No evidence for Musk's $1 billion National Parks survey claim
"DOGE just revealed that the government spent $1 billion on a survey asking if people liked National Parks," says a March 27, 2025, X post.
Image
Screenshot from X taken April 7, 2025
The same post has circulated elsewhere on X, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, YouTube and Gettr following a March 27 interview of Musk by Bret Baier on the Fox News Channel (archived here). In it, Musk purported that his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative aimed at slashing federal spending, had uncovered a $1 billion contract with a company to conduct a single 10-question survey for the National Parks Service.
"We routinely encounter wastes of a billion dollars or more. Casually. You know, for example, the simple survey that was literally a 10-question survey you can do with SurveyMonkey and cost you about $10,000, the government was being charged almost $1 billion for that," Musk said after Baier asked him what was "the most astonishing thing" he had encountered at the helm of DOGE.
In the same interview, one of Musk's top aides, Steve Davis, said that the parks survey was part of an $830 million contract proposed by the Department of the Interior that DOGE had halted.
Musk and Davis appear to be referring to a March 19 X post from DOGE, which pointed out an $830 million contract approved by the Federal Consulting Group, a division of the Interior Department. The post said the contract was never signed and that DOGE was shutting down the Federal Consulting Group (archived here).
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum also highlighted the cancellation of the purported survey contract during a March 24 cabinet meeting with President Donald Trump, calling the expense "pure fraud" (archived here).
However, data from USASpending.gov, a government website that tracks federal spending, has no records of the Department of the Interior, which oversees the National Park Service, awarding a contract valued at over $800 million for such services (archived here).
The largest contract awarded by the agency for which the site has records was a 2022 agreement to provide legal aid to unaccompanied refugee children through the Health and Human Services Department. It had a potential value of $896.1 million (archived here).
The same database shows that the Federal Consulting Group has awarded $87 million in contracts since 2010. AFP searched past expenses made by the Federal Consulting Group and found the largest tender it awarded was for about $3 million, around 270 times smaller than the supposed $830 million contract (archived here and here).
CBS News and The New York Times previously reported on the same data.
The DOGE website, which lists contracts the group has terminated, has been criticized for sharing inaccurate or duplicate information and does not show any saved expense for either $1 billion or $830 million relating to the Department of the Interior and a customer survey (archived here).
In a document submitted as part of the 2023 federal approval process outlining how the National Parks Service would create and gather data from public surveys, the agency estimated that research aimed at improving park services would cost just over $2 million annually. This estimate included about $28,000 to employ a program manager, $600,000 to support contracted researchers and investigators and another $1.4 million for other expenses such as survey design and administration (archived here).
Although the document does not include the names of contractors for National Parks surveys, the agency appears to have historically worked with faculty at various universities, such as the University of Idaho and the University of Washington (archived here and here).
The 1993 Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) requires federal agencies to regularly assess their performance and services and form strategic plans to make improvements (archived here). The National Parks Service says its Visitor Survey Card program (archived here), which solicits responses from visitors across the park system, is how it complies with this part of the GPRA.
AFP has debunked other claims about US politics here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Stephen King puts Trump vs Musk feud into perspective with savage post
It's the headline-grabbing breakup that continues to see tensions rise between Donald Trump and former ally Elon Musk – with the pair continuing to throw jabs at one another on thier owned channels X and Truth Social. One bombshell blow included the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) claiming that Trump is featured in the Jeffrey Epstein files, alleging that was the reason they had not been made public. Musk also asked his 220 million X followers whether it was time 'to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle'. The entertainment world has commented on the end of the bromance and many have started comparing the bitter fallout to the cult comedy Mean Girls. 'Watching Trump and Elon go all Regina George/Mean Girls on each other is entertaining,' one wrote online, as another added: 'Like two teenagers airing their dirty laundry online.' The Mean Girls comparison has been going viral, with many creating memes with frames from the film. Now, acclaimed author Stephen King has added his name to the celebrities commenting on the spat, issuing a scathing and sobering critique. Rather than take sides, the outspoken Trump critic put the argument into perspective by saying: 'Couple of billionaires having a hissy little catfight. Who gives a shit? The world actually has problems.' The author of "It" and "Carrie", whose works have been widely adapted to film and television, has not been shy when it comes to calling out both Trump and Musk. Last year, King accused Musk of spreading political misinformation, informing his X followers about how the "Musk-man has posted 3,000 times on Twitter in the last month". "Most are pro-Trump disinformation and lies," King wrote, adding: "Remember, he has skin in the game. Consider his posts accordingly." The horror icon had previously announced he was leaving X in the aftermath of Trump being reelected US president. However, in February this year, he came back to the social media platform to share with his 6.8 million followers: 'I'm baaaack! Did you miss me?' before adding: 'Just wanted to say that Trump is a traitorous, Putin-loving dipshit! Goes double for Elon!' Oscar-winning American actor and Thirty Seconds From Mars frontman Jared Leto has been accused of sexual misconduct by nine women. In a report published by Air Mail, multiple women accused the 53-year-old star of Fight Club, Requiem For A Dream, Dallas Buyers Club and Suicide Squad of inappropriate behaviour. The allegations date back to the early 2000s, with one woman calling it 'an open secret' that he texted sexual remarks to teenage models. Allegations against Leto emerged last month, when DJ Allie Teilz shared an old Facebook post, written in 2012, on her Instagram Story. 'Youre [sic] not really in L.A. until Jared Leto tries to force himself on you backstage… In a kilt.. And a snow hat. I was assaulted and traumatized by this creep when I was 17,' she wrote. In separate story, she added: 'He knew my age and didn't care. What he did was predatory, terrifying and unacceptable.' One woman told the publication that in 2006, when she was 16-years-old, Leto approached her outside a Los Angeles café. She claimed Leto was sat with fellow actor Ashley Olsen – who was then 19 – and he had grabbed her arm. 'I looked down and it was Jared Leto,' she told Air Mail, adding: 'We had a quick conversation, and he got my number.' She went on to say that Leto called her home a few days later, recalling: 'I don't know if he was on drugs or what … It was the weirdest, grossest voice … [but] for me, it's Jared, you know?' 'And the conversations turned sexual,' she continued. 'He'd ask things like: 'Have you ever had a boyfriend? Have you ever sucked a dick?'' Model Laura La Rue came forward with similar claims, saying that when she was 16-years-old in 2008, she was at an event in a private residence in Beverly Hills where Leto was 'watching her so intensely'. 'He asked how old I was. I said, 'I'm 16. How old are you?'' La Rue told Air Mail. Leto, who was 36 at the time, then reportedly asked for her number. The two began an email correspondence, which resulted in her visiting Leto's home in April 2009, the outlet alleges. 'I remember him teasing me the whole time I was there,' La Rue said, adding: 'He was flirting with me. He'd lean in close, then pull away, like it was a game.' She described a separate visit when she was 17 years old, where she alleged Leto walked out of a room completely naked. 'He just walked out, dick out, like it was normal… I thought maybe this was just what adult men do,' she said. Another woman who spoke to the outlet said that she and Leto began texting while she was still underage. She alleged he would ask her inappropriate questions during her visits to his house, including 'Do any of the little boys you hang out with fuck you?' The woman alleged that once, when she was 18, Leto had 'suddenly pulled his penis out and started masturbating'. She told Air Mail: 'He walked over, grabbed my hand, and put it on him. He leaned in and said: 'I want you to spit on it.'' A representative of Leto has 'expressly denied' the multiple accusations reported in the Air Mail exposé, saying the claims were 'demonstrably false'. This is not the first time that Leto's behaviour has been questioned and called out. Similar claims were made in 2005, when The New York Post shared a story with the opening line: 'Jared Leto likes 'em young' after he had been spotted with Olsen and Lindsay Lohan. At the time, sources told the publication he had been 'aggressively pursuing many of the teen models shacked up at the Maritime Hotel'. In 2018, Metro reported on a Twitter post made by Dylan Sprouse, who is married to model Barbara Palvin. The post read: 'Yo @JaredLeto now that you've slid into the DMs of every female model aged 18–25, what would you say your success rate is?' Guardians Of The Galaxy and Superman director James Gunn replied to Sprouse's tweet at the time, saying: 'He starts at 18 on the internet?'
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
The 100 ways Elon Musk allegedly benefited from Trump's White House
A new report published by a prominent American senator's office this week sheds light on how the first 130 days of US President Donald Trump's second term may have benefited Elon Musk, the world's richest man. Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren's office compiled a 14-page document using a combination of media reports, White House statements, and think tank research to identify over 100 occasions where Musk's companies and his own personal wealth benefited during his time with the unofficial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). A statement on Warren's website describes the report as a list of actions where Musk or White House officials "broke ethics norms and precedent or may have violated laws regarding federal employees' participation in matters in which they have a financial interest," while benefiting Musk's business concerns. The report alleges that these actions have increased Musk's personal wealth by "at least" $100 billion (€85.4 billion) and wiped out a potential additional $2.37 billion (€2.07 billion) in business liabilities from Musk's record. Warren's report comes in the wake of a very public fallout this week between Trump and Musk, who left his role at DOGE earlier this month. Warren's report claims that Musk had conflicts with "at least 70 per cent" of the government departments that his new role came after. The report claims that President Trump fired the USAID Inspector General, who was set to inspect Musk's satellite company Starlink for its role in providing services to Russia in its ongoing war against Ukraine. In one of the most controversial moves of his early presidency, the report claims that Trump then tried to shut down USAID in light of this pending investigation. Trump then announced a pause of US foreign development assistance programmes through USAID, creating a $60 billion (€55.3 billion) funding gap. Among the USAID cancellation repercussions is some non-profit funding to Ukraine that the EU told Euronews in February that it will not be able to meet the gap. Warren's report also claims that Starlink either struck deals or is negotiating deals with at least a dozen countries, largely in Asia and Africa, 'amid threats of tariffs'. Regulators "have taken no public action on their investigations" in more than 40 federal agency matters regarding Musk's companies "for several months or more," the report continued. Many of the stalled investigations highlighted in the report were focused on Tesla, Musk's electric vehicle company. Citing NPR reports, Warren said that Trump fired the Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in the first round of DOGE cuts after it received over 300 consumer complaints about Tesla. Pending investigations and audits from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance into Tesla were shut down by the Trump administration, the report continued. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in charge of investigating market manipulation, limited staff authority to launch investigations as the body was investigating Tesla's potentially false claims about self-driving vehicles. In a similar vein, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) laid off workers in DOGE cuts while it investigated Tesla crashes caused by the car's 'full self-driving' and remote control features. Trump's administration also administered cuts and slowed down the work of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) and Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS) after these agencies launched investigations into SpaceX, Tesla and xAI Musk's artificial intelligence (AI) company behind chatbot Grok, for environmental violations. During his time at DOGE, Musk was able to put in motion or sign several government contracts worth billions of dollars for SpaceX, his space technology company based in Texas. Trump's announcement of the Golden Dome project to guarantee security for the US, along with an initial $25 billion (€22 billion) investment, had already pegged SpaceX as a frontrunner for the project. The White House is now also reportedly calling for 13 per cent more spending for the Department of Defense, with SpaceX "considered likely to be the top recipient" of this funding, while the report alleges the company has already made over $7 billion (€6.15 billion) in contracts. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is expected to subsidise SpaceX's broadband services in a reversal of a previous decision to give the company $900 million (€790 million). Musk also helped handpick many of the administration's key personnel, including the initial selection of SpaceX investor Jared Isaacman as NASA's top administrator and putting Michael Guetlein, a former SpaceX fellow, at the head of the Golden Dome missile program. These picks also influenced a potential contract with the Pentagon where SpaceX would be paid to "transport military cargo around the globe". The report also alleges that DOGE infiltrated the Treasury Department's Federal Payment System, which could give Musk the financial information of competitor companies that have been awarded contracts.
LeMonde
3 days ago
- LeMonde
Sergio Mattarella, president of the Italian Republic, the last of the democrats
When American billionaire Elon Musk attempted to interfere in Italian politics by criticizing the country's judiciary – accusing it of blocking the migration policy of his "friend," Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni – he found himself up against a man from another world, another era. An old-school European. An old-school democrat. A discreet statesman with uncontested legitimacy, a republican deeply rooted in Christian values: the president of the Italian Republic, Sergio Mattarella, 83 years old. "These judges need to go," Musk wrote on November 12, 2024, on his social network X, as an outspoken backer of the global far right. The Italian president replied the following day, without even naming Musk: "Anyone (...) about to assume an important government role in a friendly and allied country must respect [Italy's] sovereignty and cannot assume the task of imparting prescriptions." The clash between the world's richest man, whose ambitions include interplanetary conquest, and the president of an ancient nation that is a cradle of classical European culture, crystallized the confrontation between two opposing visions of politics. On one side, the affirmation of an electoral autocracy, where a victorious election is the sole condition for unlimited power. On the other, a vision of democracy based on checks and balances and legal as well as philosophical constraints. The president of the Italian Republic has stood as the guarantor of this second vision, even if it means subtly challenging the government's direction. For the far-right leader, Musk is a valuable asset; for the president, he resembles the "new feudal lords."
