itself – for more than a decade. READ MORE: Furious Anas Sarwar clashes with BBC journalist over Labour policies It's obvious to every Scot that Farage's view relies on a mischaracterisation of Barnett as a subsidy, when in fact it simply ensures Scotland receives a proportional share of changes to spending in England for devolved services. It doesn't calculate entitlement or need, it mirrors policy shifts at Westminster. If England increases education or health spending, Scotland sees a relative uplift. If England cuts deeply, Scotland's budget falls, even if demand remains or rises. This has led to an absurd and punitive dynamic where Scotland loses funding not by its own decisions, but because England spends less. And when Scotland chooses to maintain higher standards in public services, it must do so from a proportionately smaller pot. Perversely, it doesn't stop there, though. Since the 2016 Brexit vote, Westminster has begun bypassing devolved governments directly. Funds like the Levelling Up Fund and Shared Prosperity Fund are allocated by UK ministers to local authorities, often bypassing Holyrood entirely. Promises made in The Vow on the eve of the 2014 independence referendum to deliver near-federal powers and respect Scottish decision-making have unravelled. READ MORE: SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action' The Internal Market Act has overridden devolved laws under the banner of market 'consistency'. Powers that returned from Brussels in areas like food standards, procurement, and agriculture were supposed to go to Holyrood, but in many cases they were retained by Westminster. The Sewel Convention, once a safeguard of devolved consent, has been treated as optional. Farage's proposal to scrap Barnett isn't an outlier, it's the natural conclusion of a decade-long pattern: cut services in England, shrink the Barnett allocation, bypass devolved institutions, and then blame the devolved nations for 'taking more than their share'. There's no consideration of fairness, or implementation of a needs-based analysis, it's a strategy of erosion; one that gouges out the Union from the centre while draping itself in the flag. The failures of justice in England, catastrophic as they are, expose a deeper injustice: the systematic unravelling of the constitutional promises made to Scotland. Ron Lumiere via email

British ‘service person' arrested on suspicion of ‘raping' woman near army training camp in Kenya
British ‘service person' arrested on suspicion of ‘raping' woman near army training camp in Kenya

Scottish Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

British ‘service person' arrested on suspicion of ‘raping' woman near army training camp in Kenya

A UK-Kenya defence cooperation agreement allows thousands of Brit soldiers to train in Kenya every year ARMY 'RAPE' British 'service person' arrested on suspicion of 'raping' woman near army training camp in Kenya Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A BRITISH "service person" has reportedly been arrested on suspicion of raping a woman near an army training camp in Kenya. The alleged rape happened last month, with the man arrested after a group of soldiers visited a bar in the area near the town of Nanyuki, BBC reports. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The incident occurred close to the British Army Training Unit Kenya (Batuk) 2 A Brit 'service person' has reportedly been arrested on suspicion of raping a woman near an army training camp in Kenya Credit: Getty Military cops have questioned the bar owner and security guards who were working the night of the incident that occurred close to the British Army Training Unit Kenya (Batuk), The Sunday Times reports. According to the paper, the bar owner said: "They [soldiers] like this place and when I meet some of them in the supermarkets, they tell me they have been banned from coming here. "Sometimes they get too drunk and I drop them at the gate for free." An investigation is being carried out by the UK military police from the Defence Serious Crime Unit. read more news HOLIDAY TRAGEDY Brit tourist, 21, found dead on street in popular Algarve resort The UK Ministry of Defence confirmed in a statement that a "service person" had been arrested in Kenya. A MoD spokesperson said in a statement: "We can confirm the arrest of a Service person in Kenya. "As the matter is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the Defence Serious Crime Command, we will not comment further." A UK-Kenya defence cooperation agreement allows thousands of Brit soldiers to train in the East African country every year. About 200 UK troops are based there permanently to train Kenyan soldiers. Some Kenyan people have complained for a long time about the soldiers behaviour alongside the atmosphere around their training camp near the town of Nanyuki. There was an outcry over the 2012 death of 21-year-old Agnes Wanjiru, who was last seen alive leaving a bar with British troops near their training camp. Bloodcurdling moment ruthless soldier cocks his gun & presses it against woman's temple during restaurant brawl Her body was tragically later found in a septic tank. Wanjirus family has campaigned for years for the suspected perpetrator, a serving British soldier at the time, to be charged. In April, UK Defense Secretary John Healey met with Wanjirus grieving family in Kenya and vowed to help the family secure the justice they deserve. The British Army has launched an inquiry into allegations of unacceptable behavior by UK personnel in Kenya. The MoD said in a statement that all British personnel in the country "have clear direction about how to behave, on and off duty, must complete mandatory training and attend compulsory briefings on conduct." It added: "We will have zero tolerance for unacceptable behaviour."

Declan Lynch: The BBC got us through endless Northern nights, Gerry Adams
Declan Lynch: The BBC got us through endless Northern nights, Gerry Adams

Belfast Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Declan Lynch: The BBC got us through endless Northern nights, Gerry Adams

The BBC is 'The British Broadcasting Corporation', but nobody calls it that except Gerry Adams. Again and again, very deliberately, as he savours his triumph in the recent libel action against 'The British Broadcasting Corporation', he gives it the full official title — almost as if the 'British' part has connotations of inherent badness. He claims that his purpose in taking the action was to 'put manners' on this British Broadcasting Corporation. There were even suggestions — later denied — that the BBC would consider blocking the transmission of its programmes in this country, rather than risk further exposure to our atrocious libel laws.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store