
Churches condemn arrest of nuns, demand immediate release
Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church raised concerns over the incident. Malankara Association secretary Biju Oommen said a trial by the mob, led by organisations with an extremist nature, was cruel.
"Our democratic society will differentiate between the approaches of persecuting in north India and appeasement bid in Kerala. The situation where minorities are not given the freedoms enshrined in the Constitution is worrying. The misuse of anti-conversion laws is becoming a recurring theme," he said. He demanded the immediate release of the two nuns.
Head of Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church Theodosius Mar Thoma metropolitan condemned the arrests, saying such incidents against nuns are a violation of fundamental rights and will weaken Indian democracy.
He urged for ensuring legal protection to the nuns and wanted them free at the earliest.
Bishop of Madhya Kerala diocese of Church of South India (CSI) Sabu Koshy Cherian strongly condemned the arrests and urged Centre to intervene in the matter. "CSI Church firmly believes that the central govt has the responsibility to allay fears of minorities here and the entire Christian community," he said. Cherian indicated that the issue came up in discussions between various churches and bishops in Kerala.
Kerala Council of Churches stated that the arrest of Malayali nuns in Chhattisgarh on charges of religious conversion and human trafficking is condemnable and a challenge to Indian secularism. In a joint statement, president Alexios Mar Eusebius metropolitan and general secretary Prakash P Thomas demanded Centre's urgent intervention.
"Making the general public communal and narrow-minded and denying them freedom of movement without fear is an insult to a secular and democratic nation.
Subjecting individuals, who are selflessly working in social service and nation-building, to mob trials in the name of religion, arresting them on false charges and imprisoning them is evidence of the legal system becoming biased," .
Meanwhile, Kerala Congress (Mani) on Monday organised marches across the state in protest against the arrests. At the state-level inauguration of the dharna in front of the post office in Kottayam, Job Michael, MLA, a member of the party's high-power committee, urged Prime Minister's immediate intervention to release both the nuns.
Kottayam MP Francis George submitted a memorandum to PM Narendra Modi and Chhattisgarh chief minister protesting the incident and demanding the nuns' release.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Lord Meghnad Desai passes away; PM Modi expresses anguish over demise of renowned economist and author
Lord Meghnad Desai, an eminent economist and House of Lords member, passed away on Tuesday. Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed anguish over Desai's death, stating how the economist 'played a role in deepening India-UK ties.' 'Anguished by the passing away of Shri Meghnad Desai Ji, a distinguished thinker, writer and economist. He always remained connected to India and Indian culture. He also played a role in deepening India-UK ties. Will fondly recall our discussions, where he shared his valuable insights. Condolences to his family and friends. Om Shanti," PM Modi posted on X, along with a photo of the prominent economist. Born in Gujarat's Vadodara, Meghnad Desai was the emeritus professor of Economics at the London School of Economics. In 1992, Desai established the Centre for the Study of Global Governance at the eminent institution. Sanjeev Sanyal, an economist and member of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Economic Advisory Council, also condoled Lord Meghnad Desai's death. 'Very sorry to hear that eminent economist Meghnad Desai has passed away. I had known him for over two decades. He was always cheerful and open to new ideas. I will cherish the many long discussions and debates that we had over the years. Om Shanti,' Sanjeev Sanyal posted on X. (This is a developing story. Keep checking for more updates)


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Daily subject-wise quiz: Polity and Governance MCQs on panchayat elections, Article 356 of the Constitution and more (Week 121)
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative of daily subject-wise quizzes. These quizzes are designed to help you revise some of the most important topics from the static part of the syllabus. Attempt today's subject quiz on Polity and Governance to check your progress. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at With reference to article 356 of the Constitution, consider the following statements: 1. According to the provisions of Article 356, the President's Rule in a state can be imposed for one month at a time. 2. It empowers the President to withdraw only legislative powers and not the executive powers and financial powers of any state. 3. Article 356 was inspired by the Government of India Act of 1909. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Explanation — The Union Home Minister moved a resolution in Rajya Sabha to extend the President's Rule in Manipur for another six months. Article 356 of the Indian Constitution contains provisions for the imposition of 'President's Rule' in a state, removing an elected government. — Article 356 was inspired by Section 93 of the Government of India Act of 1935. Hence, statement 3 is not correct. — Article 356 empowers the President to withdraw executive and legislative powers of any state 'if he is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution'. Hence, statement 2 is not correct. — According to the provisions of Article 356, the President's Rule in a state can be imposed for six months at a time for a maximum duration of three years. Every six months, Parliamentary approval to impose President's Rule will be required again. Hence, statement 1 is not correct. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer. Consider the following statements: 1. The Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes. 2. The quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament shall be one-fifth of the total number of members of the House. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Explanation — The Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes. Hence, statement 1 is correct. — Either House of Parliament has the authority to act despite any vacancy in its membership, and any proceedings in Parliament are valid even if it is later discovered that someone who was not entitled to do so sat, voted, or otherwise participated in the proceedings. — Until Parliament by law otherwise provides, the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament shall be one-tenth of the total number of members of the House. Hence, statement 2 is not correct. — If at any time during a meeting of a House there is no quorum, it shall be the duty of the Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, either to adjourn the House or to suspend the meeting until there is a quorum. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. (Source: Constitution of India) With reference to the panchayat elections, consider the following statements: 1. All the seats in a Panchayat shall be filled by persons chosen by indirect election. 2. The ratio between the population of the territorial area of a Panchayat at any level and the number of seats in such Panchayat to be filled by election varies throughout the state. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Explanation — There shall be constituted in every State, Panchayats at the village, intermediate and district levels. — Panchayats at the intermediate level may not be constituted in a State having a population not exceeding twenty lakhs. — The ratio of the population of a Panchayat's territorial area at whatever level to the number of seats to be filled by election shall, to the greatest extent possible, remain same throughout the State. Hence, statement 2 is not correct. — All seats in a Panchayat shall be filled by people elected directly from territorial constituencies in the Panchayat area. Hence, statement 1 is not correct. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer. (Other Source: Constitution of India) Consider the following statements about the Ninth Schedule: 1. The schedule became part of the Constitution by the Twenty-Seventh Amendment. 2. It contains a list of central and state laws that cannot be challenged in court on the violation of fundamental rights. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Explanation — The Ninth Schedule contains a list of central and state laws which cannot be challenged in court. Currently, 284 such laws are shielded from judicial review. — Most of the laws protected under the Schedule concern agriculture/land issues. — The Schedule became a part of the Constitution in 1951 when the document was amended for the first time. Hence, statement 1 is not correct. — It was created by the new Article 31B, which along with 31A was brought in by the government to protect laws related to agrarian reform and for abolishing the Zamindari system. While A. 31A extends protection to 'classes' of laws, A. 31B shields specific laws or enactments. — The First Amendment added 13 laws to the Schedule. Subsequent amendments in 1955, 1964, 1971, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1984, 1990, 1994, and 1999 have taken the number of protected laws to 284. — When the Tamil Nadu law was challenged in 2007 (I R Coelho v State of Tamil Nadu), the Supreme Court ruled in a unanimous nine-judge verdict that while laws placed under Ninth Schedule cannot be challenged on the grounds of violation of fundamental rights, they can be challenged on the ground of violating the basic structure of the Constitution. Hence, statement 2 is correct. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer. With reference to the preamble, consider the following statements: 1. The ideals behind the preamble were first laid down in the Objectives Resolution. 2. The preamble is 'non-justiciable'. 3. The 42nd Amendment to the Constitution replaced the words 'sovereign democratic republic' with 'sovereign socialist secular democratic republic'. How many of the statements given above are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Explanation — A preamble serves as an introduction to a document and contains its basic principles and goals. — When the Indian Constitution was being drafted, the ideals behind the preamble were first laid down in the Objectives Resolution, adopted by the Constituent Assembly in 1947. Hence, statement 1 is correct. — Additionally, the violation of any principle mentioned in the preamble cannot be a reason to go to court, meaning the preamble is 'non-justiciable' — however, judgments of courts can cite it as an additional factor in their reasoning, given that it constitutes the spirit of the Constitution. Hence, statement 2 is correct. — The 42nd Amendment to the Constitution, passed in 1976 when the Emergency was in place, replaced the words 'sovereign democratic republic' with 'sovereign socialist secular democratic republic'. Hence, statement 3 is correct. — The amendment also changed 'unity of the nation' to 'unity and integrity of the nation'. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer. Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 119) Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 120) Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 120) Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 120) Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 120) Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 120) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.


India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
From Sindoor to Sindhu, Pakistan taught a lesson: PM Modi in Lok Sabha
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who responded to the debate on Operation Sindoor in Lok Sabha, said that from Sindoor to Sindhu, Pakistan was taught a lesson during the operation. Speaking in Lok Sabha, PM Modi said," The world has seen the scale at which India can operate. From Sindoor to Sindhu, we struck Pakistan. Op Sindoor established that Pakistan and its terror leaders will have to pay a heavy price for such attacks. PM Modi again reiterated Centre's claims that Pakistan pleaded for a ceasefire with India and no world leader asked to stop counter-terror operation, Operation Sindoor.