logo
Summer of Our Discontent by Thomas Chatterton Williams reivew – a muddled take on US race, politics and class

Summer of Our Discontent by Thomas Chatterton Williams reivew – a muddled take on US race, politics and class

The Guardian22-07-2025
Thomas Chatterton Williams, a public intellectual of some standing in the US, dislikes the Trumpian right for its erratic authoritarianism. But he dislikes its hysterical leftwing critics too – arguably with more vehemence. He takes great pride in having no truck with tribes, but he does belong to one: like halitosis, as Terry Eagleton quipped, ideology appears to be only what the other person has. Williams may think he is a freethinker above the fray, but he has a creed – and it is liberal complacency.
His 2010 debut memoir Losing My Cool was the story of – as the subtitle had it – Love, Literature and a Black Man's Escape from the Crowd. Rap, he declared, was not so much a genre as a subculture, seducing young black men into a world of crime. That, apparently, would have been Williams's fate (when he physically attacks his girlfriend, for instance, hip-hop lyrics shoulder the blame) had it not been for Pappy, his disciplinarian father, who foisted 15,000 books on him.
The classics beat crime in the end, and we leave Williams on his happy road to intellectualdom, absorbing Sartre in Parisian cafes. But it wasn't enough for him to merely present his own story; Williams elected to hold up his life as an example for black Americans. 'See, you can be just like me' is the breathless gist of Losing My Cool. It never struck him that he might have had certain class advantages – a father with a PhD in sociology; a mixed-race heritage; an upbringing in white, bourgeois, suburban New Jersey – that make him somewhat unrepresentative as a role model.
Self-Portrait in Black and White: Unlearning Race, Williams's second memoir, published just before the pandemic, served up more hyper-agentic advice. The springboard for these post-racial reflections was the birth of his daughter. Bearing, as babies tend to do, a resemblance to her mother, who is white and French, Williams's child is blond. It follows that there is an arbitrariness to the whole business of race, from which Williams swiftly emancipates himself. Then comes the counsel: black Americans would do well to follow in his footsteps by 'transcending' race themselves. Conceding that this may be an easier proposition for him and his white-passing daughter, he exhorts mixed-race people to 'form an avant garde when it comes to rejecting race'.
Williams's grand subject being himself, now we have a third memoir. Summer of Our Discontent takes a caustic look at Black Lives Matter from the lofty vantage point of his Parisian garret. At the outset, he tells us that the self-preening, race-mad identity politics of left-leaning liberals has fostered atomisation and precluded solidarity. As a consequence, the illiberal, unhinged right, now united behind Trump, has stolen a march on them. But from this not unreasonable edifice, Williams throws up a enormous scaffolding of enemies, which comes to encompass anyone and everyone engaging in some form or another of collective action. Ultimately, by the end, it appears that Williams's beef is not so much with Trump as with his leftwing critics.
This is a strange, muddled book. On the one hand, Williams emphasises the primacy of class over race in the US. George Floyd, he says, was not your average African American: he was poor, unemployed, and had a criminal record. Horrific as his killing by a white policeman was, it was unduly racialised by BLM. Fewer than 25 unarmed black civilians are killed by police annually. Most black people will never find themselves in Floyd's shoes, Williams contends.
While class is important for Williams, class politics isn't. There is only so much that initiatives to lift the poor from poverty can achieve, we are told, because 'the fundamental political unit, going back to Aristotle, remains the family'. The left has got it all wrong, obsessing over the 'macro level' when real change apparently happens at the individual level.
Williams's strategy is to cherrypick the most ludicrous examples of 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' to smear the entire left. Sympathy from a few celebrities for the actor Jussie Smollett – who was accused of faking a hate-crime against himself, which he denied – is taken as evidence of the left's crumbling 'moral authority and credibility'. BLM, he claims, was driven by 'an ascendant raider class' of middle-class and not always black activists seizing institutional power – such as when a 'multi-ethnic mob of junior employees' ousted New York Times opinion editor James Bennet for publishing Senator Tom Cotton's call to deploy troops against BLM protests.
Williams's other objections appear to be mostly aesthetic. He expends much energy pillorying the performative activism of such BLM 'allies' as 'the official Twitter account of the wildly popular British children's cartoon Peppa Pig', which tweeted a black square in solidarity. Later, visiting BLM-ravaged Portland, he mourns that 'a beloved statue of an elk has been toppled'. This in a town with a 'well-deserved reputation' for 'exquisite gastronomy'. Quelle horreur.
He concludes by suggesting that the left and right are just as odious as one another. The storming of the Capitol in 2021, he says, had a mimetic quality, the populist right 'aping' the 'flamboyant reflex' of the unruly left. With such invidious comparisons, and with such a dim view of collective action, Williams is unable to make the case as to how precisely his homeland is to move towards a post-racial utopia. Excelling in sending up bien-pensant opinion, he has no answers. Fixated on slagging off the left, he has marooned himself on an island of vacuity. So when he articulates a positive vision of the future, all he offers are new age nostrums such as 'reinvestment in lived community' and 'truth, excellence, plain-old unqualified justice'.
His plea for perspective is similarly misplaced. Young black Americans, Williams whinges, have been seduced by the race pessimism of the likes of Ta-Nehisi Coates, his more popular nemesis. He enjoins us to look on the bright side: the racial wage gap is closing; black school attainment rates are nearing white levels.
Williams's Panglossian outlook is, I suspect, a form of American parochialism. His homeland, he says, is a 'society that is frankly more democratic, multi-ethnic, and egalitarian than any other in recorded history'. The Gini coefficient and Democracy Index beg to differ. There are eminently sensible reasons for race pessimism in America. Segregation and ghettoisation are facts of life. The wage gap between black and white people is still a staggering 21% (in Britain, it's under 6%). White Americans live three-and-a-half years longer than black Americans on average (black Britons outlive white Britons).
Collectively, it was not the complacent optimists (who declared we had never had it so good) but rather the do-gooding pessimists (that demanded change at the dreaded 'macro level') who overthrew slavery and fought for civil rights. Individually, too, pessimism pays. For someone who sets great store by personal agency, Williams will no doubt appreciate Billy Wilder's melancholy observation – occasioned by losing three relatives at Auschwitz – that 'the optimists died in the gas chambers; the pessimists have pools in Beverly Hills'.
Summer of Our Discontent: The Age of Certainty and the Demise of Discourse by Thomas Chatterton Williams is published by Constable (£25). To support the Guardian, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chip and Joanna Gaines detail marriage struggles
Chip and Joanna Gaines detail marriage struggles

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Chip and Joanna Gaines detail marriage struggles

By EMILY LEFROY, US CHIEF FEMAIL REPORTER Published: | Updated: Chip and Joanna Gaines have been married for over two decades - but that doesn't mean they haven't had their fair share of ups and downs. The HGTV stars - who share five children - recently opened up about their private life and how they have dealt with the challenges of marriage. Joanna, 47, revealed that they had 'non-negotiables from day one,' speaking on how to balance their fame, family, and relationship. Joanna referenced the store she and Chip, 50, owned - which was called The Little Shop on Bosque and opened in the early 2000s - at the start of their marriage. However, the mom-of-five said even though it was scary, she could see the bright side even if they 'were struggling for the first 12 years of marriage.' 'Like every Friday it was like, "Well, is this when we close our doors [of The Little Shop on Bosque]?"' she explained on the Stronger Podcast with Don Saladino. 'Every day we showed up, it was like, "Well, if this all goes away, we still have each other,"' the Fixer Upper star said passionately. She explained that sums up the 'core and foundation' of who they are. 'Every decision we make, we say, "How will this affect this?"' the renovation star shared. 'As I think about fame and success and money in comparison to my marriage and my family… [If] all of this would instantly go away, and my wife and my kids would be back on the farm, raising animals,' the doting dad mused during the interview. 'But Jo and I, we believe we can have our cake and eat it too in the sense that I can be successful and I can have a healthy marriage and family,' he added. Joanna also shared the new endeavor the two are embarking on - their wellness journey. 'At this stage in our life, what we're trying to figure out is: we've got family, we've got business, like that's our thing... but now this wellness and health and working out, that is a new thing for us that we're trying to figure out,' she shared. Joanna and Chip have been married since 2003 and share five children: Drake, 20, Ella, 18, Duke, 17, Emmie, 15, and Crew, seven. Last month, the couple faced backlash from conservative Christians for their 'unbiblical' casting on their new reality show. The pair were slammed by some critics for their new series, Back to the Frontier, which they serve as the executive producers of. The show, which airs on the Magnolia Network, drops three families near the Canadian Rockies and forces them to live like it is the 1880s for eight weeks. The families have no access to modern technology, no electricity or running water, and must harvest all their own food and tend to livestock. While the show sounds like must-see TV for Chip and Joanna's target audience, some viewers have expressed outrage over the inclusion of a gay couple on the cast. Jason Hanna and Joe Riggs, a same-sex couple, and their children are one of three families featured on the show. They both took to social media to defend the Gaines', with Hanna posting a screenshot of a news article with the headline, 'Conservative Christians rage at reality show for letting gay people on,' and explained why he believes families like his should be shown on TV. Riggs also shared a post thanking Chip and Joanna for casting them and standing by their decision to do so — even though nearly a decade ago, it was revealed that the Fixer Upper stars attend an Evangelical church, which believes 'homosexuality is a sin.'

‘You have to ruffle feathers': a history of controversial jeans adverts
‘You have to ruffle feathers': a history of controversial jeans adverts

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘You have to ruffle feathers': a history of controversial jeans adverts

There aren't many advertising campaigns that elicit responses from the US president and vice-president, the senator Ted Cruz and the rappers Doja Cat and Lizzo. But the Euphoria actor Sydney Sweeney's recent ad for American Eagle denim has done just that. Critics have interpreted the campaign as promoting eugenics, defenders have taken the backlash as evidence of so-called 'woke' culture in the extreme and scrutinising it has taken on the trappings of a cottage industry. 'Clocking in for my shift at the Sydney Sweeney American Eagle opinion factory,' the journalist Hunter Harris wrote on her Substack. It comes in a long line of provocative jeans adverts, some objectively controversial or offensive, others more subjectively so. A 1973 campaign from Jesus Jeans that featured the slogan 'you shall have no other jeans before me' sparked discussion for its use of religiosity to sell clothes. The Italian anti-consumerist film director Pier Paolo Pasolini even wrote an essay on the subject in which he said the slogan 'takes the form of a nemesis – although unintentionally – that punishes the church for its pact with the devil'. A series of 1980s Calvin Klein jeans adverts raised hackles for their use of young female models in sexually suggestive guises. 'You know what gets between me and my Calvin's? Nothing,' mused a 15-year-old Brooke Shields in 1980, in a video directed and shot by Richard Avedon. In another Calvin Klein campaign from 1995, which was criticised for alluding to child exploitation, models including Kate Moss were filmed as they undid their jeans and were asked: 'Are you nervous?' 'Calvin made millions,' said Allen Adamson, an author and branding expert. 'He was the first one to really understand that buzz and controversy and being disruptive could sell denim.' The Shields campaign was reportedly a huge success, with many customers going into shops to ask for the 'Brooke Shields jeans'. Levi's also has a history of setting tongues wagging. The famous Nick Kamen ad from the 80s, in which he strips down to his underwear in a laundrette so he can wash his 501s, turned the straight male gaze of most mainstream ads on its head by making the object of desire a male model. According to the fashion historian Tony Glenville: 'It was massive and made it even into spoofs on comedy shows. It made a huge impact on sales and jeans sales generally.' Levi's made its mark again in 1995 with a campaign in which the Filipino-American fashion designer Zaldy, sitting in the back of a New York taxi in drag, seems to shock the sweaty, lecherous driver ogling her by shaving her chin mid-drive. Landing at a time when there was a lack of LGBTQ+ representation in advertising, the Advertising Standards Authority reportedly came close to banning it. According to the retail marketing expert Catherine Shuttleworth, campaigns designed to turn heads evolve from a need to 'cut through'. 'Good advertising creates cut through, and when it comes to advertising for clothing, it's really hard to grab people's attention,' she said. Cutting through in the social media age is arguably much harder than before given the fragmentation of media. Adamson said: 'It's very expensive to reach consumers through traditional media, so you need social media to break through,' especially to reach younger consumers. Sign up to Fashion Statement Style, with substance: what's really trending this week, a roundup of the best fashion journalism and your wardrobe dilemmas solved after newsletter promotion But given the fact that 'no one shares anything ordinary on social media,' it needs to be bold. 'People only share something extraordinary or different or offensive,' he said. 'To really get talked about on social media, you have to ruffle feathers.' For jeans this is particularly important. 'The basic challenge is that they've been around forever', said Adamson. 'There is little to no product difference. People can talk about the fit or the stitching. It's basically denim.' Glenville agreed: 'Sometimes the actual jeans can be a bit dull. It's packaging within the advertising, it's styling and narrative that sells them.' More so than in the past, the market for denim is also saturated. 'The denim market in America is ginormous,' said Shuttleworth. 'You've got to do something that makes you stand out from the pack. And so I think a lot of those companies will take risks.' Even going as far as to get your ad banned might be a good thing, she said. 'By getting it banned, everybody talks about it [but] if you get it wrong, suddenly you could have a long-term problem where people boycott your products.' For Adamson, the worst possible scenario for fashion advertising is that 'no one notices or no one cares'. It's too early to know what the Sweeney ad's impact on direct sales will be, but it's clear that people noticed and cared, andit doesn't seem to have been bad for business. American Eagle shares climbed 23% in a week, even as commentators began to move on to the next: a Levi's ad in which Beyoncé wears a blonde wig and red lipstick moved the conservative commentator Megyn Kelly to take umbrage and Piers Morgan to accuse the singer of 'culturally appropriating' Marilyn Monroe.

L'Oréal hires OnlyFans star to market makeup popular with teenagers
L'Oréal hires OnlyFans star to market makeup popular with teenagers

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

L'Oréal hires OnlyFans star to market makeup popular with teenagers

Global cosmetics giant L'Oréal has recruited a model famous for filming pornographic content on the OnlyFans adult website to promote a makeup brand popular with teenagers. Ari Kytsya, a US-based adult performer, has been hired as a new brand ambassador for Urban Decay, a line of makeup sold in Boots and in other high street stores globally. Kytsya, who describes herself as a 'mattress actress', a euphemism for an explicit content creator, has a dual online persona. She produces hair and makeup tutorials and lifestyle influencer content for the more than 4.6 million followers she has on Instagram and TikTok. Her account on OnlyFans, the platform used by millions for its adult content, offers subscribers nude images and videos of her performing sex acts. Penny East, the new chief executive of the Fawcett Society, the UK's leading charity campaigning for women's rights and gender equality, said the brand's decision to collaborate with an OnlyFans star broke a new threshold in the mainstreaming of the controversial website and its explicit content, warranting 'legitimate concern'. The decision to work with Kytsya appears to contravene L'Oréal's own 'Value Charter', which sets out the ethical standards that must be adhered to by influencers who are partnering with their brands. The charter says influencers must share L'Oréal's 'ethical principles' and must not previously have posted pornography and other 'content which is at odds with our values of respect, tolerance and inclusion'. L'Oréal defended the collaboration, praising Kytsya for her openness in talking about 'the joys, challenges, and risks of the industry she works in'. But the Fawcett Society CEO questioned whether Kytsya represented an appropriate choice by L'Oréal as a role model for the young women who buy its cosmetics. 'We have concerns about the thousands of very young women joining the site in the hope of finding fame and fortune. The majority of OnlyFans creators make very little money and the pressure to find a niche is pushing women to make increasingly explicit content,' East said. 'Ari Kytsya is one of the few successes. She is a hugely popular and engaging influencer, with a large following across all social media platforms. She also creates highly explicit and pornographic content on OnlyFans. The move to put OnlyFans content creators in high-street commercial makeup campaigns will only serve to make OnlyFans a more enticing prospect for young girls.' The advertisement, which has been viewed by more than 18.7 million people on Urban Decay's TikTok page, contains pixellated images of Kytsya, with a sensitive content warning, beneath the headline 'UD likes it raw'. Kytsya tells viewers that 'censorship is out of control' and calls for 'uncensored makeup' that performs 'on stage, on camera and yes on mattresses'. Founded in 1996, Urban Decay was bought by L'Oréal in 2012 and is known for its provocatively named products, such as 'Perversion' eyeliners, 'Naked' eye shadows and 'All Nighter' setting sprays. L'Oréal's communications team supplied a comment on behalf of an Urban Decay spokesperson, saying: 'Urban Decay partners with a diverse range of talent who represent the many facets of creative expression. Urban Decay chose US creator Ari Kytsya for her distinctive makeup artistry and her authenticity. She is known for her open and transparent dialogue with her community, fostering conversations about her personal experiences, including the joys, challenges, and risks of the industry she works in.' Kytsya frequently promotes the advantages of going into the adult content creation industry, promising TikTok followers that it can prove a lucrative career choice. 'The thing about my job is if you go full out you can make enough money to start your own thing whether that's buying houses or doing Airbnbs and investing,' she says. She also offers practical advice to followers who are considering working in this world, encouraging them to make sure they get tested regularly for sexually transmitted infections. She acknowledges that there are 'dangers' involved in the work, and recommends that girls 'who have just turned 18' should not rush into the adult industry. 'Take time to think about it before you do it.' Concern about L'Oréal's brand collaboration follows increasing unease about the extreme behaviour promoted by high-profile adult performers who share their material on the OnlyFans platform. Visa and the drinks brand Diageo last week pulled advertisements from a Channel 4 documentary 1,000 Men and Me about Bonnie Blue, another adult performer who became famous on the site. OnlyFans had refused to host videos of her attempt to sleep with 1,000 men. Farhad Divecha, CEO of AccuraCast, an international digital marketing agency, said he was unaware of other mainstream global brands using adult content creators to advertise their products. 'Today's society is much more accepting of advertising like this than it might have been five or 10 years ago. Brands want eyeballs. As a marketer, I see untapped potential in those sites,' he said. 'It might not hurt Urban Decay if the controversy provokes extra visibility.' Kytsya thanked Urban Decay for hiring her, commenting: 'Most brands tend to hesitate when it comes to collaborating with me because of the kind of content I create.' OnlyFans did not respond to an approach for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store