
Sergio Mattarella, president of the Italian Republic, the last of the democrats
When American billionaire Elon Musk attempted to interfere in Italian politics by criticizing the country's judiciary – accusing it of blocking the migration policy of his "friend," Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni – he found himself up against a man from another world, another era. An old-school European. An old-school democrat. A discreet statesman with uncontested legitimacy, a republican deeply rooted in Christian values: the president of the Italian Republic, Sergio Mattarella, 83 years old.
"These judges need to go," Musk wrote on November 12, 2024, on his social network X, as an outspoken backer of the global far right. The Italian president replied the following day, without even naming Musk: "Anyone (...) about to assume an important government role in a friendly and allied country must respect [Italy's] sovereignty and cannot assume the task of imparting prescriptions."
The clash between the world's richest man, whose ambitions include interplanetary conquest, and the president of an ancient nation that is a cradle of classical European culture, crystallized the confrontation between two opposing visions of politics. On one side, the affirmation of an electoral autocracy, where a victorious election is the sole condition for unlimited power. On the other, a vision of democracy based on checks and balances and legal as well as philosophical constraints.
The president of the Italian Republic has stood as the guarantor of this second vision, even if it means subtly challenging the government's direction. For the far-right leader, Musk is a valuable asset; for the president, he resembles the "new feudal lords."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Italy holds referendum on citizenship, workers' rights
A non-EU adult resident without marriage or blood ties to Italy must currently live in the country for 10 years before they can apply for citizenship -- a process which can then take years. The referendum proposal, triggered by a grassroots campaign led by NGOs, would cut this to five years, putting Italy in line with Germany and France. Campaigners say around 2.5 million people could benefit from the reform, which is being backed by the centre-left Democratic Party. Meloni, whose far-right Brothers of Italy party has prioritised cutting illegal immigration even while increasing the number of legal work visas for migrants, is strongly against it. She said Thursday that the current system "is an excellent law, among the most open, in the sense that we have for years been among the European nations that grant the highest number of citizenships each year". More than 213,500 people acquired Italian citizenship in 2023, double the number in 2020 and one fifth of the European Union total, according to EU statistics. More than 90 percent were from outside the bloc, mostly from Albania and Morocco, as well as Argentina and Brazil -- two countries with large Italian immigrant communities. Ministers agreed in March to restrict the rights to citizenship of those with blood ties to Italy from four to two generations. Meloni and her coalition partners have encouraged voters to boycott the referendum, which will only be valid if 50 percent of eligible voters plus one participate. Even if it passes, the reform will not affect the migration law many consider the most unfair, that children born in Italy to foreign parents cannot request nationality until they reach 18. Prominent rapper Ghali, who was born in Milan to Tunisian parents, has been an outspoken advocate changing the law for children, but nevertheless urged fans to back Sunday's vote as a step in the right direction. "With a 'Yes' we ask that five years of life here are enough, not 10, to be part of this country," he wrote on Instagram. Interests of workers Under Italy's constitution, a referendum can be triggered by a petition signed by at least 500,000 voters. This week's ballot includes one question on citizenship and four others on increasing protections for workers who are dismissed, in precarious situations or involved in workplace accidents. The changes are being pushed by the left-wing CGIL trade union. "We want to reverse a culture that has prioritised the interests of business over those of workers," CGIL general secretary Maurizio Landini told AFP. The Democratic Party is also backing the proposals -- even if it introduced some of the laws the CGIL wants to repeal while in office in the past. The proposals are notably aimed at measures of the so-called Jobs Act, passed a decade ago by the government of the Democratic Party prime minister, Matteo Renzi, in order to liberalise the labour market. Supporters say the act boosted employment but detractors say it made work more precarious. Under new leadership, the Democratic Party -- which is polling at around 23 percent, behind Meloni's Brothers of Italy at about 30 percent, according to an SWG survey this week -- is seeking to woo working-class voters by backing the referendum reform.


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
US aerospace industry anxious as tariffs loom
At the request of President Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's department launched an investigation on May 1 to determine whether to impose tariffs of between 10 and 20 percent on civil aircraft and parts, including engines. The US industry those tariffs were crafted to protect swiftly let the administration know it was not interested. "Imposing broad tariff or non-tariff trade barriers on the imports of civil aviation technology would risk reversing decades of industrial progress and harm the domestic supply chain," the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) said in a letter addressed to Lutnick and obtained by AFP. The interested parties were given until June 3 to communicate their positions. The very next day, Lutnick announced that Washington aimed to "set the standard for aircraft part tariffs" by the end of this month. "The key is to protect that industry," he said, adding: "We will use these tariffs for the betterment of American industry." But AIA and the Airlines for America (A4A) trade association voiced fear that far from helping, the tariffs would end up harming US manufacturers. No fix needed "Unlike other industries, the civil aviation manufacturing industry prioritizes domestic production of high-value components and final assembly," AIA pointed out. According to the organization, US aerospace and defense exports reached $135.9 billion in 2023, including $113.9 billion for civil aviation alone. This allowed the sector to generate a trade surplus of $74.5 billion and to invest $34.5 billion in research and development, it said. The sector employs more than 2.2 million people in the United States across more than 100,000 companies, which in 2023 produced goods worth nearly $545 billion. In its response to Lutnick, the A4A highlighted how beneficial the international Agreement on Trade in Commercial Aviation (ATCA) had been by helping to eliminate tariffs and trade barriers over nearly half a century. "The US civil aviation industry is the success story that President Trump is looking for as it leads civil aerospace globally," it insisted. A full 84 percent of production was already American, it said, stressing that Washington "does not need to fix the 16 percent" remaining. "The current trade framework has enhanced our economic and national security and is a critical component to maintaining our national security moving forward," it said. For manufacturers, the potential tariffs would act like sand jamming a well-oiled machine that has been running smoothly for decades, experts warned. They would also throw off balance an ultra-sensitive supply chain still recovering from the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Competitive disadvantage' "To avoid the situation getting worse, we advocate to keep aerospace outside of trade wars," Willie Walsh, head of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), told the organization's general assembly last week. AIA meanwhile stressed that "aircraft and parts are already in high demand and have a limited supply." "Integrating new suppliers and expanding capacity is complex, timely, and costly," it warned, pointing out that finding suppliers capable of meeting rigorous safety certifications could "take up to 10 years." Delta Air Lines also argued for sticking with the status quo, cautioning that the proposed tariffs "would hinder Delta's ability to maintain its current trajectory." "If component parts incur tariffs upon entering the United States, Delta will be at a competitive disadvantage to foreign competitors," it said. "The action would also impose an unexpected tax on Delta's purchases of aircraft contracted years in advance." Delta chief Ed Bastian insisted in late April that the airline "will not be paying tariffs on any aircraft deliveries we take," adding that it was "working very closely with (European group) Airbus" to minimize the impact. Delta pointed out in its letter to Lutnick that it currently had 100 aircraft on order from Boeing, and that it was demanding that its Airbus A220s be produced primarily in Mobile, Alabama. But if the tariffs are imposed, it warned, "Delta would likely be forced to cancel existing contracts and reconsider contracts under negotiation."

LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Sergio Mattarella, president of the Italian Republic, the last of the democrats
When American billionaire Elon Musk attempted to interfere in Italian politics by criticizing the country's judiciary – accusing it of blocking the migration policy of his "friend," Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni – he found himself up against a man from another world, another era. An old-school European. An old-school democrat. A discreet statesman with uncontested legitimacy, a republican deeply rooted in Christian values: the president of the Italian Republic, Sergio Mattarella, 83 years old. "These judges need to go," Musk wrote on November 12, 2024, on his social network X, as an outspoken backer of the global far right. The Italian president replied the following day, without even naming Musk: "Anyone (...) about to assume an important government role in a friendly and allied country must respect [Italy's] sovereignty and cannot assume the task of imparting prescriptions." The clash between the world's richest man, whose ambitions include interplanetary conquest, and the president of an ancient nation that is a cradle of classical European culture, crystallized the confrontation between two opposing visions of politics. On one side, the affirmation of an electoral autocracy, where a victorious election is the sole condition for unlimited power. On the other, a vision of democracy based on checks and balances and legal as well as philosophical constraints. The president of the Italian Republic has stood as the guarantor of this second vision, even if it means subtly challenging the government's direction. For the far-right leader, Musk is a valuable asset; for the president, he resembles the "new feudal lords."