logo
Roma to earn around €3.5 million from Leandro Paredes' exit

Roma to earn around €3.5 million from Leandro Paredes' exit

Yahoo09-07-2025
Roma to earn around €3.5 million from Leandro Paredes' exit
Leandro Paredes has said left Roma for the second time in his career and returned to Boca Juniors, the club where he made his professional debut.
The Argentine midfielder's transfer will bring the Giallorossi club approximately €3.5 million, including a fixed fee and bonuses.
Advertisement
As reported by Il Tempo, the financial agreement was finalized previously, during the last contract renewal between the player and the Giallorossi.
The contract included favorable terms for a future return to Boca Juniors, an option the player had always specifically desired.
This transaction concludes Paredes' second season with the Giallorossi, which began in accordance with the agreed terms.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chinese automakers gain ground in contracting European market, data shows
Chinese automakers gain ground in contracting European market, data shows

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chinese automakers gain ground in contracting European market, data shows

By Amir Orusov (Reuters) -Car registrations across Europe declined in June, with a 4.4% year-on-year drop to 1.25 million vehicles, data from Jato Dynamics showed on Wednesday. While overall demand softened, Chinese automakers continued to gain ground, taking a record market share and squeezing several established European brands, the research data showed. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Chinese automakers are expanding in Europe, breaking into a market traditionally dominated by European and American brands supported by their cheaper pricing amid a shift towards electric vehicles. This has stoked trade tensions between Brussels and Beijing, including a row over EU tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, imposed to protect European producers. BY THE NUMBERS Chinese brands nearly doubled their combined share of the European market to 5.1% in the first half of 2025, just shy of Mercedes-Benz's 5.2%, the report said. Registrations of Chinese vehicles surged 91% since the start of the year. BYD, Jaecoo, Omoda, Leapmotor and Xpeng were the five names fuelling the surge, with BYD alone registering 70,500 units in the first six months of 2025, a 311% jump from a year ago. Stellantis saw the steepest market share decline among major automakers, to 15.3% from 16.7% a year earlier. The second biggest decline came from Tesla, to 1.6% in the half-year period versus 2.4% last year. Registrations of battery electric vehicles (BEV) surpassed one million for the first time in the first half, with a 25% rise to 1.19 million units — 17.4% of the market. KEY QUOTES "Persistently high prices, geopolitical and economic tensions with Europe's trading partners, and the postpandemic market reality are behind the decline," Felipe Munoz, global analyst at JATO Dynamics, said. "The updated Tesla Model Y has so far failed to provide the expected sales boost for the brand," Munoz said. "At the same time, competition from BYD and Volkswagen Group is making it harder for Tesla to maintain its leadership position."

NFL offseason power rankings: No. 6 Minnesota Vikings put their trust in J.J. McCarthy
NFL offseason power rankings: No. 6 Minnesota Vikings put their trust in J.J. McCarthy

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NFL offseason power rankings: No. 6 Minnesota Vikings put their trust in J.J. McCarthy

The Minnesota Vikings won 14 games last season. Their only losses were to two division winners: the 15-2 Detroit Lions and the Los Angeles Rams. Had they won in Week 18 at Detroit, they would have been the No. 1 seed in the NFC and one of nine teams in NFL history to win 15 regular-season games. Not that the Vikings' breakout season has been forgotten, but it has been dismissed. The Vikings, after a good offseason, find their win total at BetMGM to be 8.5. A team that went 14-3 a season ago without a bad loss, then had a very good offseason, is expected by oddsmakers to be .500. Everyone must think Sam Darnold, who the Vikings moved on from, is a no-doubt superstar who can't be replaced, right? (No, in fact, nobody is saying that this offseason.) If you believe Darnold is below average and also believe the Vikings are going to come crashing back to mediocrity, you must really, really dislike J.J. McCarthy. There's no great reason for that either. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] The Vikings traded up to draft McCarthy at 10th overall last season. They obviously liked him. He injured his knee in the preseason and had his rookie year wiped away, but that doesn't mean he's bad. The rest of the 2024 quarterback draft class has been pretty good. The brief glimpse of McCarthy we saw in preseason was promising, for whatever that's worth. He has the same exceptional environment, with great coaching and all-world receiver Justin Jefferson, that helped Darnold to a fantastic season far beyond his career norms. McCarthy is an unknown. But so were Jayden Daniels and Bo Nix last season. And for all the concern of a drop-off, what if McCarthy is better than Darnold, who had a career passer rating under 80 before he landed in the warm Vikings cocoon? It's not out of the question. "I want him to be just as confident as I am of him to make the plays out there," Jefferson told Yahoo Sports' Jason Fitz. Maybe McCarthy falls on his face and Vikings fans can pine for the salad days of Darnold. The quarterback switch isn't guaranteed to be the right move. But mostly, the Vikings are being brushed aside after a fantastic season and should feel a bit disrespected for it. [Get more Minnesota news: Vikings team feed] The Vikings showed last season that their foundation is strong. Kevin O'Connell has shown he is one of the NFL coaches who can elevate whatever roster he is given to work with, especially at quarterback, and his 2023 hire of defensive coordinator Brian Flores changed Minnesota's defense. Justin Jefferson, Jordan Addison (who could face a suspension after pleading to a lesser offense following being arrested on suspicion of DUI), T.J. Hockenson and Aaron Jones are very good skill-position players around the quarterback position. The offensive line got some huge upgrades in free agency, and getting left tackle Christian Darrisaw back from a knee injury will be big, even if the Vikings take it slow with Darrisaw and he misses the beginning of the season. There are some tangible reasons, aside from the quarterback change, to believe the Vikings don't come close to 14 wins again. They won eight of nine games decided by one possession, which was a bit lucky. The schedule gets tougher. Maybe opponents finally have a plan to beat Flores' hyper-aggressive approach. But the Vikings were a good team last season. Assuming McCarthy isn't a total bust, they should be pretty good again, even if nobody seems to be projecting that to be the case. Offseason grade The Vikings had a clear plan for the offseason. They chose to let Sam Darnold leave and use the cap space that would have been slotted for him to improve the roster around J.J. McCarthy. The Vikings clearly thought they needed to upgrade the interior of the offensive and defensive lines. They signed two standouts from the Colts' line to fix the offensive line issues. Guard Will Fries got a five-year, $87.7 million and center Ryan Kelly to a two-year, $18 million deal. That's a big help. Then the Vikings used the 24th pick on offensive lineman Donovan Jackson, who will likely start at left guard. The defensive tackle position got two new, expensive pieces. Jonathan Allen was signed to a three-year, $51 million deal and Javon Hargrave got $30 million over two years. Minnesota was also able to keep cornerback Byron Murphy Jr. after his career year, signing him to a three-year, $54 million extension. Other than Darnold, the Vikings lost cornerback Camryn Bynum, offensive tackle Cam Robinson and outside linebacker Patrick Jones. The Vikings' draft was thin, with only one pick in the top 100, but overall Minnesota executed its offseason plan very well. Their offseason got one of my three A or A- grades across the NFL. Grade: A- Quarterback report J.J. McCarthy's talent shouldn't be much of an issue. He was the 10th overall pick in a really good, and potentially historic, quarterback draft class. He could be a bust, because almost all prospects have that risk, but there's no real reason to believe it based on his skill level. Health is a factor though. McCarthy had surgery in August to repair the meniscus in his right knee, which ended his season before it started. Then he had a second surgery in November to address swelling in the knee, which was alarming. The offseason hasn't brought any bad news. McCarthy had no limitations at the start of the offseason program in April. There hasn't been any word of a setback. But until McCarthy shows that he can hold up over a full season in the NFL, it will be a lingering question. If that part is answered, there aren't many other reasons to doubt McCarthy's ability to succeed in a very good offensive environment. BetMGM odds breakdown From Yahoo's Ben Fawkes: 'Coming off an impressive 14-3 season that no one outside the organization (and maybe inside it as well) saw coming, the Vikings identified the biggest hole on the roster and attacked it: offensive line. By drafting Donovan Jackson in the first round, and signing Ryan Kelly and Will Fries, Minnesota now should have one of the best O-lines in the NFL — to go along with Brian Flores' defense. Cornerback has some question marks, but how J.J. McCarthy plays will be the deciding factor in how well Minnesota goes this season. The Vikings have a win total of only 8.5 at BetMGM and are favored in just seven games." Yahoo's fantasy take From Yahoo's Scott Pianowski: "Obviously J.J. McCarthy is all over this preview; let me quickly add that I expect him to beat his global ADP of QB20. I'd follow Kevin O'Connell into a burning building, and Minnesota's pass-catching rooms are brimming with talent. "Another value target is Jordan Mason, the new backup running back. Mason is about five years younger than Aaron Jones, and he's 15 pounds heavier. It's possible Mason could become this team's short-yardage specialist, and Mason looked like a potential feature back during his time in San Francisco (5.3 YPC). The depth chart is thin after Jones and Mason — the Vikings probably envision Mason holding a notable role no matter what becomes of Jones. Mason isn't cheap (his Yahoo ADP is just outside the Top 100) but he's still a proactive pick for me." Stat to remember Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores has no brake pedal. The 2024 Vikings were the most aggressive defense in the NFL. They used a four-man rush at the lowest frequency in the NFL, and by a wide margin. Flores sent only four rushers just 53.1% of the time, via FTN Fantasy. No other team was below 59.4%. The Vikings' rate of sending five or more rushers was 38.8%, which topped the league. The crazy part was the Vikings' blitz rate dropped dramatically from 2023, Flores' first season in Minnesota, when they blitzed 50.7% of the time. The Vikings were effective blitzing last season, as their DVOA on blitzes (-12.3%) was the sixth best in the NFL. Flores' approach isn't a mystery. He'll send extra rushers at a league-leading level and it will make quarterbacks uncomfortable. The NFL had an offseason to adjust after that outrageous 50.7% blitz rate, and the Vikings were still among the league leaders in blitz effectiveness while blitzing the most of any team in the NFL. This season, Flores is going to send many blitzes, even with two good interior pass rushers added in Javon Hargrave and Jonathan Allen, and the Vikings will be pretty good at it. That's what made the Vikings' defense one of the best in the NFL last season. Burning question Is Justin Jefferson the NFL's best receiver? It's still astonishing that 2019 LSU had Joe Burrow, Ja'Marr Chase and Justin Jefferson (among others) all on the same team. Burrow is one of the NFL's best quarterbacks and most impartial observers would have Chase or Jefferson ranked as the best receiver in the league. Jefferson had that title, at least when he won NFL Offensive Player of the Year in 2022, but last season Chase might have passed him by winning the receiving triple crown. Jefferson was still excellent, dealing with a change in quarterbacks and still putting up a 103-1,533-10 line. He's the best reason to predict success for new Vikings quarterback J.J. McCarthy. Jefferson just turned 26 years old and Chase will turn 26 next March. Chase told CBS Sports he believes someone will produce the NFL's first 2,000-yard receiving season, and he had an easy answer on who he thinks are the best bets to do it. "Me and Justin, of course," Chase told CBS. It's hard to pick between the two as the NFL's best. Perhaps the first to a 2,000-yard season gets the tiebreaker. Best-case scenario Even in the Vikings' dreams, repeating 14 wins is a tough goal. Those types of seasons don't come along often. But it shows Minnesota has the ceiling of winning the NFL's toughest division and being the NFL's No. 1 seed. They were extremely close to doing both last season. It's fine to predict the Vikings fall off, but you haven't heard the counterargument often this offseason: A fantastic coaching staff is back, the Vikings' roster got better in key places, they did win 14 games last season (even if many have chosen to selectively ignore that part). And there's a scenario in which J.J. McCarthy is a better quarterback than Sam Darnold. Every great run by a team had to start somewhere, and it's usually with a big growth season when nobody was expecting it. Maybe what we saw from the 2024 Vikings was the start of a sustained run. As long as McCarthy is good, Flores doesn't get a head-coaching job and the roster stays mostly intact, why can't the Vikings remain a top-10 team? Nightmare scenario The regression argument for the Vikings starts with J.J. McCarthy. We haven't seen him play an NFL regular season game and maybe he isn't good. Perhaps we will look back and see that 2024 was the beginning of Sam Darnold being a star, and the Vikings made a mistake letting him go. Who knows? More realistically, the Vikings' record in close games can't repeat. They were 8-1 in games decided by seven points or fewer, and 5-1 in games decided by three points or fewer. If this season's Vikings find normal luck in those games, Minnesota can quickly drop two or three wins from last season. And the schedule, while it wasn't easy last season (14th toughest in DVOA), is definitely tougher this season (fifth toughest via Sharp Football, which uses win totals to project schedule strength). That might bring Minnesota down by a couple more wins. Then, suddenly, the Vikings might be hovering around .500 and find themselves out of the playoffs. The NFC North is the toughest division in the league and someone has to finish last place. There's an argument that it could be Minnesota. If McCarthy looks like a bust and the Vikings take a big tumble from 14-3 to out of the playoffs, it would make 2024 look like a mirage and that would be tough for hard-luck Minnesota fans to take. The crystal ball says The Vikings should be getting a lot more respect. That's why they're pretty high in these rankings. What they did last season was not fluky. The same people believing the Vikings will fall way back are also skeptical of Sam Darnold in Seattle. It's hard to reconcile that. Assuming J.J. McCarthy won't be good is strange, too. He's not some fifth-round pick; a smart Vikings front office liked him enough to trade up and draft him 10th overall. Maybe we'll look back and see that last season for Minnesota was a weird positive blip and they fall back to the middle or worse of the NFL, but I have no reason to project that now. Their coaching staff is excellent. McCarthy was a good prospect. They had a good offseason, including a clear-eyed plan to invest the money many teams would have thrown at Darnold into the rest of the roster. The Vikings aren't going 14-3 again. But they will go to the playoffs and be a contender in a very tough NFC North all season. I have no reason to believe otherwise as we head into the season.

EU Readies €100 Billion No-Deal Plan to Match US 30% Tariff
EU Readies €100 Billion No-Deal Plan to Match US 30% Tariff

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU Readies €100 Billion No-Deal Plan to Match US 30% Tariff

(Bloomberg) -- The European Union plans to quickly hit the US with 30% tariffs on some €100 billion ($117 billion) worth of goods in the event of no deal and if US President Donald Trump carries through with his threat to impose that rate on most of the bloc's exports after Aug. 1. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom How San Jose's Mayor Is Working to Build an AI Capital As a part of a first wave of countermeasures, the EU would combine an already approved list of tariffs on €21 billion of US goods and a previously proposed list on an additional €72 billion of American products into one package, a European Commission spokesman said on Wednesday. The US exports, which include industrial goods such as Boeing Co. aircraft, US-made cars and bourbon whiskey, would face a levy that matches Trump's 30% threat, according to people familiar with the matter. The threatened retaliation from Brussels would hit about one-third of American exports to the EU, based on the €335 billion worth of US goods shipped to the bloc last year. The tariffs would be prepared to come into force next month but only if there is no deal and the US implements its levies after the August deadline, said the people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. The euro extended a fall after the report, down 0.3% at $1.1723, leading losses among major currencies. German bonds trimmed an earlier decline. The plans come as EU member states, including Germany, have hardened their positions in response to the US stiffening its negotiating stance. Berlin would be willing to even support the activation of the EU's anti-coercion instrument, or ACI, in a no-deal scenario, a government official said on condition of anonymity. This tool would come into play only if a deal fails to materialize. Trump announced two tariff deals on Tuesday — one with the Philippines and another with Japan, and both featured across-the-board duties on their imports that were lower than initially threatened. Also noteworthy was the 15% US levy on Japanese autos that was lower than the current 25% rate on major car exporters including the EU. European leaders are in Tokyo and Beijing this week for talks with some of the the bloc's biggest trading partners in Asia. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, speaking with Bloomberg Television on Wednesday, said the EU hasn't yet brought anything as innovative as the Japanese offer. 'Talks are going better than they had been,' he said in the interview. 'I think that we are making good progress with the EU, but as I've said before, the EU has a collective action problem with 27 countries.' Explainer: All About the EU's Trade Weapon of Last Resort The EU's most potent trade tool is the ACI, and a growing number of member states is pushing for its use if a deal isn't reached. The instrument is primarily designed as a deterrent and is currently not on the table, with its activation requiring a qualified majority of member states to support the move. The ACI would enable the EU to launch a broad range of retaliatory actions, including new taxes on US tech giants, targeted curbs on US investments, and limiting access to the EU market. 'We are now approaching the decisive phase in the tariff dispute with the USA — we need a fair, reliable agreement with low tariffs,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told reporters in Berlin on Tuesday after a meeting with his Czech counterpart Petr Fiala. 'Without such an agreement, we risk economic uncertainty at a time when we actually need exactly the opposite.' The Commission, the EU's executive arm, is discussing the instrument with member states, the people said. While some capitals having been pushing to use the tool, most want to wait to see how the situation develops beyond Aug. 1 before progressing discussions further to try to achieve the required majority, they added. The overwhelming preference is to keep negotiations with Washington on track in a bid for an outcome to the impasse ahead of next month's deadline. EU and US negotiators are scheduled to continue talks on Wednesday. The US is now seen to want a near-universal tariff on EU goods higher than 10%, with increasingly fewer exemptions limited to aviation, some medical devices and generic medicines, several spirits, and a specific set of manufacturing equipment that the US needs, Bloomberg previously reported. The two sides have also discussed a potential ceiling for some sectors, as well as quotas for steel and aluminum and a way to ring-fence supply chains from sources that oversupply the metals. Any agreement would need Trump's sign off – and his position isn't clear. The US president wrote to the EU earlier in the month, warning of a 30% tariff on most of its exports from Aug. 1. Alongside a universal levy, Trump has hit cars and auto parts with a 25% customs tax, and steel and aluminum with double that. He's also threatened to target pharmaceuticals and semiconductors with new duties as early as next month, and recently announced a 50% duty on copper. Hoped-For Extension Before Trump's letter, the EU had been hopeful it was edging toward an initial framework that would allow detailed discussions to continue on the basis of a universal rate of 10% on many of the bloc's exports. While most capitals and officials accept that any agreement would be asymmetrical in favor of the US and see the EU facing higher than 10% rates, the bloc has been seeking wider exemptions than the US is offering, as well as looking to shield the bloc from future sectoral tariffs. The EU's €100 billion list would cover its response to Trump's universal duties as well as his tariffs on metals and cars. The level of pain that member states are prepared to accept varies, and some are open to landing on a higher 15% levy if enough exemptions are secured and the scope of the duty was clear, the people said. In addition to the tariffs on goods, the bloc's executive arm is also working on measures that could see export controls as well as restrictions on some services and public procurement contracts introduced in future, they said. --With assistance from Greg Ritchie and Annmarie Hordern. (Adds detail on US exports in fourth paragraph, Bessent comments in 11th) Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border Thailand's Changing Cannabis Rules Leave Farmers in a Tough Spot How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store