Ukraine bags a third of EU's €300 billion external action budget bill
The budget for external action is part of the €2 trillion announced on Wednesday by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
The European Commissioner for the Mediterranean, Dubravka Šuica, said the EU hoped to extend its influence through the external action budget, adding: 'Global Europe empowers us to be a player, not just a payer.'
The enlargement and neighbourhood policy — which has become geostrategic for the European Union — sees its funding increased by 37% to €42.6 billion. It should help candidate countries accelerate their reforms, the Commission said.
"Accession talks with Montenegro, Albania, Moldova and Ukraine have never progressed faster,' Marta Kos, European commissioner for enlargement said.
The €100 billion earmarked for Ukraine targets reforms and reconstruction.
'Whoever thought European support would weaken over time was wrong. Time is really not on Russia's side,' Kos added.
Of the total fund €42 billion has been earmarked for the Mediterranean region, including EU southern neighbours in the Middle East, North Africa, and the Gulf, designed to shape migration policy.
'We will enhance investments in security and safe borders to better control smuggling and illegal migration,' Šuica said, adding: 'But we will also develop legal pathways for migration.'
The EU pact on migration and asylum adopted in 2024 includes 'talent partnerships' with Egypt, Tunisia and Marocco to promote legal migration.
'We need people to fill in the labour shortages in the European market, but at the same time we will fight strongly against illegal migration and against smugglers,' Šuica said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
19 minutes ago
- Euronews
Musk's X says French probe into algorithm is ‘politically motivated'
Elon Musk's social media platform X denied allegations by French authorities that it was part of a criminal investigation into alleged data tampering. The company also said on Monday that the French investigation is 'politically-motivated' and designed to 'restrict free speech' and denied the allegations. 'French authorities have launched a politically-motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged 'fraudulent data extraction,'' the company wrote on X. In January, French prosecutors launched an investigation following allegations that X's algorithm was being used for the purposes of foreign interference. The first complaint was filed by a centrist member of parliament, Eric Bothorel, a member of President Emmanuel Macron's party. Bothorel warned against "recent changes to the X algorithm, as well as apparent interference in its management" since Elon Musk acquired the company in 2022. "Concerns about the impartiality' He said there has been in "reduction in the diversity of voices and options" that go against a secure and respectful environment on the social media platform. He blamed this on "a lack of clarity in criteria that led to algorithm changes and moderation decisions", and to "personal interventions from Elon Musk in the management of his platform". In February, the French investigative media Le Canard Enchaine reported that the second complaint came from a cybersecurity director in the public administration. The individual had reported a "major modification in the algorithm used by the X platform,' which had resulted in a huge amount of political content that is 'hateful, racist, anti-LGBTQ (or) homophobic, and aims to skew democratic debate in France". X said that it remained in the dark about what the allegations were but that 'based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech'. It said that for these reasons, X would not hand over data, despite the prosecutor's demand. X has also said that the experts who will review X's algorithm are biased. The two experts are David Chavalarias, director of the Paris Complex Systems Institute (ISC-PIF) and Maziyar Panahi, an AI platform leader at ISC-PIF. X said that Chavalarias runs a campaign called 'Escape X,' which encourages users to leave the social media platform and that Panahi had in the past participated in research projects with Chavalarias that demonstrate open hostility towards X'. 'The involvement of these individuals raises serious concerns about the impartiality, fairness, and political motivations of the investigation, to put it charitably. A predetermined outcome is not a fair one,' X said. Euronews Next has reached out to the prosecutors' office and X but did not receive a reply at the time of publication. X owner Elon Musk has previously caused outcry by European politicians for commenting about domestic politics and publicly supporting Germany's far-right AfD party.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Iran to consult with Russia and China ahead of European nuclear talks
A trilateral meeting will take place on Tuesday between Iran, China and Russia to discuss Tehran's nuclear programme and the risk of sanctions being reimposed, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said on Monday. The meeting comes ahead of renewed nuclear talks with France, Germany and the UK —known as the E3 nations — scheduled for this Friday in Istanbul. The three European powers, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 nuclear deal that lifted sanctions on Iran in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme. The deal began to unravel in 2018, when the US under President Donald Trump pulled out of it and began reimposing certain sanctions. Since then, Iran has gradually increased its nuclear activities, including uranium enrichment up to 60%, a step away from weapon-grade nuclear materials, or 90% enrichment of uranium. European countries have threatened to trigger the 2015 deal's 'snapback' mechanism, which would allow sanctions to be reimposed in the case of non-compliance by Tehran. France, Germany and the UK have warned that they would do so if there is no progress on nuclear talks by the end of August. Baghaei said Iran is "continuously coordinating" with Beijing and Moscw on how to prevent the snapback mechanism or "to mitigate its consequences". 'No plan' for renewed talks with Washington On Sunday, Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, stated in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres that the three European nations lack 'any legal, political and moral standing' to invoke such mechanisms, and accused France, Germany and the UK of failing to uphold their commitments under the deal. 'The European parties have been at fault and negligent in implementing' the nuclear agreement, Baghaei added. He also noted that "we have no plan for talks with America, under the current situation." Friday's talks will be the first since a ceasefire following a 12-day conflict waged by Israel against Iran in June, which also saw the US strike three major nuclear facilities in Iran. Nearly 1,100 people were killed in Iran, including dozens of military commanders and nuclear scientists. A total of 28 civilians were killed in Israel. Iran has long said its nuclear activities have aimed at peaceful purposes. 'The agenda is clear: removal of the sanctions and issues related to Iran's peaceful nuclear programme,' Baghaei said in his briefing on Monday. Tehran has been one of Russia's key allies in its all-out war against Ukraine, providing the Kremlin with its domestically produced Shahed suicide drones.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
French defense industry faces challenge of ramping up production
Are the logistics keeping pace? Three years after President Emmanuel Macron announced a shift to a "war economy," following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, France's arms industry has struggled to scale up. The significant increase in defense spending Macron announced on July 13 will be essential to support this transition. However, moving from a production model designed for peacetime to a military-industrial complex suited to the new geopolitical context is not only a matter of financial resources, but also of organization. The challenge essentially lies in changing both the scale and the pace of production, which requires a complete overhaul of existing processes. Until now, the prevailing production processes had focused on just-in-time, small-batch manufacturing, intended either for the Defense Ministry or for export, with relatively relaxed delivery deadlines. Yet a war economy demands mass production and regular output within tight deadlines. Years of underinvestment, economic rationalization and sporadic orders have weakened France's industrial base, which now needs a profound transformation, on both a qualitative and a quantitative level. Efforts to ramp up production toward this wartime model have come up against several obstacles in recent months. Without solid orders, manufacturers have been unable to invest in new production capacity, which is now almost entirely saturated. The orders given to major defense groups by the Directorate General of Armement (DGA) the French military procurement agency, were disrupted by the delays to the vote on the 2025 budget. This situation is now in the process of being resolved. In addition to this delay, some accounting practices have created further hurdles for companies. For example, the practice of "deferring expenses," in which the DGA only pays for equipment that has already been delivered the following year, has hampered the expansion of production facilities. Coordination at the European level Another blind spot is the fragility of France's defense industrial and technological base, which consists of thousands of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and midsize companies. Large groups such as Thales, Safran, Dassault and KNDS depend on a network of subcontractors who lack a clear view of orders, access to funding and support for hiring or investment. If major leaders and public authorities do not step up efforts to protect and strengthen this ecosystem, the entire sector could break down. Yet, as it stands, the support mechanisms that exist are still fragmented, slow and difficult to understand. Finally, this strategy cannot succeed without better coordination on standards, requirements and industrial priorities at the European level. If each European Union member state continues to develop its own equipment and munitions independently, without at least some degree of resource sharing, Europe's collective effort risks being diluted and ultimately losing effectiveness. The fact that joint projects, such as the future tank (MGCS) or air combat systems (SCAF), have become bogged down by national rivalries and political inertia bodes ill for the future. A war economy is not just about producing more; it also means making decisions faster, anticipating challenges better and coordinating efforts at the national and European levels. Unless these conditions are met, the ramp-up of France's defense industry will remain little more than wishful thinking.
