ITO provisions and Section 4B: SC urged to harmonise definition of ‘income'
Lawyer Makhdoom Ali Khan argued that the super tax was imposed on the banks, companies and industries whose income was more than Rs500 million. He questioned that if a company does not have this much income then how this levy could be imposed.
A five-member CB, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, and comprising Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan on Tuesday heard 354 petitions filed against Section 4B and 182 against the Section 4C of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.
Word 'tax' in ITO, Article 260: SC judge seeks accurate definition
Makhdoom Ali Khan, representing a number of taxpayers, concluded his arguments against the judgment of the Sindh High Court (SHC) on Section 4B of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The lawyers appearing on behalf of other taxpayers adopted his arguments.
Makhdoom said the levy has been imposed in a discriminatory manner without any adherence to the provisions of Article 25 of the constitution. Tax cannot be imposed, more than once, on the income of an assessee under the guise of Entry 47 of 4th Schedule of the constitution.
Justice Aminuddin observed that the super tax is levied on the income and not the losses.
Makhdoom argued that the government cannot impose the super tax on the final income of a company which has already been taxed. He submitted if I (petitioner) am not allowed liability, depreciation, amortisation and brought forward allowance in the annual income then the result of it will be that grossly it may be deemed income but in fact the individual will be facing losses.
Justice Amin remarked that calculation of tax is on the basis of the formula given in Section 4B of the Income Tax Ordinance.
Makhdoom said generally the income of a person is his total gain minus the total expenditure. He said that if the Court came to the conclusion that the super tax was imposed for the social welfare of a class then the government would have to inform how much money collected under Section 4B. He said that the tax is imposed on a certain number of persons, adding the purpose in the law has been identified but it was not informed that whether objective has been achieved or not? The tax on social welfare can be imposed by the provinces and not the federal government. If the tax is oppressive and inequitable then it is against Articles 4 and 9 of the Constitution, Makhdoom argued.
Advocate Waqar Rana, who also represented a number of taxpayers, contended whether the notification of speaker National Assembly is not justified. He then apprised that he fully adopts the arguments of Makhdoom Ali Khan.
Imtiaz Siddiqui, also a taxpayers' lawyer, has challenged the Lahore High Court (LHC) on Section 4B. He asked the bench to direct the federal government to submit a statement on how much funds collected in terms of super tax and how much money was spent on the social welfare of FATA temporary displaced persons.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
40 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Independence Day: President Zardari, PM Shehbaz urge national unity for a just, equal Pakistan
As the nation celebrates Pakistan's 79th Independence Day today, President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shebaz Sharif have urged the nation to stand united for a Pakistan that is built on justice, equality, and service to all. The day dawned with 31-gun salute at the Federal Capital and 21-gun salute at provincial headquarters. Prime Minister Shehbaz unfurled the national flag at the Pakistan Monument in Islamabad. In his message, the president said that the nation celebrate this Independence Day with a sense of renewed pride and hope as the nation has reaffirmed its strength and unity in the face of external aggression in May this year, as per Radio Pakistan. 'Our success in Marka-i-Haq and Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos is a landmark moment in our history,' he said. Independence Day today 'It was a demonstration of unshakable national will, professional excellence, and united purpose.' Meanwhile, PM Shehbaz paid tribute to the martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the sake of Pakistan's freedom. He also paid tribute to Jinnah and national poet Allama Muhammad Iqbal, who along with other resolute leaders and workers of the Independence Movement, united the nation under one vision, one mission and one goal. 'The past 78 years tell a tale of resilience, strong faith and a hope of a bright future when as a nation, we braved several difficult challenges', he said. 'Despite this, Pakistan achieved a series of milestones of success and achievements in every field.' He also paid tribute to the martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the sake of Pakistan's freedom, saying Marka-i-Haq was not just a military conquest, but also the victory of validation of the Two-Nation Theory. Moreover, Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Chief of the Naval Staff Admiral Naveed Ashraf, and Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmad Babar Sidhu, on behalf of the Armed Forces of Pakistan, also extended heartfelt felicitations to the nation. In their separate messages, they said as we pay homage to our founding fathers, we honor their indomitable spirit, resolute determination, and unparalleled sacrifices under the visionary leadership of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah sacrifices that paved the way for independence. The Armed Forces pay solemn tribute to the visionaries, statesmen, and soldiers who laid our nation's foundations, cherishing their legacy with deep reverence and gratitude. As guardians of national security, we reaffirm our unwavering resolve to safeguard Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity, uphold the Constitution, and protect the values that define our national identity.
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
SCBA expresses concern over amended SC rules
ISLAMABAD: The president Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) expressed deep concern over the recent amendments to the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, which were introduced 'without prior and meaningful consultation with the SCBA'. SCBA chief Mian Rauf Atta, in a statement issued on Wednesday urged the Supreme Court to review and withdraw the recent increase in court filing fees so as to restore public confidence and uphold the constitutional promise of speedy, inexpensive, and unobstructed justice. The SCBA remains steadfast in its commitment to the rule of law, judicial independence, and the equal right of all citizens to access justice without financial or procedural barriers, and will continue to safeguard these principles in the national interest. Atta said that the apex representative body of the legal fraternity, with members across all provinces and territories, the association has a vital institutional role in any reforms to the procedural framework of the Supreme Court. 'Introducing such changes in isolation risks weakening the spirit of collaborative decision-making and overlooks the legitimate contribution of the Bar in protecting the integrity and accessibility of the justice system.' Rauf Atta noted that the substantial and unprecedented increase in court fees and filing charges is excessive and poses serious challenges to the principle of affordable justice. He emphasised that the Supreme Court's constitutional role is to remain the ultimate forum for the dispensation of justice – not to create financial hurdles that discourage citizens, especially the poor and vulnerable, from exercising their right to seek redress. Determining or revising such fees is properly within the legislative and the executive domain, and such increases, if disproportionate, risk placing justice beyond the reach of many, contrary to the foundational principles of a democratic legal order. The SCBA president further highlighted that the dignity, respect, and fair treatment of lawyers, litigants, and all stakeholders must be preserved at every stage of judicial proceedings and within court premises. A fee structure of this magnitude will inevitably increase the overall cost of litigation, making it more difficult for ordinary citizens to pursue their cases. This, he observed, is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees contained in Article 8 to 39 of the constitution, which require the State to ensure inexpensive, expeditious, and unobstructed justice for all. Atta also stressed that the Supreme Court should focus on delivering substantive justice through patient and thorough hearings, rather that placing undue emphasis on statistical disposal of cases. True justice is reflected not in the number of cases decided but in the fairness, impartiality, and depth of judicial reasoning. Efficiency should serve the cause of justice, not replace it. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bahria Town auction: SC bench declines to hear case
ISLAMABAD: A bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, on Wednesday, declined to hear the case of auction of Bahria Town's properties. The chief justice sent the case back to a bench, which had previously heard the case. 'It would be appropriated for the old bench to hear this case,' CJP Afridi said. Farooq H Naek, representing Bahria Town, stated he has no objection if the matter is sent back to the old bench. He; however, told that detailed verdict of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been announced, adding that he would submit additional objections on the detailed IHC verdict related to business tycoon Malik Riaz, who established the Bahria Town empire in Pakistan. A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan and comprising Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb on August 8, 2025, had turned down M/s Bahria Town (Private) Limited plea to halt the auction of its properties, but issued notices to the respondents. Justice Naeem questioned what the National Accountability Ordinance says about plea bargain. He noted that if an accused challenges the plea bargain process then it becomes inoperative, adding in the instant matter the accused has challenged the plea bargain, and the applications against them are pending, but the properties are being auctioned. Justice Naeem observed that instead of main petition only the Civil Miscellaneous Applications (CMAs) were fixed for hearing today (Friday), adding how come they can hear the CMAs without hearing the main petition. Naek told that he came to know about this case late at night, adding still the case is not issued on the cause list. The counsel stated thanks God that he was in Islamabad; therefore, appearing before the bench. The case was adjourned for an indefinite time period. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
