"Made in India iPhones will still be cheaper in US, even with Trump's 25% tariff: GTRI Report
New Delhi [India], May 24 (ANI): Even if the United States were to impose a 25 per cent tariff on iPhones manufactured in India, the total production cost would still be much lower if compared with manufacturing the devices in the U.S, according to a report by Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI).
This comes amid a statement by U.S. President Donald Trump, threatening to impose 25 per cent tariffs on iPhones if Apple decides to make it in India. However, the GTRI report showed that manufacturing in India remains cost-effective, despite such duties.
The report breaks down the current value chain of a USD 1,000 iPhone, which involves contributions from over a dozen countries. Apple retains the largest share of the value, about USD 450 per device, through its brand, software, and design.
It also added that the U.S. component makers, such as Qualcomm and Broadcom, add USD 80, while Taiwan contributes USD 150 through chip manufacturing. South Korea adds USD 90 via OLED screens and memory chips, and Japan supplies components worth USD 85, mainly through camera systems. Germany, Vietnam, and Malaysia account for another USD 45 through smaller parts.
GTRI stated that China and India, despite being major players of iPhone assembly, earn only around USD 30 per device. This is less than 3 per cent of the total retail price of an iPhone.
The report argues that manufacturing iPhones in India is still economically viable even if a 25 per cent tariff is applied.
This is mainly because of the sharp difference in labour costs between India and the U.S. In India, assembly workers earn approximately USD 230 per month, while in the U.S. states like California, labour costs could soar to around USD 2,900 per month due to minimum wage laws, a 13-fold increase.
As a result, assembling an iPhone in India costs about USD 30, while the same process in the U.S. would cost around USD 390. In addition to this Apple gets the benefit of production-linked incentive (PLI) on iPhone manufacturing in India from government.
If Apple were to shift production to the U.S., its profit per iPhone could fall drastically from USD 450 to just USD 60, unless retail prices are significantly increased.
The GTRI report highlighted how global value chains and labour cost differences make India a competitive option for manufacturing, even in the face of potential U.S. trade restrictions. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Big tech on a quest for ideal AI device
CHATGPT-maker OpenAI has enlisted the legendary designer behind the iPhone to create an irresistible gadget for using generative artificial intelligence (AI). The ability to engage digital assistants as easily as speaking with friends is being built into eyewear, speakers, computers and smartphones, but some argue that the Age of AI calls for a transformational new gizmo. "The products that we're using to deliver and connect us to unimaginable technology are decades old," former Apple chief design officer Jony Ive said when his alliance with OpenAI was announced. "It's just common sense to at least think, surely there's something beyond these legacy products." Sharing no details, OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said that a prototype Ive shared with him "is the coolest piece of technology that the world will have ever seen." According to several US media outlets, the device won't have a screen, nor will it be worn like a watch or broach. Kyle Li, a professor at The New School, said that since AI is not yet integrated into people's lives, there is room for a new product tailored to its use. The type of device won't be as important as whether the AI innovators like OpenAI make "pro-human" choices when building the software that will power them, said Rob Howard of consulting firm Innovating with AI The industry is well aware of the spectacular failure of the AI Pin, a square gadget worn like a badge packed with AI features but gone from the market less than a year after its debut in 2024 due to a dearth of buyers. The AI Pin marketed by startup Humane to incredible buzz was priced at US$699. Now, Meta and OpenAI are making "big bets" on AI-infused hardware, according to CCS Insight analyst Ben Wood. OpenAI made a multi-billion-dollar deal to bring Ive's startup into the fold. Google announced early this year it is working on mixed-reality glasses with AI smarts, while Amazon continues to ramp up Alexa digital assistant capabilities in its Echo speakers and displays. Apple is being cautious embracing generative AI, slowly integrating it into iPhones even as rivals race ahead with the technology. Plans to soup up its Siri chatbot with generative AI have been indefinitely delayed. The quest for creating an AI interface that people love "is something Apple should have jumped on a long time ago," said Futurum research director Olivier Blanchard. Blanchard envisions some kind of hub that lets users tap into AI, most likely by speaking to it and without being connected to the internet. "You can't push it all out in the cloud," Blanchard said, citing concerns about reliability, security, cost, and harm to the environment due to energy demand. "There is not enough energy in the world to do this, so we need to find local solutions," he added. Howard expects a fierce battle over what will be the must-have personal device for AI, since the number of things someone is willing to wear is limited and "people can feel overwhelmed." A new piece of hardware devoted to AI isn't the obvious solution, but OpenAI has the funding and the talent to deliver, according to Julien Codorniou, a partner at venture capital firm 20VC and a former Facebook executive. OpenAI recently hired former Facebook executive and Instacart chief Fidji Simo as head of applications, and her job will be to help answer the hardware question. Voice is expected by many to be a primary way people command AI. Google chief Sundar Pichai has long expressed a vision of "ambient computing" in which technology blends invisibly into the world, waiting to be called upon. "There's no longer any reason to type or touch if you can speak instead," Blanchard said. "Generative AI wants to be increasingly human" so spoken dialogues with the technology "make sense," he added. However, smartphones are too embedded in people's lives to be snubbed any time soon, said Wood.
Hype Malaysia
an hour ago
- Hype Malaysia
Yahoo's Downfall: Why Did The Tech Giant Fade Into The Background?
Gaining a competitive edge is not easy; maintaining it is harder. In the online world, rapid success can lead to inevitable decline, as seen with Yahoo. Once a trusted portal for news, email, and search, Yahoo lost its advantage due to missteps and missed opportunities, reshaping the digital landscape in its decline. Time isn't easy on everyone. Compared to its peak, Yahoo has become merely a faint reflection of what it once was. In the 90s and 00s, the portal saw over 700 million concurrent users, raked in USD$7.2 billion (approximately RM32 billion), and was the most visited site for the first half of the 2000s. Here's what happened: Missed Opportunities While Yahoo! enjoyed early success, it made several pivotal miscalculations that would prove costly in the long run. One of the most famous examples is the company's refusal to acquire Google. In 1997, when the search engine's founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, reportedly offered Yahoo! a chance to buy their budding startup for a modest sum, Yahoo! passed on the opportunity. Even when a deal was later on the table for billions of dollars, Yahoo!'s hesitation to commit ultimately set the stage for Google's explosive growth— an outcome that would redefine the search landscape and leave Yahoo! scrambling to catch up. As social networking began to emerge as a dominant force, Yahoo! also faltered in its attempts to expand into this realm. In 2006, the company made a high-profile but ultimately unsuccessful bid to acquire Facebook for USD$1.1 billion (approximately RM4.91 billion). This deal, along with repeated failures to merge with potential partners like Microsoft— even when a staggering offer of nearly USD$45 billion (approximately RM201.7 billion) was on the table in 2008— illustrates a pattern of overconfidence and a reluctance to embrace change. In hindsight, miss after miss became emblematic of Yahoo!'s strategic paralysis in a period where the digital world was transforming at breakneck speed. Expensive Acquisitions and Strategic Overreach In a bid to solidify its position as an internet powerhouse during the dot-com boom, Yahoo! embarked on a spree of acquisitions. The deals for GeoCities and in 1999 were emblematic of the era's exuberant investment mentality. At the time, both acquisitions were hailed as visionary moves that would expand Yahoo!'s reach into user-generated content and streaming media. However, as the market evolved, it became clear that these expensive experiments were not sustainable. Integration challenges, mismanagement, and a failure to adapt these platforms to shifting consumer demands eventually forced Yahoo! to shutter these services, marking a series of costly lessons in strategic overreach. Security Failures and the Erosion of Trust No discussion of Yahoo!'s decline would be complete without mentioning its significant security lapses. The company suffered two major data breaches— one in 2014 affecting over 500 million accounts and another, an even more massive breach, later revealed to have compromised 3 billion accounts. Exposing millions of users to potential harm and further tarnishing Yahoo!'s reputation. In a time of increasing awareness and prioritising of security and privacy, these breaches underscored the company's vulnerability and eroded any remaining user trust. In the eyes of the consumer and investors, Yahoo! is a spiralling plane that just caught fire. Every now and then, companies find themselves in the right place and time, a culmination of factors that present an opportunity to make an imprint in history. The nature of this imprint, however, is up to the founders and management— to take on the arduous task of capturing and nurturing screaming electrons and plasma in grandma's jam jar. From market leader to the brink of collapse, sustaining success not only requires foresight, innovation, and luck but also being humble enough as to not succumb to one's hubris. Sources: a2hosting, bizjournals, medium, fastcompany Gan contributed to this article. What's your Reaction? +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Microsoft reaffirms commitment to M'sia amid global data centre pullbacks
As of May, more than 400,000 Malaysians have received AI training under the initiative under Microsoft's AI for Malaysia's Future (AIForMYFuture) initiative, according to the tech giant. (AFP pic) PETALING JAYA : Microsoft has reaffirmed its commitment to a RM10.5 billion investment in cloud and artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure in Malaysia, including the development of hyperscale data centres in the Klang Valley. A spokesperson for Microsoft Malaysia told FMT the tech giant is closely monitoring the ongoing uncertainty following US President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs in April, which unsettled stock and currency markets before a 90-day pause was declared a week later. 'Microsoft remains committed to our investment in Malaysia to accelerate the nation's AI and cloud adoption. As a company, the tariff is something we are watching, but we don't have anything to share right now,' it said. Citing people familiar with the situation, Bloomberg reported in April that Microsoft had either halted talks for, or delayed the development of, data centre projects in Indonesia, the UK and Australia, as well as Illinois, North Dakota and Wisconsin in the US. Microsoft acknowledged making changes to its data centre plans at the time, saying the move reflected the flexibility of the company's strategy and aligned with its goal of ensuring it has 'sufficient infrastructure in the right places'. Last month, Microsoft announced the general availability of the Malaysia West cloud region in Greater Kuala Lumpur comprising three availability zones aimed at offering low-latency connections and a highly resilient infrastructure, including Azure and Microsoft 365. Additionally, Microsoft Malaysia managing director Laurence Si previously said the company is also investing in talent development through its 'AI for Malaysia's Future' (AIForMYFuture) initiative, which aims to equip 800,000 Malaysians with AI skills by the end of 2025. In an interview with FMT, Microsoft Malaysia's legal and government affairs director Adilah Junid revealed that, as of May, more than 400,000 Malaysians have received AI training under the initiative. She also encouraged participation in the free AIForMYFuture initiative via Microsoft's AI Skills Navigator website, and the monthly Microsoft AI Teach programmes held nationwide at local educational institutions and National Information Dissemination Centres. 'Microsoft relies heavily on local partners such as Biji-Biji, HRD Corp, Perkeso, Pepper Labs, and the International Women's Federation of Commerce and Industry Malaysia. 'They are really the ones to have networks within the community and society, enabling us to make this opportunity as widely accessible as possible,' said Adilah. Addressing concerns about sustainability, particularly the high water usage of data centres for cooling, she said Microsoft is constantly exploring innovative solutions to operate more sustainably. 'We were part of the consultations with the digital ministry's guidelines for sustainable data centres. We also work with authorities to ensure that our water and energy usage metrics are aligned,' said Adilah.
