M&S resumes limited online sales after ransomware attack
Marks & Spencer (M&S) has resumed some online clothes orders six weeks after a damaging cyberattack that the retailer has warned will cost it hundreds of millions of pounds.
"Select fashion ranges" are available again for the first time in 46 days for customers across Britain.
M&S said that people in Northern Ireland were still missing out as its online operations got back in gear.
Ransomware hackers broke into its systems in April by tricking employees at a third-party contractor, skirting its digital defences, according to the company.
"We are bringing back online shopping this week," said John Lyttle, managing director of fashion, home and beauty.
"A selection of our best-selling fashion ranges will be available for home delivery to England, Scotland and Wales.
"More of our fashion, home and beauty products will be added every day and we will resume deliveries to Northern Ireland and Click and Collect in the coming weeks."
M&S stopped taking clothing and home orders through its website and app on 25 April.
Three days earlier, it said it was managing a "cyber incident", with problems for its contactless pay and click and collect services over the Easter holiday weekend.
Last month, M&S said it expected online disruption to continue into July and forecast the attack would cost it £300m.
However, it expected insurance would cover some of those losses.
The company has refused to say if it has paid any ransom to the hackers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: If this is a fixed economy, I'd hate to see a broken one
Nearly half a century has passed since Margaret Thatcher skewered the incumbent PM James Callaghan at the 1979 election with her famous ' Labour Isn't Working' poster, which showed dole queues stretching across the horizon. We are not quite there yet. But after years of low unemployment in Britain, Rachel Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer have brought chaos – in just 11 months – to what was one of the strongest labour markets in Europe. Last October's Budget and its central and perhaps most hated policy – an increase in employers' National Insurance to 15 per cent – added no less than £23 billion to bosses' wage bills. And for all this Government's promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', it's now clear that this misguided and self-defeating pledge is having a vicious impact on jobs. Companies are proving reluctant to take on new workers, are deliberately not replacing colleagues who move on and are taking the opportunity to cut costs by making people redundant. The only silver lining is slowing wage increases, at least in the private sector, should make it possible for the Bank of England to lower interest rates by a further 0.25 per cent this summer to 4 per cent – making mortgages and borrowing cheaper. The public sector is another matter, of course, and has enjoyed lavish raises at the expense of the productive part of the economy – to say nothing of its far more generous gold-plated pensions, paid out of direct taxation. But overall the picture is dire. The National Insurance increase, along with a hugely generous rise in the minimum wage – now one of the highest on the planet – surging fuel costs and rising business rates, have shattered business confidence. Companies are shedding jobs at an alarming rate. Figures collected by HMRC show that 55,000 jobs were lost in April alone and numbers 'were notably weaker' than expected, according to bankers Goldman Sachs. Vacancies are tumbling, too – these stood at 736,000 in the three months to April, down from 760,000 in the previous period, and were at 1.4 million as recently as 2022. The unemployment rate, which was 3.6 per cent of the workforce prior to the pandemic, has now zipped up to 4.6 per cent. And the worst part? There's more to come. Businesses are steeling themselves for socialist firebrand Angela Rayner's beloved Employment Rights Bill, currently grinding its way through Parliament, which will make hiring new workers even more expensive. To peals of outrage (and a front-page Daily Mail headline: 'Deluded'), this week Sir Keir claimed to have 'fixed' our public finances, thus making possible his Government's U-turn on snatching the winter fuel allowance from millions of pensioners. Well, if this is what 'fixed' looks like, Sir Keir, I'd hate to see the economy 'broken'. Rising unemployment is a menace. It inevitably raises the cost of Britain's already gargantuan welfare bill – and it simultaneously reduces Government revenues due to lower income tax and National Insurance receipts. In 1979, unemployment stood at 5.3 per cent – and, despite the Iron Lady's famous poster, it rose to a staggering 11.9 per cent by 1984 on her watch. We are a long way from those days. Yet as I have said before, Ms Reeves – with last year's £40 billion tax-raising Budget, locked Britain into a doom loop of plummeting business confidence, rising unemployment and reduced job choices. Yesterday's multi-year public-spending review will splash the cash on investments in nuclear power, science and technology, roads and railways. As helpful as all that may be, it will mean more Government borrowing and debt that will take years to pay off. Expect unemployment to keep on rising until the Government changes course.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Casement Park in Spending Review: Will UK government announce funding?
The government will announce later on Wednesday whether it will make a financial contribution towards the redevelopment of Casement the west Belfast stadium is estimated to cost about £260m - of which £120m in funding is jointly in place from the Stormont Executive, the Irish government and the has been building on the government to make a decision, which is now anticipated as part of the Spending review will allocate money to day-to-day public services for the next three years. It will also set infrastructure budgets for the next four review will directly affect what Stormont ministers have to spend on public services in Northern are also expected to find out if they have succeeded in persuading the Treasury that Stormont's finances require a more generous "needs-based" top-up. Last week, Finance Minister John O'Dowd said he believed the Treasury was in "solution-finding mode" when it came to reaching agreement on funding for Casement Park. Days later, a senior figure in the GAA said the association was "cautiously optimistic" that an announcement on funding was coming this Stormont executive is contributing £62.5m to the project, the GAA will pay £15m, while the Irish government has pledged about £ GAA has acknowledged it will need to increase its commitment."We are prepared to step up. It would be premature to start mentioning figures here. I think it will be higher than £15m", said Stephen McGeehan, the project lead for the stadium Park, with a proposed 34,500 capacity, had been earmarked to host football games at the Euro 2028 football tournament but, with the project on hold, the plan was shelved. Stormont's Communities Minister Gordon Lyons has defended his handling of the planned Casement redevelopment and insisted the hold-up is not his has said the GAA will need to make its plans for the stadium more affordable if the government fails to cover the gap for the current proposed rebuild."What we do need to make sure is that any additional public funding that comes forward for sport is done on a fair and equitable basis," he said. Could Stormont get a bigger top-up? When devolution was restored in 2024, Stormont ministers persuaded the Treasury that Northern Ireland's public services were being funded below an objective level of a result any additional funding Stormont gets from Westminster now comes with a top-up - an additional 24p for every will be worth more than £800m over five years, the independent Fiscal Council has Treasury also left the door open for a bigger top-up if there was credible, independent evidence to support ministers believe they have provided that evidence in the form of an analysis by the devolution finance expert Prof Gerry Treasury's response to that will come as Chancellor Rachel Reeves lays out the government's Spending Review in the Commons on Wednesday afternoon.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Amazingly there are 12% of voters who think Rachel Reeves does a GOOD job! Survey gives damning insight into Chancellor's policy backlash
Barely one in ten voters believe that Chancellor Rachel Reeves is doing a good job, a poll has revealed. The YouGov survey, published on the eve of the Chancellor's spending review today, showed widespread disillusionment with her performance since taking office last year. Just 12 per cent of people said Ms Reeves is doing a good job, while 53 per cent said she is doing a bad job – giving her a net approval rating of minus 41. Ms Reeves even fared badly among Labour voters, with only 28 per cent voting in favour of her efforts, while 32 per cent condemned them. A separate poll by the think-tank More In Common found that confidence in Labour's ability to deliver on its promises has collapsed since the election. The survey also revealed that the public has become tired of Labour blaming the country's current problems on the previous Conservative government. Ms Reeves and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer have repeatedly blamed the Tories for their economic inheritance, including claims of facing a £22billion 'black hole' in the public finances on taking office. But the tactic seems to be wearing thin, with 54 per cent of voters saying Labour is wasting too much time blaming the Tories for its failures in office. The survey also found that 71 per cent of voters do not expect Labour to improve their lives, compared to just 29 per cent who do. When the same question was asked just days after last year's election, 54 per cent said they believed Labour would improve their lives, compared with 46 per cent who did not. In addition to this, the poll suggests just a third of Labour voters believe the changes announced by Ms Reeves in today's spending review will be good for the country. Among the wider public, that figure falls to just 15 per cent, compared with 26 per cent who believe the Chancellor's expected spending splurge will make little difference and 32 per cent who fear decisions announced in the spending review will be generally bad for the country. Civil Service hits 550,000 Civil Service headcount has hit a near 20-year high despite Labour vowing to crack down on numbers. Official figures show the workforce grew by 2,000 in the first three months of the year to 550,000. That was up from 544,000 in March 2024, and is the highest since 2006 when Tony Blair was in power. In March, the Chancellor promised running costs would be reduced by 15 per cent by the end of the decade. And in April ministers announced plans to squeeze numbers, including cutting 2,100 Cabinet Office staff.
