Trump admin tries to kill the most indisputable evidence of human-caused climate change by shuttering observatory
The Mauna Loa laboratory in Hawaii has measured atmospheric carbon dioxide, which — along with other planet-warming pollution — has led directly to climate change, driving sea level rise, supercharging weather and destroying food systems.
The president's budget proposal would also defund many other climate labs, including instrument sites comprising the US government's greenhouse gas monitoring network, which stretches from northern Alaska to the South Pole.
But it's the Mauna Loa laboratory that is the most prominent target of the President Donald Trump's climate ire, as measurements that began there in 1958 have steadily shown CO2's upward march as human activities have emitted more and more of the planet-warming gas each year.
The curve produced by the Mauna Loa measurements is one of the most iconic charts in modern science, known as the Keeling Curve, after Charles David Keeling, who was the researcher who painstakingly collected the data. His son, Ralph Keeling, a professor at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego, now oversees collecting and updating that data.
Today, the Keeling Curve measurements are made possible by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric administration, but the data gathering and maintenance of the historical record also is funded by Schmidt Sciences and Earth Networks, according to the Keeling Curve website.
In the event of a NOAA shut down of the lab, Scripps could seek alternate sources of funding to host the instruments atop the same peak or introduce a discontinuity in the record by moving the instruments elsewhere in Hawaii.
In 1958, when the Keeling Curve began, the concentration of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere was 313 parts per million. In 2024, that had risen to 424.61 ppm, and this year, monthly average CO2 levels at Mauna Loa exceeded 430 ppm for the first time.
The proposal to shut down Mauna Loa had been made public previously but was spelled out in more detail on Monday when NOAA submitted a budget document to Congress. It made more clear that the Trump administration envisions eliminating all climate-related research work at NOAA, as had been proposed in Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for overhauling the government.
It would do this in large part by cutting NOAA's Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research entirely, including some labs that are also involved in improving weather forecasting.
NOAA has long been one of the world's top climate science agencies, but the administration would steer it instead towards being more focused on operational weather forecasting and warning responsibilities.
CNN has reached out to NOAA and Scripps for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
8 minutes ago
- CBS News
Fake scientific publications are a serious and growing problem, Northwestern University researchers say
Published scientific research fuels the breakthroughs that shape our world — but what happens when that research is totally fake? Researchers at Northwestern University said the number of junk scientific publications is growing, and bad actors are profiting. "These people are ruining it for all of us," said Northwestern University researcher and professor of engineering science and applied math Luís Amaral. Amaral and fellow Northwestern researcher Reese Richardson said they have always known there were fake scientific studies floating around. But it wasn't until they started studying the issue — with the help of several helpful sleuths — that they discovered the problem was much bigger than anyone thought. They showed CBS News Chicago four research papers on four different types of cells — but the papers all "borrowed" the same set of images. "We did this analysis, and we found out something that was extraordinarily scary," said Amaral. "Essentially, the number of fraudulent papers is doubling every year and a half." Amaral and Richardson's study on the problem was published earlier this month. In a nutshell, the publication of fraudulent science is outpacing the publication of legitimate science. "Everywhere we looked, we were seeing indications that there was systematic fraud being produced," Richardson said. But why would anyone spend the time publishing fake research? Amaral and Richardson say there are two main reasons. The first is buying a reputation. "They do this out in the open," said Richardson. "It is not hard to find paper-mill advertisements at all." Amaral and Richardson showed CBS News Chicago hundreds of advertisements that have appeared online — asking for anywhere from $100 a publication to about $3,000 in exchange for authorship. The second reason for the fakes is to push for a certain point of view — for example, backing a dietary supplement for financial gain. "So there are lots of people with a point of view, and it has become very easy for them to make it appear like there are hundreds of experts, thousands of publications that are very highly cited about all of these," said Amaral. In a 2024 post on his blog, Richardson specifically cited an example of how a researcher with a financial interest in the turmeric industry was able to push fake research on the benefits of turmeric. Richardson wrote that Bharat Aggarwal, who worked at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston from 1989 to 2015, authored more than 120 articles about the compound curcumin in turmeric — claiming that it therapeutic potential for cancers, Alzheimer's disease, and most recently, COVID-19. At first, MD Anderson seemed to endorse Aggarwal's research, and the FAQ page on the cancer center's website even recommended that visitors buy curcumin wholesale from a company that paid Aggarwal as a speaker, Richardson wrote. But in 2012, MD Anderson Cancer Center launched a research fraud probe against Aggarwal, which led to the retraction of 30 articles — some of them about curcumin, Richardson wrote. Still, while Aggarwal retired from MD Anderson in 2015, he has gone on authoring articles and appearing at conferences, Richardson wrote. Curcumin does not work well as a treatment for any disease, Richardson wrote. But even though Aggarwal's research has been discredited, the volume of studies published on curcumin keeps growing — and they also often show signs of fraud, Richardson wrote. Amaral and Richardson say they're raising the red flag about the fakes now — at a time when the future of federal funding for some legitimate science is uncertain. "There is only greater competition, and a more scarce pool of resources, for scientists to use and do genuine science," said Richardson. "If actually, there is an entire stream of research that is actually making false claims… it puts all of our health at risk," added Amaral. The authors argue their findings should serve as a wake-up call to the scientific community, which needs to act before we all lose confidence in the scientific process.
CNN
38 minutes ago
- CNN
CNN10 11-year-old becomes youngest American to summit Matterhorn
Today on CNN10: We learn about a new technology that could safely remove unwanted drones from the airspace around sporting events, concerts and eventually-- war zones. Then, we get an update on how to watch the year's most popular meteor shower, before taking a historical stroll through the White House Rose Garden. Plus, we'll meet an 11-year-old boy who just became the youngest American to summit Matterhorn in the Alps. All this and more on today's CNN10!
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Man Steals $21M of Lunar Rocks from NASA to Use During Sex After Promising His Girlfriend the Moon
Thad Roberts, 48, was sentenced to eight years in prisonNEED TO KNOW Former NASA intern Thad Roberts and several accomplices stole 17 pounds of moon rocks from NASA in 2002 The scheme included authentic NASA badges, rewriting security cameras and Neoprene bodysuits to avoid setting off thermal alarms Roberts and his girlfriend had sex atop the rocks: "No one had ever had sex on the moon before," he saidThe most out-of-this-world heist occurred just over 23 years ago, which ultimately led to sex on the moon — literally. In July 2002, NASA intern Thad Roberts, his girlfriend of three weeks and another friend stole 17 pounds of moon rocks and a meteorite from Houston's Johnson Space Center in a daring dead-of-the-night burglary. The crime involved authentic NASA badges, rewriring security cameras and Neoprene bodysuits to avoid setting off thermal alarms. It took NASA several days to notice the missing 601-pound safe containing an estimated $21 million worth of moon rocks from every lunar landing from 1969 to 1972. Roberts, the brains behind the heist, was 24 years old when he arrived at NASA, having completed a triple degree in physics, geology and geophysics at the University of Utah. Eventually, Roberts met Tiffany Fowler, a 22-year-old who worked in NASA's tissue culture laboratory, conducting stem cell research. They began a relationship and moved in together within three weeks. Not long after, he told her about his idea to steal moon rocks, which was said to have intrigued her. 'I was in love with Tiffany,' he told the LA Times in 2004. 'In my mind, I was thinking, 'Baby, I'd give you the moon.' It would be a romantic start to our relationship.' When Fowler agreed to be an accomplice, the duo grabbed a third person, Shae Saur, also a NASA intern, to help. One July evening, the three interns pulled up to Building 31, where the moon rocks were being housed. Roberts, now 48, and Fowler headed into the building, while Saur reportedly served as a lookout and watched the rewired cameras. The couple donned Neoprene bodysuits, went straight into the airless room and fled with the safe, which was cracked using a power saw. "In my own head, stealing something wasn't the way I looked at it," Roberts told CBS in 2012. "We weren't going to take this money we were getting from it to go buy a yacht or lots of cars or a big house. We were gonna live just the small kind of lifestyle we were, but fund science that might change the world, you know?' Asked why he went through with he heist, he said, "I mean, the simple answer is to say that I did it for love. I did it because I wanted to be loved. I wanted someone to know that I'd literally cared about them that much. And to have the symbol there to remind them of it." Using the defense that he was essentially a fool in love, Roberts has argued that the theft wasn't financially motivated, but the FBI said otherwise, indicating he had been in contact with a buyer from Belgium, who was willing to pay the asking price of $1,000 to $5,000 per gram. The buyer, though, got suspicious and contacted the FBI, who quickly sent undercover agents to Orlando, where the sale was set to take place. On July 20, 2002, the 33rd anniversary of the first moon walk, Roberts and Fowler drove from Houston to Orlando to meet with the buyer. About an hour before the sale, though, Roberts had an idea. "I take some of the moon rocks, and I put 'em underneath the blanket in the bed," he said. He and Fowler then had sex. 'I never said anything, but I'm sure she could feel it. She never said anything directly, either, but it was more about the symbol of what we were doing — you know, basically having sex on the moon,' he told CBS. 'It's more uncomfortable than not, but it wasn't about the comfort at that point. It was about the expression. And no one had ever had sex on the moon before. I think we can safely say that.' Roberts' luck ran out shortly at the meeting with the undercover agents, who placed him and Flower in handcuffs. Authorities nabbed Saur later that day, and a fourth accomplice, Gordon McWhorter, who helped find the Belgian buyer, was also arrested. Still, the FBI said the rocks are now 'virtually useless to the scientific community.' A press release added, 'They also destroyed three decades worth of handwritten research notes by a NASA scientist that had been locked in the safe.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Roberts pleaded guilty in 2002 to stealing moon rocks. He also admitted to stealing dinosaur bones and fossils from the Natural History Museum in Salt Lake City while he was attending the University of Utah, the Deseret News reported. He was released two years early from prison in 2008 after serving more than six years of an eight-year sentence. Fowler and Saur pleaded guilty and were given 180 days of house arrest, 150 hours of community service, a three-year prohibition, and ordered to pay more than $9,000 in restitution to NASA. McWhorter was found guilty in trial and received a six-year prison sentence. Roberts and Fowler reportedly never saw each other again. The story was documented in Ben Mezrich's 2011 book, Sex on the Moon. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
