‘US too large to write off': Trump's 50% tariffs threaten 70% of India's exports, ICRIER warns
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Focus on agriculture in trade talks
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
High-risk sectors beyond agriculture
Turning crisis into reform
ICRIER's recommended strategy
Smart US re-engagement – Negotiate science-based access for GM crops, ethanol corn, and dairy; pursue balanced market access.
Targeted relief – Provide urgent fiscal and policy support for severely impacted sectors such as textiles and gems.
Export diversification – Reduce dependence on the US by accelerating free trade agreements with the EU, UK, and CPTPP nations, and expanding outreach to Africa and ASEAN markets.
Policy shifts proposed
Slash tariffs on low-risk imports like walnuts, berries, and cereals.
Move from protection to productivity by prioritising R&D, logistics upgrades, and regulatory reforms.
Recognise that the damage, while not uniform across all exports, will be concentrated in labour-heavy sectors that are central to India's employment base.
India cannot afford to treat the United States as dispensable in global trade, even as it seeks closer economic ties with the UK, EU, and other partners, the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) has warned.In a new paper, the think tank estimates that almost 70% of India's exports now face the brunt of US President Donald Trump's recently announced 50% tariff hike, as reported by Business Today.'The US remains too large and too important to write off,' the report stressed, urging New Delhi to adopt a two-pronged response, shield vulnerable sectors such as textiles and gems with targeted relief, and re-engage Washington through 'smart, tactical' negotiations that resolve long-standing agricultural disputes.Authored by economists Ashok Gulati, Sulakshana Rao, and Tanay Suntwal, the paper calls for upcoming trade discussions to prioritise contentious farm issues, especially American demands on genetically modified (GM) products. The authors said the talks should be guided by 'scientific evidence rather than ideology.'Among the proposals: permit GM corn imports for ethanol blending or poultry feed, and consider easing restrictions on GM soya in seed form, India already imports soya oil. They also recommended steep duty cuts on non-sensitive farm imports with limited domestic production, such as walnuts (currently taxed at 120%), cranberries, blueberries, and breakfast cereals.On dairy, ICRIER suggests introducing a tariff rate quota system, allowing a capped volume of imports at lower duties while keeping higher tariffs above that limit. The paper also floats the idea of a certification scheme, similar to halal standards, to assure American buyers that cattle are pasture-grazed or fed on non-meat diets.While farm exports may be somewhat insulated, labour-intensive manufacturing faces sharper pain. Textiles and apparel confront a tariff disadvantage of more than 30% compared to rivals Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Vietnam, threatening to erode market share unless the government steps in with subsidies, tax rebates, or other incentives.The gems and jewellery sector is in even greater peril. With 50% tariffs, the report warns the industry could 'come to a standstill very soon.' Other at-risk segments include herbal products, nutraceuticals, and auto components.Shrimp exports are flagged as a critical short-term casualty. Producers in Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, and Odisha risk steep value losses and rapid market share erosion. Semi-milled rice exports could also lose ground to competitors like Thailand and Pakistan.Rather than falling back on blanket protectionism, ICRIER argues that the tariff shock should be treated as a catalyst for structural change. The paper calls for investment in infrastructure, supply chain efficiency, and R&D 'on the scale of the 1991 liberalisation.'The report's bottom line: India's trade relationship with the US is too significant to abandon. Navigating this tariff storm will require both immediate relief measures and longer-term competitiveness upgrades, while keeping the door to Washington firmly open.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Did Trump cave to Putin during Alaska Summit? Shocking report out as Zelensky, EU left scrambling
Did Trump cave to Putin during Alaska Summit? Shocking report out as Zelensky, EU left scrambling
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe
The London Stock Exchange overhauled the ceremony for welcoming new companies to its ranks last year, adding confetti cannons, slick videos and cinematic music. It has mostly been used for such events as product launches and anniversaries. So far this year, according to Dealogic, six companies have gone public in the U.K., raising $208 million, the lowest level in three decades of data. It isn't much better across the English Channel, despite surging stock markets. Initial public offerings in continental Europe have nearly halved in value compared with last year. Fundraising in the U.S., meanwhile, has jumped 38% to around $40 billion, while IPOs more than doubled in value in Hong Kong after a fallow patch. Tech stars such as the Swedish 'buy now, pay later' company Klarna and the British chip designer Arm are eschewing local markets to list in New York. And stock-market heavyweights are disappearing, either bought out by American companies or moving their listings stateside, where business is growing faster. Examples are Wise, the British payments company, and the sports-betting company Flutter Entertainment. 'For the Europeans who are responsible for the future, this is a material wake-up call,' said Stéphane Boujnah, chief executive officer of Euronext, which owns seven stock exchanges in the region. Europe doesn't want to 'be just a zone between America and Asia,' he added. Amsterdam and London pioneered the creation of public stock trading centuries ago, raising money for ship voyages to Asia, Africa and the Caribbean that forged Europe's colonial empires. Now, Europe's stock markets face a crisis of inactivity. Not only are listing volumes moribund—exchanges are shrinking too. Hastened by a global shift toward greater private ownership of businesses, the number of listings in London has fallen by a fifth in five years, to about 1,600. London's total market value stands at about $5 trillion, while Nvidia alone is worth $4.4 trillion. The exodus looks likely to continue. Next year Wise and the machinery specialist Ashtead are set to move their main listings to the U.S. from the LSE, which is part of the broader London Stock Exchange Group. Speculation has swirled that AstraZeneca—the largest company in the FTSE 100—could do the same. In a recent interview in New York, CEO Pascal Soriot declined to comment on whether he is considering moving the listing. 'We are very committed to the U.K.,' he said. 'But the reality is, over time, the investments are moving to the U.S.' AstraZeneca recently pledged to invest $50 billion in the U.S. by 2030. European leaders see the withering of these historic exchanges as an emergency—and one of the culprits behind Europe's economic stagnation, low productivity, and the widening wealth gap between its citizens and Americans. 'The wealth creation will happen to Texas teachers and California public-sector employees, not to European pensioners,' said Stephan Leithner, CEO of Deutsche Börse, operator of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Politicians fear the continent's inability to finance and keep exciting companies entrenches American domination over financial markets and reduces Europe's strategic autonomy. President Trump's 'America First' stance has added to the sense of urgency. A lack of investment hurts European businesses, and starts long before they go public. Startups struggle to get access to venture-capital funding, and many leave for Silicon Valley or New York. Those who stay in Europe often get investment from American firms, which then want them to go public in the U.S. or shift operations there. Some companies that make the leap have become more American over time simply because their U.S. businesses grew so fast. New listings are in the doldrums as other corners of European finance, such as the debt markets, shine. Trans-Atlantic dealmaking—one reason for Europe's shrinking stock market—is generating big paydays for selling shareholders and advisers, as U.S. acquirers hunt for bargains. Europe's problem isn't a shortage of money, but an underdeveloped and risk-averse system for investing it. European Union households save more than Americans, but their wealth has grown by a third as much since 2009, according to a 2024 paper by former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi on Europe's lack of competitiveness. Europeans hold $12 trillion of their savings, or about 70%, in bank accounts that typically have low yields, according to the European Commission. Unlike in the U.S., which cultivated widespread stock ownership through 401(k)s, they often rely on state pensions, paid out through government budgets, in retirement. Private pension systems—in places such as the U.K., the Netherlands and Denmark—invest mostly in supersafe assets including government bonds, or U.S.-focused global stock funds. Defense-spending pledges and aging populations are straining government budgets. Channeling more savings into high-returning investments would alleviate the pressure. Executives complain that tepid domestic investment results in lower stock valuations. The French oil producer TotalEnergies, its U.K. rival Shell and the mining company Glencore have in recent years raised the possibility of moving their listings, citing valuation gaps with U.S. peers, though none have made the jump. S&P 500 constituents have a forward price/earnings ratio of 22, compared with 13 for the FTSE 100 and 15 for Germany's DAX. Some Europeans argue that the premium on U.S. stocks is illusory, noting that groups such as the plumbing-supplies company Ferguson Enterprises failed to close the discount to American rivals after moving their primary listings to New York. Only three of the 20 U.K. companies that opted for a New York debut in the past decade have seen market value increase, while half have delisted, according to the LSE. Higher pay for U.S. executives is another draw. Peter Jackson, the chief executive of Flutter, which owns the betting platform FanDuel, nearly tripled his compensation after the gambling company moved its main stock listing to New York last year from London. European leaders have tried to reverse the tide, but with little to show so far. The U.K. has moved to deregulate, including by loosening restrictions on supervoting shares favored by tech founders. The government is launching a 'concierge service' to court businesses and backed an advertising campaign to encourage more retail investing. Speaking at a recent investment conference in London, Julia Hoggett, the CEO of the London Stock Exchange, urged attendees to be more confident. 'If we keep talking ourselves down…then we shouldn't be surprised of the consequences,' Hoggett said. The EU, meanwhile, has revived the painstaking work of knitting together its 27 members' capital markets. The project is already a decade and more than 55 regulatory proposals old. Deutsche Börse's Leithner was part of a working group that ended in a list of technical problems, such as tackling differences in national bankruptcy approaches. 'We need to make the leap from talking about technicalities to fundamental change,' said Leithner. 'If this doesn't happen, it will be a major shame. It would be almost a crime on the younger generation.' Write to Chelsey Dulaney at and Joe Wallace at America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump-Putin Summit Ends Without Breakthrough
ANCHORAGE, Alaska—President Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin ended their highly anticipated meeting here without announcing a breakthrough, leaving the path toward ending the war in Ukraine unclear. At the end of the over three-hour meeting, the two men offered few details about their talks. 'There's no deal until there is a deal,' Trump told reporters at a news conference following the close of the summit. The typically talkative U.S. president took no questions from the dozens of reporters assembled before him. The president said the delegations made progress on key issues, but added, 'We haven't quite got there.' Trump said he would call members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. 'We will probably see you again very soon,' Trump told Putin. The Russian president interjected and offered that their next meeting could take place in Moscow. Trump responded, 'I can see it possibly happening.' Trump had come into the summit seeking Putin's agreement on a cease-fire in Ukraine. But Putin in his remarks gave no indication he was prepared to agree to that demand, repeating that Moscow wanted the root causes of the 3½ year conflict addressed—a term that refers to Moscow's demands for demilitarizing Kyiv and blocking its hopes for membership in NATO. In contrast to the handshakes and smiles that characterized the start of their meeting on the tarmac on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Putin and Trump looked stone-faced during much of the news conference. Putin spoke for roughly eight minutes. Trump then spoke for three minutes, before leaving the room. Even before the meeting officially began, Putin, who has been sanctioned by the U.S. and largely snubbed on the world stage, racked up a series of symbolic wins. Trump waited onboard Air Force One for 30 minutes before the Russian president's plane touched down. The U.S. president greeted his Russian counterpart warmly, applauding as he walked down a red carpet and shook his hand. After posing for photos, both men got into the U.S. president's armored limousine, known as the Beast, giving Putin the one-on-one time with Trump that some of the American president's advisers sought to avoid. Photographers caught the Russian leader smiling as he sat next to Trump in the limo. While it isn't unusual for an American president to invite a foreign leader for an intimate ride in the president's motorcade, the privilege comes after Putin has repeatedly thumbed his nose at Trump's repeated calls to stop the violence in Ukraine. Trump's earlier reception of Putin was markedly different from the way the U.S. president treated Zelensky during a February visit to the Oval Office. Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated the Ukrainian president for not, in their view, showing sufficient gratitude for U.S. support in the war with Russia. Relations between Trump and Zelensky have subsequently improved. But Trump, a former reality-television star who focuses intently on stage-managing his public events, also sent a message to Putin about America's military might. Trump and Putin walked down a red carpet flanked on either side by F-22 stealth fighters and, as the two leaders stepped onto a riser with the words 'ALASKA 2025,' a nuclear-capable B-2 bomber and four F-35 jet fighters roared overhead. As the meeting was in progress, Russian military forces launched new attacks targeting Ukraine's eastern regions, according to the Ukrainian air force. Securing a face-to-face meeting with Trump is a win for Putin, analysts said. The fact that the meeting took place in Alaska, which Russia sold to the U.S. in 1867, is an bonus for the Russian leader. It's 'a Russian revisionist dream come true,' said Celeste Wallander, a senior Pentagon official in the Biden administration. The Russian Foreign Ministry's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote on Telegram that the meeting signaled to the media a shift in relations between Moscow and Washington. 'For three years, they have been reporting that Russia is in isolation, and today they saw the red carpet, laid to greet the Russian president in the United States,' she wrote. Trump has expressed frustration with Putin in recent months after once claiming his strong relationship with the Russian president could lead to a resolution of the war in just a day. In the days leading up to the summit, Trump played down the prospects for a breakthrough, calling his first face-to-face meeting with Putin in six years a 'feel-out meeting.' He didn't rule out the possibility the talks could fail and he said he was prepared to walk away entirely if Putin refused to work toward peace. Trump said he hoped Friday's meeting would lay the groundwork for a second meeting in the near future in which Putin would negotiate directly with Zelensky toward a cease-fire. But in the hours before the summit, Trump upped the stakes, telling Fox News that he wouldn't be happy if Putin didn't agree to a cease-fire at the meeting. The summit was initially set to begin with a one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin, but it was expanded to include top advisers from each delegation at the U.S. president's request. Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff represented the American delegation, while Putin was joined by Yuri Ushakov, his longtime foreign-policy adviser, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. While Trump and Putin have spoken several times in the last six months, the meeting in Anchorage was the first time they met in person since the Group of 20 summit in Osaka, Japan, in 2019. Russian officials indicated that Putin wanted to push a spectrum of bilateral issues onto the negotiating table, likely in an attempt to water down talks about Ukraine, decouple the conflict from U.S.-Russia ties and avoid the threat of sanctions from the Trump White House. The absence of any binding steps for the Russian side to follow out of the meeting could give Putin a chance to continue prosecuting his war in Ukraine, where Russian troops are gaining crucial footholds in eastern Ukraine, while avoiding any new sanctions on Russian oil. Putin's broader goal of trying to put Russia on an equal footing with the U.S., however, was already achieved just by clinching the meeting, particularly on U.S. territory. 'This meeting elevates Russia in some ways to an equal status to the United States, which is what he has craved,' said Heather Conley, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a former top State Department official on European affairs. Kremlin loyal media had suggested the meeting would carry echoes of the 1945 Yalta Conference in which the U.S. and the Soviet Union managed to carve up Europe into spheres of influence, a scenario Putin would be eager to repeat with Trump. Putin is unlikely to be deterred from his ultimate goal of conquering Ukraine militarily or politically to re-establish the Russian sphere of influence in Europe which Moscow lost with the collapse of the Soviet Union. 'Putin is primarily carrying out this war to end the post Cold War order, that is to return Russia to its place as a great power in the classic sense, with its sphere of influence and the right to establish its own conditions there,' said Ruslan Pukhov, founder of Moscow-based defense think tank Center for the Analysis of Strategies and Technologies. Conflict negotiation is usually a drawn-out process that involves detailed timetables, confidence-building measures and verification over months and years. But little of that is expected to be hammered out in a matter of several hours, leaving the rapid cease-fire agreement that Trump wants an open question. 'The big question is whether any of this is enough for Trump,' said Samuel Charap, a veteran Russia watcher and senior political scientist at Rand Corporation. 'He wants an immediate cease-fire, and that's highly unlikely.' Write to Lara Seligman at Meridith McGraw at and Thomas Grove at
