Espionage trial of New Zealand soldier shrouded in secrecy
Photo:
Petty Officer Chris Weissenborn
A soldier with links to far-right groups and who is accused of spying will face a court martial hearing next week - a first-of-its-kind prosecution shrouded in secrecy for now.
The Linton-based soldier's name is suppressed and so is the foreign country at the centre of the espionage case, as well as the names of some prosecution expert witnesses.
RNZ is opposing these orders and a suppression hearing is scheduled for Monday morning, before the court martial begins.
In late 2020, 17 charges under the Armed Forces Discipline Act were laid against the soldier, including espionage and possessing objectionable material.
Since then, the case has
wended its way through pre-trial hearings
.
RNZ has previously reported the soldier, aged 27 at the time of his arrest, was a member of far-right groups the Dominion Movement and Action Zealandia.
A similar case 50 years ago saw Bill Sutch
tried and acquitted in the civilian court of espionage
, for passing information to the Russians.
Next week's court martial is the first military case.
"I think 'unusual' is not the right term," said retired Auckland University law professor Bill Hodge about the prosecution. "I think 'unique' might be the correct term."
Hodge said the suppression orders appeared extensive.
"I've always been surprised that there could be information held by the armed forces, which absolutely had to be kept top secret.
"There maybe information about the citizens of a foreign jurisdiction and what they're doing here, but still, that would be of public interest."
Hodge said military courts were historically ahead of civilian ones on matters of justice and fairness, although they might hold concerns about making information public.
"Remember, the background of a military court would concern hostilities and [be] in the face of the enemy. In that sort of situation, that sort of context, they would be greatly concerned with information that would aid the enemy.
"I don't see an enemy at this moment, so I'm still mystified at what secrecy they'll be pursuing."
One difference between courts martial and civilian courts is that, instead of a jury, a panel of senior military officers hears the evidence, and decides on a defendant's guilt or innocence, and - if applicable - their sentence.
In his previous career in the military, Hodge sat on these panels.
"A military court is concerned with fairness, right to counsel, the insanity defence, for example, the discovery of information," he said. "One thing I could say firmly is the individual will have a fair trial, because in my experience, it's a fair system."
David Pawson is an experienced court martial counsel and, in 30 years - firstly with the military police, then as a lawyer - he has never seen a similar case.
"When I was a military police special investigator - that was at the end of the Cold War period - and even during that period, I was not aware of any investigation of that sort of nature. I have to say that was a new one to me."
The system was robust and transparent, he said.
"The court martial, in my experience, has always been very careful not to be seen as a secretive court and generally does apply those principles the same way that they do in the civil court."
This meant the starting point for suppression decisions was open justice.
Another experienced court martial lawyer, Michael Bott, said talking to a military panel was somewhat different to addressing a jury.
"There are military values you have to take into account and also, with a court martial, it's governed by the Armed Forces Discipline Act, as opposed to the Criminal Procedure Act, but the Bill of Rights still applies.
"When you're doing an opening and a closing, the processes and techniques are pretty much transferable."
He said suppression arguments at courts martial sometimes included matters not applicable to civilian courts, such as national security.
Hodge said he didn't think the court martial would reflect badly on New Zealand's reputation.
"I think there's the opposite argument that the allies could say, 'New Zealand is alert, New Zealand is sufficiently concerned about this matter and they're looking after whatever information this might be'.
"While you could say, 'Is New Zealand a leaky sieve?', no, New Zealand is behaving properly and attending to the disciplinary side of a possible breach."
If the soldier is found guilty next week, he won't face the death penalty. This was removed from military law in 1989, but sentences for courts martial range from losing rank to a lengthy term in military prison.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
'Unique' espionage trial of a NZ soldier to be heard next week
A soldier with links to far-right groups and who is accused of spying will face a court martial hearing next week – a first-of-its-kind prosecution shrouded in secrecy for now. The Linton-based soldier's name is suppressed and so is the foreign country at the centre of the espionage case, as well as the names of some prosecution expert witnesses. RNZ was opposing these orders and a suppression hearing was scheduled for next Monday morning, before the court martial would begin. In late 2020, 17 charges under the Armed Forces Discipline Act were laid against the soldier, including espionage and possessing objectionable material. Since then, the case has wended its way through pre-trial hearings. ADVERTISEMENT RNZ has previously reported the soldier, aged 27 at the time of his arrest, was a member of far-right groups the Dominion Movement and Action Zealandia. First of its kind A similar case 50 years ago tried and acquitted Bill Sutch in the civilian court of espionage, for passing information to the Russians. Next week's court martial is the first military case. "I think 'unusual' is not the right term," said retired Auckland University law professor Bill Hodge about the prosecution. "I think 'unique' might be the correct term." Hodge said the suppression orders appeared extensive. "I've always been surprised that there could be information held by the armed forces, which absolutely had to be kept top secret. ADVERTISEMENT "There maybe information about the citizens of a foreign jurisdiction and what they're doing here, but still, that would be of public interest." Hodge said military courts were historically ahead of civilian ones on matters of justice and fairness, although they might hold concerns about making information public. "Remember, the background of a military court would concern hostilities and [be] in the face of the enemy. In that sort of situation, that sort of context, they would be greatly concerned with information that would aid the enemy. "I don't see an enemy at this moment, so I'm still mystified at what secrecy they'll be pursuing." Military panel to hear the case One difference between courts martial and civilian courts is that, instead of a jury, a panel of senior military officers hears the evidence, and decides on a defendant's guilt or innocence, and – if applicable – their sentence. In his previous career in the military, Hodge sat on these panels. ADVERTISEMENT "A military court is concerned with fairness, right to counsel, the insanity defence, for example, the discovery of information," he said. "One thing I could say firmly is the individual will have a fair trial, because in my experience, it's a fair system." David Pawson is an experienced court martial counsel and, in 30 years – firstly with the military police, then as a lawyer – he has never seen a similar case. "When I was a military police special investigator – that was at the end of the Cold War period – and even during that period, I was not aware of any investigation of that sort of nature. I have to say that was a new one to me." The system was robust and transparent, he said. "The court martial, in my experience, has always been very careful not to be seen as a secretive court and generally does apply those principles the same way that they do in the civil court." This meant the starting point for suppression decisions was open justice. Another experienced court martial lawyer, Michael Bott, said talking to a military panel was somewhat different to addressing a jury. ADVERTISEMENT "There are military values you have to take into account and also, with a court martial, it's governed by the Armed Forces Discipline Act, as opposed to the Criminal Procedure Act, but the Bill of Rights still applies. "When you're doing an opening and a closing, the processes and techniques are pretty much transferable." He said suppression arguments at courts martial sometimes included matters not applicable to civilian courts, such as national security. Hodge said he didn't think the court martial would reflect badly on New Zealand's reputation. "I think there's the opposite argument that the allies could say, 'New Zealand is alert, New Zealand is sufficiently concerned about this matter and they're looking after whatever information this might be'. "While you could say, 'Is New Zealand a leaky sieve?', no, New Zealand is behaving properly and attending to the disciplinary side of a possible breach." If the soldier was found guilty next week, he wouldn't face the death penalty. This was removed from military law in 1989, but sentences for courts martial ranged from losing rank to a lengthy term in military prison. ADVERTISEMENT
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Golden Bay residents call for investment to future-proof emergency phone line
Tasman was hit by heavy rain last month. Photo: RNZ/Mark Papalii A group of Golden Bay residents want to see government investment in the region's communications network, so residents have reliable access to the 111 line during emergencies. Project STRIM (strengthening telecommunications resilience in Mohua) was set up by a group of Golden Bay residents after damage to the fibre optic cable that runs along State Highway 60 in July, resulted in a day long outage where residents were unable to call 111. Founder Axel Downard-Wilke said it was after that outage he posted about his concerns on social media and said the community should do something to improve its resilience, which led to the group's formation. "It's really a life or death situation if you need to make a 111 call, it's no good driving to a community hub where there's a Starlink system, you need to be able to use your phone reliably so we need a backup system," Downard-Wilke said. "The other thing of course, is when the Alpine Fault goes no technician can drive their van over with all the specialist equipment that's needed to find faults and fix them." He said the group wanted to see a feasibility study done and Crown funding set aside to future-proof the communications network, as had been done on the West Coast. In 2023, the government spent $435.4 million on a connectivity package for Westland with 118km of fibre laid between Te Anau and Milford Sound to improve resilience and connectivity. At a Tasman District Council meeting on Thursday, Downard-Wilke asked the council to send letters in support of a scoping report and funding for a more resilient system to Government ministers, Chorus and Civil Defence. Golden Bay is currently serviced by a single fibre optic cable that runs between Motueka and Tākaka. During bad weather on 3 July, the fibreoptic cable at Uruwhenua Bridge on State Highway 60 was severed, knocking out connection to about 1100 households. The cable was thought to have been damaged by a slip, but it was later revealed that rats had chewed through it. Downard-Wilke said it wasn't the first time such an outage had affected the community. In September 2023, the cable was accidentally severed by contractors and in August 2022 a slip at Birds Hill took out the road connection and the fibre optic cable with it. While other parts of the country were reliant on a single fibre cable, Downard-Wilke said he thought Golden Bay was the biggest community in the country that relied on a single cable, and was vulnerable to failures. "Whoever thought that having a system with a single point of failure is a good idea. I don't know what they were thinking. "If that goes, nothing goes." A large washout across a highway during extensive flooding and heavy rain in the Nelson Tasman areas. Photo: Supplied/ Nick Smith Telecommunications Forum chief executive Paul Brislen has said the key was to have multiple different types of networks (fibre, mobile, fixed wireless connections and satellite) so there wasn't a single point of failure. He also said telecommunications network companies were doing work to ensure cities were connected by a loop, instead of a point-to-point connection, so if half the cable was knocked out, traffic could be connected via the other side of the cable. A Chorus spokesperson said a second fibre optic cable for the Tākaka and Golden Bay area was not feasible as there was only one point of entry, it would follow roughly the same route and be exposed to the same risks. It said a second cable laid on a different route would face challenges due to the geography and topography of the area and would require significant funding and considerable feasibility work. The spokesperson said Chorus was aware of several regions connected to the fibre network via a single cable, some with larger populations that Golden Bay, and that came with risks that were actively managed. "We have robust monitoring and assurance processes in place to respond swiftly to any service disruptions, particularly those caused by adverse weather or natural events." An example of some of the widespread damage to roads and infrastructure in the Nelson Tasman areas. Photo: Supplied/ Nick Smith Golden Bay Community Board deputy chair Grant Knowles said the July outage was concerning and the inability to call 111 took was a shock to many. "I think it was a surprise to people that they couldn't get hold of emergency services or the chemist, for instance, couldn't let people know that they had a prescription to pick up, it was quite a broad problem." Tākaka residents then received an emergency alert during heavy rain on July 11, warning them to expect flooding and to be prepared to evacuate and Knowles questioned how people would be informed of alerts if there was no mobile coverage. The town's population grew significantly over summer, which was often when it experienced heavy rain and slips which could knock out the cable as had happened in 2022. Knowles said the region remained vulnerable during weather events and natural disasters and there was an urgent need for a backup communications system. He hoped the government would take the community's concerns, seriously. "It needed to be there yesterday, I mean, it should never have got to this point." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
New Plymouth councillor Murray Chong kicked out after labelling policy ‘racist'
Councilllor Murray Chong makes his "racist" claims at a New Plymouth District Council meeting. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki/LDR New Plymouth's mayor has thrown councillor Murray Chong out of a meeting for calling a new policy racist and questioned a Hobson's Pledge founder's motives for stoking division. Would-be mayor Max Brough and running-mate councillor Gordon Brown also faced criticism, after defending Chong at this week's New Plymouth District Council meeting. Kevin Moratti - a founding board member of Hobson's Pledge - last week denounced the council's new buy-local plan as "race-based". Moratti said he wanted the New Plymouth Ratepayers Alliance given access to council decision-making "just as some other unelected parties are". The council's procurement plan aims to save money, while making local economic, social, cultural and environmental gains. Among many goals, it seeks to improve partnerships with iwi, hapū and Māori businesses, so they can supply council alongside other local companies. At Tuesday's meeting, Chong vowed to oppose it. "We do have a racist policy here." Mayoral contender Sam Bennett objected, saying council policies were based on the Local Government Act and Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and "are no way race-based". Outgoing mayor Neil Holdom upheld the objection. Chong withdrew the comment, then immediately repeated it. "The reality is, if the word 'race' [sic] and it involves a race, that is racist," Chong said. He accused councillors of following the previous Labour Government's agenda. Holdom ruled that incorrect, banning him from speaking further. "Councillor Chong, it's three strikes and I'm saying you can sit down, because… you've disparaged this organisation." "This is a racist policy," Chong insisted. Holdom ordered him out. Mayor Neil Holdom ordered councillor Murray Chong from the chambers. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki/LDR "It's time to go, Councillor Chong." Chong tried to approach Moratti, who was in the audience. For years, the pair have campaigned against specific representation for mana whenua. "Out!" shouted the mayor. Mayoral candidate Brough attempted to explain Chong's concern. "We're going to... be doing this again in a few months, because the government will change the rules," he said. "I think that's Murray's point." Councillor Brown said Chong "just used the wrong words". "I don't think it was his intent, so cut him some slack?" he pleaded. "The oral language not his greatest strength and he's done well over the last 12 years to get where he is." Councillor Dinnie Moeahu said he'd clearly heard what Chong said. "You two try and justify that behaviour… when you say he didn't mean it that way," said Moeahu. "Those who keep questioning our standing in our community, in our country… what are you afraid of and what have you lost? "All I see is finally we're being included." Councillor Harry Duynhoven pointed to the councillors' oath to serve the entire community. "Mr Moratti, I see you laughing," said the former Labour minister. "I'm surprised you're not on the ballot paper, that you haven't actually put yourself up there and gone for it, because you think you can do it better." Like similar groups nationwide, the New Plymouth Ratepayers Alliance is aligned with the Taxpayers' Union, which forbids members standing for office. Chong and Brough set up the ratepayer group with Moratti, but stepped aside to get elected. Councillor Anneka Carlson Matthews said they didn't represent all ratepayers. "They are racist and outdated, and I'm happy to call that out." Mayor Holdom made her withdraw the racism allegation. Councillor Bryan Vickery urged Moratti and others to read the "pretty impressive" procurement strategy. "I don't see this in any way as being separatist. In fact, the tenor of this document is being fair to all - but inclusive." Holdom said councillors ought to lead inclusivity. "It's disappointing, when people come into the organisation and try to divide us," he said. "It's shadow-boxing, the fear of something that doesn't exist. "It's a fear that somehow being inclusive… comes at a cost to someone else. "Just be aware of the people that want to do this and what are their agendas, because it's clear to me that they are not acting in this community's best interest, so what are they trying to achieve?" Businessman Brough favours local contracting, so voted for the procurement strategy at last week's finance committee, but backtracked on Tuesday and abstained. With Chong expelled, Brough was the sole councillor not in favour. Moratti has been an Act candidate for parliament, while Chong has stood for NZ First and the New Conservatives. Last week, Moratti said he'd not been a Hobson's Pledge member for 10 years, but as recently as 2021, confirmed he was a trustee. On Tuesday, he refused questions, saying the LDR story revealing his demand for decision-making influence was biased. "We will not give it any more energy." - LDR is local body journalism funded by RNZ and NZ on Air Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
