High Court to hear in full RM1bil KL Tower contract termination suit against govt
High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain ordered for the hearing to proceed after finding that there were triable issues in the case.
In her decision on Tuesday (July 15), the judge dismissed the application by Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil (first defendant) and the government (second defendant) to strike out the lawsuit by the former operator of Kuala Lumpur Tower.
In March, Hydroshoppe with MKLSB filed the legal action against Fahmi, the government, LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd, LSH Best Builders Sdn Bhd and Service Master (M) Sdn Bhd.
LSH Service Master, a joint venture company between LSH Best Builder and Service Master, was awarded the concession that replaced Hydroshoppe and MKLSB in managing the tower.
Justice Roz Mawar, however, allowed the striking out application by the third until the fifth defendants; LSH Service Master, LSH Best Builders and Service Master.
"This court is of the considered view that it cannot strike out the case against the first and second defendants here at this juncture because there are triable issues especially pertaining to the proposed 2022 agreement.
"The trial will be cut short most definitely but this court cannot allow the striking out against the first and second defendants because it is not a clear case where they are plainly and obviously unsustainable.
"The circumstantial evidence may strongly suggest that there's no binding agreement that concluded in 2022 but this court must have that opportunity to determine viva voce evidence," she said.
The court fixed Nov 3 for case management.
Hydroshoppe and Menara KL filed the lawsuit alleging breach of contract against the respondents. They claimed that LSH Capital and its subsidiaries induced a breach of an agreement purportedly reached with the government during a meeting in August 2022.
The plaintiffs further claimed that the respondents engaged in dishonest assistance and are seeking a declaration that the award of the KL Tower concession to LSH Service Master is void and unlawful.
In addition, they are claiming an estimated RM1bil in damages and are seeking the concession of the iconic Kuala Lumpur landmark to be transferred back to them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
33 minutes ago
- The Star
Media council opens membership sign-up next month
PUTRAJAYA: Membership registration for the Malaysian Media Council (MMC) will take place from early August to the end of September, with a nominal fee of RM10, say the council's founding board members. Applications can be submitted at the council said in a statement yesterday, Bernama reported. 'Membership is open to media owners, professionals, individuals and organisations involved in the media ecosystem, as well as those representing the public's interest,' the statement read. This was announced after members of the founding board received their letters of appointment from Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil (pic). The MMC also announced that its inaugural Annual General Meeting (AGM) is scheduled to take place on Nov 7 in Kuala Lumpur. At the AGM, new board members will be elected and key matters will be discussed, including the membership fee structure, the industry's code of ethics, the complaints mechanism, the annual budget and MMC's bylaws. At its first meeting, the founding board appointed Premesh Chandran as interim chairperson, pending the election of a full board later this year. As an independent self-regulatory body for Malaysia's media industry, the MMC is expected to play a pivotal role in promoting ethical and responsible journalism, establishing the industry code of ethics and serving as a bridge between the media, government and the public. 'The MMC will enhance professionalism in the media industry and protect public interest within an increasingly complex media environment,' MMC added. MMC said its structure is designed to ensure broad representation, with the founding board consisting of elected representatives from media publishers, media professionals and public interest groups, including academics and members of civil society. 'Additionally, the government may appoint two representatives. Notably, the MMC Act 2025 stipulates that at least 25% of board members must come from Sabah and Sarawak, and leadership of the Council must reflect gender parity – a first in Malaysia,' it said. In the same statement, founding board member Phyllis Wong, representing Borneo Post and Utusan Borneo, expressed her honour at being entrusted with this responsibility. She felt encouraged by the collective commitment to uphold media ethics and accountability, even though the MMC is not yet fully operational.
Free Malaysia Today
15 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Govt, minister fail to quash ex-KL Tower operator's suit
The High Court ruled that there are issues arising from a supplementary agreement signed in 2022 between Hydroshoppe and the government for the lease of KL Tower which must go to trial. KUALA LUMPUR : The High Court has rejected the government's bid to strike out a lawsuit filed by KL Tower's former operator over the award of the tower's concession to another company. Justice Roz Mawar Rozain held that Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd and Menara KL Sdn Bhd's claim against the government and communications minister Fahmi Fadzil, named a co-defendant, must proceed to trial. 'There are triable issues regarding the 2022 agreement,' she added. However the court struck out Hydroshoppe's claim against the new operators, LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd, LSH Best Builders Sdn Bhd, and Service Master (M) Sdn Bhd. Roz Mawar held that Hydroshoppe had failed to properly identify its cause of action against the three entities, rendering the suit defective. She also ordered Hydroshoppe to pay them RM20,000 in costs. The court fixed the suit against the government and Fahmi for case management on Nov 3. In March, Hydroshoppe and Menara KL filed the suit claiming that the government's award of the concession to the LSH group was in breach of contract. They asked the court to declare the award of the KL Tower concession to LSH Service Master void and unlawful. They are seeking an estimated RM1 billion in damages. Lawyer Vinayak Sri Ram appeared for Hydroshoppe while senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly appeared for the government and lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar represented LSH Service Master.
![[UPDATED] Menara KL, parent company's suit against government to proceed to trial](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Fmamakltowera_NSTfield_image_socialmedia.var_1752566936.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] Menara KL, parent company's suit against government to proceed to trial](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
16 hours ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] Menara KL, parent company's suit against government to proceed to trial
KUALA LUMPUR: Menara Kuala Lumpur Sdn Bhd (MKLSB) and its parent company, Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd's RM1 billion lawsuit against the government over the termination of the Kuala Lumpur Tower (Menara KL) management agreement will proceed to full trial. This came after High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed the application by Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil and the government to strike out the suit today. Roz Mawar, in her ruling, said the case against Fahmi and the government should not be struck out at this stage as there are triable issues, particularly relating to the proposed agreement in 2022, that warrant a full hearing. "Fahmi and the government gave five reasons to support their bid to strike out the suit. "While I may agree with some of them, the court finds that the case should not be dismissed at this stage, especially on the 2022 agreement. "This court cannot allow the striking out of the claims against the first (Fahmi) and second (the government) defendants, as this is not a clear and obvious case where the claim is plainly unsustainable. "Therefore, I dismiss the first and second defendants' application to strike out the suit," she said. Roz Mawar then fixed Nov 3 for the next case management. During the same hearing, Roz Mawar also allowed the application by three companies named as defendants to strike out the suit. According to Judge Roz Mawar, the pleadings filed against all three companies were weak, overly general, and insufficient for a claim that requires proof of specific elements. "The plaintiffs failed to state specific facts to support their allegations concerning the defendants' knowledge, the manner of interference (whether direct or indirect) any specific intention to interfere, or any special damages suffered. "The plaintiffs merely made bare allegations of dishonesty without stating specific supporting facts. "The details provided were merely a repetition of general claims from an inducement of breach of contract allegation. "The plaintiffs also failed to specify how the third to fifth defendants breached any duties related to the trust. "Serious allegations such as dishonesty require serious statements supported by concrete facts, not just conclusions," she said. In March 2024, Hydroshoppe and MKLSB filed a lawsuit against Fahmi, the government, LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd, LSH Best Builders Sdn Bhd, and Service Master (M) Sdn Bhd. LSH Service Master is a joint venture between LSH Best Builders and Service Master, which was awarded the tower management concession, replacing Hydroshoppe and MKLSB. Hydroshoppe and MKLSB filed the suit over the alleged wrongful termination of their agreement in November 2022, which included the extension of the company's concession period from 15 to 30 years.
