Protests Break Out Against Zelensky in Ukraine: What to Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Protests have broken out against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky after he signed a bill that critics says weakens the country's anti-corruption agencies.
The law effectively strips the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) of their independence and places them under the control of the prosecutor general. It will make it easier for the government to control which cases are pursued.
Dmytro Koziatynskyi, a veteran of the Russia-Ukraine war, rallied hundreds of Ukrainians for the protests on Tuesday. He called the bill an "assault on the anti-corruption framework," according to Ukrainska Pravda.
He added: "Time is not on our side... we must take to the streets tonight and urge Zelensky to prevent a return to the dark days of Yanukovych. See you this evening!"
He was referring to Ukraine's former president Viktor Yanukovych, who was removed from the presidency in 2014 following weeks of protests.
People chant during a protest in central Kyiv, Ukraine, on Tuesday.
People chant during a protest in central Kyiv, Ukraine, on Tuesday.
AP
This is a developing story. More to follow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
22 minutes ago
- UPI
Five dead in Ukraine-Russian drone duels; Zelensky optimistic
Community workers clean debris at the site of a strike on a residential area in Kharkiv, northern Ukraine, on Saturday. At least six people, including two children, were injured after Russian forces attacked Kharkiv with glide bombs, rockets. Photo by Sergey Kozlov/EPA July 26 (UPI) -- Russia and Ukraine on Saturday exchanged drone attacks, with five people dead in the overnight strikes, as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed optimism about his nation's military progress. Zelensky said Ukraine was winning the war against Russia, which invaded his country in February 2022. Since then, Ukraine has regained some territory. "Russian military enterprises, Russian logistics and Russian airfields must see that Russia's own war is now hitting them back with real consequences," Zelensky posted Saturday on X. "The precision of our drones, the daily nature of Ukraine's responses -- are some of the arguments that we will surely bring peace closer." In Ukraine on Saturday, Russia used more than 200 drones and almost 300 missiles, mainly in Dnipropetrovsk. Three people died there. In Russia, a car caught fire after a drone strike, killing two, Rostov's acting governor, Yury Slyusar, said. Military on both sides claimed success. Russia said soldiers took two villages in eastern Ukraine: Zelenyi Hai in the Donetsk region and Maliivka in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Zelensky said his troops were "gradually pushing Russian forces out" of the Sumy region. "Although this region remains one of the enemy's priority directions, our forces consistently block Russian attempts to advance deeper into the Sumy region from the border areas," Zelensky wrote on X. Zelensky noted Russia's airstrikes targeted Kharkin and Sumy. At least six people, including two children, were injured after Russian forces attacked Kharkiv with glide bombs, rockets and drones, the State Emergency Service of Ukraine reported. A village in the region -- Kindrativka -- reportedly was liberated from Russian control. "Particular attention was given to the Pokrovsk direction -- just over the past day alone, there were 51 intense engagements," Zelensky posted on X. "Ukrainian units are defending their positions, and every elimination of occupiers is of great value." He said he plans to discuss with other nations the need for more weapons. Zelnsky said he has commitments from Germany for two Patriot missile systems and one from Norway. He said he's working on Patriot help from the Netherlands Zelensky said drone production will significantly exceed figures projected at the start of the year. Peace talks Fighting is continuing amid hopes to end the war. Delagations from both nations met on Wednesday in Istanbul but both sides rejected each other's ideas. In May, there were two rounds of cease-fire talks, also in Turkey, at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants an end to the "horrible, bloody war." In Scotland, Trump plans to meet with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday about ending the war. Trump said before departing for Scotland on Friday that he was still considering "severe" secondary sanctions against Russia. On July 14, he suggested they would go into effect in 50 days if Russia doesn't end the war. "We're looking at that whole situation," Trump said Friday. Trump said he is backing Zelensky's proposed summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. "It's going to happen, but it should have happened three months ago," Trump said. The Kremlin said a summit with Zelensky will only occur as a final step for a peace deal. Russian spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it is unlikely Putin will accommodate Ukraine's proposal for the meeting at the end of August. Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said he plans to speak with Trump and Putin about conveying the talks in his nation.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia says it has captured two villages in Ukraine, Ukraine reports heavy fighting
MOSCOW (Reuters) -Russia's Defence Ministry said on Saturday its forces had captured two more villages in eastern Ukraine, including one in Dnipropetrovsk region where Moscow says its troops have begun to make advances. Ukrainian forces made no acknowledgement that the villages had changed hands, but reported heavy fighting. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, in an assessment of the situation along the 1,000-km (620-mile) front line, said the logistics hub of Pokrovsk remained the focal point of battles. He also said Ukrainian forces had recorded "successful actions" in Sumy region on Ukraine's northern border, where Russian forces have established a foothold in recent weeks. Reuters could not independently confirm battlefield accounts from either side. The front-line clashes were reported three days after the two sides held their third direct meeting in Turkey aimed at resolving the nearly 3-1/2-year-old war. Both sides reported progress in swaps of prisoners or the remains of war dead, but no breakthroughs were announced in terms of a ceasefire or a meeting of the two countries' leaders. Russia's military has been reporting nearly daily the capture of new villages in its slow advance westward. The Russian Defence Ministry said its forces had taken control of Zelenyi Hai in Donetsk region and Maliivka, a village just inside Dnipropetrovsk region. The ministry described Zelenyi Hai as "a major stronghold of Ukrainian formations in this section of the front (that) covered approaches to the administrative border of the Dnipropetrovsk region". Dnipropetrovsk is not among the five regions that Moscow claims as its own -- Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia and the Crimean peninsula, annexed in 2014. Russia last month said its forces had crossed into Dnipropetrovsk region and now says it holds at least two villages. Ukraine's military has for weeks dismissed any notion that Russian troops hold territory in the region. The Ukrainian military's General Staff, in a late evening report, mentioned Zelenyi Hai as one of several frontline areas that had come under Russian attack 11 times over the past 24 hours. It said Maliivka was one of several villages where 10 Russian attacks had been halted. Zelenskiy, in his nightly video address, said Ukraine's top commander, Oleksandr Syrskyi, had identified Pokrovsk as an area requiring "special attention" under constant attack. A military spokesperson, Viktor Trehubov, told national television that Russian forces were attacking Pokrovsk in "a small simply does not stop". Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
JONATHAN TURLEY: The key players in the Russia collusion hoax, and why they're sweating now
The release of declassified material has shed new light on the creation of the Russian collusion investigation and many of the names are crushingly familiar. Indeed, Congress is moving to "round up the usual suspects" in light of the new revelations. It is the story of the real Russian conspiracy: how high-ranking officials in the Obama Administration seeded this false claim with the help of an eager, unquestioning press corps. Not surprisingly, the media, which spent years repeating the false Russian collusion claims, is doing a full-court press to kill the story. Yet, many of these key figures are retaining counsel in anticipation of the unfolding investigation. Many previously secured contracts with MSNBC or CNN, or book deals, where they doubled down on the false claims detailed in these new documents. Here are just a few of the usual suspects: Brennan is arguably the most at risk in the new disclosures, which appear to contradict his prior testimony before Congress. On May 23, 2017, Brennan testified that the infamous Steele dossier "wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community Assessment that was done." However, the new material shows that Brennan was the key figure insisting on the inclusion of the Steele dossier in an intelligence assessment, suggesting that the Russians did influence the election in favor of Trump. Brennan not only intervened to include the dossier but overruled the CIA's two most senior Russia experts, who said it "did not meet even the most basic tradecraft standards." One analyst recounted how "[Brennan] refused to remove it, and when confronted with the dossier's main flaws, responded, 'Yes, but doesn't it ring true?'" Notably, it was Brennan who briefed Obama in 2016 about Hillary Clinton's plan to create a Russian conspiracy "to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service." Months later, it would be Brennan who actively incorporated the dossier secretly funded by Clinton's campaign. James Clapper, former DNI under Obama, is expecting the worst and said that he has "lawyered up." Clapper was in the briefing in July 2016 when Obama was told that Clinton was planning to create a Russian conspiracy narrative. In November 2016, Clapper received an assessment from the intelligence community that Russia was "probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means." He also received talking points from staff on Dec. 7, 2016, "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome." On Dec. 9, 2016, another report stated that "Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent U.S. election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure." That Presidential Daily Brief was scheduled to be published on Dec. 9, but CDNI Clapper's office stopped its publication "based on some new guidance." Clapper later joined Obama with Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and others, in a meeting where a new assessment was ordered that would detail the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election." Brennan then reportedly handpicked the analysts who seemed to flip the earlier assessments without any credible intelligence. In a 2018 interview with the Harvard Gazette, Clapper continued to spread the false narrative, referring to the high-confidence judgment that "Putin directly ordered the hacking and election interference." He added, "I think they [Russians] actually influenced the outcome." Clapper later added to his tarnished legacy by signing the letter with more than 50 former intelligence officials dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 presidential election as having the [hall]marks of "Russian disinformation." James Comey would use this contrived intelligence to green-light the investigations that overwhelmed the first Trump term. The FBI was aware early that the Steele dossier was an unreliable political hit job funded by the Clinton campaign. Moreover, the CIA told the FBI that Trump associate Carter Page was a U.S. intelligence asset, not a Russian spy. The FBI ignored such countervailing intelligence, violated protocols, and lied to a federal court to maintain the Russian investigation. In an interview with Fox's Bret Baier, Comey was asked about the lack of evidence of "Russian collusion." Comey dismissed the question by saying "collusion's not a word that I'm familiar with." Putting aside the lunacy of that statement, Comey then says the question is whether Americans were "in cahoots with the foreign intelligence activities." It appears "cahoots" is a word he is familiar with. He then denied knowing, in April 2018, that the Clinton campaign had funded the report. Comey routinely seems unfamiliar with terms or facts that contradicted his investigating Trump, even years later. Comey repeatedly testified to a lack of memory on key decisions made in the Russian investigation. However, documents show that it was Comey who pushed back on a planned statement by Clapper, stating that they had not determined the dossier to be reliable. Andrew McCabe, now a CNN contributor, was fired after career Justice Department officials found that the former acting FBI director not only lied to investigators but deserved to be fired. That recommendation was reportedly embraced by the career officials in the inspector general's office. He was accused of lying four times, including twice under oath. Not surprisingly, McCabe makes appearances in the new disclosures. He is not only present at critical meetings, but it also appears that McCabe was allegedly responsible for blocking congressional investigators from interviewing the FBI analysts who supported Brennan and drafters of the controversial ICA. Congress alleged that at least 30 FBI employees associated with the dossier were walled off by McCabe. These and other names are not new. As the media was spreading the false narrative of Russian collusion, many of these figures knew that there was no evidence of such collusion. They said nothing. Instead, after Obama ordered a new assessment effectively flipping the conclusions of the earlier assessment, anonymous sources leaked the false narrative to the media, which eagerly ran with the story. While leaks of the false narrative were rampant, none of the actual facts were leaked to the media. In the meantime, figures like then Rep. Adam Schiff, now a Democratic senator from California, continued to claim, even after Special Counsel Robert Mueller rejected evidence of collusion, that he had secret evidence to the contrary in the House Intelligence Committee. Schiff never revealed that evidence, and the public now knows that the intelligence community rejected the collusion claims from the outset. The public is now learning about the real Russian conspiracy and its key players. It was the most infamous -- and successful -- political hit job in history. The same media that pushed the false claims are now, again, imposing a news blackout as they did with the Hunter Biden laptop. The problem is that the truth, like water, tends to find a way out. That trickle just turned into a flood for the architects of the Russian collusion hoax.
