Del Monte Foods files for bankruptcy, plans to pursue sale
Why it matters: The nearly 140-year-old company — known for staples like canned vegetables and fruit cups — has faced mounting pressures from changing consumer habits, supply chain volatility and rising costs.
The company said it has secured support from key creditors for a plan to sell its key assets and stay in business.
Zoom in: Del Monte has been suffering from excessive debt, a downturn in consumer demand, increased discounting, a declining private label business and higher costs from inflation, according to a court filing.
The company, like other consumer packaged goods brands, has "experienced changing consumer purchase behavior and increased inflationary costs," chief restructuring officer Jonathan Goulding said in a court filing.
Context: Founded in 1886 in California, Del Monte eventually became one of the nation's leading packaged fruit sellers.
Today, Del Monte has about 2,780 employees and four factories, with two in the U.S. and two in Mexico.
The company's brands include its namesake lineup of canned fruit as well as Contadina, College Inn and Joyba. It also sells under private labels, but that business has been shrinking.
The company, which is not affiliated with Fresh Del Monte Produce, said in a statement that non-U.S. subsidiaries are not included in the Chapter 11 proceedings.
Threat level: The company racked up extra debt in 2023 as it anticipated higher volume — but sales instead fell in the next fiscal year, leaving it with "outsized production commitments," greater costs and higher promotional spending, according to Goulding.
The company said it recently closed certain production facilities to reduce its cost structure.
But its annual interest expenses exceed projected earnings, leaving it with "historically low liquidity," Goulding said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Layoffs climb to highest level since 2020: Research
Layoffs across the United States have climbed to the highest level since 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic slowed down economies around the world, according to a new report that was published on Wednesday. The report, which was released by the executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said companies have announced 744,308 job cuts so far this year, the highest tally since 2020, when 1,585,047 positions were slashed. Excluding the 2020 figures, the number of job cuts in 2025 is the highest since the first half of 2009, when 896,675 reductions occurred. The U.S.-based companies announced 47,999 job cuts in June, nearly 50 percent lower than the 93,816 reductions in May. 'The bulk of companies cited economic conditions last month. We saw some DOGE activity and have tracked over 2,000 jobs directly attributed to tariffs this year, but for the most part it was a quiet June,' the Challenger, Gray & Christmas' senior vice president and labor expert Andrew Challenger said in a statement. Challenger, Gray & Christmas laid out several reasons why layoffs have increased this year. The leading reason is the impact of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was cited in 286,679 planned layoffs in 2025. Economic and market conditions was the second most-cited reason for reductions, linked to 154,126 cuts this year. The shutdown of stores, plants and units has resulted in 107,142 layoffs. Restructuring efforts have also caused 64,487 job cuts. Bankruptcies led to another 35,641 cuts. Retail has seen the most cuts in the private sector in 2025, with 79,865 reductions, an increase of 255 percent compared to the first half of 2024, when 22,467 job cuts took place. 'Retailers are one of the hardest hit business sectors by tariffs, inflation, and uncertainty. If consumer spending continues to fall, it could mean more job losses in this industry,' Challenger said in a statement.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 Revealing Analyst Questions From Sonos's Q1 Earnings Call
Sonos' second quarter results were well received by the market, with revenue coming in above Wall Street expectations and year-over-year sales growth driven by strong demand for home theater products and successful promotional campaigns. Management attributed the performance to disciplined cost reduction, software reliability improvements, and early momentum from targeted pricing moves. Interim CEO Tom Conrad noted, 'We delivered a solid second quarter with revenue up 3% year-over-year and adjusted EBITDA increasing by $33 million, driven by a combination of strong gross margin and disciplined execution on our restructuring.' Is now the time to buy SONO? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $259.8 million vs analyst estimates of $255.1 million (2.8% year-on-year growth, 1.8% beat) Adjusted EPS: -$0.18 vs analyst expectations of -$0.15 (24.1% miss) Operating Margin: -23.6%, up from -28.1% in the same quarter last year Market Capitalization: $1.35 billion While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Steven Frankel (Rosenblatt Securities) asked about Sonos' channel inventory strategy amid tariff uncertainty. CFO Saori Casey explained that the company is coordinating closely with partners to time inventory flows and balance pricing strategies in response to tariff changes. Frankel (Rosenblatt Securities) also inquired about the conclusion of the IKEA partnership. Interim CEO Tom Conrad said the decision reflects a sharpened focus on core experiences and direct control of the Sonos ecosystem. Frankel (Rosenblatt Securities) followed up on efforts to repair relationships with installer partners. Conrad reported improved product reliability and positive customer feedback, indicating progress in restoring trust. Logan Katzman (Raymond James) questioned whether tariffs have impacted demand or pulled forward purchases. Casey stated no material demand changes have been observed so far, but the company is monitoring the situation closely. Erik Woodring (Morgan Stanley) requested clarification on Sonos' current tariff exposure by manufacturing location. Conrad responded that almost all U.S.-bound production now comes from Vietnam and Malaysia, minimizing exposure to China-specific tariffs. In the coming quarters, the StockStory team will be watching (1) how effectively Sonos manages tariff costs and supply chain flexibility, (2) the pace of software and hardware product updates—especially in the home theater segment, and (3) sustained double-digit growth in targeted international markets. Progress on these fronts will help clarify Sonos' ability to achieve profitable growth amid external uncertainties. Sonos currently trades at $10.96, up from $8.96 just before the earnings. In the wake of this quarter, is it a buy or sell? See for yourself in our full research report (it's free). Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election sent major indices to all-time highs, but stocks have retraced as investors debate the health of the economy and the potential impact of tariffs. While this leaves much uncertainty around 2025, a few companies are poised for long-term gains regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate, like our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+782% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What Del Monte's bankruptcy means for Canadian consumers
Del Monte Foods, the California-based subsidiary of the packaged global food giant of the same name, filed for bankruptcy in New Jersey this week, a development that came as a surprise for many Canadians who grew up eating the brand's canned fruit and vegetables. But rest easy: For now, at least, the bankruptcy is not expected to have an impact on what's available in Canadian grocery aisles. Here the Financial Post breaks down what led to the company's financial troubles and what it could mean going forward. With a debt load that exceeded US$1 billion, on July 1, Del Monte Foods Corp. Inc. filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy in New Jersey. In its filing, the company said its problems began about two years ago: Every summer, the company makes critical decisions about how much food it thinks it can sell in the year ahead, and commits to buying that much. It believed it would see 'heightened' consumer demand in 2024, based on past years, and thus committed to high production during what it calls its packing season. But that's not how things turned out: consumer demand instead declined, saddling Del Monte with excess inventory. To sell it, Del Monte resorted to costly promotions, and it also faced higher costs to warehouse all that inventory. 'The sharp rise in interest rates in 2023 and 2024 increased the company's annual cash interest expense to approximately US$125,000,000, which materially exceeds the Company's current projected annual EBITDA,' it wrote in its bankruptcy filing. With a liquidity crunch looming, it has asked permission to pay out approximately US$102 million to vendors, while it works to renegotiate its debt with lenders, and potentially sell some of its assets. Some analysts have pegged the company's problems as rooted in the shift toward more fresh fruits and vegetables. Gregory Longstreet, chief executive of Del Monte Pacific, Singapore-listed parent company of Del Monte Foods Inc., has emphasized to analysts in earnings calls that demand for his products remains strong. But at the same time, excess inventory has proven to be a consistent challenge. In March, chief financial officer Parag Sachdeva told analysts that the company had reduced excess inventory by US$291 million. Some of that was waste, such as expired or damaged products that cannot be sold and must be donated, he said. The problem, however, is that there was still excess inventory in the system: 'As I mentioned, we still have 8 million cases excess, which was brought down from 14.5 million,' Sachdeva said, adding that the company would continue to reduce its inventory. In a call with analysts on March, Sachdev said that the company had lowered its production of certain products, in order to reduce its excess inventory. But doing so ate into its gross margin. 'The cost increase that you see is a number of things,' said Sachdev. 'One is your under-absorption of overheads because we have lowered our production volume to lower inventory.' Overall, the situation meant that the company was more exposed to inflation, which shows up as higher costs. At the same time that the company has been struggling to reduce its inventory, U.S. President Donald Trump embarked on his second term in office by issuing blanket tariffs, which have a number of effects on a global company such as Del Monte. Longstreet told analysts that the tariffs affected everything from mandarins that the company imports from China to grapefruits grown in Mexico. But then there was also one much broader impact: the tariffs hit the cost of the actual cans that it uses to package its products because they are constructed out of a combination of steel and tinplate. Trump first slapped 25 per cent tariffs on steel and then in June raised them to 50 per cent. 'We source most of our steel domestically,' Longstreet said on an earnings call in March. 'We source and buy from the largest can producer, but we will have some impact that will likely require up to mid-single-digit price increases on our metal packaging products.' He added that rising costs would lead to higher prices, which in turn could lead to lower sales. 'In the end, it is something that we're going to manage,' said Longstreet, 'but there will be some headwinds in terms of pricing impact on demand.' How does Canada's burgeoning LNG industry measure up to its ambitions? What is Canada's digital services tax and why is it infuriating Trump? Meanwhile, the U.S. subsidiary is carrying a little more than US$1 billion of debt, according to court filings this week in New Jersey. The hope is that under bankruptcy protection, Del Monte can continue to operate as usual and make sales. But it could use bankruptcy to renegotiate some of its debt and possibly sell some of its assets. Before filing for bankruptcy, the company struck an agreement with some of its lenders that will inject a US$165 million in capital — pending court approval — into its coffers in what's known as a debtor-in-possession loan. It is hoping to move through bankruptcy quickly and is saying that it will not have an impact on its operations. 'A drawn-out and protracted bankruptcy process would be value-destructive for the company and its stakeholders, and therefore the company believes that any chapter 11 process must be on an expeditious timeline,' the company wrote in one of its filings. So far, the parent company has said that it does not expect its U.S. bankruptcy to have any impact on Del Monte products in other countries. In Canada, the Del Monte brand has been part of the France-based Bonduelle Group since a 2018 deal. Pamela Samedy, of Nata PR, which handles media for Bonduelle, said she had no comment on the pending bankruptcy. The Del Monte brand has been registered in Canada since 1918. That's when the company began preserving the bounty of fresh fruit and vegetables coming out of California and sending it to Canada. The rest is history: Canadians became familiar with the company's fruit cups and canned vegetables over the ensuing decades. An Ipsos study cited by the company found the brand had 96 per cent recognition in Canada. • Email: gfriedman@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
