
Woke Dem Governor in big re-election danger, according to new poll
Some 45.5 percent of voters hold a favorable opinion of the Democrat politician - but the same number dislike her as a leader, per the Opinion Diagnostics survey seen by DailyMail.com.
The study of more than 800 likely Massachusetts voters from February 11-12 found that 33 percent hold a 'very' unfavorable opinion of Healey, who has served as governor since January 2023.
'After a first-year honeymoon, Healey has faced unrelenting challenges over the past sixteen months on issues such as immigration, affordability, energy, transparency, and housing,' the pollsters said.
'As a result, Healey enters the 2026 election cycle in an extremely vulnerable position.'
Left-leaning Healey, 54, who is the first woman elected governor of Massachusetts and was the first lesbian woman elected attorney general of a US state, has been walking a political tightrope since Donald Trump, 78, came to power in January.
The first-term Democrat from Arlington, MA, has been critical of Trump's tariffs and deportations, and blamed his policies on the 'tremendous amount of chaos, uncertainty and unpredictability' seen in Massachusetts and beyond.
Despite mixed reviews of Healey among people in her state, a narrow plurality of voters approve of the job she has done as governor overall, by a 45 percent to 41 percent margin.
However, she falls short on four key public policy issues - housing, taxes, the immigration crisis, and strengthening the economy.
Only 25 percent of people said they approved of her work on housing, 32 percent on taxes, 33 percent on the immigration crisis, and 39 percent on the economy.
When asked whether Healey has performed her job well enough to deserve re-election, only 37 percent of voters say she has, compared to 46 percent who said it's time to give a new person a chance.
In a memo accompanying the Opinion Diagnostics poll, Brian Wynne, the head of the company and former campaign manager for Gov. Charlie Baker, said Healey has a 'net disapproval' of her handling of key issues like immigration and housing.
'A plurality of voters believe that Healey's job performance warrants a change in governor,' Wynne said, according to a copy of the poll obtained by DailyMail.com.
'While they are open to replacing the chief executive of the commonwealth, voters will not accept just any alternative.'
The poll was commissioned by Mike Kennealy, 57, the former Massachusetts Secretary of Housing and Economic Development, who is running against Healey in the 2026 gubernatorial election.
It found that in a hypothetical matchup between the two, Healey narrowly led by 37.5 percent to 35.9 percent - but among the 27 percent of voters who were undecided, more believe Healey 'does not deserve re-election', according to the memo.
DailyMail.com has contacted Healey's office for comment.
Massachusetts is facing a housing affordability crisis, and needs to build more than 222,000 more housing units over the next decade to address spiraling demand, according to a Bloomberg report from February 2025.
Median home prices in the Bay State have risen 73 percent since 2000, while household income has risen by only four percent over the same period, according to a report by the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities.
On the ritzy Massachusetts island of Martha's Vineyard, rent prices have reached such staggering levels that doctors and nurses are leaving in droves because they simply can't afford to live on the luxury enclave.
Martha's Vineyard Hospital President Denise Schepici said that one of their 'greatest challenges' is simply 'keeping people housed' - and the non-profit hospital has had to start paying for affordable housing units just to retain staffing levels.
Healey's administration has described the housing crisis as 'the state's greatest challenge', and it signed the Affordable Homes Act into law.
The act 'authorizes a record $2 billion for the repair, rehabilitation and modernization of the state's public housing portfolio', per Healey's release - but polls suggest residents don't think it's having enough impact.
Massachusetts residents are also feeling a hit to their wallets from another angle - tax increases imposed by Healey's administration.
In January, the Democrat leadership slipped a series of tax increases into her fiscal year 2026 budget, which impacted products like candy, synthetic nicotine products, and excise tax on complimentary hotel rooms.
The budget also amounted to a 7.4 percent increase in overall spending compared with the fiscal year 2025 plan which was signed into law last summer - something the administration did not acknowledge.
In March, Healey's administration went further by slapping additional taxes on prescription drugs - a move which was met with 'staggering disapproval' from residents, according to a Fiscal Alliance Foundation poll.
The cost of living in Massachusetts is much higher than the national average. In the state's priciest city, Nantucket, the cost of living is 132 percent higher than the rest of the US, according to Rent Cafe.
Bostonians tend to pay 47 percent more than the national average on the basics like rent and food, while people in Framingham pay 36 percent more, and Leominster residents spend 14 percent more on average.
Massachusetts is also under strain from an influx of migrants who are sent to overcrowded centers where crime has been rife, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.
The Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities has recorded 316 'serious incident' reports at hotels, congregate sites, scattered sites and co-shelters within the program from January 2022 until December 2024.
In May 2024, Healey was forced to convert a former prison into a shelter for homeless people, many of whom are migrants.
Almost 4,000 people were granted asylum in the New England state in 2023 - or 20 percent of those who applied, according to US Custom and Border Protection data.
The number of migrants on the Massachusetts emergency shelter system swelled to 3,500 by mid-December, figures show. Many of those without a place to go have been camping out at Logan International Airport in Boston.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Drama explodes over controversial ranking of prominent politicians' podcasts: 'Thanks for playing'
Out of all the politicians who have journeyed into the world of podcasting, there is one heavyweight who is the clear number one. And he's not accepting the award with humility. Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz 's podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' boasted nearly 1.5 million estimated downloads in July, according to a recent analysis by political media analyst Kyle Tharp. According to the report, Cruz's strategists disclosed that the podcast hit 2 million downloads in March of this year. The show is so popular that the money generated from its ad revenue prompted a complaint from a watchdog group alleging Cruz wrongly directed nearly $1 million in payment related to the podcast, the Texas Tribune reported. The complaint was later dismissed. With 440,000 estimated downloads, the second most popular show was 'This is Gavin Newsom,' a talk show with the 57-year-old Democratic California governor. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, another Texas Republican, was in third place with his show 'Hold These Truths,' which pulled in 365,000 estimated downloads last month. The audience of the pair of Texas Republicans far overshadowed that of Newsom and the other Democrats. 'Thanks for playing, @GavinNewsom,' Cruz wrote on X alongside a picture of his podcast downloads and a link to his show, adding 'Tune in.' Texas Republicans Ted Cruz and Dan Crenshaw had two of the top downloaded podcasts among politicians in July Social media erupted after seeing how many tuned in to hear the politicians address the news of the day. 'I can't figure out who would ever suffer listening to Ted Cruz blather,' another X user, Andrea Gail posted. Eric Strobel wrote on X: 'A Newsom pod?? Sounds like cruel & unusual punishment to me.' The California governor has hosted several episodes of his podcast featuring prominent MAGA figures, including Charlie Kirk and former Trump advisor Steve Bannon. As of Friday, Cruz's podcast was ranked #36 in the U.S., and Newsom's was ranked #58 on Apple's top podcast charts. The quick ascent of Newsom's show is significant considering how long it has taken the Republican senator to climb the charts. Unlike Newsom, who began podcasting in March of this year, Cruz has been hosting his show since 2020. Ben Ferguson, a political commentator and Cruz's co-host, has helped the senator with the program for over five years. The senator regularly dissects the news and pertinent political debates from a conservative perspective alongside his co-host. There are over 600 episodes of 'Verdict,' and it's often produced three times a week. iHeartMedia picked up Cruz's podcast and now syndicates it to its vast audience. The group has also donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to pro-Cruz political efforts. Other politicians' attempts to break into the podcasting mainstream have remained stalled, to say the least. Outside of Cruz, Newsom and Crenshaw, the remaining most downloaded shows hosted by other politicos receive a measly 11,000 downloads combined, according to the analysis. Democratic Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, 47, has a show that garnered 7,300 estimated downloads in July, the analysis reveals. Kentucky Republican Rep. Tim Burchett has the next most popular podcast, with just under 1,100 monthly downloads. The remaining group of politicians-turned-podcasters have too pitiful of audience sized to be mentioned, ranging from a few hundred to a paltry 68 downloads for Rep. Troy Carter's 'What Makes America Tick?'


The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service
A year after being lauded for its plan to replace thousands of aging, gas-powered mail trucks with a mostly electric fleet, the U.S. Postal Service is facing congressional attempts to strip billions in federal EV funding. In June, the Senate parliamentarian blocked a Republican proposal in a major tax-and-spending bill to sell off the agency's new electric vehicles and infrastructure and revoke remaining federal money. But efforts to halt the fleet's shift to clean energy continue in the name of cost savings. Donald Maston, president of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association, said canceling the program now would have the opposite effect, squandering millions of dollars. 'I think it would be shortsighted for Congress to now suddenly decide they're going to try to go backwards and take the money away for the EVs or stop that process because that's just going to be a bunch of money on infrastructure that's been wasted," he said. Beyond that, many in the scientific community fear the government could pass on an opportunity to reduce carbon emissions that contribute to global warming when urgent action is needed. Electrified vehicles reduce emissions A 2022 University of Michigan study found the new electric postal vehicles could cut total greenhouse gas emissions by up to 20 million tons over the predicted, cumulative 20-year lifetime of the trucks. That's a fraction of the more than 6,000 million metric tons emitted annually in the United States, said professor Gregory A. Keoleian, co-director of the university's Center for Sustainable Systems. But he said the push toward electric vehicles is critical and needs to accelerate, given the intensifying impacts of climate change. 'We're already falling short of goals for reducing emissions,' Keoleian said. 'We've been making progress, but the actions being taken or proposed will really reverse decarbonization progress that has been made to date.' Many GOP lawmakers share President Donald Trump's criticism of the Biden-era green energy push and say the Postal Service should stick to delivering mail. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said 'it didn't make sense for the Postal Service to invest so heavily in an all-electric force." She said she will pursue legislation to rescind what is left of the $3 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act allocated to help cover the $10 billion cost of new postal vehicles. Ernst has called the EV initiative a 'boondoggle' and "a textbook example of waste,' citing delays, high costs and concerns over cold-weather performance. 'You always evaluate the programs, see if they are working. But the rate at which the company that's providing those vehicles is able to produce them, they are so far behind schedule, they will never be able to fulfill that contract," Ernst said during a recent appearance at the Iowa State Fair, referring to Wisconsin-based Oshkosh Defense. 'For now,' she added, "gas-powered vehicles — use some ethanol in them — I think is wonderful.' Corn-based ethanol is a boon to Iowa's farmers, but the effort to reverse course has other Republican support. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, a co-sponsor of the rollback effort, has said the EV order should be canceled because the project "has delivered nothing but delays, defective trucks, and skyrocketing costs.' The Postal Service maintains that the production delay of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles, or NGDVs, was 'very modest" and not unexpected. 'The production quantity ramp-up was planned for and intended to be very gradual in the early months to allow time for potential modest production or supplier issues to be successfully resolved,' spokesperson Kim Frum said. EVs help in modernization effort The independent, self-funded federal agency, which is paid for mostly by postage and product sales, is in the middle of a $40 billion, 10-year modernization and financial stabilization plan. The EV effort had the full backing of Democratic President Joe Biden, who pledged to move toward an all-electric federal fleet of car and trucks. The 'Deliver for America' plan calls for modernizing the ground fleet, notably the Grumman Long Life Vehicle, which dates back to 1987 and is fuel-inefficient at 9 mpg. The vehicles are well past their projected 24-year lifespan and are prone to breakdowns and even fires. 'Our mechanics are miracle workers,' said Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union. 'The parts are not available. They fabricate them. They do the best they can.' The Postal Service announced in 2022 it would deploy at least 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028, including commercial off-the-shelf models, after years of deliberation and criticism it was moving too slowly to reduce emissions. By 2024, the agency was awarded a Presidential Sustainability Award for its efforts to electrify the largest fleet in the federal government. Building new postal trucks In 2021, Oshkosh Defense was awarded a contract for up to 165,000 battery electric and internal combustion engine Next Generation vehicles over 10 years. The first of the odd-looking trucks, with hoods resembling a duck's bill, began service in Georgia last year. Designed for greater package capacity, the trucks are equipped with airbags, blind-spot monitoring, collision sensors, 360-degree cameras and antilock brakes. There's also a new creature comfort: air conditioning. Douglas Lape, special assistant to the president of the National Association of Letter Carriers and a former carrier, is among numerous postal employees who have had a say in the new design. He marvels at how Oshkosh designed and built a new vehicle, transforming an old North Carolina warehouse into a factory along the way. 'I was in that building when it was nothing but shelving,' he said. 'And now, being a completely functioning plant where everything is built in-house — they press the bodies in there, they do all of the assembly — it's really amazing in my opinion.' Where things stand now The agency has so far ordered 51,500 NGDVs, including 35,000 battery-powered vehicles. To date, it has received 300 battery vehicles and 1,000 gas-powered ones. Former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said in 2022 the agency expected to purchase chiefly zero-emissions delivery vehicles by 2026. It still needs some internal combustion engine vehicles that travel longer distances. Frum, the Postal Service spokesperson, said the planned NGDV purchases were "carefully considered from a business perspective' and are being deployed to routes and facilities where they will save money. The agency has also received more than 8,200 of 9,250 Ford E-Transit electric vehicles it has ordered, she said. Ernst said it's fine for the Postal Service to use EVs already purchased. 'But you know what? We need to be smart about the way we are providing services through the federal government,' she said. 'And that was not a smart move.' Maxwell Woody, lead author of the University of Michigan study, made the opposite case. Postal vehicles, he said, have low average speeds and a high number of stops and starts that enable regenerative braking. Routes average under 30 miles and are known in advance, making planning easier. 'It's the perfect application for an electric vehicle," he said, 'and it's a particularly inefficient application for an internal combustion engine vehicle.' ____


The Herald Scotland
12 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches
The two superpower leaders exchanged flatteries, with Putin saying the war wouldn't have started it Trump had been president in 2022. Andrei Gurulyov, a Russian parliament member and retired general, described it as a "breakthrough" moment that was played up heavily on Russian state television. Putin's foreign ministry said it marked an end to the foreign country's reported isolation. That showcase is in sharp contrast to a fiery exchange Trump and top administration officials had earlier this year with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy when the foreign ally's leader was told in the Oval Office he was being disrespectful to the U.S. and risking World War III. More: From no-deal to Putin's deal? A flummoxing summit, a Trump flip Zelenskyy was teased by Trump and others for his attire and eventually booted from the White House. Republican lawmakers, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., suggested Ukraine's president should either resign, change his tune or "send somebody over that we can do business with." The administration went as far to pause intelligence sharing and weapons shipments to Ukraine after the incident, and while Trump has threatened to impose sharp economic penalties on Russian if an agreement to end the war wasn't reached, he suspended those sanctions after the Alaska sit-down with Putin. Now, Trump is poised to welcome Zelenskyy back to Washington on August 18 to discuss a peace agreement. More: Trump to meet Zelenskyy at White House after Putin summit in Alaska Republican praise Trump's strength, Dems fret 'it was just theater' After being hyped by the administration and its congressional allies as an opportunity to end the more than three-year conflict in the region, Trump's dealmaking skills are being tested in an international negotiation that could backfire on the country and globe. "The goal is always peace," the White House said in an Aug. 15 post on X, amid the talks. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said in an Aug. 16 post on X that Trump "stood firm in defense of U.S. interests," and that the summit marks a critical first step to a "durable and stable peace that protects Ukraine's territorial and economic sovereignty." But Democrats and other detractors warn that the summit has largely benefited Putin, who is facing war crime charges from the International Criminal Court and seeking legitimacy on the global stage after starting a war that has resulted in more than 1.4 million casualties, according to studies. "Our fear is that the Trump-Putin meeting wasn't diplomacy--it was just theater," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, said in a post on X ahead of the talks. Trump seeks reset in pursuit of peace as Europe worries Trump returned to Washington on Aug. 16 carrying plenty of compliments from Putin, but without a deal the administration appears to be skipping cease-fire discussions altogether and pivoting quickly to reset its public relationship with Zelenskyy, who will be returning to the Oval Office on Aug. 18 for a talk that remains inconclusive to most observers. Trump began to tip-toe away from Putin and toward Zelenskyy in late April after Russia bombarded Kyiv with missiles. The president, however, is also reportedly considering land swaps including Ukraine areas not currently occupied by the Russians, according to the New York Times, something U.S. allies have opposed in the past. Zelenskyy said in an Aug. 16 post on X that he spoke with Trump and European leaders, adding that the "killings must stop" but that the battling must pause first before a larger peace agreement can be made. "The positions are clear," he said. "A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions." In a joint statement, European leaders echoed that sentiment and expressed support for a Putin-Zelenskyy summit with some, such as French President Emmanuel Macron noting Russia's "tendency not to honor" peace agreements in the past. "I'm disgusted that Donald Trump met with Putin on American soil and did so with no representatives from Ukraine," Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, a retired Army helicopter pilot, said in an Aug. 16 post on X. "Trump and his inflated ego may not realize it, but it's clear that Putin is not engaging in good faith to end this war."