
You're probably too emotional to own Bitcoin
With Bitcoin hitting repeated record highs this year amid optimism over 'pro-crypto' Donald Trump, many want in. Crypto bulls dismiss Bitcoin's early 2025 plunge as a temporary blip, with the subsequent rebound to new highs portending even bigger gains ahead.
But if you feel tempted to buy crypto, ask yourself a simple question: 'Why should I own it?'
Many say crypto's recent surges are justified. Crypto firms were big Trump and Republican donors, so now they expect lighter US regulation and pro-crypto legislation. Trump has already established America's 'strategic bitcoin reserve' and 'digital asset stockpile', and American regulators have dropped investigations into Coinbase, the largest US crypto exchange.
Trump's two eldest sons made a big investment in a Bitcoin mining firm, while Trump's ' memecoin ' investor dinner in May spurred heartfelt headline hopes.
It isn't just America. As you know, Britain's Labour government aims to bolster London's status. Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the 'Plan for Change' in April, aiming to align crypto regulation with that of traditional finance – using clear guidelines and antifraud measures to bolster crypto confidence and innovation.
Beyond Britain, virtually every global financial hub vies to be crypto's capital. Hong Kong has over 1,100 crypto-tilted fintech firms, up fivefold from 2017. Switzerland's 2021 crypto framework fostered a booming startup landscape. Japanese regulators mull crypto regulatory reform similar to Britain's, potentially cutting crypto tax rates and paving the way for Japanese bitcoin ETF approval.
Some publicly traded firms are increasingly adding Bitcoin to their holdings, potentially facilitating crypto bleeding into stocks. While that merits watching, these so-called 'crypto treasury firms' total an estimated 135 in all and, outside a handful, are so small they aren't even in major indices. A single firm, Strategy, accounts for over half of corporate Bitcoin purchases.
Again, what is the case for you to own crypto? Some say it diversifies, guarding against risks to normal currencies or assets, or hedges inflation. Since Bitcoin supply is capped at a now-approaching 21 million, bulls believe it can't be endlessly devalued like pounds or dollars. Plus, many Bitcoins are lost, likely forever, reducing total supply.
On the other hand, overall crypto supply is infinite. Think Ethereum, Dogecoin, XRP, Trump's memecoin and more ahead. All defray demand and raise questions about which survive long term. Trump's memecoin has nosedived since its launch, illustrating crypto's fickleness.
Still, most bulls tout giant gains. Since 2010, Bitcoin soared 162pc annualised through 2024's close. It rose 125pc in 2024. It climbed 47pc from America's election through June 30, despite 2025's wild volatility. Explosive!
But huge surges pair with deep crashes, as 2025 has already shown. In rolling 12-month spans this decade, Bitcoin returns ranged repeatedly from 2,156pc to -79pc. It unpredictably booms and bombs.
Bitcoin topped £100 in April 2013. Days later, a -70pc swoon started. Later in 2013, it neared £700. Within roughly 21 months, it dropped -83pc. It did the same in 2018. The extant boom follows 2021-2023's -73pc bomb. Multiple 1970s-sized stock market crashes in just one decade. Even early-2025's relatively 'small' drop was -30pc! Poor timing and selling out can sink you.
What drives these swings? Not fundamentals – crypto has none. No industrial uses, profits, sales or yield. The industry is rife with crime and scams, as you have seen with multiple UK convictions in 2025 alone involving millions of pounds stolen via crypto scams and ATM fraud.
July's global OmegaPro scam is the latest, to say nothing of February's Bybit hack, crypto's largest ever, or America's infamous FTX fraud.
Also, most 'coins' are vastly too volatile to be actual currencies. Yes, there are stablecoins – those pegged to a major currency – which overall swing less.
But 'stable' isn't always so stable, and regulatory haze abounds. For example, recently proposed UK guidelines suggest regulating non-UK-issued stablecoins differently from those minted in Britain, likely causing endless confusion if implemented.
Inflation hedge? No. 2022's -64pc Bitcoin drop came as UK inflation galloped to 11.1pc year-on-year, and America's hit 9.1pc. Bitcoin failed its only inflation hedging test.
So, what explains crypto's swings? Demand shifts, full stop. Pure sentiment.
Can you time crypto investors' mood swings? I can't. If not, can you really hang on long term if Bitcoin nosedives again? Emotions don't help. With volatile assets, investors often buy after big gains – like 2025's – on fear of missing out. When prices fall, they sell out of fear of holding on, locking in losses.
I have watched investors repeat this human folly in volatile commodities and stocks for 50 years. Crypto is stock market volatility on serious steroids. Can you stomach that?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Stocks slump on latest tariffs, soft jobs data
NEW YORK, Aug 1 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks slumped on Friday, with the S&P on track for its biggest daily percentage decline in more than three months as new U.S. tariffs on dozens of trading partners and a surprisingly weak jobs report spurred selling pressure. Also weighing on equities was a tumble in (AMZN.O), opens new tab shares after the company posted quarterly results but failed to meet lofty expectations for its Amazon Web Services cloud computing unit. Just hours before the tariff deadline on Friday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order imposing duties on U.S. imports from countries, including Canada, Brazil, India and Taiwan, in his latest round of levies as countries attempted to seek ways to reach better deals. Further denting confidence in the economic picture, data showed U.S. job growth slowed more than expected in July while the prior month's report was revised sharply lower, indicating the labor market may be starting to crack. The report significantly pushed up expectations the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at its September meeting. "There's no way to pretty-up this report. Previous months were revised significantly lower where the labor market has been on stall-speed," said Brian Jacobsen, Chief Economist at Annex Wealth Management in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin. "Last year the Fed messed up by not cutting in July so they did a catch-up cut at their next meeting. They'll likely have to do the same thing this year." According to preliminary data, the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab lost 101.60 points, or 1.60%, to end at 6,237.79 points, while the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab lost 472.78 points, or 2.24%, to 20,649.67. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab fell 543.97 points, or 1.23%, to 43,587.01. Market expectations the Fed will cut rates by at least 25 basis points at its September meeting stood at 80.9%, according to CME's FedWatch Tool, opens new tab, up from 37.7% in the prior session. Other data from the Institute for Supply Management showed U.S. manufacturing contracted for a fifth straight month in July and factory employment dropped to the lowest level in five years. Both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq recorded their biggest single-day percentage declines since April 21 and all three major indexes were on track for weekly losses. The CBOE Volatility Index (.VIX), opens new tab, also known as Wall Street's fear gauge, climbed to as much as 21.90, its highest since June 23. Amazon was the biggest drag on the Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq and pushed the consumer discretionary index (.SPLRCD), opens new tab, down nearly 4% as the worst performing of the 11 major S&P 500 sectors. Also reporting earnings was Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, which fell after it posted a current-quarter revenue forecast well above Wall Street estimates, but CEO Tim Cook warned U.S. tariffs would add $1.1 billion in costs over the period. Stocks briefly extended declines after Trump said he ordered the commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika L. McEntarfer, to be fired in the wake of the jobs data. In contrast to the broad declines, Reddit (RDDT.N), opens new tab surged after it reported quarterly results that exceeded Street expectations, boosted by an AI-focused advertising strategy and strong user engagement.


Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
VIEW Investors react to Kugler's resignation, firing of BLS commissioner
Aug 1 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve said on Friday that Governor Adriana Kugler was resigning from the central bank effective Aug. 8. Separately, U.S President Donald Trump ordered that the commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika L. McEntarfer, be fired after data showed employment growth was than expected last month. COMMENTS: "Obviously, (Adriana's resignation) is a negative, and that'll probably continue to pressure the dollar. That's not a good sign, when someone resigns, unless there is a personal reason, there is always a question mark as to why. So the unknown factor of that usually adds to uncertainties. "Of course, you had a major revision in the employment numbers so it's a fact that Trump fired the Commissioner of Labour Statistics, basically questioning the accuracy of these numbers because of that huge revision that we had. So, anytime something like this happens, it always raises uncertainties." CHRISTOPHER HODGE, CHIEF US ECONOMIST, NATIXIS ,NEW YORK: 'The interim BLS Chief looks to be an accomplished technocrat, which is a great sign. Going forward, should the fidelity of the data be compromised, this would place the markets and Fed in a very precarious position. I would expect the Fed to rely more and more on the anecdotes it collects from the Beige Book. Her (Adriana Kugler's ) term was set to expire in January, so no great change in policy. I have not seen an indication that she is resigning in protest, but the timing is very curious' JODY CALEMINE, DIRECTOR OF ADVOCACY, AFL-CIO, WASHINGTON, D.C. 'Today was probably the last reliable jobs report we will ever see. This isn't good for anybody looking to see what's going on with the economy, not just for workers but for the business community in general.' 'This morning's jobs report was showing what was the first indicators of probably a coming recession…it's clear he fired her (McEntarfer) for issuing a jobs report he just didn't like.' On Kugler: 'The Fed board should be independent of the president, that's for sure. He (Trump) is wielding increasingly authoritarian control over different agencies, and clearly he wants to wield that control over the Fed. The markets have kept that impulse in check so far. He's increasingly out of control.' JUAN PEREZ, SENIOR DIRECTOR OF TRADING, MONEX USA, WASHINGTON: "The way (the market) is going to interpret (the departures) is in a very dollar-negative way." "No matter what the economic picture in the United States, the one thing that holds the U.S. dollar strong in the eyes of the world is the authority and the independence of the Federal Reserve. Whenever anything comes to potentially put that into compromise then that's when the U.S. dollar spirals down." "There will be an opening for the Trump administration to fill. It's likely he will choose somebody whose views on interest rates match his own. Then Treasury Secretary Bessent wants to have a list of possible replacements for the Fed Chair by the end of the year so, Trump is getting a bigger chance to appoint people whose views match his own." Regarding Trump's order to fire Erika L. McEntarfe, he said: "I don't like to see a bureaucrat fired just because the data that gets presented doesn't support the administration's policies. We have a president who believes the economy is strong and that interest rates should be cut . I have read nothing that suggests she was not doing a good job or conscientious. It's upsetting. We're killing the messenger here instead of trying to see what the data really says and go from there. I see no evidence that the numbers were ever manipulated. It wouldn't be big news today if it happened a lot. Certainly, it's unusual."


Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Fed's Kugler resigning from Fed effective Aug 8
Aug 1 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve said Friday that Governor Adriana Kugler is resigning early from her term and will exit the central bank on Aug. 8, potentially shaking up what was already a fractious succession process for Fed leadership amid difficult relations with President Donald Trump. The Fed said in a statement that Kugler, who became a governor in September 2023, will leave before her term's conclusion, which was scheduled for Jan. 31, 2026. In a press release, the Fed said Kugler will return to Georgetown University as a professor next autumn. Kugler did not attend this week's rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meeting, which is unusual. Kugler's early exit may shake up the timeline for the succession process now surrounding Chair Jerome Powell, whose term ends next May. Trump has threatened to fire Powell repeatedly believing interest rates should be much lower than they are. Trump will now get to select a Fed governor to replace Kugler and finish out her term. Some speculation had centered on the idea Trump might pick a potential future chair to fill that slot. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the Fed appointment. In a letter to Trump announcing her resignation, Kugler wrote 'I am proud to have tackled this role with integrity, a strong commitment to serving the public, and with a data-driven approach strongly based on my expertise in labor markets and inflation.' Kugler's time at the Fed was a challenging one as central bankers raised rates aggressively to combat high inflation pressures. Those high rates have put them in the crosshairs of Trump and have caused economic challenges, although inflation pressures have moved much closer to the 2% target.