Maha education officers threaten indefinite strike from August 8 over Shalarth fraud arrests
A Shalarth ID serves as a unique digital identifier assigned to teachers and staff working in government and aided schools across Maharashtra. It is essential for managing salary disbursements, accessing service records, and availing employment-related benefits through the state's centralised payroll system.
In Nagpur, several teachers and staff members allegedly obtained bogus Shalarth IDs by paying bribes to school managements and education officers. Investigations suggest that some of them actively colluded with officials to create fake identities and open fraudulent bank accounts, receiving a cut from the misappropriated government funds.
On July 18, chief minister Devendra Fadnavis informed the state assembly that the estimated scale of the fraud could range between ₹1,000 and ₹ 3,000 crore. A Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been constituted to probe the matter. In the wake of the revelations, School Education Minister Dada Bhuse has suspended Mumbai's deputy director Sandeep Sangave, while Ulhas Narad, the deputy director of education in Nagpur, has been arrested.
The protest was triggered by ongoing police action in the Shalarth ID fraud case, where, till now, 17 officers from the education department have been arrested. The case involves allegations of creating 547 fake Shalarth IDs to embezzle around 100 crore.
Among those who joined the protest were primary education director Sharad Gosavi, secondary education director Mahesh Palkar, and planning director Krishnakumar Patil, along with several other senior gazetted officers. The protest was organised by the All Maharashtra Gazetted Education Officers' Association.
During the protest, education commissioner Sachindra Pratap Singh held discussions with association leaders, but no resolution was reached. The association reiterated that unless the government provides clear assurances and meets its demands, a full-scale indefinite strike would begin on August 8.
Sheshrao Bade, president of the Akhil Maharashtra Rajya Shikshan Seva Rajpatrit Adhikari Sangh, said, 'We are not against inquiries, but justice cannot be sacrificed for the sake of urgency. Our demand is simply to ensure a fair and transparent process before taking punitive action.'
The agitation has received strong backing from several other bodies, including the extension officers' Union, the Headmaster's Federation, the Non-Gazetted officers' Association, and various teachers' unions. L
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
State Govt Defends SIT Probe into APMC Corruption as Serving Farmers' Interests
Nagpur: The Maharashtra govt on Tuesday defended its decision to appoint a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe alleged corruption in Nagpur's Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), informing the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court that the law governing such bodies exists "for the benefit of farmers, not for the benefit of office-bearers. " Appearing for the state, government pleader Devendra Chauhan argued that while market committees are autonomous, they ultimately fall under the ambit of the state govt, which has the authority to oversee their functioning and order inquiries. "The APMC Act is not designed to protect office-holders but to safeguard farmers' interests. The argument that the Act bars the appointment of an SIT is untenable," Chauhan submitted. The SIT, headed by collector Dr Vipin Itankar, was tasked with investigating alleged irregularities by the APMC's board of directors. However, committee chairman Sheikh Ahmadbhai Karim Bhai and director Kishor Palandurkar challenged the probe through senior counsel Sunil Manohar and Ajay Ghare, contending it was unlawful. Manohar told the court that the cooperation department had already conducted two separate inquiries into the matter and that two related cases are still pending before the high court. He stressed that the disputed transactions — allocation of shops — took place in 2012 under a different executive committee, making it unfair to hold the current 2021 committee responsible. "The SIT order shows the state wants to investigate APMC's day-to-day functioning. While APMC is under the state's purview, it remains an autonomous body. This SIT is therefore illegal," Manohar said. The bench heard arguments from both sides and reserved its verdict, which is expected within a week.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Govt to file review petition in SC for Mahadevi's return to Jain mutt: CM
Kolhapur: Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis said on Tuesday that state govt will file a review petition in the Supreme Court seeking the return of the elephant, Mahadevi alias Madhuri, to the Jain mutt at Kolhapur's Nandani village. Fadnavis convened a meeting with the Jain mutt's top office-bearers and representatives. Deputy chief minister Ajit Pawar, forest minister Ganesh Naik, along with ministers Chandrakant Patil, Girish Mahajan, Hasan Mushrif, Prakash Abitkar, and other MLAs and MPs attended the meeting. Addressing the meeting, Fadnavis said, "The elephant has been in Nandani mutt for the past 34 years. Keeping public sentiment in mind, state govt will file a reconsideration petition. The mutt should also include the state govt in its petition. Also, a separate detailed stand will be presented in the Supreme Court on behalf of the forest department. In this, all the issues suggested by the Central Zoo Authority and the high-level committee will be resolved. " "State govt will form a team, including a doctor to take care of the elephant, and provide all necessary assistance. If necessary, arrangements like a rescue centre will be made and facilities will be provided accordingly. A request will also be made in this petition through the state govt to appoint an independent committee by the Supreme Court to investigate these matters. Efforts will be made to bring Mahadevi elephant back to the mutt through the legal process," added Fadnavis. After the meeting, former MP Raju Shetti said, "If Madhuri was fit before shifting her as per the eight different medical reports, then how come she became physically unfit after reaching the Gujarat facility in 48 hours? How did she get multiple fractures? Elephants from the North East were also brought to Vantara after travelling 3000 km. An elephant from Vita in Sangli was taken to Vantara three years ago. What is its condition now? Three other mutts in the border villages of Karnataka have also received notices from the forest department. " MLC Satej Patil said, "If govt, and more specifically the forest department, puts forward the case properly, then only we will be able to bring our elephant back. The govt has taken a positive stand for the elephant, and we welcome it." Meanwhile, the chief of Jain mutt, Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya, said, "CM Devendra Fadnavis has assured us that they will support us in this case." The Bombay HC, responding to petition by Peta, ordered the rehabilitation of the elephant from the Nandani mutt to an elephant welfare centre operated by Vantara Trust in Jamnagar, Gujarat. The mutt appealed to SC against this directive, but following the dismissal of the petition, the elephant was relocated to Jamnagar on July 29. Since then, the issue has sparked a highly emotional and politically charged campaign across Kolhapur and neighbouring districts, including border areas of Karnataka, advocating for the elephant's return to Nandani.
NDTV
17 minutes ago
- NDTV
More Acquittals, Fewer Convictions: 5 Years Of Madhya Pradesh's Anti-Conversion Law
Bhopal: The first five and a half years of Madhya Pradesh's stringent anti-religious conversion law branded in political circles as the 'Love Jihad' law paint a picture far removed from its stated intent. What was introduced as a tough legal shield to stop forced conversions has, in reality, seen more accused walk free than end up behind bars. The Madhya Pradesh Religious Freedom Ordinance, brought into force in January 2020, and its successor, the Madhya Pradesh Religious Freedom Act, 2021, promised uncompromising action against religious conversions through coercion, deception, or marriage. Yet, the figures tabled by Chief Minister Mohan Yadav's government in the Assembly on Tuesday have shaken even seasoned political observers. Between January 1, 2020, and July 15, 2025, a total of 283 cases were registered across the state under the law. Of these 197 cases, nearly 70% are still pending in various courts. In the remaining 86 cases where trials have concluded or settlements have been reached, the numbers tell a story of collapsing prosecutions: 50 acquittals, just 7 convictions, and one case that ended in a mutual compromise. The convictions themselves are scattered. A lone life sentence in a case from Agar-Malwa's Nalkheda police station; a 10-year jail term in a Mandsaur case involving rape charges; two convictions from Dhar, and one each from Burhanpur and Rewa districts. So why is the law faltering in court? According to senior police sources, the primary reasons are flimsy evidence and hostile witnesses. In case after case, women initially presented as victims have told courts they entered into relationships or marriages with men of another religion of their own free will, living with them without fear or inducement. In some cases involving minors, families admitted that FIRs were filed under societal pressure, only to retract their statements later, dismantling the prosecution's case. The data also reveals troubling demographics. Out of the 283 cases, 71 victims were under the age of 18. Most incidents have emerged from the communally sensitive and tribal-dominated Malwa-Nimar region. Indore tops the list with 74 cases (26% of the total), followed by Bhopal (33), Dhar (13), Ujjain and Khandwa (12 each), Chhatarpur (11), and Khargone (10). The government has attempted to project renewed seriousness, informing the Assembly that in May this year it formed a state-level Special Investigation Team (SIT) to re-examine every case filed under the law so far. The Act itself prescribes harsh penalties: forced conversion can attract 1-5 years in prison and a fine up to Rs 25,000; if the victim is a minor, woman, or belongs to SC/ST, punishment rises to 2-10 years and a fine up to Rs 50,000; concealing religion before marriage can result in 3-10 years' imprisonment and a Rs 50,000 fine; and mass conversions carry 5-10 years in prison with fines up to Rs 1 lakh. Despite these provisions, the law's enforcement track record appears weak, a fact critics say undercuts its deterrent effect. And now, the political rhetoric is heating up again. In March, Chief Minister Mohan Yadav declared that the government is considering amending the Act to make 'Love Jihad' punishable by death, a move that would make Madhya Pradesh's legislation one of the harshest of its kind in the country.
