No injustice to any State on proposed Banakacharla project: Centre
The Centre will evaluate the proposed Banakacharla irrigation project in a fair manner as per existing norms and after consulting all the stakeholders, said Union Minister for Water Resources C.R. Patil on Wednesday.
He told his Cabinet colleague and Union Minister of Coal and Mines G. Kishan Reddy at his office in Shram Shakti Bhavan, New Delhi, that no State will face any injustice.
Metro Phase II
Mr. Kishan Reddy also met Union Minister of Housing and Urban Development Manohar Lal Khattar, and discussed the Hyderabad Metro Rail phase two proposals submitted by the Telangana Government.
Mr. Khattar stated that the DPR after incorporating Centre's suggestions was received and it was under evaluation. The Centre is keen to support the project, he said in a press release.
Playing politics
Meanwhile, Nizamabad MP D. Aravind accused the Congress and BRS of playing politics on AP's Banakacharla project, ahead of local body polls.
'This is a plan hatched by former Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao to rake up the Telangana sentiment. Why can't Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy discuss the issue with his AP counterpart N. Chandrababu Naidu if there are any grievance about the project,' he questioned.
The MP wanted to know if the Congress Government has any plans or funds to take up projects to make use of the Godavari river waters which AP has plans to make use of with the proposed new project. The political game plan of the Congress and BRS parties appears to blame the Central Government despite having no clue on perceived grievances, he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
CM: Bengal will not observe ‘Samvidhan Hatya Diwas'
1 2 3 Kolkata: Bengal govt will not observe 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas' on June 25, CM Mamata Banerjee has said, calling a central directive in this regard a mockery of the Constitution and democracy. The Union ministry of culture has in a letter asked the administration to organise events to be led by the governor or CM to mark 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas' on June 25, which also marks the 50th anniversary of the imposition of Emergency. "The intent is politically motivated. I condemn the term 'murder of Constitution'. Constitution is the very foundation of our democratic system, our rights, everything we stand for. How can they say that Constitution has been murdered? I object to this," the CM said. She added, "You may have your political differences with Rahul Gandhi, the leader of opposition. You may or may not like him. But there are other political parties. Many of them were not even there during the Emergency. Did you consult them?"Accusing the Centre, instead, of "murdering democracy", Banerjee said, "Every day, democracy is being murdered, fundamental rights are being curtailed, state economies are being bulldozed. You are forcefully imposing your fabricated religious ideologies on people and pursuing your own toppled elected govts in Maharashtra, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Jharkhand. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dermatologist Says "Throw Away Your Regular Bedsheets Right Now, Here's Why" Miracle Sheets Learn More Undo You even approached the SC seeking President's Rule in Bengal. You should be ashamed." Alleging that all four pillars of democracy were under threat, Banerjee asked, "Which one have you left untouched? Even the Election Commission has become entirely biased." She added that the Centre's letter to the chief secretary mentioning "constitutional morality" was unbecoming. "Who is talking about constitutional morality? Those who do not respect the Constitution?" Taking a swipe at PM Narendra Modi, she said, "The PM is always abroad. Who is the PM, Narendra Modi or Amit Shah? Modiji travels the world while Amit Shah handles everything. If that's the case, why not officially declare Amit Shah as Prime Minister? It appears that he is running the country. You are using governors for political ends. Letters are being drafted and sent from the MHA through them. There is no adherence to any system. You play with people's dignity." Questioning the Centre for choosing a pre-Independence date to celebrate Bengal Foundation Day, the CM said the state assembly had passed a resolution declaring Poila Baisakh as Bangla Diwas. "On June 20, 1947, when India was not yet independent, a law was passed stating that Bengal would remain with India and Bangladesh with Pakistan. Why should we accept that date? India became independent on Aug 15. Shouldn't Bengalis decide Bengal's foundation day? Will you decide everything?" She alleged that Centre was repeatedly stonewalling attempts to rename West Bengal as Bengal. In a reference to the violence at Maheshtala recently, the CM said, "A fruit vendor went home to celebrate a festival. And you planted a holy tulsi plant there. We offer tulsi to Lord Jagannath and Sri Krishna. If you wanted to plant tulsi, why didn't you do so in your own house? I am telling everyone indulging in mean politics that this is injustice and an insult to our gods. People have the right to follow their religion…So many people go to their ancestral homes during Durga Puja. Can we occupy their houses? What are you teaching people?"
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Regime could fall': Donald Trump says no decision yet on joining Israel in bombing Iran; warns 'anything could happen'
(Photo credit: AP) US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he has not yet decided whether the United States will join Israel in launching strikes against Iran, but warned that the 'regime could fall,' as a result of the conflict. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump was asked whether he believed the Iranian government could fall. 'Sure. Anything could happen, right?' he replied, adding that a change in Iran's leadership 'could happen.' His remarks come amid heightened tensions in the region following Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites. While Trump has not committed to direct US involvement in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, he signaled increasing pressure on Tehran and emphasized that all options remain on the table. Earlier, during another exchange with reporters at the White House, Trump declined to say definitively whether he would order US forces to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' He also warned that a turning point may be imminent. 'Nothing is finished until it is finished,' further adding that, 'the next week is going to be very big— maybe less than a week." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Responding to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who rejected US demands for surrender, Trump offered a blunt reply: 'I say good luck.' The president's cryptic remarks come as Israel's strikes on Iran enter their sixth day, fueling speculation over potential US involvement and raising concerns about a broader regional conflict. Trump's cautious yet provocative tone has also sparked debate within his own party, with allies divided on how far the US should go in backing Israel. Earlier, Khamenei had dismissed Trump's previous threats and rejected the call for "unconditional surrender." "Intelligent people who know Iran, the nation and the history of Iran will never speak to this nation in the language of threats, because the Iranian nation cannot be surrendered," Khamenei declared in a televised statement, according to Iranian state media. "The Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage," he added. This response challenged both Israel and Trump, as the US contemplated joining Israel's aerial operations. Both nations insist Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons, whilst Iran maintains it has no such intentions.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
HC orders Centre to restart MGNREGA in Bengal from Aug 1, TMC says state govt vindicated
Stating that no central scheme can be sent to cold storage forever, the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday directed the Centre to restart MGNREGA, the 100-day rural job guarantee scheme, in West Bengal prospectively from August 1. The Division Bench of the High Court, led by Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam, allowed the Centre to impose special conditions, restrictions, and regulations — not imposed in other states — to ensure that no irregularity occurs when the scheme is being implemented in West Bengal. The BJP-led government at the Centre had stopped the implementation of the scheme in West Bengal from March 9, 2022, alleging widespread irregularities and non-compliance of its directives by the state. The TMC government in the state, on the other hand, accused the Centre of withholding the MGNREGA dues for 'political reasons' and said that it has submitted 22 compliance reports to the Centre but to no avail. The Division Bench, also comprising Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), said: 'The scheme of the Act does not envisage a situation where the scheme would be put to cold storage for eternity… The Centre can impose any kind of conditions to prevent corruption… If the Center wants, it can send money directly to the account of a specific person through the central portal. The Centre can carry out necessary surveillance to prevent corruption. In addition, the Centre can continue investigations in all the districts of the state.' The High Court's order came on a PIL (Public Interest Litigation) filed by an outfit of labourers called Paschim Banga Khet Mansoor Samity. The group sought the outstanding wages of workers settled with at least 0.05 per cent interest. BJP MLA and Leader of Opposition in Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, also filed an application demanding a CBI investigation into the alleged embezzlement of Central funds in the scheme's implementation in West Bengal. Welcoming the High Court's order, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said the Centre must immediately release the arrears under MGNREGA scheme and other rural development projects before sending further inquiry teams to the state. 'We welcome the High Court judgment. Let them (Centre) restart the programme first. This is not their money, it's public money. It's our right to get it,' Banerjee said at a press conference at Nabanna. 'We did not even go to court; an individual organisation went. From the government's side, we will go for a review to demand the arrears. The Centre is sending teams to Bengal, but first, give us the due money. Not a single rupee has been released for the past few years. This is public money,' she said. TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said that the High Court's order vindicated the state government's stand. 'The order vindicated our stand and our fight for the central funds. The Centre has been blocking Bengal government's dues illegally and in a discriminatory manner. The High Court had on April 10 directed the central government to state why the MGNREGA scheme should not be prospectively implemented in West Bengal, leaving out four districts. It has been stated that there are allegations of defalcation of funds with regard to four districts of Purba Bardhaman, Hooghly, Malda and Darjeeling (GTA area). The Central government on Wednesday submitted its stand in the form of an affidavit on implementing the NREGA scheme prospectively in the state. During the hearing on Wednesday, the court said: 'From beginning, in so many hearings, we are trying to make it clear whether the legal beneficiaries will get their wages. If there are 10 people who have genuinely done the work, what about them?' To this, Additional Solicitor General Ashok Chakraborty, representing the Central government, said: 'Who is to assess whether these people have genuinely worked or not? Since there is factual proof of misappropriation of funds and unless we are satisfied with the State's action taken report, we cannot disburse funds.' The Chief Justice then said: 'Whatever has happened has happened. Now, draw a line and make a beginning. Prospectively implement the scheme from August 1. Impose conditions. Parallelly proceed with your inquiry and recovery of misappropriated amounts.' State Advocate General AG Kishore, representing the West Bengal government, said that nodal officers might not be required anymore for wage distribution as the Centre has come out with a new portal for the electronic disbursement of payments. The matter will come up for further hearing after August 15. Before the Centre had suspended the MGNREGS in West Bengal in March 2022, 75.97 lakh families had availed the scheme in the state in 2021-22. The number was even higher (79.65 lakh) during 2020-21, the year that saw the outbreak of Covid-19. The last allocation, made in 2021-22, was for 27 crore labour days, out of which wages worth Rs 3,500 crore were withheld by the Centre. In the previous year, 2020-21, the allocation had been 41 crore labour days. Responding to a starred question asked by TMC member Jawar Sircar, Rural Development Minister Giriraj Singh on December 06, 2023, informed Rajya Sabha that a total amount of Rs 13,965.91 crore was pending as Central share for two schemes—MG-NREGS and PMAY-G. The West Bengal government sources, however, say that the total dues of about Rs 18,000 crore are pending under three rural development schemes—MG-NRGES, PMAY-G, and PMGSY. In January this year, West Bengal's Rural Development Minister Pradip K Mazumdar had written a letter to the Union Rural Development Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, seeking an appointment for a meeting to urge the latter to release funds. TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee had led two delegations of party MPs to Krishi Bhawan, seeking the release of funds to the states. Recently, the Ministry of Rural Development had informed a parliamentary standing committee that the decision to release funds amounting to Rs 7,888.67 crore to West Bengal under Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana-Gramin (PMAY-G) during the current financial year (2024-25) is pending with 'competent authority'. With inputs from ENS, New Delhi
