logo
Delaware bill would limit investor lawsuits as companies threaten to leave the state

Delaware bill would limit investor lawsuits as companies threaten to leave the state

Reuters18-02-2025

WILMINGTON, Delaware, Feb 17 (Reuters) - Delaware lawmakers on Monday proposed changes to the U.S. state's widely used corporate law that would limit shareholder lawsuits after several high-profile companies said they might move their legal home to another state.
The bill sets out steps that corporate boards could take to insulate directors and controlling shareholders from litigation over alleged conflicts. The bill would also limit the kinds of internal records that shareholders can access, which they need to build their cases. The bill is sponsored by leaders of both parties in both houses of Delaware's state assembly.
Delaware's corporate law governs relations between company boards and their investors for around two-thirds of the S&P500 index. Companies tend to charter their businesses in the state for its stable law and well-respected courts and the fees those companies pay to the state generate around a third of Delaware's general budget revenue.
But several companies, including Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab, Dropbox (DBX.O), opens new tab and Bill Ackman's management company, recently have said they were moving or considering moving their incorporation out of Delaware, which prompted the bill, according to the sponsor, Delaware state Senator Bryan Townsend, a Democrat and senate majority leader.
"And it also comes at a time when you have a couple other jurisdictions in particular that are seeming to gain some traction with being viewed as legitimate alternatives to Delaware," Townsend told Reuters.
Texas has established a business court that is meant to rival Delaware's Court of Chancery for specializing in business and investor disputes. Elon Musk's Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab and SpaceX moved their state of incorporation to Texas from Delaware after a Chancery judge last year ordered Musk's $56 billion pay package from Tesla to be rescinded.
Townsend said he'd like to move quickly on the bill, which he said was drafted with input from the state's recently elected Governor Matt Meyer, a Democrat. The bill was not drafted by the state's bar association, which typically oversees changes to the state's corporate law.
Townsend said the bill would not change the case challenging Musk's pay, which is on appeal before the Delaware Supreme Court. "This has nothing to do with Elon Musk. And I'll note that this legislation is not retroactive," Townsend said.
Townsend also introduced a bill that asked the state bar association to prepare a report on awarding attorneys fees. Delaware judges have awarded several fees that were among the largest ever in the past two years.
In recent years, several corporate leaders who lost costly cases in the Court of Chancery have attacked the state's judiciary, most notably Musk. Another outspoken critic was Phil Shawe, who was embroiled in a long-running case over control of TransPerfect, a translation provider. Shawe has run ad campaigns in local media criticizing Chancery judges and was a leading proponent of Meyer's campaign for governor.
Several rulings in recent years have held controlling shareholders liable over deals that corporate lawyers thought were properly structured, fueling criticism that the state was becoming too favorable to shareholder lawyers.
State lawmakers took the unusual step last year of amending the corporate law in response to three rulings before those cases had even been appealed, which was widely criticized by academics.
Ann Lipton, a professor of corporate law at Tulane Law School, said Monday's bill would make shareholder litigation in Delaware "dramatically less successful."
The exact impact of that is unclear. Some experts argue shareholder lawsuits prevent the worst board room abuses and self-dealing. But others say litigation acts as kind of tax on companies that rarely results in much benefit for shareholders and that the real policing of corporate boards comes from institutional investors such as large pension funds.
However, the administration of Republican President Donald Trump may loosen federal securities regulations and place constraints on the ability of institutional investors to apply pressure to corporate boards. "That mechanism is failing at exactly the same time," Lipton said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

president donald trump deploys national guard california
president donald trump deploys national guard california

The Herald Scotland

time24 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

president donald trump deploys national guard california

"Presidents set precedents and this one is escalatory, incendiary, and could come back to haunt all Americans," Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said June 8. Trump's order gives 2,000 soldiers the authority to protect federal property like office buildings but no power to arrest civilians, according to a spokesperson for U.S. Northern Command, which is directing the operation. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also has put an active-duty Marine unit on orders to prepare to deploy to California. The 300 members of the California National Guard who deployed Sunday to three sites in Los Angeles appeared to face little in the way of organized opposition, according to a Defense official who was not authorized to speak publicly. Their presence was a performative show of force, the official said, as their authority is clearly restricted. Most of the Guard soldiers are military police officers whose day jobs typically are in civilian law enforcement. They understand the need for restraint, the official said. If they see a protester vandalize federal property, a Social Security Administration office, for example, they can detain the suspect and turn them over to local police. Trump's order fell short of invoking the Insurrection Act, an 18th century law that gives the president authority to use the military to enforce federal law, suppress a rebellion or protect a group's civil rights if the state does not do so. It was last invoked in 1992 during by President George HW Bush at the request of California's governor in response to riots after police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King had been acquitted. Trump and Hegseth's unilateral action over Newsom's objection sets dangerous precedent, Reed said in a statement. "It is crucial that decisions of this magnitude are made with transparency, restraint, and respect for constitutional balance," Reed said. "The President and Defense Secretary should immediately stand down these troops and Congress should reject this dangerous overreaction."

California governor accuses Trump of 'acts of a dictator'
California governor accuses Trump of 'acts of a dictator'

The Herald Scotland

time24 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

California governor accuses Trump of 'acts of a dictator'

Gavin accused Trump of "inciting and provoking violence," "creating mass chaos" and "militarizing cities." "These are the acts of a dictator, not a President," Newsom said. The two men have long been at odds. Trump said on social media June 7 that federal authorities needed to step in because of the inaction of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom, who Trump has nicknamed. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump said in the post. The two have repeatedly clashed, most recently in late May, when Trump threatened to cut California's federal funding after a transgender high school athlete qualified for the state championship. "Large scale Federal Funding will be held back, maybe permanently," Trump said at the time, if California fails to follow an executive order he signed Feb. 5 seeking to bar transgender student athletes from playing women's sports. Newsom, a Democrat with presidential aspirations, has also sparred with Trump over tariffs, fighting fires and the management of water and environmental resources, though he has also criticized his own party.

China's imports of major commodities hiccup in May
China's imports of major commodities hiccup in May

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

China's imports of major commodities hiccup in May

LAUNCESTON, Australia, June 9 (Reuters) - China's imports of major commodities lost momentum in May, with crude oil, coal, iron ore and copper all recording declines amid concerns about growth in the world's second-biggest economy. Only imports of natural gas showed any improvement, with May's 10.11 million metric tons slightly ahead of the 9.67 million in April, although they were still down 11% from a year earlier, according to customs data released on Tuesday. Crude oil arrivals dropped to 10.97 million barrels per day (bpd) in May, down 6.2% from April's 11.69 million bpd and also below the 12.1 million bpd recorded for March, which was the strongest month since August 2023. Iron ore imports slipped to 98.13 million tons in May from 103.14 million tons in April, and were also weaker than the 102.03 million from May last year. Imports of all grades of coal were 36.04 million tons in May, down 4.7% from April's 37.83 million tons and 17.8% weaker than the 42.82 million tons in May 2024. Unwrought copper imports were 427,000 tons in May, down 2.5% from the 438,000 tons in April and also below the 514,000 tons from the same month a year earlier. On the surface the decline in imports of major commodities looks ominous for China as the world's biggest buyer of natural resources faces an ongoing trade war with the United States and still sluggish growth at home, especially in the key residential construction sector. But there is always a risk of reading too much into monthly numbers, which can be quite volatile and are also often driven by price moves during the period when cargoes were arranged. Crude oil is a good example of this. China's imports were weak in January and February, with cargoes delivered in these two months having been bought against a backdrop of rising prices, with benchmark Brent futures rallying from early December to a peak of $82.63 a barrel on Jan. 15. But oil prices started sliding thereafter, with Brent dropping to a low of $58.40 a barrel by April 9. Therefore, the rebound in China's crude imports in March and April came amid a declining price trend when the cargoes would have been bought. However, May cargoes would have been arranged when prices were once again trending higher. It's also worth noting that China's imports of Russian and Iranian crude have also been volatile in recent months, dropping as new U.S. sanctions on vessels were imposed and then recovering as traders worked out ways around the measures. This pattern seems likely to have continued, with commodity analysts Kpler estimating China's imports of Iranian oil at 743,500 bpd in May, but also forecasting a sharp rise to 1.48 million bpd in June. Iron ore imports may also have been impacted by price moves, with the price rising modestly over April, the time when most May-arriving cargoes would have been booked. The Singapore Exchange contract reached a recent high of $101.80 a ton on May 14, and has since moderated to end at $96.26 on June 6. While the price moves are modest, the small decline may encourage some buying by China's steel mills, especially given the prevailing view that Beijing will launch new stimulus efforts in coming weeks to boost the economy. Copper imports are also likely reflecting dynamics on global markets rather than the domestic situation in China. China's imports have trended weaker and are now down 6.7% for the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year. But physical copper has been shifting to the United States as market players expect President Donald Trump to impose a tariff on imports of the industrial metal. U.S. demand has bolstered the premium of copper for delivery to the United States, and drawn metal away from China. While the London price has been volatile and driven by news reports on what Trump may or may not do, the trend has been to higher prices, with an increase from an April 9 low of $8,105 a ton to $9,701 in early Asian trade on Monday. Coal is the major commodity where China's domestic prices and supply have driven weakness in imports, with strong production and soft local prices cutting the need for imports. Seaborne thermal coal prices have dropped to four-year lows in response, and there are some early signs that demand is picking up, but it will likely take further declines to spark any meaningful interest in boosting imports. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab. (The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store