logo
As higher ed faces attack, Ohio State, Johns Hopkins presidents address role in democracy

As higher ed faces attack, Ohio State, Johns Hopkins presidents address role in democracy

Yahoo26-03-2025

What is the role of the American research university? How should they educate and prepare students to be engaged citizens? And how should universities leaders engage in this moment when many say that higher education is under attack?
Ohio State President Ted Carter and Johns Hopkins University President Ronald J. Daniels aimed to answer those questions during a public discussion at the Ohio Union Tuesday afternoon.
The discussion, called "Citizenship Education at America's Leading Research Universities," was the first public event held by Ohio State's Salmon P. Chase Center for Civics, Culture & Society and was co-sponsored by the Center for Ethics and Human Values, the Institute for Democratic Engagement and Accountability and the John Glenn College of Public Affairs.
Study up on education news: Subscribe to The Dispatch's weekly education newsletter Extra Credit
Though the Ohio General Assembly mandated the creation of five independent academic centers promoting intellectual diversity at Ohio State and four other state public universities in 2023, and the center has been active since this past fall, Tuesday's event was in some ways a public introduction to the Chase Center and its offerings.
Chase Center Executive Director Lee J. Strang moderated the hourlong event. Strang said the purpose of the event was two-fold: to provide information about citizenship education at the university level and to model civil debate.
Carter and Daniels both shared their perspectives as leaders of public and private universities, respectively, on how what they see as the role of a research university in promoting civic education. It is a question that Strang was particularly interested in hearing from Daniels.
Daniels, who has served as president of Johns Hopkins since 2009, wrote a book titled "What Universities Owe Democracy" in 2021. Strang read the book three years ago, about the same time that discussions started at the Statehouse related to creating the Chase Center and other like it. He thought it was interesting why the president of the country's leading research institution would write a book about citizenship education.
The two concepts are more intertwined than one might think, Daniels said during Tuesday's discussion.
He took attendees back to post-WW2 America, when inventor and science administrator Vannevar Bush led the movement responsible for creating the National Science Foundation. His push to promote national security and economic growth by financing higher education research through federal funds, Daniels said, was "true genius."
That relationship between the university and the federal government is crucial to the growth and existence of not only high-level research but also democracy itself, both presidents said. Ohio State, Carter said, wouldn't exist without its research arm.
"As a public (university), we are beholden to those dollars for us to be able to do this work for the nation," Carter said. "The United States has a gift for the future and the current work of research."
Both presidents submitted, however, that universities need to do a better job communicating all of the work they do and why it is crucial to civic engagement. A Gallup poll published in July 2024 found that Americans are nearly equally divided on their confidence levels in higher education. Those who have a lot of confidence in higher education, about 36%, just barely outweighs those who have some confidence (32%) and those with little or no confidence (32%) in higher education. That is in stark contrast to when Gallup first measured confidence in higher education in 2015, when 57% had a great deal or quite a lot of confidence and only 10% had little or none.
"It's a little bit under attack, to be quite honest, right now," Carter said. "But what it is that we do and how we do it is so important."
Daniels said that we've seen democracies around the world "drifting to authoritarianism" and "robust democracies becoming fragile."
"It's in that context that you ask the question, 'What can institutions do to ensure the survival and the flourishing of these political arrangements, of these institutions that we associate with the idea of democracy?'" he said.
Education, both Daniels and Carter said, is a huge part of the solution. Both shared how they've worked to integrate civics education at their universities.
At Johns Hopkins, Daniels said the university started "Democracy Day," a full day of programming during freshman orientation where new students hear all about the tenets of democracy, learn about opportunities across campus and in the broader community to get involved, and participate in activities to cultivate and practice civil discourse.
"We're trying to normalize this exchange, and again, be a corrective force to the deep polarization that exists in this country," Daniels said. "We're deeply, deeply divided, but we're not even talking to each other. We're just hurling insults and getting more and more entrenched... This is an opportunity to develop this ability to navigate these differences."
Carter noted that "Education for Citizenship" is both Ohio State's motto and its mission. He highlighted the university's Listen. Learn. Discuss. platform, launched during fall semester. The platform acts as an umbrella to campus groups dedicated to free expression and civics, including the Center for Ethics and Human Values, OSU Votes and the Divided Community Project.
Civil discourse: These Ohio State academics want to help you navigate difficult conversations better
It was almost fitting that an event about education did not take place without its detractors. About halfway through the discussion, two students seated in the audience stood up and called on Carter to join them at a protest outside the Ohio Union to hear directly from students.
About 50 students gathered before the Chase Center event to protest the university's recent decision to shutter two of its diversity offices, as well as the state of university's investments and student housing.
"We have students, faculty and staff who are concerned about the lack of democracy at Ohio State University," one of the students said. "... We want you to embody the citizenship you're talking about here."
The protestors were escorted out of the theater minutes later without issue. Before resuming the event, Carter said to audience members that he is proud that students feel comfortable expressing their freedom of speech on campus.
"As I said earlier, I wore the uniform for 38 years. I was committed to the Constitution of the United States, and part of that was First Amendment," he said. "So as much as it seems like a disruption, it's OK, and that's part of what we do here."
Higher education reporter Sheridan Hendrix can be reached at shendrix@dispatch.com and on Signal at @sheridan.120. You can follow her on Instagram at @sheridanwrites.
This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Ohio State, Johns Hopkins leaders speak at Chase Center's first event

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chad announces suspension of visas to US citizens in response to Trump travel ban
Chad announces suspension of visas to US citizens in response to Trump travel ban

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Chad announces suspension of visas to US citizens in response to Trump travel ban

N'DJAMENA, Chad (AP) — Chad's President Mahamat Idriss Deby has announced that his country will suspend the issuing of visas to U.S. citizens in response to the Trump administration's decision to ban Chadians from visiting the United States. President Donald Trump on Wednesday resurrected a hallmark policy of his first term when he announced the visa ban on 12 countries including Chad, accusing them of having 'deficient' screening and vetting, and historically refusing to take back their own citizens who overstay in the United States. The new ban targets Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. There will also be heightened restrictions on visitors from seven others in the new travel policy, which takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. In a Facebook post, Chad's president on Thursday said he is directing his government to suspend visas to U.S. citizens 'in accordance with the principles of reciprocity.' 'Chad has no planes to offer, no billions of dollars to give but Chad has his dignity and pride,' Deby said, referring to the $400 million luxury plane offered to his administration as a gift by the ruling family of Qatar. Republic of Congo calls the ban a mistake The new travel policy has triggered varied reactions from Africa, whose countries make up seven of the 12 countries affected by Trump's outright visa ban with some exemptions. In the Republic of Congo, government spokesperson Thierry Moungalla said he believes the country was among those affected because of a 'misunderstanding' over an armed attack in the U.S. with the perpetrators 'mistaken' to be from the Republic of Congo. 'Obviously, Congo is not a terrorist country, is not home to any terrorist, is not known to have a terrorist vocation. So we think that this is a misunderstanding and I believe that in the coming hours, the competent diplomatic services of the government will contact the American authorities here,' he said in the capital of Brazzaville. In Sierra Leone, among countries with heightened travel restrictions, Information Minister Chernor Bah said the country is committed to addressing the concerns that prompted the ban.

‘60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be ‘very damaging'
‘60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be ‘very damaging'

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

‘60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley warns a CBS settlement with Trump would be ‘very damaging'

'60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley spoke out about President Donald Trump's lawsuit against CBS and its parent company on Saturday, arguing that a settlement would be 'very damaging.' 'Well, it'd be very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies,' Pelley said during a conversation with CNN's Anderson Cooper on Saturday, who asked how harmful a settlement and potential apology would be to the network. Trump filed a lawsuit against Paramount Global, CBS News' parent company, over a '60 Minutes' interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris in October 2024. Fox News Digital confirmed that Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit, according to a source familiar with the matter, as the president's legal team is also demanding at least $25 million and an apology from CBS News. Cooper, who is also a correspondent on '60 Minutes,' also asked Pelley about former show producer Bill Owens resigning from the program in April. 'Bill's decision to resign may not have been much of a decision for him because he was always the first person to defend the independence of '60 minutes.' Bill didn't work for Paramount. Bill worked for our viewers, and he felt very keenly about that. And so I'm not sure Bill had any choice, once the corporation began to meddle in Bill's decisions about the editorial content, or just place pressure in that area, Bill felt that he didn't have the independence that honest journalism requires,' Pelley said. 4 Scott Pelley warned that a settlement between President Trump and CBS would be 'very damaging.' 4 President Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit, according to Fox News Digital. AP Pelley also said he wished he had the public backing of CBS News, but added that his work was still making it onto the program. 'You really wish the company was behind you 100%, right? You really wish the top echelons of the company would come out publicly and say '60 Minutes', for example, is a crown jewel of American journalism, and we stand behind it 100%. I haven't heard that. On the other hand, my work is getting on the air, and I have not had anyone outside '60 Minutes' put their thumb on the scale and say, 'you can't say that. You should say this. You have to edit the story in this way. You should interview this person.' None of that has happened. So while I would like to have that public backing, maybe the more important thing is the work is still getting on the air,' Pelley said. 4 The Federal Communications Commission accused '60 Minutes' of heavily editing an interview with Kamala Harris in 2024. 60 Minutes / CBS 4 Former show producer Bill Owens resigned from the program in April. The '60 Minutes' correspondent recently went viral for calling out Trump during a commencement address. 'In this moment, this moment, this morning, our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack,' Pelley said during his commencement speech at Wake Forest University. 'And insidious fear is reaching through our schools, our businesses, our homes and into our private thoughts, the fear to speak in America. If our government is, in Lincoln's phrase, 'Of the people, by the people, for the people,' then why are we afraid to speak?' Pelley addressed the remarks during the CNN interview and told Cooper that he felt 'strongly' it needed to be said. 'I don't refer to him or the president or the White House or the administration. But I was talking about actions that have been taken by the government over these last many months. But, there was a little bit of hysteria among some about this speech, and I simply ask you, what does it say about our country when there's hysteria about a speech that's about freedom of speech?' the CBS correspondent added.

Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries took effect Monday amid rising tension over the president's escalating campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed last week, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. While many of the listed countries send few people to the United States, Haiti, Cuba and Venezuela had been major sources of immigration in recent years. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest. Haitians continue to flee poverty and hunger while police and a U.N.-backed mission fight a surge in gang violence, with armed men controlling at least 85% of its capital, Port-au-Prince. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat court challenges by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. Trump said this time that some countries had 'deficient' screening for passports and other public documents or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. He relied extensively on an annual Homeland Security report of people who remain in the U.S. after their visas expired. Measuring overstay rates has challenged experts for decades, but the government has made a limited attempt annually since 2016. Trump's proclamation cites overstay rates for eight of the 12 banned countries. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. U.S. officials say the man charged in the attack overstayed a tourist visa. He is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban does make exceptions for Afghans on Special Immigrant Visas, generally people who worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade-long war there. Afghanistan had been one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Trump suspended refugee resettlement his first day in office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store