PAS moots PN presidential council to ‘oversee' coalition
PETALING JAYA : PAS has proposed that Perikatan Nasional (PN) establish a presidential council composed of the heads of the opposition coalition's four components.
PAS central committee member Khairil Nizam Khirudin said the council would oversee PN while an executive committee would take on the task of 'championing issues'.
He said the proposal was aimed at improving and bolstering PN's administrative structure, and that the Bersatu leadership was aware of the matter, Berita Harian reported.
'Our proposal has reached Bersatu and we've asked them to join us in this matter, because it requires a consensus between party components.
'This council comprising the party presidents would, in principle, oversee PN.
'In terms of the day-to-day operations, including responding, championing and rallying the people on various issues, that can be left to the executive committee,' he was quoted as saying.
It was previously reported that PAS had proposed restructuring PN to make Bersatu deputy president Hamzah Zainudin the head of an executive committee that manages the coalition's day-to-day affairs.
Under the reported plan, the presidents of PAS, Bersatu, Gerakan and the Malaysian Indian People's Party would form an advisory council while retaining their roles on the PN Supreme Council.
Hamzah dismissed the speculation as 'nonsensical stories' spread by outsiders seeking to divide Bersatu and PN.
Muhyiddin Yassin meanwhile claimed that PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang had personally expressed support for him to stay on as PN chairman at a meeting several months ago.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Let Anwar's application for referral of constitutional questions to Federal Court take its course — Hafiz Hassan
AUGUST 12 — In 'If Anwar's constitutional questions are preposterous, absurd and legal nonsense, let the court say it' I wrote that if the constitutional questions proposed to be referred by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim for a ruling by the Federal Court were preposterous, absurd and legal nonsense, let the court having the ultimate authority say it. The constitutional questions were It was submitted by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim that he was being selectively exposed to litigation in a manner that violates the principle of equal protection, implying that the Prime Minister should receive distinct treatment under the law. — Bernama pic proposed in the civil action commenced by Yusoff Rawther against Anwar in the latter's personal capacity. The civil action was up for trial — the action having been filed at the High Court in July 2021, prior to Anwar's appointment as the Prime Minister in November 2022 with the trial having been fixed on June 6, 2025 — but Anwar, by an application on May 23, 2025, sought to: a) refer constitutional questions to the Federal Court (see below) – touching on whether a sitting Prime Minister enjoys certain immunities or protections from civil litigation relating to pre-office conduct — under O 92 r 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC) and/or Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution and/or Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (CJA); and b) stay the trial on June 16 pending the Federal Court's determination of those constitutional questions. At the hearing of the application, it was submitted by Anwar's legal team that the continuation of the civil action engages constitutional issues concerning the interpretation and effect of Articles 5, 8, 39, 40, and 43 of the Federal Constitution. It was further suggested that a sitting Prime Minister should be insulated from the burdens of civil litigation, and that the High Court ought to refer these issues for the determination of the Federal Court pursuant to Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution. Eight questions were listed in the application for referral to the Federal Court. The grounds that were said to be critical constitutional issues were namely: a) Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution — right to life and personal liberty: It was contended by Anwar that being subjected to a civil trial while holding the office of Prime Minister infringes his liberty interests under Article 5(1), on the basis that it imposes undue burden and distraction from the discharge of executive functions; b) Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution — equality before the law: It was submitted by Anwar that he was being selectively exposed to litigation in a manner that violates the principle of equal protection, implying that the Prime Minister should receive distinct treatment under the law; c) Articles 39, 40, and 43 of the Federal Constitution — Executive authority, Yang di-Pertuan Agong to act on advice, and Cabinet: It was argued that the above provisions collectively vest the executive authority of the Federation in the Yang di-Pertuan Agong acting on Cabinet advice, with the Prime Minister at its helm, and that subjecting the Prime Minister to civil litigation while in office undermines or disrupts this constitutional structure; d) doctrine of 'constructive harm': Anwar's counsel introduced this idea — though not anchored on any express constitutional provision, that permitting a Prime Minister to be sued while in office causes 'constructive harm' to the institution of the Executive, and this 'harm' triggered constitutional protection; and e) institutional proportionality: It was argued that the adjudication of politically sensitive private tort claims against the sitting Prime Minister, in the absence of a constitutional scrutiny threshold, violated the principle of institutional proportionality and offended the basic structure of the Federal Constitution by upsetting the functional balance between the Judiciary and the Executive. The application was made notwithstanding that Anwar was ready and willing to proceed with the trial. Anwar does not assert that the action impairs his ability to perform his constitutional functions. He does not also produce any evidence to that effect. It appears that Anwar does not raise immunity as a defence to Yusoff's claim — but I stand corrected on this. What is apparent, however, the application and the grounds are largely exploratory in nature – to test whether the Federal Constitution accords the Prime Minister any form of procedural immunity or protection from civil liability while in office. One may not agree with the proposed constitutional questions — some, even from the legal fraternity, have vilified Anwar and his legal team for the questions — but it was ingenious of Anwar's legal team to have proposed the questions — again, one may not agree with the word 'ingenious'. Be that as it may, High Court Judge Roz Mawar did not buy into Anwar's legal team's arguments, contentions and submissions. After assessing the application and each of the grounds at length, the learned judge said: 'Having considered the application in its entirety, this court is of the view that the constitutional questions framed by the defendant are not real, substantial, or necessary for the disposal of the present suit. The issues raised do not call for the interpretation of any ambiguity in our Federal Constitution, nor do they relate to the validity of any legislation, or the scope of legislative competence under Article 128(2) of our Federal Constitution. 'The principles [are] … clear: that not every question which touches on the Constitution qualifies for referral under Section 84 of the CJA. This court must be satisfied that the constitutional question is both genuine and material to the resolution of the case. The Federal Court is not a forum for speculative or defensive advisory opinions. 'This present application discloses no such question. The suit concerns a personal claim against the defendant for alleged acts occurring prior to his assumption of office. There is no suggestion that the defendant is unable to discharge his constitutional duties, and the defendant has indicated readiness to proceed with trial as scheduled on 16 June 2025. It is this court's considered conclusion that Section 84 of the CJA is not satisfied. This court therefore declines to refer the proposed questions to the Federal Court. 'The application … is hereby dismissed. Cost of RM20,000 is awarded to the plaintiff. Trial to commence on 16 June 2025 as scheduled.' (See Muhammed Yusoff Rawther v Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim [2025] 10 MLJ 689, 690) So, instead of vilifying Anwar's so-called claim of immunity, which may be misplaced – unless Anwar pleads as such in his defence – let's celebrate the learned High Court judge's independence. Her Ladyship decided against Anwar, who may be sued in his personal capacity, but nonetheless the country's prime minister. Anwar has appealed against the decision and has successfully obtained a stay of the trial pending the outcome of his appeal to the Court of Appeal. Let Anwar's application and its grounds be ventilated in the higher court. Let the application take its legal course. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘It doesn't matter who': Justice will prevail in Zara Qairina case, says Anwar
LARUT, Aug 16 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has reaffirmed that those responsible for the death of Form One student Zara Qairina Mahathir will be brought to justice, stressing that no individual involved will be allowed to escape accountability. In this regard, Anwar advised certain parties not to manipulate the case in ways that create negative perceptions or resort to insulting specific individuals. '… the government has said the police are investigating, and I have made it clear that it doesn't matter who (is involved), they will be investigated,' he said when officiating the Madani Dairy Entrepreneurs Carnival themed 'Driving Modern Agricultural Revolution, Generating People's Economy' at the Farm Fresh Perak Dairy Complex here today. Also present were Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Saarani Mohamad, Agriculture and Food Security Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Sabu and Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek. Meanwhile, Anwar said the government will continue efforts to protect the vulnerable, including fishermen and farmers. 'That is why every Friday before prayers, I eat at small eateries, because I want to meet the people, I want to ask, is everything okay, do you have enough? 'I don't want to wait until election campaigns to visit eateries … I do this every week,' he said. After the event, the Prime Minister also took time to inspect the construction of the new road from Kamunting to Anak Kurau, Larut Matang Selama (LMS) Phase Two, implemented under the Rural Roads Programme (JALB) of the Ministry of Rural and Regional Development (KKDW). The project, approved in 2016 with a total cost of RM91 million, is being carried out by the Public Works Department (JKR) through conventional consultancy, involving the construction of a 6.6-kilometre new road. It is expected to benefit more than 5,000 residents in the surrounding areas and have a positive impact on agriculture and plantation enterprises along the route, besides improving accessibility and stimulating local economic growth. To date, the project, which is scheduled for full completion on August 15, 2026, has achieved 70.5 per cent progress compared to the original 62.6 per cent, ahead of schedule by 59 days. — Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Calls grow for DAP to ‘cut ties' with Akmal
Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh is being investigated for sedition, criminal intimidation, and improper use of network facilities over a Facebook video related to the Jalur Gemilang issue. PETALING JAYA : Another DAP Youth state chapter has called for the party to sever all ties with Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh, as the spat related to the upside-down Jalur Gemilang issue continues to drag on. Negeri Sembilan DAP Youth urged the central DAP leadership and youth wing to take a clear stand on Akmal, whom they accused of sowing division among Malaysians and politicising the flag issue. 'We urge the national DAP and DAP Youth leadership to take a clear stand by cutting all political ties with irresponsible politicians like Akmal. 'This is to ensure that DAP Youth remains consistent in rejecting hateful and divisive politics,' it said in a statement today, echoing its Penang counterpart, which made a similar call yesterday. Akmal had laughed off the threat and dared DAP to cut ties with him. The Merlimau assemblyman said severing ties with him would inadvertently mean ending DAP's relationship with Umno, a key partner in the unity government. 'Bring it on,' he said. Akmal is being investigated for sedition, criminal intimidation, and improper use of network facilities over a Facebook video in which he allegedly made statements that could disrupt public peace. The video in question was related to a hardware store owner in Kepala Batas, Penang, who was caught on video allegedly hanging the Jalur Gemilang upside down. Separately, Melaka DAP publicity secretary Kerk Chee Yee said the state chapter should not work with 'individual politicians who don't intend to build a harmonious and inclusive community' in the next state election. Kerk, the Melaka assembly deputy speaker, said Akmal should have handled the flag issue in a mature and tactful manner, claiming that the state executive councillor's actions caused unease among the public.
