'His mind is not working': Prashant Kishor targets Nitish Kumar for skipping Niti Aayog meet
Prashant Kishor and Nitish Kumar (File photos)
NEW DELHI: Political strategist and Jan Suraaj founder
Prashant Kishor
took a jab at
Bihar chief minister
Nitish Kumar
on Sunday, following Kumar's absence from the recent Niti Aayog meeting. Kishor questioned the CM's health, cognitive ability, and the political motivations behind his continued leadership.
'Nitish Kumar didn't attend the meeting as he is not physically and medically fit,' Kishor claimed while talking to reporters. He further criticized the CM for prioritizing political negotiations over development-focused discussions. 'If you see it from another perspective, the CM of the poorest state, Bihar, didn't attend the meeting, which was for development, but he has gone today (at NDA CMs and deputy CMs meeting) to bargain for more seats for JD(U) (in
Bihar elections
),' he said.
— ANI (@ANI)
In a sharp personal dig, Kishor also questioned Kumar's mental faculties and claiming the lack of accountability for those holding public office. 'His mind is not working... A student from a common family has to take physical and medical tests to pass an examination, but the state's CM, who doesn't even remember his name, has no such rule for him,' he remarked.
Kishor also targeted the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing it of political opportunism.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Shop Directly from Adidas Franchise Stores – Up to 50% OFF
Original Adidas
Shop Now
Undo
'BJP has imposed such a person on Bihar as they have 12 Lok Sabha seats and support in Bihar,' he saidd. He added that the BJP was compelled to project Nitish as the CM face ahead of elections due to strategic calculations.
'It's the BJP's compulsion to keep Nitish Kumar as the CM face till election, as if they won't do that, he will shift to the other side,' Kishor added.
This comes as Bihar CM and key NDA ally Nitish Kumar was notably absent from the 10th Niti Aayog governing council meeting held in New Delhi on Saturday.
He was amongst various leaders from opposition-governed states who did not attend the session. His non-attendance has sparked political discussions, particularly as Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to visit Bihar in advance of the state's assembly elections this year.
His absence at the crucial meeting triggered discussions in political circles. Leaders from both Congress and RJD have expressed their disappointment, labelling it as "unfortunate" whilst suggesting potential underlying political implications.
Read more:
Bihar's Nitish Kumar joins non-NDA CMs in skipping Niti Aayog meet, sparks political buzz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
MP shocker: Woman, 2 minor daughters abducted at gunpoint in Chhatarpur; 5 held
Image used for representational purpose only NEW DELHI: Armed assailants, numbering more than twelve, reportedly kidnapped a woman and her two young daughters after shooting and wounding her husband in Chhatarpur district of Madhya Pradesh, authorities reported on Sunday. The occurrence took place in Sumedi village within Lavkushnagar police jurisdiction at approximately 12.30 pm on Saturday. The perpetrators arrived using motorcycles and vehicles, according to Sub-Divisional Police Officer Naveen Dubey. Police are actively searching for the woman and her two children. Authorities have detained five suspects and registered charges under various Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions, including attempted murder. Superintendent of Police Agam Jain has formed five specialised teams to locate the remaining suspects and offered a Rs 10,000 reward for information. The perpetrators attacked Hariram Pal and his family before forcibly taking his wife and daughters, aged 7 and 5, at gunpoint. They were compelled into an SUV whilst shots were discharged into the air. A widely circulated social media video allegedly shows the abduction occurring in public view. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Pal informed journalists that he sustained gunshot wounds whilst attempting to protect his family but survived. The event has sparked controversy, with the opposition Congress criticising the BJP-led government's handling of state security. "A woman and her two children were kidnapped in broad daylight in Chhatarpur. The accused opened fire and forcibly took them away in a car," state Congress president Jitu Patwari posted on X. He asserted that despite concerning statistics on crimes against women, the state was establishing "new records of lawlessness" and questioned Chief Minister Mohan Yadav's silence on the matter. Former chief minister Kamal Nath also denounced the incident, stating, "There is no fear of law left in Madhya Pradesh. Such film-style crimes point to a state of jungle raj. This is deeply worrying." The Madhya Pradesh Home Department confirmed via X that authorities have filed charges, including attempted murder, regarding the Sumedi village incident.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Owaisi slams US strikes on Iran, calls it violation of international law
AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi on Sunday strongly condemned the US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling the move a blatant violation of international law and even the Constitution of the United States of America. AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi speaks to the media, in Hyderabad on Wednesday. (ANI - X/File) The US officially joined Israeli campaign against Iran, launching airstrikes on Saturday targeting three key Iranian nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. Follow Israel-Iran conflict live updates US President Donald Trump later confirmed the strikes on Truth Social, declaring them a 'spectacular military success,' and claimed that Iran's nuclear enrichment infrastructure had been 'completely and totally obliterated.' Reacting to the US strikes, Owaisi said, 'The strikes carried out this morning by the US on nuclear sites in Iran are a violation of international law, and even of the US Constitution itself." The Trump entry marks a dramatic escalation in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, with the US now directly involved. Trump described the operation as a 'historic moment' for the US, Israel, and the world, and issued a stern warning to Tehran: 'Make peace or face greater and easier attacks.' Congress leader Pramod Tiwari, on US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, said, 'The world operates on international laws, and violating the sovereignty of any nation is a serious crime. The US is carrying out bombings from so far away, I just want to say that such actions were taken against our neighboring country, like Iran, who have stood with India during difficult times, is not good and on the other side, our government is silent on all this." RJD leader Manoj Jha said the entire world is going through a period of great turmoil, and the US President has played a significant role "in shaping this situation.' Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi took a clever jibe at the growing coordination between the United States and Israel over the recent strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. "America voted for President Trump but got Netanyahu as their boss," the UBT leader said.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
US Strikes Iran: The significance of Strait of Hormuz for global oil supply – explained in 5 points
US Strikes Iran: The US strike on three key nuclear facilities in Iran on Saturday night has put the spotlight back on the Strait of Hormuz – the strategically significant shipping pathway that carries about a fifth of the world's oil. Iran has long threatened to choke the Strait of Hormuz. In a fresh threat after the military strikes by its long-time foe, the United States, Hossein Shariatmadari, the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's representative, has reportedly called for immediate retaliation, including closing the Strait of Hormuz to American, British, German, and French ships. The Strait of Hormuz is a strait between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It provides the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and is one of the world's most strategically important choke points. The Strait serves as the primary export route for Gulf producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, and Kuwait. This pathway allows about 20 per cent of the world's daily oil consumption—around 20 million barrels—to pass through it. The strait has been at the heart of regional tensions for decades, and recently, attacks have occurred near it and targeted alternative routes for oil bypassing Hormuz, news agency Reuters said. Recently, President Trump blamed Iran for the June 12 attacks on two oil tankers at the entrance to the Gulf despite Tehran's denials, stoking fears of a confrontation in the vital oil shipping route. On July 19 Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had captured a British-flagged oil tanker in the Gulf after Britain seized an Iranian vessel on July 4. At present, approximately 50 large oil tankers are attempting to navigate out of the Strait of Hormuz, according to the media reports. Iran's fresh threat after US strikes has raised concerns about how disruptive a conflict in the Gulf could be for the global oil trade. But what if Iran closes the Strait this time? How will it impact India? The Strait links the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean. Any blockade would drive the oil price up and cause inflation. Over two-thirds of India's oil imports and nearly half of its liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports transit through the Strait of Hormuz. Of the 5.5 million barrels of oil India consumes every day, 1.5 million pass through the waterway. 'If Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, India will definitely suffer. About 20 per cent of the world's crude oil and 25 per cent of the world's natural gas flow through these,' Foreign Affairs Expert Robinder Sachdev told news agency ANI. India will suffer because oil prices will go up, inflation will rise, and there is an estimate that for every ten-dollar increase in the price of crude oil, india's GDP will suffer by 0.5 per cent, he said. Union Minister Hardeep Puri said earlier this week that India plans to source crude oil from outside the Persian Gulf and to cut its own refined‑product exports, as a potential blockage of the Strait of Hormuz looms. 'We have enough diversified supplies of crude, and even if there were to be a disruption, we can source it from alternative suppliers,' Puri, the Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas, told NDTV 'I don't think this is something we are unduly worried about,' he added. Ample crude is available on the global market, so the concern is not supply but price, the Minister said. India is a net exporter of petroleum goods, with refiners such as Reliance Industries Ltd. and Nayara Energy shipping to countries such as the United Arab Emirates, Singapore, the US and Australia. The crisis could reduce those shipments if needed to maintain sufficient stockpiles at home. India's product exports have averaged 1.3 million barrels a day so far this year, with Reliance and Nayara dominating the industry with 82 per cent of shipments, Bloomberg reported. The strait has never been closed, despite apprehensions that its closure in the past would disrupt the global oil supply. Experts said that while there might be a temporary disruption in maritime traffic, Iran might refrain from choking the Strait of Hormuz, as it will pinch its friends more than its enemies. 'There are three significant reasons why Iran might not actually do so, even while signalling that it might do so rhetorically. First, it will hurt Iran's friend, China, the world's second-largest economy, and Iran's largest trading partner. China, is the number one importer of oil, accounting for nearly three-quarters of its oil export,' Shweta Singh is an associate professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of International Studies, South Asian University, wrote in Mint recently. So China, will not like to see any disruption in its maritime oil shipments, and might actually use its economic leverage with Iran to prevent Iran from the closure of the narrow lane, she said 'Second, it will rupture Iran's relationship with Oman (which owns the southern half of the strait) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC States). With Oman, careful crafting of a relationship has resulted in greater dependency for Iran on a wide range of issues,' Singh added. During the Iran–Iraq War in the 1980s, the two countries engaged in what is called the ' Tanker War'. Tehran targeted Kuwaiti and Saudi tankers, as Iraq retaliated with missile strikes. The US launched Operation Earnest Will to protect Kuwaiti oil tankers from Iranian attacks during the Iran-Iraq War. It was a key part of the larger 'Tanker War' and involved the largest maritime convoy operation since World War II. This oil war led to a hike in prices across the world, but still, the Strait remained open. 'Third, domestically this might not work for the interest of the regime, as any economic hits or closure of its oil exporting terminal, will see a surge in prices, and fuel popular discontent, which might impact both regime stability, and reformist tendencies for President Masoud Pezeshkian,' Singh wrote. Steven Schork, Schork Group principal and editor, told Bloomberg, that he does not think Iran will close the Strait of Hormuz because it would hurt India and China, two of their biggest oil export clients. If Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, India will definitely suffer. About 20 percent of the world's crude oil and 25 percent of the world's natural gas flow through these. In 2011-2012, Iran again threatened to close the Strait in response to European and US sanctions against its oil exports and banking system. The then-Iranian Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi warned of a complete shutdown if oil sanctions were enforced. The Strait, however, was not closed. Likewise, in 2019, when the US withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal and tensions soared, apprehensions of closure gripped the globe yet again. But despite severe escalation, the Strait remained functional.
