Lib Dem-led council in row with motorists over double parking fines
Incidents of rogue parking in Bournemouth include cars left on double yellow lines, pavements, verges, roundabouts and across private driveways.
But visitors appear happy to take the financial hit of a £35 fine – only marginally more than car parking charges, which can cost £20 a day.
Now, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council has been given permission by the Department for Transport to double their standard parking fine to match London rates, so the minimum fine will be £70, or £140 if not paid within two weeks.
The move comes just weeks after the Lib Dem-led council about-turned on implementing residents' permits in the area, following a 'tsunami' of objections over the £70 cost to residents.
The trial scheme will operate throughout August, which is the seaside resort's busiest time of the year. Already over 4,000 penalty notices have been issued over three 'heatwave' weekends this year.
Tom Hayes, Labour MP for Bournemouth East, said: 'The parking fine fee has been capped for 20 years and it's frustrating for everyone.
'The hope is by having such a significant increase in parking fines it can really have a deterrent effect.'
At the same time, the local authority will be required to provide enough legal parking spaces to cater for visitors.
Residents have previously criticised BCP Council for it's 'war on motorists', after it sold a number of beach-front car parks, reduced the number of legal spaces available, and spent £3 million on cycle lanes that make access to driveways a 'nightmare'.
The council insisted there are spaces available within a short walk of the seafront which have been left unused.
The trial has prompted a mixed response as some residents insist the council is still not on their side.
'We will all be stung'
Jim James, a resident, said: 'Finally, about time. Let's see their faces when they realise it's not a measly £30 any longer.'
Another commenter posted: 'As much as locals think this is brilliant, it isn't. We will all be stung as a result. It is all about BCP making money.
'We should be welcoming visitors during the peak season and accommodating them sufficiently.
'There is not enough adequate parking as car parks are being auctioned off to the highest bidder. There are not any sufficient park and ride schemes. Local businesses will suffer as a result.'
The local authority welcomed the trial as they said they had been calling for greater powers to tackle illegal parking for six years.
Cllr Millie Earl, the leader of BCP Council, said: 'We welcome the fact the Government has recognised the problem we experience in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole with illegal and irresponsible parking.
'We have been asking Governments for more than six years to let us impose higher fines and our parking team now await final details on the work required to implement the trial in time for the August 1 deadline.
'Even at our busiest last weekend, there were enough parking spaces within a short walk of the seafront across our three towns and when visitors make a choice to park illegally, we know that residents, and responsible visitors, want us to take robust enforcement action.
'We want to encourage and support visitors to our wonderful area but just ask them to consider the safety of others when parking; and a level of fines that reflects the true costs of patrolling and enforcing will help us to do this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Convertible cars sold in UK almost halved in last 25 years
The days of open-top driving seem to be behind us as the number of new convertible cars sold in the UK has almost halved in the last 25 years. Although Blighty isn't famed for its good weather, that hasn't stopped it being the European capital for convertible car sales over the years, with Britons buying more soft top models than motorists in much hotter continental countries. But those wind in your hair heydays are no more because there are now just 16 new convertible models to buy from the UK's top 30 car makers, CarGurus latest annual Convertibles Report reveals. This compares to 31 in 2000. For enthusiasts, this marks a sad 20-year low after convertible offerings peaked in 2005. In fact, as of 2025, nearly 70 per cent of the top 30 automotive brands on sale to UK drivers do not make a drop-top motor. While convertibles have often been called 'toys and not tools' due to the fun drive they offer but little in the way of practicality, it's a new trend over the last couple of decades that's the real reason these top-down cars are coming a cropper: the rise of the SUV. The height of convertible shopping was in 2005 when there were 23 models on the market. The extra blow to convertibles has been delivered in the last five years, with a decline of 45 per cent from the 29 options available in 2020 to the 16 options available today, the data shows. In the past 12 months alone, the body style has experienced an almost 28 per cent decline from a choice of 22 cars to today's 16. Audi is one of the car makers to cull its convertible model in this timeframe, axing both the TT and R8 Spyder. It now offers no convertibles as part of its range. Only 10 manufacturers still sell top-down options as part of their model ranges; German luxury drivers' brands BMW, Porsche and Mercedes, fun options from Ford, MG, Mazda, Mini and Fiat, and the ever dependable Jeep and Volkswagen. And just five car brands have consistently offered a soft top to customers over the last 25 years – BMW, Mazda, Mercedes, Porsche and Volkswagen. BMW's 'Z' range of cars, which dates back to the 1989 Z, and has consistently offered a convertible since the unveiling of the Z3 in 1995. While Porsche is synonymous with the convertible, its 911 Cabriolet and Boxster models have had an enduring presence in recent years. The Mazda MX-5 is the longest-standing affordable convertible still on sale in Britain, with the two-seat roadster on sale since 1990. And it seems few are considering convertibles for the future. Just two manufacturers out of the UK's top 30 (by sale volumes) have electric roof-down offerings - the MG Cyberster and the Fiat 500e. Chris Knapman, CarGurus UK editorial director, said: 'Thankfully, the new models that are still available in soft top form are of a very high calibre and cover a fairly broad range, from the electric Fiat 500e C city car through to more traditional sports cars such as the Porsche 911 Cabriolet. 'Plus, of course, the used car market remains a rich ground for soft top motoring, with our top picks such as the Mazda MX-5 starting from less than £5,000.' And yet there's no denying that the convertible market is drying up and there's one big place to lay the blame: at the wheels of SUVs. Why SUVs are killing off the convertible Knapman commented: 'Our latest annual Convertibles Report highlights more than just a drop in new car model selection. It reflects a wider shift in the automotive landscape towards SUVs. 'As evidence of this, note that while the number of new convertibles on sale has fallen by 45 per cent since 2020, the number of new SUVs and crossovers has grown by a staggering 543 per cent.' This is Money has well documented the rapid rise of the SUV – from the sports utility vehicle origins of the Jeep Cherokee in 1974 to the Sloaney Range Rovers of the '80s and '90s, and most recently the Nissan Qashqai inspired crossovers that are everywhere. Earlier this year, CarGurus found that more than half the new car options in showrooms are SUVs , with 193 different SUV and crossovers on sale across the 35 most popular car brands in the UK. SUVs have become a luxury symbol and the car body shape everyone wants over the last couple of decades: Sales exceeded one million in 2023, with registrations of the bulky vehicles increasing by around a fifth between 2022 and 2023 - to the point where one in three motors are now sports utility vehicles. Knapman said in May: 'Features like the high driving position, flexible interior space, big boot, and potential off-road capability make SUVs an appealing body style to consumers, so it's no surprise that manufacturers have been racing to meet this demand with an increasingly varied supply of new models. 'This increase in appetite for SUVs has meant there's been less demand for other types of cars, with the choice of MPVs in particular having dwindled on the new car market.' The other curse of the convertible? Panoramic roof Panoramic sunroofs have become a hot feature, especially in the EV market. They offer lighter interiors, an airy feeling of space, and a connection with the outdoors. They enhance the driving experience and have huge aesthetic appeal. And as a result the panoramic sunroof is becoming big business. According to a report by Custom Market Insights, the Global Automotive Panoramic Sunroof Market was valued at approximately $16.39billion in 2024 and is expected to reach $18.05bn in 2025. That's expected to surge to $48.78bn in the next decade - a compound annual growth rate of 11.7 per cent between 2025 and 2034. At the same time the number of cars with panoramic roofs has exploded in recent years - the Tesla Model S arriving in 2012 had a lot to do with this making the feature a must have in new electric cars - the number of convertibles has reduced. With electric cars especially, panoramic roofs make much more sense aerodynamically than convertibles. When a convertible has its roof down the airflow is disrupted over the car, creating more drag whereas a panoramic roof can maintain a smoother airflow even though it adds weight and affects aerodynamics when open. Top of the market models such as the Mercedes EQS and BMW iX to affordable models including the MG ZS EV, Kia Niro EV and budget Chinese LeapMotor T03 city car all have panoramic roofs. The Renault Scenic even has a 'solarbay' panoramic roof that darkens and lightens on voice controlled demand. With noise cancelling, sun dimming, thermal insulation just a few of panoramic roof features, traditional convertibles are starting to look less appealing.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The 10 most shocking dash cam crashes and dangerous driving incidents caught on camera in the past year
From dozy drivers ploughing into the back of stationary vehicles to motorists on the wrong side of the road causing head-on collisions, these dash cam clips showcase some of the most dangerous motorists in Britain. A montage of 10 videos showing incredibly careless and reckless driving - all captured in the last 12 months - have been exclusively shared with the Daily Mail. They've also been sent directly to the police in the hope of securing prosecutions. The footage displays thoughtless overtaking on country roads, hasty antics on motorways, and terrible judgement at busy junctions. It shows how some individuals are risking the lives of others to save seconds on their journey, by driving well beyond their vehicle's limits, or simply switching off behind the wheel. All but one result in crashes, with the exception being a near miss that leaves one driver screaming in fear. The videos have been released by dash cam brand Nextbase to mark the seventh anniversary of its National Dash Cam Safety Portal (NSCSP), which allows road users to upload incriminating footage caught on recording devices directly to police forces to be used as evidence. The ten videos show some of the 'most shocking crashes and scary near misses' recorded on dash cams over the last year. The first - which took place in April this year - shows a preoccupied young driver in a bright yellow Fiat 500 who fails to stop when approaching a stopped car in front, with the rear-facing camera capturing the sickening point of collision. Despite being at relatively low speed, the impact thrusts the female driver forwards into her deployed airbag, while the windscreen on the passenger side of the car smashes on the force of the airbag going off. The second clip plays out a head on collision involving a foreign registered supercar captured in Peth in Scotland. It shows the driver of a £260,000 Aston Martin DBS - either from Netherlands of Luxembourg, given the yellow front number plate) - on the wrong side of the road crashing head-on into an unsuspecting driver entering a blind bend in the wet. Video three involves a Highway Maintenance tipper truck pulling out of what looks to be a dual carriageway slip road or emergency refuge area, with the luckless driver unable to take evasive action and flipping their vehicle into its side after striking the side of the lorry. Another clip from March this year shows a queue of traffic formed behind a slow-moving tanker. When a fast-approaching driver is unable is unable to slow down in time, the footage shows them running into the back of another motorist, their car flipping onto its side and deflecting into the path of the dash cam user, who is unable to take evasive action. The next video shows the moment an unsuspecting driver in Wales turns a corner on a country road to find an out-of-control Mercedes-Benz swerving towards them. Clearly travelling too fast for the wet conditions, the luxury German motor skids off the road into a grass verge before shooting back onto the road into the path of the shocked motorist. The dash cam user manages to steer out of the way of disaster, though only just. Other clips show a transporter carrying a car ploughs into the back of a van entering a roundabout on a dual carriageway triggering a domino effect of crashes, an Audi driver reversing into another road user at a set of traffic lights, and an HGV changing lanes on a motorway and side-swiping an unfortunate motorist. The last of the videos, recorded just last month, is arguably the scariest of all. It shows a motorist attempting to undertake slow-moving traffic on a stretch of smart motorway with no hard shoulder. However, when they move into lane one, they are quickly faced with a van and car already involved in a collision and the drivers out of the vehicle. Unable to avoid the crashed vehicles, the reckless motorist smashes into the back of the van at the moment a women can be seen trying to open the rear doors of the stricken car in front. The clips represent the kind of videos used in many cases that have helped Britons to report dangerous driving as well as prove who is fault for an accident when making an insurance claim. Videos captured on dash cams and recording devices of other road users - like cyclists' helmet cameras - can also be uploaded to the National Dash Cam Safety Portal to help the Police catch dangerous drivers. The portal - which launched in July 2018 - has received nearly 30,000 submissions already in 2025, a 25 per cent increase on the same period last year, indicating that drivers are increasingly capturing and reporting instances of reckless driving. Some 35 UK police forces are using the portal, and other are currently in discussion to utilise it soon. In the year to date, the top five regions processing the most uploads include: West Midlands, West Murcia, Northumberland, Surrey and South Yorkshire. These five regions have already received over 22,000 submissions in 2025, more than the total number submitted across the UK in the whole of 2021. In the last seven years, a whopping 185,000 dangerous driving clips have been uploaded. And 70 per cent of submissions have resulted in further action, whether than be warning letters or the issuing of penalty points and prosecution. By streamlining the process of submitting evidence, the portal is estimated to have saved over 169 years of police time. Bryn Brooker, Head of Road Safety at Nextbase, commented: 'These videos highlight the serious incidents that Britons see on a daily basis on our roads, many of which would be difficult to explain or prove fault in. 'People submit these types of clips to us on a daily basis and even more are using video evidence to help take dangerous drivers off the road through the portal. 'Dash Cams are increasingly seen as an essential bit of kit for a motorist looking to protect themselves and their no-claims bonuses.' The report comes after official DfT stats published in May showed a 1 per cent increase in people killed on Britain roads - 1,633 last year, up from 1,624 in 2023. With 2020 and 2021 statistics considered outliers due to pandemic-related lockdowns dramatically reducing traffic levels, this is the first increase in annual road deaths recorded since 2017. Motorcyclist deaths increased most dramatically by 9 per cent last year with some 343 motorbike riders losing their lives in crashes in 2024, up from 315 during the previous 12 months. As such, motorcyclists made up a fifth (21 per cent) of road fatalities last year. There was also an increase in pedestrian deaths, up 2 per cent from 405 in 2023 to 413 in 2024. Bryn said the increase in road users uploading incriminating evidence of dangerous driving highlights the demand for 'technological solutions to improve road safety'. He added: 'We are pleased that almost all forces across England and Wales now accept video evidence in this way, making it easier to take dangerous drivers off the road, something that has undoubtedly saved lives.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Can I still get car finance compensation?
Drivers who bought their car on finance could still claim back up to £950 as part of a long-running investigating into hidden commission, despite a landmark court win for lenders last week. On Friday the Supreme Court spared the car finance industry from a worst-case scenario, which could have resulted in paying out a total of £44 billion to 15 million drivers. But the ruling was swiftly followed by intervention by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the City watchdog, which yesterday announced it would consult on a redress scheme that could see lenders on the hook for a total compensation bill of between £9 billion and £18 billion. The FCA is expected to confirm the details of its consultation in October and the first compensation payouts could start next year — so what does it mean for drivers, and will you be eligible for a payout? The FCA began an investigation into historic car finance lending in January 2024, prompted by a rising number of complaints to the courts and to the Financial Ombudsman Service, a free dispute service, about hidden commissions in car finance deals. In particular the FCA was looking at discretionary commission arrangements, where the fee paid to dealers was linked to the interest rate borrowers paid, which in some cases incentivised dealers to give customers a higher rate. This model was used in about 35 per cent of car finance deals, according to the FCA, before it banned the practice in January 2021. The FCA said borrowers could have paid about £1,100 more in interest over a four-year £10,000 car finance deal under the commission model. The regulator was looking at whether consumers were fully told about how to commission worked and the impact it could have on their repayments. Nikhil Rathi, the chief executive of the FCA, warned yesterday that it was 'clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules'. The Court of Appeal had ruled in October that car dealers had a duty to make clear the nature and value of any commission paid to them to ensure that borrowers could give 'informed consent' before agreeing to a deal. The judgment involved three cases brought by drivers who argued that they had been treated unfairly because they had not been told about commission involved in their deals. The ruling triggered a backlash from lenders and from the Treasury, which tried to intervene, arguing that a massive bill for the industry would damage the economy. On Friday the decision was largely overturned by the Supreme Court, although it did uphold one of the three cases — in favour of Marcus Johnson, a factory worker from south Wales, because in his case the £1,651 commission he paid was 55 per cent of the cost of finance on his five-year loan. The court said: 'The fact that the undisclosed commission was so high is a powerful indication that the relationship between Mr Johnson and the lender was unfair.' • Common sense has triumphed over compensation culture Most of the money paid out under a redress scheme will compensate those who were charged discretionary commission — but claims that do not involve discretionary commission could also be successful. The Supreme Court ruling has given hope to drivers with deals that contained a high level of commission, such as in the Johnson case, or where the commission model caused them to pay more. Philip Salter, a former FCA regulator now at the consultancy Sicsic Advisory, said: 'The key development is not just the confirmation of a scheme for discretionary commission arrangements, but the explicit inclusion of non-discretionary models as well. This is a direct consequence of the Supreme Court's ruling and widens the net of lenders that will be impacted.' The FCA suggested it would look at the size of commission in absolute terms, and also relative to the overall cost of the interest, in deciding whether an agreement was unfair. The size of the payout would likely be a refund of the commission, plus compensatory interest. The FCA suggested that the majority of successful claimants would get less than £950 per finance deal. The FCA said it would decide whether any scheme would be opt-in (where drivers would have to complain to their lender) or opt-out, which would require lenders to contact customers directly if they thought they were due compensation for loans taken out since 2007. These details are expected to be confirmed towards the end of this year. Adrian Dally from the Finance & Leasing Association trade body said: 'We have concerns about whether it is possible to have a fair redress scheme that goes back to 2007 when firms have not been required to hold such historic information, and the evidence will be patchy at best.' Since the FCA began its investigation last year it has been clear that any redress scheme would be free to use, like the financial services ombudsman, where customers can take a complaint if the company rejects it. But consumers have been bombarded with adverts from claims management companies and no-win no-fee law firms offering to take on their cases, in return for up to 30 per cent of any payout. If you have already signed a contract with a claims management company to represent your claim, it is worth checking it for any details of an exit fee. Under FCA rules you have the right to exit an agreement with a claims company, subject to a fee. But some consumer law firms have exit fees of £150 or more. If you feel a claims firm is charging an unfair exit fee — these charges must reflect the work the firm has done — you can complain about them either to the FCA (which regulates claims management companies) or, if it is a law firm, the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
