Anand calls for 'de-escalation' after Israel strikes Iran, warning against 'broader regional conflict'
Anita Anand, in a statement posted to X, warned that 'further action' risks triggering 'a broader regional conflict with devastating consequences.'
'De-escalation must be the priority,' she wrote Friday morning.
'We urge all parties to refrain from actions that further destabilize the region. The protection of civilians must be paramount.'
Anand went on to say that Canada remains concerned about Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs and capabilities.
'Importantly, Canadians in the region are advised to exercise a very high degree of caution, monitor developments closely, and follow the advice of local authorities.'
After its strike, Israel's military said Iran retaliated by launching drones. Israel has closed its airspace, grounding airlines.
In an earlier statement from the White House, United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took 'unilateral action against Iran' that did not involve the U.S.
'Our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Rubio's statement read.
'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence. President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners.'
Rubio then added a warning: 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests of personnel.'
Back in Canada, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre posted to X that Israel 'disarming Tehran's genocidal nuclear program' is within Israel's right to self-defence.
'It cannot wait until the regime has capabilities for a nuclear strike.'
More to come …
–With files from The Associated Press
National Post
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
27 minutes ago
Witkoff and Huckabee head to Gaza as Trump comes up with a plan for aid
As global concern over the hunger crisis in Gaza intensifies, Steve Witkoff, President Donald Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee are set to visit an aid distribution site there, according to the White House. 'Special Envoy Witkoff and Ambassador Huckabee will be traveling into Gaza on Friday to inspect the current distribution sites and secure a plan to deliver more food and meet with local Gazans to hear firsthand about this dire situation on the ground," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday. Leavitt also said that immediately following the visit, Witkoff and Huckabee would brief Trump in order to 'approve a final plan for food and aid distribution into the region.' The president hinted at a new plan to address humanitarian concerns in Gaza on Monday following a meeting with United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'We're going to set up food centers and where the people can walk in and no boundaries. We're not going to have fences,' Trump said. He later added that he expected European nations to work with the U.S. on the initiative, and that he expected the plan to be operational 'very soon.' But so far, both the White House and the State Department have declined to elaborate on the president's comments or provide a basic framework for the new plan. The Trump administration and Israel have backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial American non-profit now charged with distributing most aid that is allowed to enter Gaza. The GHF -- with Israel's approval and despite rejection from the United Nations -- took over most of the aid distribution system in Gaza on May 27, after an 11-week Israeli blockade on all supplies from entering the strip. Israel has long accused Hamas of stealing aid provided by the U.N. -- formerly the main distributor -- and others to fund its militant activity -- claims which Hamas denies. Earlier this month, more than 160 charity groups and NGOs called for the GHF to be shut down, claiming that more than 500 Palestinians had been killed while seeking aid from the organization and that its distribution locations 'have become sites of repeated massacres in blatant disregard for international humanitarian law.' But the administration has shown no signs of backing away from the GHF, which it has repeatedly touted as the only organization working in Gaza that is able to ensure aid doesn't benefit Hamas. The U.S. has pledged $30 million toward GHF's efforts in Gaza and a U.S. official told ABC News on Wednesday that the money was expected to be distributed to the group within the coming days -- a sign of the administration's continued confidence in the organization. As of now, GHF operates only four distribution sites across Gaza. Trump administration officials have always maintained that its operations could be scaled up, but there's no indication the administration has played any direct role in planning for its expansion. Ahead of his visit to Gaza, Witkoff met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday. Following their discussion, an Israeli official told ABC News that the two had agreed to several tenets related to bringing the war in Gaza to a resolution, including that it was time to consider a ceasefire framework that would free all Israeli hostages, that Hamas must disarm, and that Israel and the U.S. should work together to increase the flow of aid into Gaza even as the conflict continues. Witkoff's visit to Gaza of Friday will mark his second trip to Gaza this year. In late January, when the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas that was negotiated in part by both the Biden and Trump administrations was still in place, Witkoff became the first high-level U.S. official to enter Gaza in more than a decade when he toured an area of the Gaza Strip that was still occupied by the Israeli military.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump signs order imposing new tariffs
President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order that set new tariffs on a wide swath of U.S. trading partners to go into effect on Aug. 7 — the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and sturdiness of American alliances built up over decades. The order was issued shortly after 7 p.m. on Thursday evening. It came after a flurry of tariff-related activity in the last several days, as the White House announced agreements with various nations and blocs ahead of the president's self-imposed Friday deadline. The tariffs are being implemented at a later date in order for the rates schedule to be harmonized, according to a senior administration official who spoke to reporters on a call on the condition of anonymity. After initially threatening the African nation of Lesotho with a 50% tariff, the country's goods will now be taxed at 15%. Taiwan will be tariffed at 20%, Pakistan at 19% and Israel, Iceland, Fiji, Ghana, Guyana and Ecuador among the countries with imported goods taxed at 15%. The order capped off a hectic Thursday as nations sought to continue negotiating with Trump. It set the rates for 68 countries and the 27-member European Union, with a baseline 10% rate to be charged on countries not listed in the order. The senior administration official said the rates were based on trade imbalance with the U.S. and regional economic profiles. On Thursday morning, Trump engaged in a phone conversation with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on trade. As a result of the conversation, the U.S. president said he would enter into a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico, one of the nation's largest trading partners, with the current 25% tariff rates staying in place, down from the 30% he had threatened earlier. 'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,' Mexican leader Claudia Sheinbaum wrote on X after a call with Trump that he referred to as 'very successful' in terms of the leaders getting to know each other better. The unknowns created a sense of drama that has defined Trump's rollout of tariffs over several months, with the one consistency being his desire to levy the import taxes that most economists say will ultimately be borne to some degree by U.S. consumers and businesses. 'We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country,' Trump told reporters on Thursday afternoon without detailing the terms of those agreements or nations involved. The senior administration official declined to reveal the nations that have new deals during the call with reporters. Trump said that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had called ahead of 35% tariffs being imposed on many of his nation's goods, but 'we haven't spoken to Canada today.' Trump imposed the Friday deadline after his previous 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. His unusually high tariff rates unveiled in April led to recession fears, prompting Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty deals. Trump reached a deal with South Korea on Wednesday, and earlier with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. His commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said on Fox News Channel's 'Hannity' that there were agreements with Cambodia and Thailand after they had agreed to a ceasefire to their border conflict. Going into Thursday, wealthy Switzerland and Norway were still uncertain about their tariff rates. EU officials were waiting to complete a crucial document outlining how the framework to tax imported autos and other goods from the 27-member state bloc would operate. Trump had announced a deal Sunday while he was in Scotland. Trump said as part of the agreement with Mexico that goods imported into the U.S. would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. He said autos would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminum and steel would be taxed at 50% during the negotiating period. He said Mexico would end its 'Non Tariff Trade Barriers,' but he didn't provide specifics. Some goods continue to be protected from the tariffs by the 2020 U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which Trump negotiated during his first term. But Trump appeared to have soured on that deal, which is up for renegotiation next year. One of his first significant moves as president was to impose tariffs on goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year. U.S. Census Bureau figures show that the U.S. ran a $171.5 billion trade imbalance with Mexico last year. That means the U.S. bought more goods from Mexico than it sold to the country. The imbalance with Mexico has grown in the aftermath of the USMCA, as it was only $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump started his first term in office.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
It's important to get answers on Hillary Clinton's RussiaGate plot
'Deflection,' 'Distraction' and 'Dishonest' are just some of the accusations leveled at President Trump recently for saying he'd like to look into past Democrat conspiracies against him. The President's critics have claimed that he is simply trying to push attention away from the Jeffrey Epstein story. Even some of the President's defenders have sighed that surely he should focus on moving forward and not get distracted by these past problems. But putting aside for a moment the fact that President Trump has shown himself able to do more than one thing at a time, he is right to bring up the Russian collusion hoax and more. The Hillary Clinton campaign and the entirety of the Democrat court media spent four years exciting themselves and boring the American public with their claims. When Trump won his surprising election victory in 2016, the Democrats already had their Russia attack lined up. Because the DNC had been hacked that year, exposing some of the unbelievable chicanery that was going on, they were already ripe for a Russia angle. When Trump jokingly said that he'd like the Russians to expose Hillary Clinton's notorious emails they put their spin into overdrive. 'Trump is asking the Russians to hack us,' they said. 'Trump is openly colluding with Putin' they went on — showing themselves intent on turning an off-the-cuff joke into some sort of national security alert. Once Trump was in office they more than doubled-down. Hillary Clinton, the Democrats in the House and Senate and their whole Amen-chorus in the media decided that Trump had only got into office because the Russians had 'hacked' the 2016 election. In doing so they not only told a lie, they also undermined the idea that American elections are safe and secure and that the ballot is accurate. For four years they then tried to bring Trump down. 5 Hillary Clinton speaks onstage during a conversation with Margaret Hoover for 'Something Lost, Something Gained' at 92NY on May 01, 2025, in New York City. Getty Images They tied him up in investigations. They tied him up in impeachments. Every single night hosts like the unwatchable Rachel Maddow worked themselves into a frenzy promising that they had the evidence. Congressman Adam Schiff and others insisted to the American people that there was a smoking gun, that they had the smoking gun and that they were going to produce the smoking gun it if not today then tomorrow, or the day after that. They worked themselves, their audiences and voters into a fever pitch. And what evidence did they end up providing for their claims? Nada, nothing, zilch. A big fat nothing. And then, having spent four years lying and exaggerating and slandering and plotting, they got away with it. The people who had insisted that Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump had colluded to steal an American election just moved on and hoped that nothing would happen, or that no one had noticed. Adam Schiff moved seamlessly into the Senate. Maddow and the hosts of the asylum-outbreak that is 'The View' kept pretending that they had been right all along. 5 President Donald Trump delivers remarks in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 31, 2025. REUTERS At present the mainstream media seems to have decided to pretend that they never pushed the Russia hoax and that they don't know what Trump and his supporters are even talking about. Fortunately not everybody has their Biden-esque short-term memory problems. Speaking to my colleague Miranda Devine this week, President Trump said that he had resisted calls to go after Hillary Clinton during his first term in office, despite all the rally chants against her. As he told the Pod Force One, he felt that it would be 'inappropriate' to go after his political opponent in that way, and to pursue his former rival in the courts. And there was a time when that might have been the case. 5 Russian President Vladimir Putin looks on during Russian-Laotian talks at the Kremlin on July 31, 2025, in Moscow, Russia. Getty Images To have pursued a former First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State and Presidential candidate would undoubtedly have been divisive. Unfortunately for Trump the Democrats had a different set of standards. They had no problem going after him even after he had won an election fair and square. They had no problem toxifying the political landscape and undermining the sanctity of the voting booth. Now they say that Trump is being merely vindictive, or trying to distract attention, by going back to these issues. 5 Former Secretary of State and First Lady Hillary Clinton speaks at the New York State Democratic Committee Convention at the Sheraton Times Square in Manhattan. Stephen Yang But they are important issues. If elected officials and parts of the media spend years pushing conspiracy theories that have absolutely no evidence to back them up then there should be a price to pay. And there should, at the very least, be some kind of investigation. After the disaster that was January 6, 2021 the House had no problem at all with setting up a Committee to look into what happened that day. If there can be a House Committee on January 6th why shouldn't there be one on the Russia collusion hoax? 5 Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with Sberbank's CEO German Gref in Moscow, Russia, July 29, 2025. via REUTERS Why shouldn't we find out which parts of the intelligence community knowingly worked on promoting lies about a sitting US President? And why shouldn't we learn just how wide, deep and high-up that conspiracy really went? President Trump can easily focus on moving this country forward. Another week of trade deal successes shows that. But as a country we can´t just move beyond an era in which powerful people tried to undermine the Presidency and then just got away with it. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The Time's lie about Gaza makes peace harder Talking of pushing lies, the New York Times has had to about-turn this week after lying to their readers on the front-page. A terrible photo of a sickly child in Gaza was given to Times readers as evidence of a 'famine' in Gaza. In fact the poor child has been sick since birth, having been born with cerebral palsy. The Times quietly changed its headline to acknowledge that the child in question had 'pre-existing health problems.' By then the Times had pushed its lie around the world. This week Hamas hardened its negotiating position, making a peace deal harder. One of their calculations seems to be that international pressure on Israel will force Israel — not Hamas — to a compromise. Seems its OK to embolden terrorists if you're the lying Gray Lady.
