What's the latest on the Apple Tax? All (or most) will be revealed next week
The account was closed in May of this year, with a total sum of almost €14.25b transferred to the exchequer.
Apple had originally transferred €14.3b to the account in 2018 ahead of its appeal against the European Commission decision, which
found that the company owed Ireland
€13.1b plus interest of €1.2b.
So what happens now?
You may be thinking, 'We haven't heard about this money in a while, what's the government's plan for it?'
A lot will be revealed next week when the Department of Public Expenditure publishes its review of the National Development Plan for 2026-2035.
This plan sets out the government's scheme to build infrastructure over the coming years, including things like rail, roads, electricity connections and sewage schemes.
Next week, the publication of the review will set out how some of the €14b in Apple Tax will be spent.
It will also set out spending plans for the proceeds from the sale of AIB shares, and money from other State funds, including the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund.
Advertisement
The government has previously said that Apple money will be used to invest in our stock of critical infrastructure — housing, energy, water and transport – instead of paying for day-to-day spending.
But other than that, we haven't been told much more about what exactly the money will be used for.
Ahead of last year's general election, all parties
outlined their ideas for how the money should be spent
, with Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael differing slightly in how they would split it.
Fianna Fáil pledged to focus on five key infrastructure areas – housing, the electricity grid, water infrastructure, transport and health digitalisation, while Fine Gael promised to allocate €10b for housing and €4b on energy, water and transport.
Given that it's Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin who holds the Taoiseach's office at the moment, we can expect to see the actual spending skew towards his party's priorities.
Specifically, Fianna Fáil wanted to see €4b of the money allocated to the Land Development Agency (LDA) to build housing.
Fine Gael wanted to use the money they had ringfenced for housing to extend the first-time buyer supports, including increasing the Help to Buy grant from €30,000 to €40,000 — something we already know has not made its way into the Programme for Government.
A Fine Gael source pushed back on the notion that it will be Fianna Fáil in the driving seat, insisting that final decisions on spending have not yet been agreed.
It's understood that government leaders are set to meet with Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers over the weekend to flesh out the final plan on how the NDP cookie will crumble.
So for now, we wait.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
15 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Flat-rate Vat removal to cost average broiler farm €12,000 a year
Removal of flat-rate Vat may cost the average poultry broiler farmer more than €12,000 per year. The Revenue Commissioners have said overcompensation of all flat-rate farmers involved in chicken production amounted to about €7 million in 2017. Revenue considers that the yearly overcompensation is approximate to the level identified in 2017, and it continued since then. The average overcompensation is around €12,500 per year, if the 560 or so poultry breeding, hatching and rearing farms in Ireland are included. The flat-rate scheme compensates farmers, that are not Vat-registered, for the Vat incurred by them on input costs used in the course of their farming activities. This is achieved through the addition of a flat-rate percentage (currently 5.1%) to the price charged by the farmer for their supplies to Vat-registered persons (such as a meat-processing business, in the case of poultry). The flat-rate scheme also reduces farmers' administrative burden of registration and returns. The scheme is provided for under EU legislation. However, a key element is that it should not lead to farmers being overcompensated for Vat incurred by them on their business costs. Following an investigation in 2018, Revenue determined that there was a significant amount of overcompensation in the poultry sector. The matter was re-examined over the last 18 months, and it has been determined that overcompensation is still occurring. This resulted in finance minister Paschal Donohoe's recent decision to remove the sector from the scheme. From September 1, 2025, farmers in the poultry (broiler) sector will not be able to charge the flat-rate addition on the sale of their goods and services. Instead they will be required to register for Vat, if the level of their poultry broiler business is above the relevant Vat registration threshold in order to claim back Vat on their inputs (but farmers can register for Vat even if they are operating below this threshold). The Vat registration thresholds are €42,500 for services and €85,000 for goods. Minister Donohoe said he is required to have regard for the welfare of all farmers who avail of the scheme (more than 85% of Irish farmers avail of the flat-rate scheme). "As the EU Vat Directive does not permit overcompensation, failure to take this action could undermine the integrity of the scheme as a whole". I understand the concern this will cause amongst impacted farmers, and want to emphasise that every effort was made to find a resolution for our poultry sector. However, this matter has come to a head and must be addressed. "I have asked Revenue to provide the appropriate level of assistance and guidance on this matter to the affected farmers. In this regard, queries can be directed to businesstaxesregistrations@ IFA Poultry Chair Nigel Sweetnam said the decision to exclude a single sector is unprecedented. He said most broiler poultry farmers also have suckler, beef, dairy, or sheep enterprises, and this complexity will make compliance with the new Vat rules more difficult, as the farmers must separate their farm enterprises for Vat purposes. The change could possibly be the first of many in Vat for farmers. Accountants say no clear intention in Vat modernisation has been published by Revenue, but it is likely that all farmers could eventually fall into the Vat net over a number of years. Following a complaint about the poultry sector, Revenue undertook a comprehensive review in 2018 to establish if there was evidence of overcompensation. This review, provided to the minister for finance in 2019, established that there was a very significant overcompensation. Due to other factors, including Brexit and the covid-19 pandemic, this matter was not further considered until July 2023. Officials in the Department of Finance and Revenue said additional information provided by the sector indicated that while the overcompensation had reduced from the initial Revenue report, it was still quite significant. Together with the CSO, they investigated the possibility of creating a sector-specific flat-rate percentage for the poultry broiler sector. Unfortunately this was not possible, but if it is developed in the future, the sector could be reinstated within the flat-rate addition scheme. The poultry broiler sector has about 430 chicken farms, and 32 duck and 100 turkey farms and produces 170,000 tonnes of poultry meat. Read More Is it the thin end of the wedge for flat rate Vat compensation scheme?
Irish Examiner
15 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Relief for the industry or a blow to public health: Mixed reaction to delayed health warnings on alcohol
There was a mixed reaction to the Government confirming it would delay putting health warnings on alcohol products, from 'breathing space for a sector under pressure' to 'a blow for public health in Ireland'. At Cabinet on Tuesday, ministers heard that the introduction of health warnings on alcohol labels was being delayed by two years after concerns were raised about the impact of their implementation in the current global trading environment. It comes against the backdrop of fears for Irish business from US trade tariffs propagated by President Donald Trump, with Fine Gael ministers in particular such as Paschal Donohoe and Peter Burke raising concerns in recent months. Part of the landmark Public Health Alcohol Bill, which has seen the introduction of minimum unit pricing and advertising curbs, the measure will now proceed next year as planned but at a 'more appropriate time', Cabinet heard. Ibec organisation Drinks Ireland welcomed the move and said it provided 'much-needed relief' for drinks producers in this country. 'Our members are currently contending with major trade uncertainty, new tariffs on product entering our most important export market, the US, and threats of further tariff escalation,' it said. 'In these uncertain times, companies must be as competitive as possible to survive in international markets. This means tackling regulatory burden and reducing costs for producers.' It claimed that commentary that the now-deferred changes would not impact exports, as the labelling requirement would only have applied here, was 'misguided and disingenuous'. 'The introduction of supplementary requirements uniquely for the Irish market would have placed additional pressure on all companies operating here, and this would of course be more pronounced for SMEs,' it added. The move was also welcomed by the Irish Whiskey Association, which called it a 'reprieve' as some members would have seen packaging and labelling costs increase by over 35%. Meanwhile, Alcohol Action Ireland said it was disappointed by the Government's decision and said the measure was aimed at informing consumers about the health risks that come with alcohol consumption. 'It's not just that the government is allowing its own groundbreaking legislation to be undermined by the very industry it is designed to regulate,' its CEO Sheila Gilheany said. This delay will have real-life consequences that will be felt by ordinary Irish people every day. Labels are crucial to efforts to reduce incidences of cancer, liver disease, and foetal alcohol spectrum disorder in Ireland and indeed to change the conversation about this product which is heavily marketed as risk-free and essential to everyday living.' Ms Gilheany added that the step-by-step approach to implementing aspects of the Public Health Alcohol Bill has been slow and allowed a space where misinformation has flourished. She also criticised the failure to date to introduce stricter curbs for advertising allowed by the law, which would restrict the content of such adverts to 'facts, stripping out the industry myths which are used to recklessly promote alcohol consumption'.
Irish Times
15 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Will the Government's big projects survive the next downturn?
The Government's updated National Development Plan (NDP) proposes to spend a vast sum of money on capital infrastructure. But beyond three 'mega projects' there is little detail and the vagueness of the document has led to some skepticism. In part one of today's Inside Politics podcast, Pat Leahy joins Hugh Linehan to discuss the NDP and whether the Government's promise to prioritise infrastructure could survive a major economic shock - the kind created by heavy US tariffs, for example, They then look at the Summer Economic Statement, also revealed this week, which shows there will not be much wriggle room in this year's Budget. In part two, back to the NDP and what it says about the Government's plan for the development of transportation infrastructure. Dublin's proposed MetroLink is one of the three mega projects identified, but there is €20 billion earmarked for other unidentified projects. Where should it go? How much will be spent on new roads, and what are the implications for carbon emissions? And what about public transport projects outside Dublin? Professor Brian Caulfield talks to Hugh and Pat. READ MORE Brian Caulfield is a Professor in Transportation in the Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering at Trinity College Dublin.
