logo
Is sunscreen toxic? The UV truthers on the Internet sure think so.

Is sunscreen toxic? The UV truthers on the Internet sure think so.

Boston Globe3 days ago

'They told us the sun was the threat,' another said. 'Not the corporations funding both the warning and the cure. I stopped burning when I stopped believing them.'
'People burn because of the seed oils in these processed foods,' read a third reply. 'If you eat clean, you'll be fine.'
Wait — what? Wasn't it just yesterday that we were supposed to feel guilty for
not
using sunscreen? Yes, but forget all that nonsense from your dermatologist. Now it's burn, baby burn.
Advertisement
Make America Blister Again!
Forget
Get Love Letters: The Newsletter
A weekly dispatch with all the best relationship content and commentary – plus exclusive content for fans of Love Letters, Dinner With Cupid, weddings, therapy talk, and more.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The social media doctors have weighed in, and now a serious portion of the public believes any or all of the following: Sunscreen doesn't prevent cancer, it causes it. Sunscreen is a ploy by big pharma to increase profits by making people sick. Use it, and you'll end up deficient in Vitamin D (most people reportedly don't put on enough for this to be a problem).
A 2024
Advertisement
Brigham and Women's Hospital dermatologist
She learned that firsthand, in 2023, when she posted a TikTok video with what seemed like basic, if perhaps even dull, advice: wear sunscreen on exposed skin and reapply it regularly.
The vitriolic responses, and there were hundreds, had a theme: She was a shill for big pharma. She was propagating the lie that sunscreen protects against skin cancer. She was saying this to … somehow … get more patients.
'I had no idea that this was a public sentiment,' she said. 'It had never been discussed in medical school or any of my training.'
But the misconception that it's harmful is so common that even educated people believe it, she said. 'I went to play tennis yesterday, and my coach was like, 'I'm not putting chemicals on my body.' He's an engineer.'
The skepticism has its roots in reality, if only very tangentially, said Timothy Rebbeck, a professor of cancer prevention at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, whose research focuses in part on false claims connected to cancer.
'This is a phenomenon we see in a lot of cancer misinformation,' he said. 'There is a kernel of truth to a story.'
For example, he said: a study is done in a test tube or an animal that shows a compound found in microscopic levels in sunscreen, when exposed to ultraviolet light, could cause DNA damage.
Advertisement
That result, taken out of context, makes its way to social media, where it's sensationalized and amplified. 'By the time it gets to your social media feed, it doesn't resemble the original piece of information,' he said. 'No one goes back to the original paper and sees that it was in mice.'
Even if sunscreen raised your risk for skin cancer — which it doesn't, he emphasized — its well-established cancer-fighting benefits would outweigh any risk. 'If you're trying to make a choice, the choice is pretty clear.'
There are two types of sunscreens: physical blockers, which have zinc oxide or titanium dioxide and reflect ultraviolet rays from the sun; and chemical blockers, which contain chemicals that absorb the sun's ultraviolet rays.
Fernanda Duarte put sunscreen on Luisa Vilela, 10, of Watertown at the Artesani Playground in Brighton in 2021.
Christiana Botic for The Boston Globe
Rebbeck said that people who are concerned about the content of sunscreens should choose one that contains zinc oxide or titanium oxide, which are well established as safe and effective without any indication of carcinogenicity or other adverse health effects.
As Harvard Health Publishing explained in
'However, there has been no conclusive evidence that oxybenzone is harmful to humans,' it wrote. 'Organizations that have raised concerns about oxybenzone typically cite studies done in rats, where the rats were actually fed oxybenzone. It would take an individual 277 years of sunscreen use to achieve the equivalent systemic dose that produced effects in these rat studies…'
Advertisement
But what's Harvard Health Publishing compared to the wisdom, or at least the reach, of social media star and
'Anytime I do an interview, I get a lot of s*** when I admit that I don't [wear sunscreen],' she said in a viral 2024 episode of her 'Let's Be Honest' podcast, before prompting her guest to talk 'about the health benefits of the sun and why we maybe don't need sunscreen.'
'We've literally spent our whole existence as humans under the sun all day, until the last, like, 100 years or so, and now we're like shut-ins … and that's really bad for a lot of reasons,' her guest replied.
At Castle Island on a recent weekday, the weather app was showing a UV rating of 5, high enough for the website of the National Weather Service to recommend use of a sunscreen of at least SPF-30.
But Catherine Civitella, who was hanging out with a friend from college, wasn't wearing any, as she considers it 'toxic.'
She formed that opinion from 'the internet,' she said, and also by observing people in Florida, where she used to live. There, she noticed that the better people ate, and the more time they spent in the sun, sans sunscreen, the better their skin looked.
'What you put in your body is more important than what you put on your body,' she said.
Over on the beach, Maria Turolska, a Dorchester grandmother watching her 18-month-old grandson, both fair-skinned, said she wouldn't use sunscreen on herself or the little boy, even though his parents wanted her to.
Asked if she thought sunscreen could cause cancer, she reflected the widespread skepticism about basically everything these days: 'The companies who sell the products want you to think this, but it's hard to know if it is good or not good.'
Advertisement
Alas, as is too often the case, you may be doomed no matter what you do. Studies have found that people who use sunscreen tend to stay out in the sun longer, according to Harvard Health Publishing, 'and thus may actually increase their risk of skin cancer.'
Beth Teitell can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAHA, social media further complicating parenthood
MAHA, social media further complicating parenthood

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MAHA, social media further complicating parenthood

(NewsNation) — New parents have always sought advice about whether to sleep train or use formula, but the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement has raised even more questions. Initiatives backed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have filled social media feeds with polarizing topics, including questions about raw milk, unmedicated childbirth, ultraprocessed foods and vaccinations. A national poll by C.S. Mott Children's Hospital found four out of five parents with young children — from newborn to 4 years old — use social media to discuss their concerns about a range of parenting topics. 'Agroterrorism' fungus could harm US crops, livestock: Scientist Holistic pediatrician Dr. Ana Maria Temple told NewsNation that parents can honor their own values and make sound choices — if they're able to filter out the filler they find online. Rather than following thousands of Facebook, Instagram and TikTok pages and driving 'yourself insane,' Temple recommends going 'back to finding a provider with clinical expertise that can sit and work with you.' But the divisiveness on these topics goes beyond social media — it's happening on the soccer field over post-game snacks, at kids' parties over the birthday treats served and even at schools over the cleaning products used in the classroom. Doctor: Texas junk food bill a step in the right direction Temple said to keep an open mind and avoid self-criticism when absorbing all of these different suggestions and views, both online and in person. One of the MAHA movement's most prominent thought leaders, Moms Across America founder Zen Honeycutt, suggested looking for tried-and-true options from other parents. 'Our moms have tried dozens of different ways to recover our children from their health issues, and they're sharing the ones that work the best,' Honeycutt said. 'And doesn't mean that it'll work for your child, but it's something that our mothers have tried.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

TikTok Banned the "SkinnyTok" Hashtag. It's Only a Matter of Time Until a New Insidious Diet Trend Replaces It
TikTok Banned the "SkinnyTok" Hashtag. It's Only a Matter of Time Until a New Insidious Diet Trend Replaces It

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

TikTok Banned the "SkinnyTok" Hashtag. It's Only a Matter of Time Until a New Insidious Diet Trend Replaces It

iantfoto In this op-ed, Features Director Brittney McNamara considers TikTok's SkinnyTok hashtag ban and the seemingly unbeatable monster of diet culture. If you've been on social media lately, you undoubtedly know about #SkinnyTok. Along with the rise in popularity of weight loss drugs like Zepbound and Wegovy over the last few years, thinness as an ideal has also returned to our cultural lexicon, spawning a whole hashtag full of creators discussing how they get and stay thin, swapping diet and workout tips that encourage sometimes extreme measures to be skinny. But on June 3, TikTok banned #SkinnyTok as a search term after concern from European legislators about how the app can negatively impact young people's body image, according to the New York Times. The hashtag had 'become linked to unhealthy weight loss content,' TikTok said in its reasoning for the ban, something the European Commission was investigating because of the potential 'public health risk' associated with promoting 'extreme thinness' to young people online, Politico reports. Now, when users enter that search term, they'll be directed to resources like the National Alliance for Eating Disorders. We know that social media can negatively affect our mental health, and can contribute to body image issues like body dysmorphia and even eating disorders, so this move is an all-around win. There is no benefit — even if society would like to tell you there is — to promoting extreme thinness or unhealthy diets, things that #SkinnyTok was often associated with. But even though the ban is a net positive in this sense, it's simply a bandaid on a much larger issue. Until we reckon with our cultural obsession with thinness and our wholesale buy-in to diet culture, #SkinnyTok will simply shift and transform, taking on a new slender shape online. According to Today, #SkinnyTok began appearing on TikTok around the start of this year, gaining steam in March and April. Videos under the hashtag encouraged viewers to eat less, making hunger seem like a virtue and repackaging harmful diet advice as 'tough love." If you weren't dieting and participating in behaviors to make yourself smaller, many #SkinnyTok posts were there to shame you into submission. It's not clear exactly who started the hashtag, but it is apparent how it gained popularity. Social media and other online forums have long been hotbeds for extreme diet talk and for promoting unhealthy body ideals. In the heyday of Tumblr, 'pro ana' (pro anorexia) and 'thinspo' content abounded. When those topics were banned, users found ways to evade that, substituting letters or words to signal their content to other users without triggering filters that would censor their posts. Meta whistle-blower Frances Haugen revealed internal research that found that 'when [32% of teen girls] felt bad about their bodies, Instagram made them feel worse.' As a result of that information, social media executives testified before Congress in 2021, in part about the ways their platforms impact young people's body image. Just before #SkinnyTok officially earned its title, content creator Liv Schmidt was ousted from TikTok in October 2024 because of her posts instructing viewers on how to be skinny. Her posts violated TikTok's Community Guidelines, which prohibit '​​promoting disordered eating and dangerous weight loss behaviors.' But before her ban, Schmidt had more than 670,000 followers on TikTok, according to the New York Times. She claimed her instructions on how to eat less with the explicit goal of being thin were simply the pursuit of a certain aesthetic, not a roadmap to potentially disordered eating. Even more recently, Schmidt's group chat called the Skinni Societe was demonetized by Meta after The Cut published an inside look at Schmidt's advice to followers, including lines like "eat like your next weigh-in is tomorrow.' The resurgence of explicit diet talk and 'thinspo' on social media is evidence of a trend we've seen growing for a while now. The advent of GLP-1 drugs has made weight loss attainable for many, and has made getting even thinner an option for many already-thin people. And, with another Trump administration in office, a focus on thinness in society is no surprise. Research has shown a link between conservative ideology and anti-fatness, something we've seen mirrored in Trump's own language. So it's not necessarily a shock that people with fatphobic ideas would feel emboldened in this time, especially. TikTok's #SkinnyTok ban is certainly the right move, and it's encouraging to know that people searching for it on that platform will instead be served resources to cope with disordered eating. But as we can see from the long history of disordered eating and 'skinny' content online, this move is likely to remove one threat, only for another to pop up in its wake. Diet culture is much like the mythological hydra; when you cut one head off of this beast, two more grow in its place. The threats get more numerous, more insidious, the more we strike at it. To truly beat #SkinnyTok and trends like it, we'd need a cultural reckoning — one where we collectively decide that thinness isn't a value, but simply one of many states of being. We'd need to grapple with the racism and anti-Blackness baked into anti-fatness, and how promoting thinness has ties to white supremacy. We'd need to address anti-fat bias in medicine, and rethink the common tropes about fatness and health. We'd need to radically change our thinking, our social structures, our collective stereotypes. We'd need to then cauterize the wounds diet culture has left, making sure no new ugly heads could rear when we turn our backs. Judging by the current political and social climate, that seems unlikely. It's certainly possible, and maybe one day we'll get there. In the meantime, #SkinnyTok may be dead, but it's only a matter of time before another hashtag or trend telling young people to aspire to thinness crops up, another head of this seemingly unkillable hydra ready to bite us in our ever-smaller butts. Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue

Move over rugrats — Gen Zs, millennials, are using ‘tummy time' to cure tech neck
Move over rugrats — Gen Zs, millennials, are using ‘tummy time' to cure tech neck

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Move over rugrats — Gen Zs, millennials, are using ‘tummy time' to cure tech neck

It's a position that's tech-neck-ly exclusive to babies. Still, adults of the digital age — folks constantly staring down at their devices or hunching overtop a laptop — are now remedying their poor posture and troublesome 'tech neck' with tummy time. 'Instead of scrolling [on my phone], sitting in a chair and looking down, I'm just on my tummy and I'm scrolling with my phone in front of me,' said Bek, a content creator, in a TikTok how-to. Advertisement 4 Adults are adopting 'tummy time' as a remedy for 'tech neck' caused by constant phone and computer use. Anton – 'If you are having neck problems from tech neck [because you're] looking down all the time, get on your belly,' she urged before closing the clip with an infant-like 'goo-goo, gaga.' Sure, it's a little childish, but achy millennials and Gen Zers are happily stomaching the trend. Advertisement A scourge of the times, 'tech neck' is any form of chronic neck or shoulder pain, soreness or stiffness caused by bad posture while using technology,' according to the Mayo Clinic. 4 Gen Zs and millennials suffer from tech neck as a result of leaning over to look at their phones and computers. Kittiphan – 'Bending your head forward at a 45-degree angle to look at a cellphone or tablet can dramatically increase your chances of having a tech neck,' warned the experts in a recent report. The findings revealed that the average adult spends between three to eight hours leaning downward to gaze at screens. Advertisement 'Neck pain is the fourth leading cause of disability, with an annual prevalence rate exceeding 30%,' the insiders noted. 'Most episodes of acute neck pain will resolve with or without treatment, but nearly 50% of those people will continue to experience some degree of fatigue or discomfort from frequent recurrences.' 4 Experts warn that neck and back pain caused by tech neck can be permanent, flaring up at random times throughout a person's life. Graphicroyalty – The agonizing flare ups even forced a whopping 24% of workers ages 16 to 26 to call out of work in 2024. The throbs and twinges are literal pains in the neck, cursing young adults with 'old lady issues' that may continue plaguing them into old age. So, to avoid developing a Quasimodo-esque hunchback, twentysomethings and beyond are carving out time for a little tummy time. Advertisement 4 The 'tummy time' hack is a moved inspired by babies, whose necks, arms and backs become stronger in the belly-down position. szmuli – For most parents, 'tummy time' has long referred to the practice of placing a baby on its stomach — while he or she is awake and under supervision — in effort to strengthen the tot's neck, shoulder and arm muscles. The position helps to improve the little one's motor skills, per the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. And grownups claim it's helping them too. 'To the person that suggested tummy time to correct tech neck, thank you,' raved influencer Megan Jo, adding that she 'already feels a difference' in her body by spending more time on her belly. 'Thank you.' Sam Rus, a yoga instructor, also sang the babyish move's praises, saying, '10 minutes a day will passively stretch your core and hips, increase spine mobility, aid in digestion and reverse the effects of sitting for long periods of time.' Ari Viscera, a part-time New Yorker, scored 3.5 million views on her tummy time hack vid, championing the position for curing her 'horrendous' posture. 'I got my journal and my book — my legs kicked up,' she gushed while on her front. 'Let's see what this does for my body.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store