Will the Fed cut rates Wednesday? Not likely, but here's when they might.
Will the Fed cut rates Wednesday? Not likely, but here's when they might.
The Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady Wednesday between 4.25% and 4.5% – exactly as interest-rate traders' bets had predicted after the policy-making body's meeting in early May.
The traders' bets now predict there's little chance the Fed will lower interest rates until their meeting on Sept. 17. That means Americans won't see short-term interest rates – which are heavily influenced by the Fed's decisions – decline for at least another three months.
As of Tuesday afternoon, there still just a 55% chance the Fed will cut its interest rate in September, according to the CME FedWatch tool. The FedWatch tool tracks the likelihood that the Fed will change the fed funds rate based on futures prices.
When interest rates could fall in coming months
Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them.
What time is the Fed meeting?
The Federal Open Market Committee meeting will take place at 2 p.m. ET on June 18. Fed Chair Jerome Powell will then discuss the committee's rate decision at a press conference scheduled for 2:30 p.m.
Will interest rates go down in 2025?
President Donald Trump's tariff proposals have put the Fed in a difficult position: Inflation stemming from the pandemic has moderated, but consumer prices may be on the rise. Inflation ticked up slightly in May from a year earlier to 2.4%. Analysts suggested lower energy prices last month helped to minimize the impact of tariffs.
How much tariffs will raise prices in the coming months remains uncertain, as most remain unresolved. If the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates before it's clear how tariffs are affecting the prices we pay, it could unintentionally trigger inflation—by encouraging more borrowing to pay for goods made more expensive by those tariffs.
The Fed tries to hold inflation steady at about 2% each year while keeping as many Americans employed as possible. The May jobs report released June 6 showed unemployment remained steady at 4.2%, and the economy added a 139,000 jobs.
While other indicators also suggest the economy remains relatively strong, Fed chief Jerome Powell cautioned after the May meeting that recent inflation and employment data could be showing early signs of concern. But he said the ongoing uncertainty surrounding tariffs and their impact on the economy has led them to keep interest rates unchanged.
"I think there's a great deal of uncertainty about, for example, where tariff policies are going to settle out," Powell said. "When they do settle out, what will be the implications for the economy for growth and for employment. I think it's too early to know that."
Where interest rates stand on credit cards and car loans
The Fed's three interest rate cuts in 2024 quickly translated into lower payments for short-term loans made on credit cards and for cars:
Increases and decreases in credit card interest rates are closely linked to the prime rate, which is generally three percentage points higher than the fed funds rate. Auto loans also follow a similar pattern. All three remain well above where they were in early 2022 when Powell signaled the Fed planned to start raising interest rates to curb inflation.
Higher mortgage interest rates add to housing troubles
Mortgage rates are primarily influenced by long-term interest rates, which in turn are shaped by expectations about inflation and the overall direction of the economy. Since the Federal Reserve began cutting interest rates in late September, mortgage rates have risen in tandem with short-term rates by several percentage points.
More importantly for homebuyers, mortgage rates are still more than double what they were in 2021. In December 2021, with rates at 3.1%, a buyer purchasing a $425,000 home with a 20% down payment would have paid about $1,453 per month in principal and interest. At last week's rate of 6.8%, that same mortgage would cost about $763 more each month.
Contributing: Rachel Barber
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US toy retailers grapple with effects of trump's tariffs
US toy retailers are facing mounting challenges as the trade tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump continue to squeeze margins and complicate sourcing strategies. With nearly 80% of toys sold in the United States produced in China, many businesses are reporting delayed shipments, rising costs and even legal action—all as hopes hinge on the expiry of a temporary tariff pause in early July. Retailers are contending with a web of overlapping tariffs on Chinese imports, where duty rates now stack as high as 145% in some cases—far above the 30% headline figure quoted by officials. Smaller toy importers are disproportionately affected, with many forced to increase prices or eat some of the added costs to stay afloat. Alignable reports that over 57% of small retailers expect revenue losses due to this uncertainty. The combination of high tariffs and shifting trade policy has caused substantial supply chain delays. Companies such as Basic Fun! rushed to forward-ship container loads while the tariffs were temporarily reduced from 145% to 30%—an effort that offered short-term relief but failed to eliminate ongoing uncertainty. Multiple firms have also started cutting orders or narrowing their product lines in anticipation of possible disruptions, especially during crucial retail periods like the lead-up to Christmas. Several toymakers have taken legal action against the administration. Learning Resources, an Illinois-based educational toy producer with around 500 employees, has sued the federal government, arguing Trump exceeded his authority under IEEPA in imposing steep tariffs. St Paul's Mischief Toy Store has joined similar litigation claiming the 145% levy is unconstitutional. These challenges follow broader legal rulings, such as a Federal Trade Court decision in late May blocking the so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs under IEEPA—though that ruling remains stayed during appeal. Meanwhile, larger toy manufacturers are proactively shifting production to countries like Vietnam, India and Indonesia. Major brands such as Mattel, Hasbro and MGA Entertainment have accelerated their transition away from China—MGA, for instance, plans to boost output from alternate sites from around 15% to 40% in the next six months. The current 90-day tariff reduction is set to expire in early July, re-establishing uncertainty for importers who must rapidly adapt or lock in alternative supply chains. Analysts warn that sustained high duties may lead to permanent business closures in the SME sector, reduced innovation capacity and higher prices at the checkout for consumers—especially families with school-age children. With courts mulling the legality of the tariffs and retailers racing to diversify their sourcing, the US toy industry remains on edge. Any extension or change in tariff policy could determine whether small toymakers and independent stores survive the current economic squeeze—or succumb to rising costs and regulatory the shifting tariff landscape with real-time data and market-leading analysis. Request a free demo for GlobalData's Strategic Intelligence . "US toy retailers grapple with effects of trump's tariffs" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's purges come for the U.S.' nuclear safety board
Happy Tuesday. Here's your Tuesday Tech Drop, a collection of the past week's top stories from the intersection of technology and politics. Donald Trump's efforts to strip federal agencies and commissions of their independence took an alarming step Monday, when the president fired one of the five commissioners who sit on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a congressionally authorized entity that exists 'to ensure the safe use of radioactive materials for beneficial civilian purposes while protecting people and the environment.' Christopher T. Hanson was initially appointed by Trump in his first term and reappointed by Joe Biden in 2024. The White House implied Hanson's firing was to make this important commission more favorable to Trump's agenda. 'All organizations are more effective when leaders are rowing in the same direction,' deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told NPR. 'President Trump reserves the right to remove employees within his own Executive Branch who exert his executive authority.' Read more at NPR. A new report by The New York Times highlights how Trump allies working in the president's so-called Department of Government Efficiency tried to wield power over bureaucrats at the Social Security Administration and to weaponize misinformation (and conclusions based on their own misunderstandings) about the agency to spread false claims about fraud in the program. (A White House spokesperson told the Times that the agency under Trump 'will continue to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse while protecting benefits for eligible Americans.') Read more in The New York Times. Ten Democratic lawmakers, led by Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, sent a letter on Tuesday to Palantir CEO Alex Karp over reports that the Trump administration has tapped the company to assist in creating a massive database of Americans' personal information. The letter demands answers and assurances as to how the project will comply with laws meant to protect Americans' privacy. The letter reads, in part: The unprecedented possibility of a searchable, 'mega-database' of tax returns and other data that will potentially be shared with or accessed by other federal agencies is a surveillance nightmare that raises a host of legal concerns, not least that it will make it significantly easier for Donald Trump's Administration to spy on and target his growing list of enemies and other Americans. Palantir has posted multiple responses to social media, framing the New York Times' reporting about the alleged database as 'unfounded speculation' and denying claims it is building a database to enable mass surveillance of Americans. Read more at FedScoop. The Trump sons announced plans to roll out a Trump-branded phone and mobile service this week. In addition to the ethical concerns swirling around a president's potentially profiting from his position, there are a lot of tech-related questions about the quality of the product and service being offered. With those questions in mind, CNET writer Mike Sorrentino makes a pretty compelling argument as to why 'Trump Mobile and the T1 Phone Don't Make Any Sense, Even for Trump Fans.' Read his take over at CNET. David Plouffe, a campaign manager for Barack Obama's presidential campaign and adviser to Kamala Harris' presidential bid, signed on to the global advisory council for the pro-Trump cryptocurrency firm Coinbase. Some progressives who've been disgusted by the firm's financial support for the Trump administration are arguing that a Democrat's working closely with a MAGA-aligned crypto company is reflective of everything that's wrong with politics today. For his part, Plouffe argued at a crypto conference Thursday that 'the folks who own crypto are pretty politically competitive' and that 'these are not MAGA voters. They are swing voters,' according to the AP. Read more about the outrage in Common Dreams. Some users of Meta's artificial intelligence platform may have unwittingly shared personal or otherwise embarrassing information in written or spoken prompts that are readily available for other users to read. Recent reports have highlighted how the user interface for Meta's AI platform may have contributed to users' confusion over whether they were submitting questions privately or sharing their AI prompts with the masses — a situation that has been described as a 'privacy disaster.' (Facebook did not comment on the record for TechCrunch's story.) Read more in TechCrunch. Users of the popular online game Roblox have been attending in-game protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, continuing a growing tradition of protesters' using video games to promote their causes. Read more in Teen Vogue. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas stops providing new funding for border wall construction
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas has stopped putting new money toward building a U.S.-Mexico border wall, shifting course after installing only a fraction of the hundreds of miles of potential barrier that Republican Gov. Greg Abbott set out to construct four years ago. State lawmakers this month approved a new Texas budget that does not include continued funding for the wall, which had been a multibillion-dollar priority for Abbott as part of a sprawling immigration crackdown. He even took the unusual step of soliciting private donations for construction, saying in 2021 that many Americans wanted to help. On Tuesday, Abbott's office said President Donald Trump's aggressive efforts to curb immigration allowed the state to adjust. The halt in funding was first reported by The Texas Tribune. 'Thanks to President Trump's bold leadership, the federal government is finally fulfilling its obligation to secure the southern border and deport criminal illegal immigrants," Abbott spokesman Andrew Mahaleris said. 'Because of these renewed federal assets in Texas, our state can now adjust aspects of state-funded border security efforts.' The state has completed 65 miles (104 kilometers) of border wall since construction began. The Texas border with Mexico is roughly 1,200 miles (1,931 kilometers). The wall has gone up at a slow pace as the state has navigated the drawn-out process of buying private land and confronting local opposition in some places. Abbott announced plans for the wall at a time when large numbers of migrants were showing up at the border, saying in 2021 that he believed a combination of state-owned land and volunteered private property would "yield hundreds of miles to build a border wall.' The number of migrant crossings has fallen dramatically this year. 'There was no need for it in the first place,' said Scott Nicol, a board member for Friends of the Wildlife Corridor, a habitat preservation group in the Rio Grande Valley. He has criticized the wall as ineffective. "The only thing that's changed is the political dynamic,' he said. The new budget approved by Texas lawmakers allocates about $3.4 billion for border security for two years. That amount will not be used to build out new projects for the wall and instead go to the Texas Department of Safety and the Texas National Guard, the main agencies responsible for Operation Lone Star, Abbott's key immigration program launched in 2021 during the Biden administration. The money allocated for border security is nearly half the $6.5 billion that was dedicated to immigration efforts the last time lawmakers earmarked the state budget two years ago. Funds previously allocated for the wall will allow work on it to continue through 2026 and 'will set the federal government up for success,' said Republican Sen. Joan Huffman, the lead budget writer in the state Senate. The agency responsible for constructing the wall has about $2.5 billion remaining in funding to cover up to 85 additional miles (135 additional kilometers) of the wall by 2026, according to a statement made in April by Texas Facilities Commission executive director Mike Novak, whose agency is overseeing construction of the project. 'This wall should have never been built, it's useless,' said Bekah Hinojosa, co-founder of the South Texas Environmental Justice Network. "It divides our community.' ___ Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
