How Europe got stuck between Xi's China and Trump's America
Responding to US tariffs, China limited global exports of rare earth magnets. European firms are also affected.
BRUSSELS – It once looked to many as if US President Donald Trump could be a reason for Europe and China to bring their economies closer.
His planned tariffs did little to distinguish the European Union (EU), a longtime ally of the United States, from China, the principal challenger to American primacy.
It has not turned out that way.
Instead, the EU finds itself in a geopolitical chokehold between the world's two largest economies.
In Brussels, officials are trying to secure a rough trade deal with their American counterparts before Mr Trump hits the bloc with high, across-the-board tariffs that could clobber the bloc's economy.
At the same time, EU policymakers are trying to prod their counterparts in Beijing to stop supporting Russia, to stop helping Chinese industry with so much state money and to slow the flow of cheap goods into the EU.
But at a moment of upheaval in the global trading system, the bloc also needs to keep its relationship with China, the world's leading manufacturing superpower, on a relatively stable footing.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Construction starts on Cross Island Line Phase 2; 6 MRT stations in S'pore's west ready by 2032
Singapore New SkillsFuture requirements by April 2026 to mandate regular training for adult educators
Singapore MPs should not ask questions to 'clock numbers'; focus should be improving S'poreans' lives: Seah Kian Peng
Singapore Sequencing and standards: Indranee on role of Leader of the House
Asia Australian Erin Patterson found guilty of all counts in mushroom murders case
Singapore askST Jobs: Facing intrusive demands from your employer? Here's what you can do
Singapore NUS College draws 10,000 applications for 400 places, showing strong liberal arts interest
Singapore Life After... blazing biomedical research trail in S'pore: Renowned scientist breaks new ground at 59
Leaders from the EU are scheduled to be in Beijing for a summit in late July, plans for which have been in flux. Hopes for the gathering are low.
Even as China pushes the idea that Mr Trump's hostility to multilateral trade is prodding Europe into its arms, Europe's problems with China are only growing.
'There is no China card for Europe,' said Ms Liana Fix, a fellow for Europe at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Tensions were on full display last week , when Mr Wang Yi, China's foreign minister, visited Brussels for meetings in the run-up to the summit.
China portrayed the tone as productive and dismissed the notion that the two sides had conflicts. EU officials stressed lingering pain points, including trade imbalances.
The EU recently moved to curb government spending on medical devices from China, arguing that Chinese government agencies had been treating European companies unfairly and that it was necessary to level the playing field.
China announced
on July 6
that it would retaliate .
Yet the EU remains in a delicate dance with China. Economic ties between the two economies are extensive.
Many European countries remain heavily dependent on China for industrial materials. European exports to China remain substantial, especially from Germany, which has long had close trade ties with China.
But Europe's exports have been dwindling, even as Chinese imports into the bloc have been surging. As cheap products from the fast fashion retailers Shein and Temu flood into European markets, policymakers have been working to tighten restrictions on such imports.
European leaders regularly complain that China's state-controlled banks subsidise the country's manufacturers so heavily that European companies cannot compete.
Nor are Europe's complaints unique to trade. European Union officials are angry about China's support for Russia during the war in Ukraine, providing a market for Russian fuel and other products that has blunted the bite of European sanctions.
The EU's aim cannot be to cut ties with China, according to the Danish foreign minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen.
'It is about engaging on a more equal footing and being more transactional in our approach,' he said, speaking at a briefing with reporters on July 4.
As the US upends the global trading system in a bid to shrink its trade deficit, raise revenue and re-shore domestic manufacturing, the EU finds itself in a lonely place.
It is a bloc of 27 nations that together make the world's third-largest economy. The EU was devised to promote commerce across borders and remains a powerful defender of free trade.
Europe wants to 'show to the world that free trade with a large number of countries is possible on a rules-based foundation,' Ms Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Union's executive branch, said at a news conference in June.
The EU has already deepened its trading relationships with like-minded countries like Switzerland and Canada. Ms von der Leyen suggested that it could go a step further.
It could pursue a new collaboration between the bloc and a trading group of 11 countries that includes Japan, Vietnam and Australia, but that notably does not include the US or China.
Yet even as Ms von der Leyen tries to go on the offensive, EU officials have spent months on a far more defensive footing.
That is because even as the EU takes issue with the policies coming out of the US and China, it is also being battered by — and torn between — the two.
No matter the outcome of its trade talks with the Trump administration, the EU is expected to end up with higher tariffs on its exports to the US than it faced at the start of 2025.
American officials have said repeatedly that 10 percent across-the-board levies are not negotiable.
Officials are also likely to be compelled to make concessions to secure an agreement. Those include a possible commitment to taking a tougher stance toward China.
The EU agrees with Mr Trump that China has pursued unfair trading practices. Yet the bloc can push China only so far, given how intertwined the economies are.
China has recently offered the EU a damaging reminder of that reality.
In response to US tariffs, China limited global exports of rare earth magnets, which are critical to producing a range of goods from cars and drones to factory robots and missiles.
Because China dominates rare earth production, it can inflict serious pain on its trading partners with such limitations.
European policymakers initially hoped that China's restrictions would mainly affect American companies. But European firms have also faced long delays in getting China to approve its purchases of rare earths.
The slowdown is caused not only by logistical kinks as China works through a queue of applications. Instead, it appears to be tied to a longer-standing trade flashpoint between Europe and China.
The Chinese government has for years required that foreign companies share or transfer technology to their Chinese partners as a condition for entering the China market.
Recently, European carmakers and other companies have found themselves far behind their Chinese competitors, which have led the development of electric cars, solar panels and other technologies.
Given that, EU officials have been pressing Chinese companies to transfer technology as part of the price of admission to the European market.
The EU has also joined the US in restricting the shipment to China of equipment to make the fastest semiconductors, which have military as well as civilian applications.
That has annoyed Chinese officials. China's minister of commerce, Wang Wentao, called for Europe to cancel controls on high-tech exports to China as part of discussions on a resumption of rare earth supplies.
'Minister Wang Wentao expressed the hope that the EU will meet us halfway and take effective measures to facilitate, safeguard and promote the compliant trade of high-tech products to China,' the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement in June.
At the Beijing summit this month, European officials are likely to keep pushing Chinese officials for more consistent access to rare earths.
Mr Jens Eskelund, the president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, said the chamber also wants the meetings to focus on trying to persuade Chinese officials on the need for more transparent and predictable regulations and to address how hard it has become for foreign companies to do business in China.
But the outlook for meaningful changes, or anything that draws Europe and China closer, is dim. The tone coming from Europe is not positive.
Ms von der Leyen, in a speech at the Group of 7 meeting in Canada in June, said China was engaged in a cycle of 'dominance, dependency and blackmail.' NYTIMES
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Chips won the Cold War; rare earths may win the next
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The US is doing too little to close the energy-transition technological gap. A mine for heavy rare earth metals, the minerals crucial for everything from electric cars to drones, robots and missiles, on the outskirts of Longnan, China. In retrospect, the symbolism of the moment was foreboding. On May 15, 2019, President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning US firms from doing business with Chinese telecommunications companies, including Huawei Technologies. Five days after that first broadside in a brewing trade-and-technology war, Chinese President Xi Jinping was photographed touring a factory producing rare earth magnets. Such devices, his visit seemed to imply, could be a geopolitical weapon for China quite as potent as advanced semiconductors are for the US.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
From glass and steel to rare earth metals, new materials have changed society throughout history
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Innovation in materials science has driven technological change and, as a result, shaped global economies, politics and the environment. The rare earth metals case illustrates how a single category of materials can shape trade policy, industrial planning and even diplomatic alliances. Many modern devices – from cellphones and computers to electric vehicles and wind turbines – rely on strong magnets made from a type of minerals called rare earths. As the systems and infrastructure used in daily life have turned digital and the United States has moved towards renewable energy, accessing these minerals has become critical – and the markets for these elements have grown rapidly. Modern society now uses rare earth magnets in everything from national defence, where magnet-based systems are integral to missile guidance and aircraft, to the clean energy transition, which depends on wind turbines and electric vehicles. The rapid growth of the rare earth metal trade and its effects on society isn't the only case study of its kind. Throughout history, materials have quietly shaped the trajectory of human civilization. They form the tools people use, the buildings they inhabit, the devices that mediate their relationships and the systems that structure economies. Newly discovered materials can set off ripple effects that shape industries, shift geopolitical balances and transform people's daily habits. Materials science is the study of the atomic structure, properties, processing and performance of materials. In many ways, materials science is a discipline of immense social consequence. As a materials scientist, I'm interested in what can happen when new materials become available. Glass, steel and rare earth magnets are all examples of how innovation in materials science has driven technological change and, as a result, shaped global economies, politics and the environment. Glass lenses and the scientific revolution In the early 13th century, after the sacking of Constantinople, some excellent Byzantine glassmakers left their homes to settle in Venice – at the time a powerful economic and political centre. The local nobility welcomed the glassmakers' beautiful wares. However, to prevent the glass furnaces from causing fires, the nobles exiled the glassmakers – under penalty of death – to the island of Murano. Murano became a centre for glass craftsmanship. In the 15th century, the glassmaker Angelo Barovier experimented with adding the ash from burned plants, which contained a chemical substance called potash, to the glass. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Eligible S'poreans to get up to $850 in GSTV cash, up to $450 in MediSave top-ups in August Singapore Four golf courses to close by 2035, leaving Singapore with 12 courses Singapore Singapore's second mufti Sheikh Syed Isa Semait dies at age 87 Singapore Fewer marriages in Singapore in 2024; greater marital stability for recent unions Singapore Competition watchdog gives SIA, Malaysia Airlines conditional approval to continue cooperation Singapore About 20 delivery riders meet Pritam Singh to discuss platform worker issues Business OCBC sets loan target of $5b and covers more territories in boost for serial entrepreneurs Singapore Reform Party to leave opposition group People's Alliance for Reform; two parties remain The potash reduced the melting temperature and made liquid glass more fluid. It also eliminated bubbles in the glass and improved optical clarity. This transparent glass was later used in magnifying lenses and spectacles. Johannes Gutenberg's printing press, completed in 1455, made reading more accessible to people across Europe. With it came a need for reading glasses, which grew popular among scholars, merchants and clergy – enough that spectacle-making became an established profession. By the early 17th century, glass lenses evolved into compound optical devices. Galileo Galilei pointed a telescope toward celestial bodies, while Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered microbial life with a microscope. Lens-based instruments have been transformative. Telescopes have redefined long-standing cosmological views. Microscopes have opened entirely new fields in biology and medicine. These changes marked the dawn of empirical science, where observation and measurement drove the creation of knowledge. Today, the James Webb Space Telescope and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory continue those early telescopes' legacies of knowledge creation. Steel and empires In the late 18th and 19th centuries, the Industrial Revolution created demand for stronger, more reliable materials for machines, railroads, ships and infrastructure. The material that emerged was steel, which is strong, durable and cheap. Steel is a mixture of mostly iron, with small amounts of carbon and other elements added. Countries with large-scale steel manufacturing once had outsized economic and political power and influence over geopolitical decisions. For example, the British Parliament intended to prevent the colonies from exporting finished steel with the Iron Act of 1750. They wanted the colonies' raw iron as supply for their steel industry in England. Benjamin Huntsman invented a smelting process using 3-foot tall ceramic vessels, called crucibles, in 18th-century Sheffield. Huntsman's crucible process produced higher-quality steel for tools and weapons. One hundred years later, Henry Bessemer developed the oxygen-blowing steelmaking process, which drastically increased production speed and lowered costs. In the United States, figures such as Andrew Carnegie created a vast industry based on Bessemer's process. The widespread availability of steel transformed how societies built, travelled and defended themselves. Skyscrapers and transit systems made of steel allowed cities to grow, steel-built battleships and tanks empowered militaries, and cars containing steel became staples in consumer life. Control over steel resources and infrastructure made steel a foundation of national power. China's 21st-century rise to steel dominance is a continuation of this pattern. From 1995 to 2015, China's contribution to the world steel production increased from about 10 per cent to more than 50 per cent. The White House responded in 2018 with massive tariffs on Chinese steel. Rare earth metals and global trade Early in the 21st century, the advance of digital technologies and the transition to an economy based on renewable energies created a demand for rare earth elements. Rare earth elements are 17 chemically very similar elements, including neodymium, dysprosium, samarium and others. They occur in nature in bundles and are the ingredients that make magnets super strong and useful. They are necessary for highly efficient electric motors, wind turbines and electronic devices. Because of their chemical similarity, separating and purifying rare earth elements i nvolves complex and expensive processes. China controls the majority of global rare earth processing capacity. Political tensions between countries, especially around trade tariffs and strategic competition, can risk shortages or disruptions in the supply chain. The rare earth metals case illustrates how a single category of materials can shape trade policy, industrial planning and even diplomatic alliances. Technological transformation begins with societal pressure. New materials create opportunities for scientific and engineering breakthroughs. Once a material proves useful, it quickly becomes woven into the fabric of daily life and broader systems. With each innovation, the material world subtly reorganizes the social world — redefining what is possible, desirable and normal. Understanding how societies respond to new innovations in materials science can help today's engineers and scientists solve crises in sustainability and security. Every technical decision is, in some ways, a cultural one, and every material has a story that extends far beyond its molecular structure. Peter Mullner is Distinguished Professor in Materials Science and Engineering, Boise State University. This article was first published in The Conversation .
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Not easy to buy online tickets for football matches
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The Football Association of Singapore is using Ticketek, a company based in Sydney, Australia, for selling tickets to football events in Singapore. I am 68 and am finding it very difficult to secure tickets, as the process seems rather complicated. The password field, even when filled with the required 12 characters, does not always let me proceed. I also find electronic payments a security risk. Surely a company which has counters in Singapore should be chosen as the ticketing partner, as that would give us a choice to buy physical tickets. It doesn't help that Ticketek's helpline is an Australian number. One suggestion is to sell the tickets at the venues for three days after the match dates are announced, so that fans like me can go physically to buy them. It looks like I cannot even go support Singapore's boys' and girls' squads in the Lion City Cup 2025, or watch the national team when they face India and Bangladesh in the coming months. As retired seniors, we feel locked out from attending football events in our golden years. Please think of us. Prakasam Alexander Maria Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Eligible S'poreans to get up to $850 in GSTV cash, up to $450 in MediSave top-ups in August Singapore Four golf courses to close by 2035, leaving Singapore with 12 courses Singapore Singapore's second mufti Sheikh Syed Isa Semait dies at age 87 Singapore Fewer marriages in Singapore in 2024; greater marital stability for recent unions Singapore Competition watchdog gives SIA, Malaysia Airlines conditional approval to continue cooperation Singapore About 20 delivery riders meet Pritam Singh to discuss platform worker issues Business OCBC sets loan target of $5b and covers more territories in boost for serial entrepreneurs Singapore Reform Party to leave opposition group People's Alliance for Reform; two parties remain
