
‘Real people drawing fraudulent salaries' — crackdown looms on public sector ghost employees
Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration says public sector workers should report in person to prove they're not ghost employees.
'A data audit alone is not enough. We are calling on this process to begin with physical in-person human verification audits for all government employees underpinned by biometric identification. Every person drawing a public salary must appear in person and be verified,' said committee chairperson Jan de Villiers (Democratic Alliance) in a governance cluster press conference in Parliament on Monday.
'The public has the right to know the names on the payroll correspond to individuals who really exist and who serve the public.'
Read more: Ghost employees who haunt payrolls are a major occupational fraud hazard
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, in his Budget tabled last month, announced sweeping expenditure reviews of more than R300-billion in government spending since 2013, 'with the aim of identifying duplications, waste and inefficiencies'. Godongwana said the data-driven initiative would cross-reference administrative datasets to 'identify ghost workers and other anomalies across government departments'.
De Villiers said the portfolio committee, following Godongwana's announcement in his Budget, had convened on 28 May to interrogate the 'persistent and deeply corrosive problem' of ghost workers in the public sector. He said the National Treasury could not tackle this challenge alone — it required a joint, coordinated strategy, which was now under way between the Treasury and the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA).
'We will reconvene with the Department of Public Service and Administration and the National Treasury in the third quarter of 2025 to receive a full progress report on the implementation of the joint ghost worker audit strategy. This should include details on the scope of these audits, preliminary findings and proposed enforcement measures,' said De Villiers.
'Orchestrated form of systemic corruption'
Ghost employee fraud is among South Africa's most persistent public sector challenges. However, the total number of ghost workers — individuals who are fraudulently added to an organisation's payroll but do not actually work there — is unclear.
In 2021, the government launched Project Ziveze to investigate and verify all Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) employees after material irregularities were uncovered within Prasa's ICT and payroll systems, indicating that there could be about 3,000 phantom workers.
A preliminary report in November 2022 revealed that 1,480 employees could not be verified, while 1,000 others had resigned, Daily Maverick's Suné Payne reported. The agency is estimated to have saved about R200-million through the verification project.
Last year, the Auditor-General of South Africa uncovered R6.4-million being paid to 'deceased and terminated' employees. The Public Servants Association (PSA) described this as a 'shocking misuse of public funds' and a 'gross violation of financial accountability'.
And in May 2025, the Sunday Times reported that the Gauteng Department of Health had frozen the salaries of 230 employees who could not be verified.
These are a handful of the reported cases of ghost employees.
'These are not invisible names on paper. Real people are drawing fraudulent salaries, and fraudulent money is being siphoned into the pockets of corrupt criminals,' said De Villiers.
He said the department had disclosed that inserting a ghost employee into the payroll system 'requires collusion because at least three officials need to work together to create a ghost worker. This means that we are dealing not with random lapses in judgment, but with embedded criminal syndicates operating in our public institutions.'
He added that the issue of ghost workers was 'not merely a payroll anomaly. It is a deliberate and orchestrated form of systemic corruption. It is organised crime within the state. And as a portfolio committee, tasked with oversight in the public service, the time for half-measures and talk shops is over.
'Let us be clear, the phenomenon of ghost workers is not an issue of administrative error. There are real people creating these ghost workers, reaping the benefits of siphoning taxpayer money into their coffers.
'Every ghost worker represents a post that could've been filled by a qualified graduate, a dedicated nurse, a teacher at a rural school or a social worker supporting the vulnerable. Every fraudulent salary paid is a step backwards in the fight for a professional, ethical and responsive state.'
Widespread phenomenon
De Villiers did not know how many ghost workers there were in the public service, but suggested, when looking at the known instances of ghost employees, 'that there are thousands'.
He said the DPSA had confirmed before Parliament that ghost workers were present across all three spheres of government, including national, provincial and local governments, as well as government agencies and state-owned enterprises.
'The reality is every single department, state agency, level of government and state-owned enterprise that we have, probably has ghost workers on their payroll.'
PSA spokesperson Reuben Maleka told Daily Maverick on Monday that the organisation supported a physical audit of ghost workers who 'rob' the public sector of its capacity to provide services to the public.
'The problem is widespread throughout the public sector — government departments, municipalities [and] government entities. The cleaning must happen across the sector,' said Maleka.
In addition to calling for a physical audit, De Villiers said the committee would 'push for disciplinary and criminal action to follow every detection of ghost workers.
'We don't know how many ghost workers there are, we don't know who's involved, and not enough people have been arrested so far, to be quite frank.
'I am not aware, as committee chairperson, of a single person who has been arrested thus far in terms of the creation of ghost workers,' he said.
De Villiers added that South Africa's ghost worker phenomenon was not only made possible by fraud, but by 'outdated and fragmented administrative processes and systems'.
Daily Maverick contacted the National Treasury and the DPSA with queries. Comment will be added once received. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Corruption Watch welcomes ConCourt ruling on setting aside Gender Commission appointments
CAPE TOWN - Corruption Watch has hailed yesterday's (Friday) victory against Parliament in the Constitutional Court as a turning point in enforcing meaningful public participation - particularly in the appointment of leaders to key institutions. The apex court has declared as invalid the appointment of five commissioners of the Commission of Gender Equality, including the chairperson, for more than two years since they were appointed. This invalidity has, however, been suspended for 12 months to allow parliament to restart the recruitment process. Corruption Watch said the Constitutional Court judgment is a critical milestone for its 10-year campaign on leadership appointments, and for legitimate public participation and transparency in choosing candidates to lead the country's public institutions. The Commission for Gender Equality is a Chapter 9 institution, and commissioners are appointed by the president for a five-year renewable term based on the recommendation of Parliament. On Friday, the apex court found that Parliament had incorrectly interpreted the Protection of Personal Information Act by refusing to disclose work experience information from candidates' CVs and also criticised the 14-day deadline for curtailed, online only submissions from the public. Corruption Watch lawyer Nkululeko Conco said the court's unanimous judgment should strengthen Parliament's future public participation processes. 'This victory sends a clear message. Genuine public participation is not optional. It's a constitutional requirement. Citizens have the right to meaningful involvement in choosing who leads the institutions that serve them.' Corruption Watch said the public can't be sidelined when appointing leaders to institutions meant to strengthen democracy. The court, however, made no finding on the incumbents' suitability for the roles – but said the process meant that equally qualified candidates may have been excluded.

IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Finance Minister dismisses speculation on 3% inflation target
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has dismissed speculation about a formal shift to a 3% inflation target, affirming that any changes will follow due consultation with the Reserve Bank, Cabinet, and other stakeholders. Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has firmly dismissed speculation that government will formally adopt a 3% inflation target, following a recent announcement by the South African Reserve Bank's (SARB) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC). The SARB's MPC had indicated a preference to target inflation at 3% going forward, raising expectations that the Ministry of Finance would officially endorse this shift during the upcoming Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS). However, Godongwana made it clear that "Minister Godongwana has no plans to do this."


The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘Dishonest' Judge Makhubele found guilty and faces impeachment
JSC upholds Tribunal ruling. Now Parliament will have to decide Makhubele's fate. Suspended Gauteng Judge Nana Makhubele is facing impeachment after the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) found her guilty on two charges of gross misconduct. The complaints – instigated by #UniteBehind – were that she sat as a judge at the same time that she was chair of the Prasa interim board and, while there, she involved herself in state capture. The latter was in relation to matters involving the Siyaya Group of companies in that she authorised, in an alleged 'secret settlement deal', payments from Prasa to Siyaya of R56-million while sidelining the internal legal team. Judge Makhubele faces impeachment In a statement released on Friday, the small JSC (sitting without members of Parliament) said it had considered the report of the Tribunal established to probe the allegations. 'Prior to considering the matter, the commission called for written representations from Judge Makhubele and #UniteBehind. 'These were duly considered along with the report of the Tribunal, the record and the core bundle,' it said. The complaint in Part A was that Judge Makhubele served in a position which undermined the independence of the judiciary. In doing so, she breached the separation of powers, failing to sever professional ties on her appointment to the judiciary. And that she occupied an office for profit and requested special dispensation regarding her appointment. Judge Makhubele denied the allegations and alleged the (then) Gauteng Judge President Dunstan Mlambo had consented to her starting her appointment in April 2018 rather than 1 January 2018. ALSO READ: Judge Nana Makhubele found guilty of gross misconduct The Tribunal found that on 2 November 2017, Mlambo informed Makhubele that she had been appointed and would begin work on 1 January 2018. She had previously been informed by Mlambo that her name would be forwarded as one of the successful candidates. In November, she appeared before the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee of Transport and disclosed that she had been appointed as a judge and would assume her position in January. In December 2017, she emailed Mlambo with a request that she only start work on 1 April. His response was that the President had already made the appointment. At a meeting that month he informed her that it was too late to change her starting date. Mlambo's evidence was corroborated by his deputy, Judge Aubrey Ledwaba. Abrupt resignation The Tribunal, chaired by retired judge Achmat Jappie, said it was common cause that she had made no mention of her appointment at Prasa to Mlambo. She failed to commence her duties on 1 January. Her version, that Mlambo had agreed to her starting later, was 'most unlikely' and her evidence 'was deliberately misleading and unambiguously insufficient' to cast any doubt on the credible evidence of Mlambo. The JSC said these findings clearly supported the conclusion that Judge Makhubele was guilty of gross misconduct and that she had been dishonest. READ MORE: Suspended judge Makhubele explains how she landed Prasa job Regarding the complaint in Part B, #UniteBehind had alleged that her conduct during her tenure as chairperson of the Prasa board was dishonest, lacking integrity and unethical. The Tribunal said the facts were that she took up the position at the end of October 2017. Then she 'abruptly resigned' in March 2018. Prior to her appointment, there were four claims by different entities within the Siyaya Group that were vigorously defended by Prasa. Judge Makhubele's version problematic Judge Makhubele alleged that the board had taken a resolution to settle these claims but was unable to produce the proof of this. She personally conveyed the decision to Francois Botes, an advocate who was acting on behalf of the Siyaya entities. She gave Botes correspondence to assist him to obtain default judgment against Prasa. The Tribunal's evidence leader called four witnesses regarding these allegations. Judge Makhubele disputed their evidence but provided no counter evidence. 'The Tribunal concluded that on the evidence before it, the version of Judge Makhubele was intrinsically problematic, inconsistent and amounted to a bare denial in the face of vastly credible evidence to the contrary on crucial aspects of the matter,' the JSC said in its statement on Friday. READ MORE: Suspended judge denies fault in serving dual government role 'The Tribunal specifically noted the absence of a record indicating who had taken the decision to settle the Siyaya matters as well as her conduct in assisting Adv Botes to obtain default judgment against Prasa.' The JSC said the Tribunal had found her guilty of only misconduct in this regard. 'The allegations underpinning these charges relate to dishonest conduct which qualifies as gross misconduct,' it said. The JSC is expected to recommend to the National Assembly that Makhubele be impeached. This requires a two thirds majority vote. The President must then formally remove her from office. This article was republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.