Russia To Build Eight Nuclear Power Plants In Iran
It's been no secret that Russia has been getting more heavily involved in Iran's nuclear program, and interestingly at a moment Moscow has offered to mediate between Washington and Tehran on the question of uranium enrichment and a new nuclear monitoring deal.
On Monday, in a surprise headline given the massive, ambitious scope, Iranian state sources have said Russia will construct eight nuclear power plants in Iran, two of which are already under construction.
'Russia is contracted to build eight nuclear power plants in Iran, including four in the southern city of Bushehr,' Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesman for the national security and foreign policy committee, announced on Monday.
This marks a monumental leap forward in the Iran-Russia relationship, after the two have deepened military cooperation in relation to the Ukraine war (where Russian forces have heavily relied on Iranian Shahed drones), given that a mere several years ago, Moscow was not even ready to sell Iran nuclear fuel.
But EIGHT? Some critics have denounced this as but PR nonsense and a disservice to the Iranian people, given that by some estimates Russia has already taken over a billion dollars from Iran for rebuilding just one Bushehr nuclear site with hardly any progress to show.
For example, of prior problems and severe timeline setbacks one industry source described:
Iran has one operating nuclear reactor, a 1,000-MW Russian-designed VVER unit at the southern port city of Bushehr, on the coast of the Persian Gulf. Two more VVER-1000 units are under construction at the site. Work on Unit 2 began in 2019, with commercial operation now expected in 2029 after earlier reports said the unit could come online last year. Iranian media reported that installation of safety equipment in Unit 2 began earlier in February, along with excavation works for the water cooling pump houses of both units.
Russian state media appears to also be confirming the announcement and hugely ambitious agreement:
Russia to build EIGHT nuclear power plants in Iran — Tehran's National Security spox pic.twitter.com/7lgx5ycSUE — RT (@RT_com) June 9, 2025
According to a broader background on Iranian and Russian energy cooperation from Arms Control Association:
The conclusion of an agreement in which Russia will supply Iran with nuclear fuel for a 1,000-megawatt light-water nuclear power reactor marks the latest step in a decade-long controversy.Russian Federal Agency for Atomic Energy Director Alexander Rumyantsev announced Feb. 27 that Tehran and Moscow had finally signed off on a deal to supply fuel for the reactor near the southern Iranian city of Bushehr for a period of 10 years. Although the United States has long opposed the reactor project, the Bush administration did not publicly criticize the agreement.In 1995, Russia agreed to finish the reactor project, which is widely reported to be worth about $800 million. The original German contractor abandoned the project following Iran's 1979 revolution.A final deal was delayed several times as the two sides negotiated a provision that requires Iran to return the spent reactor fuel to Russia. The arrangement was designed to reduce the risk that Iran will separate plutonium from the spent fuel. Separated plutonium can be used as fissile material in nuclear weapons. (See ACT, October 2003.)Iran does not have a known facility for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel to obtain plutonium, although Tehran has conducted related experiments.
Russia and Iran have in recent years strengthened their bilateral cooperation around energy, with President Putin touting that two countries have achieved a 'comprehensive strategic partnership' which sets 'ambitious goals and outlines guidelines for deepening bilateral cooperation in the long term.'
Iran is expanding its Bushehr nuclear power plant by building the second and third units of the facility.The reactor is designed in accordance with the standards of the International Atomic Energy Agency.Follow: https://t.co/mLGcUTSA3Q pic.twitter.com/7vi9v0rNvA — Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) June 9, 2025
All of this is of course set amid the backdrop of biting US-led sanctions targeting both Russian and Iranian economies and societies. Both have relied on BRICS and non-aligned countries to meet their growing military-industrial needs.
Also read: Sultan Of Oman Ratifies Visa Waiver Agreement With Russia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
2 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Iran: All US Bases Within Reach
Iran's Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said Wednesday that Tehran will strike US military bases in the region if nuclear talks fail and Washington decides to launch an attack on the Islamic Republic. 'Some officials on the other side threaten conflict if negotiations don't come to fruition. If a conflict is imposed on us… all US bases are within our reach and we will boldly target them in host countries,' Nasirzadeh said during a press conference, warning the US to 'leave the region' in the 'case of any conflict.' 'We have made very good progress in defense affairs. Our operational forces are fully equipped,' the defense minister added, revealing that Iran recently tested a missile with a two-ton warhead. '[If] a conflict is imposed on us, the casualties of the other party will definitely be much heavier than ours,' he went on to say. The comments came in response to escalating threats from Washington, coinciding with increased tension in nuclear talks between Iran and the US. When asked at a hearing of the House of Representatives on Tuesday if Washington is prepared to 'respond with overwhelming force to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran,' the chief of US Central Command (CENTCOM) said he has 'provided the secretary of defense and the president a wide range of options.' US President Donald Trump said on the same day in an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier that Iran has become 'much more aggressive' in nuclear talks. 'They're just asking for things you can't do. They don't want to give up what they have to give up,' adding that it is 'disappointing' because 'the alternative is a very, very dire one.' Trump said on Monday that he was 'less confident' in the ability to reach a deal. Iran has rejected a new US proposal that would significantly constrain its ability to enrich uranium, and has said it will soon put forward a counteroffer. A new round of talks is set to take place in the coming days. Trump has repeatedly threatened to attack Iran if the negotiations fail. Israel has also drawn up plans for an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. In a phone call between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, the US president said he is still pushing for a deal, adding that an Israeli attack on Iran would be unhelpful and is 'off limits' at the moment, according to Hebrew reports. However, Trump has previously signaled that Israel would play a key role in any attack in the event that nuclear negotiations fail. Iran's Intelligence Ministry announced recently that it has obtained thousands of sensitive documents on Israel's nuclear program. The chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Hossein Salami, said the intel will provide Iran with an advantage if it is forced to respond to an Israeli attack. Also read: US Ambassador to Israel Suggests Muslim Countries Should Give Up Land for Palestinian State
Gulf Insider
3 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Oil Rises as Trump Voices Doubt Over Iran Nuclear Talks
The NY Post has published a new Trump interview focused on apparently stalled Iran nuclear deal efforts which resulted in a surge in oil prices. The President said in the interview he's getting 'less confident' about ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran, soon after which oil rose as well as benchmark treasury yields and gold, as investors weigh the possibility of US-Iran nuclear talks falling apart. Trump was asked whether he thinks the Islamic Republic will agree to shut down its nuclear program. 'I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more — less confident about it,' he responded. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame, but I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,' Trump continued. 'Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made.' Then the question was raised by the Post, 'what happens then?' To which Trump responded: 'Well, if they don't make a deal, they're not going to have a nuclear weapon,' Trump answered. 'If they do make a deal, they're not going have a nuclear weapon, too, you know? But they're not going a have a new nuclear weapon, so it's not going to matter from that standpoint. 'But it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying, it's so much nicer to do it. But I don't think I see the same level of enthusiasm for them to make a deal. I think they would make a mistake, but we'll see. I guess time will tell.' On the question of China's influence on Tehran, Trump described, 'I just think maybe they don't want to make a deal. What can I say?' he said. 'And maybe they do. So what does that mean? There's nothing final.' On Tuesday Trump acknowledged in a Fox News interview that Iran is becoming 'much more aggressive' in these negotiations. And the day prior he had told reporters that the Iranians are 'tough negotiators' and sought to clarify that he would not allow Tehran to enrich uranium on its soil, after some recent contradictory reports suggested the White House had backed off this demand. Washington is awaiting a formal response from the Islamic Republic, which is expected to submit a counter-proposal in the coming days, just ahead of an expected sixth round of indirect talks with the US in Muscat, Oman, slated for Sunday, June 15. * * * More geopolitical headlines via Newsquawk: Iranian Foreign Minister 'As we resume talks on Sunday, it is clear that an agreement that can ensure the continued peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program is within reach—and could be achieved rapidly.'. Thereafter, US President Trump is less confident about the Iran deal, according to a New York Post podcast interview. Iranian Foreign Minister says 'Trump's position on Iran's possession of nuclear weapons could form the basis of the agreement ', according to Al Arabiya. US Secretary of State Rubio said the US condemns sanctions imposed by the governments of the UK, Canada, Norway, New Zealand, and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. Rubio also stated that Israel sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war, while he added that the US urges a reversal of the sanctions. 'Iran's Defense Minister warns on US officials' threats of conflict should negotiations falter: We hope for successful talks, but if conflict is imposed on us, Iran will respond decisively, targeting all US bases in host countries.', via Journalist Aslani. 'Iran successfully tested a missile equipped with a two-ton warhead last week', according to Iran International citing the Iranian Defense Minister. Also read: US On High Alert In Anticipation Of Potential Israeli Strike On Iran, WaPo Reports
Gulf Insider
5 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
US On High Alert In Anticipation Of Potential Israeli Strike
Is something brewing amid US-Iran tensions, given the stalled nuclear negotiations and ratcheting accusations, demands, and counter-demands? The State Department has ordered all embassies within striking distance of Iranian assets – including missions in the Middle East but also Eastern Europe and Northern Africa – to convene emergency action committees (EACs) and send cables back to Washington about measures to mitigate risks. The Associated Pres s also adds that the US Embassy in Baghdad is preparing to order all nonessential personnel to leave due to potential regional unrest. 'We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies,' said a State Department official who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive security matter. 'Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our Mission in Iraq.' Meanwhile the WaPo – a conduit for the deep state – writes that ' the United States is on high alert in anticipation of a potential Israeli strike on Iran, with the State Department authorizing the evacuation of some personnel in Iraq and the Pentagon green-lighting the departure of military family members across the Middle East .' The heightened security environment comes as President Donald Trump expresses dimming hopes of achieving a deal with Iran that would restrict its nuclear program and forestall a potentially cataclysmal new military confrontation in the Middle East. 'I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made,' Trump told the New York Post. In recent months, U.S. intelligence officials have grown increasingly concerned that Israel may choose to strike Iran's nuclear facilities without the consent of the United States. Such a move would almost certainly scuttle the Trump administration's delicate nuclear negotiations and prompt an Iranian retaliation on U.S. assets in the region. As GMI summarizes the latest situation: The IDF have elevated their operational readiness. In response, the United States has mirrored this posture, anticipating potential Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. A senior diplomat, speaking to the Washington Post, stated: 'We think it's more serious than any other time in the past.' The U.S. State Department has directed all embassies within Iranian strike range—including several in Europe, to immediately convene Emergency Action Committees and transmit updated risk assessments to Washington. The Trump imposed deadline on Iranian nuclear negotiations expires tomorrow, June 12th. U.S. officials speaking to Axios now assess it is increasingly unlikely the sixth round of talks in Oman will proceed as scheduled on Sunday. General Kurilla, Commander of U.S. Central Command, has postponed his scheduled testimony before Congress due to mounting tensions across the Middle East. U.S. Central Command, the military headquarters overseeing the region, is working in close coordination with State Department counterparts and allies to maintain a constant state of readiness to support numerous missions at any time, the official added. 'We are watching and worried,' said one senior diplomat in the region. 'We think it's more serious than any other time in the past.' Both oil and gold prices spiked on the alarming headlines which suggest new regional conflict could be imminent, with Israel poised to act… Meanwhile, Iran has urged the United States to prioritize a negotiated solution, with its mission to the United Nations saying that 'diplomacy — not militarism — is the only path forward.' 'Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and U.S. militarism only fuels instability,' the Iranian mission warned in a social media statement. All eyes on the Middle East as the U.S. embassy in Baghdad is on high alert preparing for an immediate evacuation. No updates on the U.S. embassy Baghdad X page yet. — Diliman Abdulkader (@D_abdulkader) June 11, 2025 President Trump has definitely expressed his preference for negotiated solution, but Iran insists that it be able to keep enriching uranium, at least at low levels, as a matter of national sovereignty. Iran and the United States are tentatively scheduled to hold a sixth round of direct talks in Oman on Sunday between U.S. negotiator Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, along with discussions between their technical teams. But people familiar with the planning said Wednesday that it is possible that talks may not happen. Trump has described the negotiations, which began in April, as heading in a positive direction and has said he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on any military plans. But on Wednesday, Trump said he was 'less confident' that Iran would agree to U.S. demands that it completely shut down its nuclear enrichment program. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame,' he said. He has frequently said that Iran would never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and threatened military action if an agreement is not reached. In a post on X Wednesday, Araghchi said that Trump's demand that Iran not develop a nuclear weapon 'is actually in line with our own doctrine and could become the main foundation for a deal. … It is clear that an agreement that can ensure the continued peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program is within reach — and could be achieved rapidly,' he said. Although Witkoff indicated early in the negotiations that some kind of compromise could be reached allowing Iran to continue producing a small quantity of low-level enriched uranium for civil purposes, the administration has since rejected that possibility. The escalating tension comes as the International Atomic Energy Agency board of governors is meeting in Vienna, where Director General Rafael Grossi reported Tuesday that Iran has dramatically increased the amount of near weapons-grade material it possesses. In a contentious meeting Wednesday, Iran's envoy to the agency, Reza Najafi, charged the Europeans with violating the decade-old agreement, which technically still remains in effect, claiming they failed to lift all of their own sanctions when the original deal was struck. In a separate post Wednesday, Araghchi said that 'instead of displaying remorse or a desire to facilitate diplomacy,' the Europeans were 'promoting confrontation through the absurd demand that Iran must be punished for exercising its right' under the agreement 'to respond to non-performance by counterparts.' If the IAEA governors proceed with plans to vote on a resolution against Iran at the end of their week-long meeting Friday, Araghchi said, Iran will 'react STRONGLY. Blame will lie solely and FULLY with malign actors who shatter their own relevance.' Also read: Trump Frustrated As Iran 'Much More Aggressive' In Nuclear Negotiations
