Royal Marine says he was arrested and treated like a terrorist after complaining that women on the front line will make unit 'unrecognisable, weak and compromised'
In a highly unusual move the man - who MailOnline understands is serving in 43 Commando protecting Britain's nuclear submarines in Scotland - took to social media to air his concerns.
The Faslane-based Marine feared top brass in the elite strike force were potentially lowering fitness standards for female recruits seeking to earn a coveted green beret.
The man claimed lives could be at risk should Britain go to war with female marines serving in front-line units.
He also said up to 1,000 of his fellow Marines had signed a private petition calling on military bosses to tackle so-called diversity, equality and inclusion policies which were in danger of creating a 'weakened and compromised version of the corps'.
The unnamed Marine's comments have been heavily rebuked by both the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and veterans minister Al Carns, who have insisted there has been no lowering of standards for recruits seeking to become a commando.
Defence sources added no females have yet reached the standard to pass the arduous 32-week course to become a Royal Marine, since the ban on women serving in the unit was lifted more than six years ago.
And that so far, only seven have passed the shorter, nine-week All Arms Commando course, with those who earned their green beret going into support roles, not direct front-line combat positions, MailOnline understands.
My Royal Marine brother is being silenced by the UK government for speaking out about dangerous DEI policies that he feels will result in the death of Marines.
HERE'S WHAT THE ROYAL MARINE PETITION SAID: https://t.co/DQq5DrJHQd #royalmarines #DEI #UK #Marines @timdavies_uk … pic.twitter.com/osW5XkN7C2
— Plastic Scot (@PlasticScot) April 25, 2025
A Royal Marine has raised fears about female recruits being allowed to join frontline commando units
However, in the private letter to military chiefs, it is claimed some female recruits at the Commando Training Centre in Devon were being 'artificially pushed through training', leading to women getting 'unearned paper passes'.
In a 32-minute video posted online, the unnamed Marine said: 'We believe that we have the high standards that we keep for [a] very important reason, which is to prevent Marines from being killed in dangerous situations when we go to war... We are concerned that those standards are being dropped.'
The commando alleges he was treated like a 'terrorist and criminal' after reportedly raising his concerns about the fitness standards of female recruits with his bosses.
He also claimed that after complaining to his chain of command he was arrested and briefly held by police under counter-terrorism laws.
In the video, the Marine says: 'I ask them: "Am I being detained?" They say: "No, you're not being detained, but we're holding you here under the Terrorism Act". And I'm just shaking my head in this instance. And I said: "Have I committed any acts of terrorism? Am I expected to commit any acts of terrorism?" And they said: "No, we have you here because of your views."
After questioning, the commando was allowed to return to his duties. However, he was later detained for questioning under counter-terrorism legislation.
The Marine claimed officers from Police Scotland were waiting for him at immigration when he arrived at a Scottish airport after his family holiday.
According to the Telegraph, sources in Whitehall claimed the man was grilled by cops over concerns he may be linked with 'extreme far-right politics'.
It adds that sources claimed the Marine was never arrested, nor was he charged with any offence. He has since returned to his duties.
Women have been allowed to serve in frontline combat roles since a ban was lifted by former Tory prime minister David Cameron in 2016.
Two years later, Gavin Williamson - the then defence secretary - announced all roles in the military would be open to women, which included frontline positions in the special forces, Royal Marines and Parachute Regiment.
However, the MoD has insisted women still have to pass all the same exhaustive fitness tests male recruits do and that there has been no lowering of standards.
'The standard for selection into the commandos has not changed and there is no intended change planned,' a defence source told MailOnline. 'Regardless of gender, they all still have to reach the same standards.'
They added: 'We're looking for the best people and only the best will pass. Why shouldn't women be Royal Marines, if they're able to pass all required fitness tests?'
But according to the commando, there is widespread concern within the corps about female trainees being given favourable treatment during training.
He said he set up a survey online to garner the sense of feeling among his comrades - one which he claims about 1,000 Marines signed.
In his video, the man adds: 'That survey exploded in the Royal Marines. Within 24 hours, I can tell you that nearly a thousand people had signed up [to] that survey. Now why do I say within 24 hours? Because within 24 hours it was deleted. That survey was taken down.'
He later accused the MoD of launching a 'full-on witch hunt', claiming his bosses tried to blame the petition on 'Russian bots' before launching a probe into who set it up.
Marines were meant to 'feel like they would go to jail' if they did no give up the commando's identity to superiors, he added. It later led to him handing himself into his chain of command, the commando said.
He claims he was then flown to MoD HQ in London for what he describes as a 'two-hour' interrogation.
'They tell me that they deal with security leaks,' he continues in his video. 'And they essentially try and make what is a genuine issue look like it was just some uppity Marines that are just being sexist, being evil... It's absurd because we wrote that in the survey, that we were concerned that... we will be painted as sexists.
'And that is exactly how they treated us. Telling me that I should be concerned for my career. Telling me that I should comply for the sake of myself and my family.'
The claims has sparked a fierce debate on social media.
Responding to it, veterans minister and former special forces operator, Al Carns, insisted standards to get into the Marines would never be compromised.
Mr Carns - who was awarded a Military Cross in 2011 for gallantry during his tour of Afghanistan and is a Colonel in the Royal Marine Reserve - said: 'I know the dedication, drive and grit required to complete the arduous Commando tests… I speak from experience.
'I have completed the Commando course not once, but twice; first as a Marine and then again as a Young Officer I therefore want to be very clear that the standards expected to pass the Royal Marines Commando Course have not, and will not change.
'I therefore want to be very clear that the standards expected to pass the Royal Marines Commando Course have not, and will not change. An issue close to every Royal Marines' heart, and something I track very closely.'
MailOnline understands that entry standards to the Royal Marines are higher now than 30 years ago.
Recruits still have to complete an arduous series of tests, which concludes in a 30-mile speed march carrying 40lb of kit, during their 32 weeks of basic training.
A defence source insisted the man, although part of 43 Commando Fleet Protection Group, does not have access to sensitive equipment based on nuclear submarines
An MoD spokesman said: 'Royal Marine commando selection standards have not changed, and the same high standards apply to every recruit.
'This issue is subject to an ongoing investigation, so we are unable to comment further at this stage.
'We expect the highest standards of all our service personnel. We are committed to investigating any allegation of behaviour that could bring the Armed Forces into disrepute.'
The MoD also denies that as many as 1,000 Marines backed the petition.
It added it does not tolerate extremism and works with the Home Office and police forces to prevent individuals from being drawn into extremism and to investigate any suspicious activity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Unspun: Scotland's Defence bill & the independence debate
Defence is one of the main issues at the heart of Scotland's constitutional debate and a row over the price tag attached to it has become a political battleground. For decades, warships built in Glasgow, nuclear weapons on the Clyde and RAF jets patrolling the skies have symbolised Scotland's significant role in UK defence. And as the 'UK's defence hub', Scotland has naturally seen the political discourse surrounding the topic play out vividly. The most recent Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) report, published last week, has reignited the debate. The Scottish Government says Scotland contributes £2.1 billion a year towards defence, based on its share of the UK population. Shona Robison argues that GERS allocates Scotland a 'population share' of reserved UK spending rather than accounting for real expenditure. Yet, the Secretary of State for Scotland, Labour's Ian Murray, describes the Scottish Government £2.1 billion figure as 'wholly misleading' and has said it 'fundamentally misrepresents how the defence of our nation works'. Westminster points to official GERS figures that allocate a much higher £5.1 billion when nuclear submarines, overseas operations, and procurement are included. Economists from the Fraser of Allander Institute suggest the Scottish Government £2.1 billion figure comes from a Ministry of Defence report which only covers transactions with UK-based companies, excluding overseas purchases or research and development that may benefit the sector. For the SNP, the lower figure helps bolster the case that Scotland could fund its own defence force while still investing more in areas such as health, education, and welfare. For Unionists, the £5.1bn estimate underlines the scale of protection provided by being part of the UK, and the challenge of replicating it in an independent state. As with so much in Scotland's constitutional debate, the fight is not really about statistics. It is about competing visions of sovereignty, security, and national priorities. The defence debate is also about livelihoods. Thousands of jobs are tied to the UK's nuclear deterrent at Faslane and Coulport and the MOD contracts sustain Scotland's naval construction industry. At RAF Lossiemouth, secure and well-paid employment supports many in a rural area. Then there's the planned £250 million redevelopment of Faslane which could create even more jobs. An independent Scotland could not guarantee the same scale of investment, at least in the short term. Supporters of independence argue jobs could be redirected into conventional defence forces and shipbuilding for Scotland's own navy. However, critics warn of potential economic shock if UK contracts were lost. READ MORE FROM UNSPUN: Opposition parties accuse the SNP of 'cooking the books,' using a narrow calculation to make independence look more affordable. The SNP counters that Westminster deliberately inflates costs to portray Scotland as dependent. Either way, the row highlights a recurring problem: independence cannot be debated without first agreeing on what the numbers actually mean. As long as two different sets of figures circulate, both sides can claim victory for their own arguments. Defence is about more than money. It is about identity, alliances, and Scotland's place in the world. Would Scots accept higher taxes to maintain a credible military? Could an independent Scotland sit in NATO while rejecting nuclear weapons? These are not abstract questions. They will shape the arguments going into the 2026 Holyrood election. And just as the independence referendum in 2014 was shaped by doubts over currency and oil, the next debate may well turn on the price tag of defence.
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
China's Communist Party is 'behind spate of takeovers' of British private schools - with more than 30 now in hands of foreign investors
China 's Communist Party is behind a spate of takeovers of British private schools, officials believe - with more than 30 bought by Chinese investors in the past decade. Department of Education and security officials are reportedly concerned by the trend - while sources claim they have been hindered by a failure to recognise China as a country which poses a risk to the UK's national security. A senior government source said China is 'playing the long game' by targeting private schools, adding that the country is 'doing all the things we used to do as an empire'. They told The Times: 'They targeted universities before but have realised it's easier to start younger. It's ideological warfare. These children will grow up and be helpful to the Communist Party.' Labour MP Phil Brickell, who sits on the foreign affairs committee, warned the UK's 'world-leading education system is an obvious target for influence' for China. He claimed previous governments have 'misunderstood' China's strategic threat, adding the current one must ensure British interests are protected. Analysis published in 2024 by Beijing-based company Venture Education said the demand among Chinese families for British education was the main reason behind the purchasing of schools. Labour MP Phil Brickell (pictured), who sits on the foreign affairs committee, warned the UK's 'world-leading education system is an obvious target for influence' for China The schools listed by Venture include Thetford Grammar School, which was founded in 1566 and is now owned by China Financial Services Holdings. Meanwhile, Wisbech Grammar, founded in 1379 and bought by Access Education, is also on the list. Some all girls' schools have begun accepting boys after their acquisition, including Abbots Bromley and Ipswich High School. Malvern St James was purchased in February, and a month later announced it would accept boys so it would appeal to the 'overseas international boarding market'. Venture Education's managing director Julian Fisher previously said: 'Surprisingly the application of VAT has increased interest from Asian investors, especially Chinese who generally see rupture as a time for opportunity. 'But most are wary of the current uncertainty and plan to hold off on any short-term deals; preferring instead to wait and see which are the highest ranked schools that might be available for sale.' He insisted that the only choices these private schools have is 'taking Chinese investment, staying open, giving consistent education to its existing students' or closing. Sir Keir Starmer has resisted pressure from security services to put China on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme (FIRS). The scheme is set up to track people working for hostile states in the UK. A Government spokesperson said: 'All independent schools must adhere to the Independent School Standards. 'This includes to actively promote the fundamental British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs. 'The Department for Education is the regulator of independent schools and can and will take enforcement action where the standards are not being met.'
Times
9 hours ago
- Times
Lisa Nandy in new cronyism row after charity choice for project
A charity with close links to the Labour Party received taxpayers' money to carry out a culture department research project, only a few months after a former trustee became the culture secretary's special adviser, The Times can reveal. Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, announced a 'listening exercise' to form a new national youth strategy shortly after scrapping the National Citizen Service, a coalition-era project for 16 to 17-year-olds. A £282,395 contract was awarded to the market research company Savanta in February to conduct further research into what young people wanted from the strategy. Savanta in turn sub-contracted the small London-based charity My Life My Say to run a series of workshops asking young people what they wanted from the new strategy. Nandy's special adviser, Harjeet Sahota, served as a trustee at the My Life My Say for three years, until she resigned on August 28 after joining Nandy as a political adviser in the culture department under the new Labour government. My Life My Say was founded in 2013 by Mete Coban, the deputy mayor of London for the environment and energy. Sahota served as a trustee at the same time that she was head of external relations for Sir Keir Starmer, then leader of the opposition. Before that she worked for Sir Sadiq Khan's re-election campaign in 2020. Sources said information about the appointment of My Life My Say — which would usually be shared within the department — was not disclosed in the case of the 'listening exercise'. They also flagged concerns about the involvement of the charity UK Youth in the delivery of the new strategy. In January 2025 a director of the charity was seconded into Nandy's department to lead development of the new youth strategy. In March, UK Youth was announced as a partner alongside My Life My Say in the consultation exercise. It is not known how much was received by either My Life My Say or UK Youth through Savanta for the delivery of the contract. UK Youth is a much larger charity and received about £16 million in income during the last financial year, compared with less than £400,000 for My Life My Say. A government official said Sahota logged her past involvement with My Life My Say and recused herself from the procurement process. New procurement legislation, which came into effect in February, forces ministers and their advisers to declare potential conflicts of interest when their department awards contracts. Procurement experts have also called for more transparency so that the government publishes the details of companies and organisations that have been subcontracted to work on government projects. Ben Paxton, a senior researcher at the Institute for Government think tank, said: 'The lack of visibility of the supply chain can limit accountability, particularly where conflicts of interest may be a concern. 'It's crucial for all public procurement that the proper process is followed, to ensure government is meeting the ultimate aim of delivering the best services for the best price possible.' A DCMS spokesman said: 'In order to undertake one of the largest government listening exercises with young people in a generation, DCMS appointed Savanta as the project's lead delivery partner through an open, fair and competitive tender process in line with government procurement guidance. The details of this procurement are publicly available on Contracts Finder. 'My Life My Say is a sub-contractor to Savanta, with all payments managed through Savanta rather than directly by DCMS. Robust conflict of interest procedures were followed throughout. No individuals with declared conflicts of interest were involved in the procurement process, which was delivered through the department's commercial team following standard procedures.' A spokesman for the charity said: 'My Life My Say is an award-winning youth-led charity, recognised by successive governments for our work championing young people's voices. As a leading youth engagement charity in the UK, we are proud to have partnered with Savanta on one of the largest national listening exercises with young people ever conducted in the UK to help shape the national youth strategy. 'While we are aware of our former trustee Harjeet Sahota's role at DCMS, we can confirm that Harjeet voluntarily stepped down as a trustee in August 2024 and has had no discussions in regards to this contract with staff at My Life My Say.' • Labour vowed to end cronyism. Unless they're Labour cronies Labour has faced allegations of 'cronyism' in recent weeks, after one of the party's pre-election donors won contracts worth millions of pounds. Tech consultancy Public Digital seconded one of its partners to work for Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, in the months leading up the election to help write Labour's tech policies. The donation was registered as being worth £100,000 and the partner, Emily Middleton, was given a senior civil service role in Kyle's department just weeks after the election. The company has gone on to win £10.2 million of contracts since Labour entered office to transform a series of different IT systems, which the government says followed all procurement rules.
