Former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte arrested on ICC warrant, presidential office says
Members of the Philippine National Police met the former president as he arrived in Manila, the capital, on a flight from Hong Kong, the office said.
"The former President and his entourage are in good health and have been examined by government doctors," the office said in a statement posted on social media in Filipino. "They have assured that he is in good condition."
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
ABC News' Joe Simonetti contributed to this report.
Former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte arrested on ICC warrant, presidential office says originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
City of Vancouver to move roadside memorial to festival victims to cemetery site
Women pause at a memorial during a vigil on a provincial day of mourning for the victims of the vehicle-ramming attack at the Filipino community's Lapu Lapu Day festival last week, in Vancouver, on Friday, May 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck DD flag wire: true flag sponsored: false article_type: : sWebsitePrimaryPublication : publications/hamilton_spectator bHasMigratedAvatar : false :
Time Magazine
3 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Why Alaska? The Symbolism of Holding the Trump-Putin Summit In The Frontier State
When Russian President Vladimir Putin touches down in Alaska on Friday to discuss ending the war in Ukraine with U.S. President Donald Trump, he'll be landing in a former Russian colony that still carries deep historic ties to his homeland. The 'Frontier State' is geographically the closest point between the U.S. and Russia, divided by the Bering Strait and resting just 55 miles away from the European country. But beyond making the U.S. and Russia neighbors, Alaska has been the site of both cooperation and conflict between the two nations beginning, in part, with the purchase of the 49th state from the Russian empire. 'The symbolism of Alaska would be a reminder of how it was possible for the United States and Russia for most of the 19th century to transcend their ideological and political differences and their expansionisms, to have warm, friendly cooperative relations,' says David S. Foglesong, a history professor at Rutgers University - New Brunswick. That is not to say that the summit was chosen solely for symbolic reasons. Putin is barred from entering the 125 countries that are parties to the Rome Statute due to an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant issued against him for war crimes. 'No other country wants them to have this meeting on their territory,' says Lee Farrow, professor and chair of Auburn University at Montgomery's history and world culture department. Farrow is also the author of Seward's Folly: A New Look at the Alaska Purchase, and other titles about Russian-U.S. relations. 'It's going to be easier to manage strategically from a safety standpoint, and Putin doesn't have to be worried about getting arrested by some kind of international court.' While experts doubt a resolution on ending the war can come from the in-person meeting—especially since Ukraine is not participating—the hope is that the U.S. can reestablish a working channel with Russia, recalling a period when dialogue and cautious cooperation were possible. 'If Donald Trump is trying to be the mediator of this,' says Farrow, 'Alaska is the perfect place to resurrect that friendship for the sake of world peace.' Ukraine has been at war since Russia's illegal invasion in 2022. Friday's summit marks the first meeting between the leaders of the U.S. and Russia since the 2021 meeting between U.S. President Joe Biden and Putin in Geneva. Alaska as a former Russian colony Political tensions between Russia and the U.S. have worsened in recent decades, but relations were historically much friendlier, even before the purchase of Alaska, which was a Russian colony for more than 65 years. U.S. officials and politicians viewed Russia as one of its closest European powers after Russian fleets traveled to New York and San Francisco in 1863, during the U.S. Civil War. Shared political upheaval also united the two nations. 'There was this common feeling of sympathy about the loss of leaders or the attempted assassination of a leader,' says Farrow, pointing to the 1865 assassination of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln and 1866 assassination attempt of Russian Emperor Alexander II. Russia, overstretched by its own expansion, opted to sell Alaska for $7.2 million, favoring the U.S. over Britain, which it still regarded as its primary rival. 'Russia preferred to have Alaska go to what it considered a friendly power, like the United States, rather than to have it possibly fall into the hands of an unfriendly power like Britain, which Russia continued to regard as really enemy number one,' says Foglesong. Today, remnants of Russian influence remain in the northernmost U.S. state. Russian Orthodox churches can be found in Anchorage and Sitka, the latter of which was once the capital of Russian America. Alaskan Creoles, descendants of Russians and Alaskan natives, are also still present in the state. And some Alaskan towns still have Russian-derived names, such as Ninilchik. Alaska has played a big role in previous conflicts with Russia Alaska also played a significant role during the World Wars, delivering thousands of aircrafts to the then-Soviet Union in World War II on ferries that traveled through the Bering Strait. Symbolically, Alaska later became the 'first line of defense' at the end of the Cold War, according to Brandon Boylan, a professor of political science and director of Arctic and northern studies at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. 'The thinking was that if the Soviets were going to attack the U.S., they would do so over the North Pole,' he says. A defense radar system was set up in Alaska to detect bombs and missiles amid concerns of a nuclear war. Today, Alaska and Russia share overlapping interests in the Arctic Circle. Both nations participate in the Arctic Council—though some of their work has been temporarily paused due to Russia's invasion—and maintain a history of scientific collaboration. Alaska's proximity to Russia also gives it strategic significance for Arctic energy resources, shipping routes, and climate research, factors that could shape the Trump-Putin talks around access to critical minerals and energy supplies—resources that Ukraine's conflict has made increasingly pivotal for global markets. Call for return of Alaska to Russia Some Russian nationalists, including politicians, have called for the U.S. to give Alaska back to Russia. 'There certainly has long been this kind of story floating around that somehow Russia should never have lost Alaska in the first place, that it wasn't a 100% legitimate deal,' says Farrow. The calls from Russian nationalists echo some of Putin's efforts to take control of Ukraine. Farrow adds that many of Putin's actions are part of an 'attempt to regain lost glory and to establish some kind of new identity and new legacy for Russia,' including trying to reclaim lost territory, such as Crimea and parts of Ukraine. Experts generally view these calls for the return of Alaska as an empty threat, but caution against what the Russian nationalist sentiment signals. 'It reminds Alaskans, and all Americans, that Alaska is still a part of Russian national consciousness,' says Boylan. Either way, some experts note that the summit in and of itself is a win for Russia, who gets to partake in negotiations without the presence of Ukraine. In fact, some may view the upcoming meeting with Trump as a way to recognize Russia's power. 'There's a long history of Russians looking to the United States for affirmation of Russia's status,' Foglesong says.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Could Vladimir Putin Be Arrested in Alaska?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As Russian President Vladimir Putin prepares to meet President Donald Trump in Alaska for a high-stakes summit on the war in Ukraine on Friday, one question is ricocheting across social media: Could the Russian leader, who is under indictment at The Hague, theoretically be arrested the moment he sets foot on U.S. soil? Putin's arrival in Alaska on August 15 will mark his first visit to the United States in a decade and his first non-UN visit since 2007. The summit is expected to place Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson outside Anchorage starting about 11:30 a.m. local time. Putin's visit has sparked a wave of calls for his arrest. Social media users and experts alike have urged the U.S. to act, but under both international and domestic law, it has no obligation to enforce an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant against the Russian leader. What Has the ICC Accused Vladimir Putin of Doing? On March 17, 2023, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia's commissioner for children's rights. The court alleges they are responsible for the unlawful deportation and transfer of children from occupied areas of Ukraine to Russia—acts defined as war crimes under international law. The charges claim Putin either directly ordered the deportations or failed to prevent them as Lvova-Belova's superior. Why the US Wouldn't Arrest Putin Despite ICC Warrant Despite the accusations, U.S. law provides no grounds to detain Putin. The U.S. signed the Rome Statute, the treaty establishing the ICC, under President Bill Clinton in 2000, but never ratified it. In 2002, President George W. Bush withdrew the U.S. as a signatory entirely. In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state owned Sputnik agency Russian President Vladimir Putin disembarks his plane as he arrives in Yakutsk on June 18, 2024. In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state owned Sputnik agency Russian President Vladimir Putin disembarks his plane as he arrives in Yakutsk on June 18, 2024. Photo by Sergei KARPUKHIN / POOL / AFP Since then, successive administrations—from Barack Obama to Donald Trump and Joe Biden—have kept the U.S. outside the ICC's jurisdiction. Trump went a step further, sanctioning ICC officials and openly discrediting the court's legitimacy. Russia has similarly rejected the ICC, calling the warrant politically motivated and threatening symbolic retaliation. Neither Moscow nor Washington recognizes the authority of The Hague-based tribunal. What Countries Are Members of the International Criminal Court? As of mid-2025, 125 countries are parties to the Rome Statute. These include: All nations in South America Nearly all of Europe Most of Oceania About half of Africa Notably absent from the list are the United States, Russia, China, Israel and Saudi Arabia. How the ICC Enforces Arrest Warrants—And Why It Often Falls Short The ICC lacks its own enforcement arm. It relies entirely on its 125 member states to carry out arrests and transfer suspects to The Hague. If a nation is not party to the Rome Statute—like the U.S. or Russia—the court must depend on voluntary cooperation, which typically doesn't materialize. Even among ICC signatories, enforcement can be inconsistent. In 2024, Mongolia—an ICC member—hosted Putin during an official visit and failed to arrest him. The court reprimanded Mongolia, but no punitive action followed. It's part of a broader trend that has undercut the ICC's authority in recent years. Netanyahu's Parallel Legal Shadow Putin isn't the only sitting leader facing prosecution at The Hague. In November 2024, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The court alleges war crimes and crimes against humanity stemming from Israel's military operations in Gaza, including the use of starvation and attacks on civilian infrastructure. An honor guard greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his visit with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán on April 3 in Budapest. Orbán invited Netanyahu despite an outstanding arrest warrant for him from the... An honor guard greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his visit with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán on April 3 in Budapest. Orbán invited Netanyahu despite an outstanding arrest warrant for him from the International Criminal Court over alleged war crimes in Gaza. During the visit, Hungary announced its withdrawal from the ICC. Orbán later called it 'political' and 'no longer an impartial court.' More Janos Kummer/Getty Netanyahu has called the charges "absurd and false," labeling the ICC's action antisemitic. Israeli President Isaac Herzog defended the country's actions, arguing that the court ignores Hamas' use of human shields and Israel's right to self-defense. Like Putin, Netanyahu has faced no consequences from ICC member states. During a 2025 visit to Hungary—a Rome Statute signatory—he was not arrested. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said the warrant "would have no effect" and later announced Hungary's intent to leave the ICC.
