Should You Buy, Sell or Hold Applied Materials Stock Post Q2 Earnings?
Applied Materials AMAT shares have lost 5.3% since it reported financial results for the second quarter of fiscal 2025 on May 15. Though the company's second-quarter top and bottom lines surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate, declining revenues in the Chinese market weighed on the investors' sentiments.
The year 2025 has remained highly volatile for AMAT stock, with its share price rising mere 1.9% year to date. The stock has also underperformed other semiconductor players, including Lam Research LRCX, KLA Corporation KLAC and ASML Holding ASML.
The underperformance of AMAT's share price, along with concerns related to China sales prospects, raises the question: Should investors buy, hold or sell AMAT stock?
Declining China Sales: A Key Concern for AMAT's Prospects
A major headwind for Applied Materials is increasing U.S.-China tensions and export restrictions on semiconductor manufacturing equipment. China remains a crucial market for Applied Materials, accounting for a significant portion of total revenues. However, U.S. government restrictions on selling advanced semiconductor equipment to Chinese manufacturers are hurting Applied Materials' sales and growth outlook.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2025, Applied Materials' China sales plunged 37.3% year over year to $1.77 billion. China market's contribution to total revenues also shrank to 25% from the year-ago quarter's 43%. This marked the third consecutive quarter of a year-over-year fall in China revenues.
Earlier, management had acknowledged that the company faces elevated uncertainty in China due to ongoing geopolitical tensions and regulatory scrutiny. If stricter export controls are imposed, Applied Materials' long-term revenue potential could take a hit, as Chinese chipmakers are forced to turn to domestic alternatives or non-U.S. suppliers.
However, despite the headwinds, AMAT has several upsides that enable the company to perform well.
AMAT Leads the Market With Superior Technology
Applied Materials is well-positioned to capitalize on the demand for AI-driven semiconductors that has become the driving force for this industry. AMAT has made significant strides in cutting-edge chip manufacturing, particularly in gate-all-around (GAA) transistors, high-bandwidth memory and advanced packaging. These innovations are critical to enabling faster, more energy-efficient AI processing.
Applied Materials' revenues from advanced semiconductor nodes surpassed $2.5 billion in fiscal 2024, and management expects this figure to double in fiscal 2025. The transition from FinFET to GAA transistors is expanding AMAT's total addressable market by 15%, while Applied Materials' revenues in this segment are projected to grow 30% per wafer fab capacity expansion. The company is also on track to secure more than 50% of the market share in GAA and backside power delivery, solidifying its leadership in the AI computing era.
The advanced packaging segment has become an increasingly critical part of Applied Materials' business, with revenues tripling over the past four years to $1.7 billion in fiscal 2024. AMAT has secured volume orders from leading-edge customers for its Integrated Hybrid Bonding technology, strengthening its position in next-generation chip manufacturing. The upcoming EPIC Center in Silicon Valley, expected to go live in 2026, will further drive innovation in semiconductor packaging and process technology.
In its most recent earnings report, AMAT highlighted that the company is well-positioned to gain from demand growth in gate-all-around transistors, backside power delivery, and high-bandwidth memory. Applied Materials' gross margins hit 49.2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2025, which was the highest since 2000. Moreover, the company expects its advanced DRAM revenues to grow more than 40% in 2025, driven by DDR5 and HBM.
Due to all these positive factors, analysts are optimistic about the stock's future growth. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for fiscal 2025 and 2026 revenues is projected to grow 5.96% and 5.7%, respectively. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2025 and 2026 earnings is projected to grow 9.2% and 5%, respectively. Applied Materials is on track to sustain its momentum. Additionally, the company has consistently outperformed earnings expectations, delivering an average surprise of 4.94% over the last four quarters, reflecting its strong execution capabilities.
AMAT's Valuation Offers Upside Potential
Applied Materials is trading at a 12-month forward P/E ratio of 17.09, significantly below the industry average of 25.5. Given its dominance in semiconductor equipment and AI-driven chip manufacturing, this valuation discount suggests strong upside potential over the long term.
Applied Materials is also trading at a lower P/E multiple than other semiconductor companies, including Lam Research, KLA Corporation and ASML Holding. Currently, Lam Research, KLA Corporation and ASML Holding have a P/E multiple of 21.25X, 24.1X and 26.2X, respectively.
Applied Materials Forward 12 Months (P/E) Valuation Chart
Conclusion: Hold AMAT for Now
Applied Materials remains a key player in semiconductor manufacturing, with a strong position in AI-driven chip development, advanced packaging and next-generation process technology. For investors, retaining AMAT is the best approach. Currently, Applied Materials carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Zacks Names #1 Semiconductor Stock
It's only 1/9,000th the size of NVIDIA which skyrocketed more than +800% since we recommended it. NVIDIA is still strong, but our new top chip stock has much more room to boom.
With strong earnings growth and an expanding customer base, it's positioned to feed the rampant demand for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Internet of Things. Global semiconductor manufacturing is projected to explode from $452 billion in 2021 to $803 billion by 2028.
See This Stock Now for Free >>
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
KLA Corporation (KLAC): Free Stock Analysis Report
ASML Holding N.V. (ASML): Free Stock Analysis Report
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX): Free Stock Analysis Report
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT): Free Stock Analysis Report
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump really wants to fly on an upgraded Air Force One — but making that happen could depend on whether he's willing to cut corners with security. As government lawyers sort out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family, another crucial conversation is unfolding about modifying the plane so it's safe for the American president. Installing capabilities equivalent to the decades-old 747s now used as Air Force One would almost certainly consign the project to a similar fate as Boeing's replacement initiative, which has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers Thursday that those security modifications would cost less than US$400 million but provided no details. Satisfying Trump's desire to use the new plane before the end of his term could require leaving out some of those precautions, however. A White House official said Trump wants the Qatari jet ready as soon as possible while adhering to security standards. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, did not provide details on equipment issues or the timeline. Trump has survived two assassination attempts, and Iran allegedly also plotted to kill him, so he's well aware of the danger he faces. However, he seems willing to take some chances with security, particularly when it comes to communications. For example, he likes to keep his personal phone handy despite the threat of hacks. He boasted this week that the government got the jet 'for free,' saying, 'We need it as Air Force One until the other ones are done.' Here's a look at what it would take to make the Qatari plane into a presidential transport: What makes a plane worthy of being Air Force One? Air Force One is the call sign for any plane that's carrying the president. The first aircraft to get the designation was a propeller-powered C-54 Skymaster, which ferried Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Yalta Conference in 1945. It featured a conference room with a bulletproof window. Things are a lot more complicated these days. Boeing has spent years stripping down and rebuilding two 747s to replace the versions that have carried presidents for more than three decades. The project is slated to cost more than $5.3 billion and may not be finished before Trump leaves office. A 2021 report made public through the Freedom of Information Act outlines the unclassified requirements for the replacement 747s under construction. At the top of the list — survivability and communications. The government decided more than a decade ago that the new planes had to have four engines so they could remain airborne if one or two fail, said Deborah Lee James, who was Air Force secretary at the time. That creates a challenge because 747s are no longer manufactured, which could make spare parts harder to come by. Air Force One also has to have the highest level of classified communications, anti-jamming capabilities and external protections against foreign surveillance, so the president can securely command military forces and nuclear weapons during a national emergency. It's an extremely sensitive and complex system, including video, voice and data transmissions. James said there are anti-missile measures and shielding against radiation or an electromagnetic pulse that could be caused by a nuclear blast. 'The point is, it remains in flight no matter what,' she said. Will Trump want all the security bells and whistles? If the Qatari plane is retrofitted to presidential standards, it could cost $1.5 billion and take years, according to a U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide details that aren't publicly available. Testifying before Congress this week, Meink discounted such estimates, arguing that some of the costs associated with retrofitting the Qatari plane would have been spent anyway as the Air Force moves to build the long-delayed new presidential planes, including buying aircraft for training and to have spares available if needed. In response, Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said that based on the contract costs for the planes that the Air Force is building, it would cost about $1 billion to strip down the Qatar plane, install encrypted communications, harden its defenses and make other required upgrades. James said simply redoing the wiring means 'you'd have to break that whole thing wide open and almost start from scratch.' Trump, as commander in chief, could waive some of these requirements. He could decide to skip shielding systems from an electromagnetic pulse, leaving his communications more vulnerable in case of a disaster but shaving time off the project. After all, Boeing has already scaled back its original plans for the new 747s. Their range was trimmed by 1,200 nautical miles, and the ability to refuel while airborne was scrapped. Paul Eckloff, a former leader of protection details at the Secret Service, expects the president would get the final say. 'The Secret Service's job is to plan for and mitigate risk,' he said. 'It can never eliminate it.' If Trump does waive some requirements, James said that should be kept under wraps because 'you don't want to advertise to your potential adversaries what the vulnerabilities of this new aircraft might be.' It's unlikely that Trump will want to skimp on the plane's appearance. He keeps a model of a new Air Force One in the Oval Office, complete with a darker color scheme that echoes his personal jet instead of the light blue design that's been used for decades. What happens next? Trump toured the Qatari plane in February when it was parked at an airport near Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort. Air Force chief of staff Gen. David Allvin was there, too. The U.S. official said the jet needs maintenance but not more than what would be expected of a four-engine plane of its complexity. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said it would be irresponsible to put the president and national security equipment aboard the Qatari plane 'without knowing that the aircraft is fully capable of withstanding a nuclear attack.' 'It's a waste of taxpayer dollars,' she said. Meanwhile, Boeing's project has been hampered by stress corrosion cracks on the planes and excessive noise in the cabins from the decompression system, among other issues that have delayed delivery, according to a Government Accountability Office report released last year. Boeing referred questions to the U.S. Air Force, which said in a statement that it's working with the aircraft manufacturer to find ways to accelerate the delivery of at least one of the 747s. Even so, the aircraft will have to be tested and flown in real-world conditions to ensure no other issues. James said it remains to be seen how Trump would handle any of those challenges. 'The normal course of business would say there could be delays in certifications,' she said. 'But things seem to get waived these days when the president wants it.' AP writer Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report. Tara Copp And Chris Megerian, The Associated Press
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
AstraZeneca Stock Declines 6% in 3 Months: Time to Buy the Dip?
AstraZeneca AZN stock has declined 6.4% in the past three months. Although AstraZeneca faces its share of challenges, a significant portion of this price decline is attributed to broader market uncertainties and a volatile macroeconomic environment. The sky-high tariffs imposed by the United States and retaliatory tariffs by China and some other countries hurt global stock markets. Though the massive tariffs imposed by the United States and China are now on a pause, it is only a temporary suspension, and no one knows what will happen after the 90-day tariff suspension ends. The uncertainty around tariffs and trade production measures remains, slowing down economic growth. Although pharmaceuticals have been exempted from tariffs in the first round, they could be Trump's target in the next round, considering the President's goal to shift pharmaceutical production back to the United States, primarily from European and Asian countries. Trump and the Republican government also continue to stress on the control of drug prices with the latest attempt being his 'most favored nations' policy.' Let's understand AZN's strengths and weaknesses to better analyze how to play the stock in an uncertain macro environment. AZN's Strong Portfolio of Blockbuster Drugs AstraZeneca boasts a diversified geographical footprint as well as a product portfolio with several blockbuster medicines. AstraZeneca now has 16 blockbuster medicines in its portfolio with sales exceeding $1 billion, including Tagrisso, Fasenra, Farxiga, Imfinzi, Lynparza (partnered with Merck [ MRK ]), Calquence and Ultomiris. These drugs are driving the company's top line, backed by increasing demand trends. The company is confident that the growth will continue in 2025. Almost every new product it has launched in recent years has done well. Newer drugs like Wainua, Airsupra, Saphnelo, Datroway (partnered with Daiichi Sankyo) and Truqap are also expected to continue to contribute to top-line growth in 2025. AZN Enjoys Strong Position in the Oncology Space Oncology is AstraZeneca's biggest segment. The company is working on strengthening its oncology product portfolio through label expansions of existing products and progressing oncology pipeline candidates. Oncology sales (comprising around 41% of AstraZeneca's total revenues) rose 13% in the first quarter of 2025, generating $5.6 billion in sales. The strong oncology performance is being driven by medicines such as Tagrisso, Merck-partnered Lynparza, Imfinzi, Calquence and Daiichi Sankyo-partnered Enhertu. A key new cancer drug approval was that of Truqap for HR-positive, HER2-negative (HR+ HER2-) breast cancer. The drug has seen a robust launch, recording sales of $430 million in 2024 and $132 million in the first quarter of 2025. In January this year, AstraZeneca and partner Daiichi's drug, Datroway, was approved by the FDA for HR+ HER2- breast cancer, while a regulatory application is under review for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Datroway witnessed encouraging early launch signals in the United States. AstraZeneca expects continued growth of its oncology medicines in 2025, particularly Tagrisso, Enhertu and Imfinzi, despite the incremental impact of the Part D redesign. Several Headwinds to Hurt AZN's Top Line in 2025 The impact of Part D redesign hurt sales of AZN's older drugs, Tagrisso, Lynparza and Ultomiris, as well as newer drugs, Truqap and Wainua, in the United States in the first quarter of 2025, with the trend expected to continue through the rest of the year. AstraZeneca expects Farxiga and Lynparza to be included in the volume-based procurement plans in China in mid-2025, which can hurt sales of these drugs in the country. Pricing and competitive pressure in Europe and generic competition in some emerging markets are expected to hurt sales of some drugs. Brilinta generics are expected to be launched in the United States in 2025. This will hurt sales of the drug. Biosimilar versions of Soliris were launched in the United States in March 2025, which, along with successful conversion to Ultomiris, biosimilar pressure in Europe and unfavorable order timing in certain tender markets, is expected to lead to a continuous decline in sales of Soliris. AstraZeneca is facing ongoing investigations at its China subsidiary. The Chinese authorities are investigating some current and former AstraZeneca employees at its China subsidiary for medical insurance fraud, illegal drug importation and personal information breaches. AZN Stock's Price, Valuation & Estimates AZN stock has risen 8.2% so far this year againsta decrease of 3.1% for the industry. The stock has also outperformed the sector and S&P 500 index, as seen in the chart below. AZN Stock Outperforms Industry, Sector & S&P 500 From a valuation standpoint, AstraZeneca is slightly expensive. Going by the price/earnings ratio, the company's shares currently trade at 14.93 forward earnings, slightly higher than 14.74 for the industry. However, AZN's stock is trading below its 5-year mean of 18.05. The stock is also much cheaper than other large drugmakers like Eli Lilly LLY and Novo Nordisk NVO. Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk currently dominate the obesity space. AZN Stock Valuation Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2025 earnings has risen from $4.47 per share to $4.50 per share over the past 60 days. For 2026, earnings estimates have risen from $4.95 per share to $4.98 per share over the same timeframe. AZN Estimate Movement Consider Buying AZN Stock Despite the potential impact from Part D redesign, AstraZeneca expects total revenues to grow by a high single-digit percentage at CER in 2025. Growth momentum in Oncology and CVRM(cardiovascular, renal and metabolism) segments is expected to continue in 2025. However, in Rare Disease, though AstraZeneca expects growth in 2025, it will be at a slower pace than in 2024. Regarding the potential impact of tariffs, AstraZeneca had a positive tone on the first-quarter conference call. The company said it has limited commercialized finished medicines imported to the United States from China, which lowers its exposure to potential China tariffs on pharmaceuticals. It also has a substantial and growing manufacturing footprint in the United States, and the majority of its medicines sold in the United States are manufactured domestically. It does import some medicines from Europe but believes that if tariffs on pharmaceutical imports from Europe are implemented in a similar range as other industries, it will be manageable and allow the company to remain within its guidance range for EPS. In 2025, AstraZeneca expects core EPS to increase by a low double-digit percentage. Backed by its new products and pipeline drugs, AstraZeneca believes it can post industry-leading top-line growth in the 2025-2030 period. AstraZeneca expects to generate$80 billion in total revenues by 2030, a significant increase from the $54 billion it generated in 2024. By the said time frame, AstraZeneca plans to launch 20 new medicines, with nine new medicines already launched/approved. It believes that many of these new medicines will have the potential to generate more than $5 billion in peak-year revenues. The company is also on track to achieve a mid-30s percentage core operating margin by 2026 Considering AZN's growth prospects, investors may take advantage of the recent dip and consider buying this Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) stock, more so as it is trading below its five-year mean. Consistently rising estimates also indicate analysts' optimistic outlook for growth. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Zacks Names #1 Semiconductor Stock It's only 1/9,000th the size of NVIDIA which skyrocketed more than +800% since we recommended it. NVIDIA is still strong, but our new top chip stock has much more room to boom. With strong earnings growth and an expanding customer base, it's positioned to feed the rampant demand for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Internet of Things. Global semiconductor manufacturing is projected to explode from $452 billion in 2021 to $803 billion by 2028. See This Stock Now for Free >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report AstraZeneca PLC (AZN): Free Stock Analysis Report Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO): Free Stock Analysis Report Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK): Free Stock Analysis Report Eli Lilly and Company (LLY): Free Stock Analysis Report
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
A $2.8 billion settlement will change college sports forever. Here's how
A U.S. federal judge has approved terms of a sprawling US$2.8 billion antitrust settlement that will upend the way college sports have been run for more than a century. In short, schools can now directly pay players through licensing deals — a concept that goes against the foundation of amateurism that college sports was built upon. Some questions and answers about this monumental change for college athletics: Q: What is the House settlement and why does it matter? A: Grant House is a former Arizona State swimmer who sued the defendants (the NCAA and the five biggest athletic conferences in the nation). His lawsuit and two others were combined and over several years the dispute wound up with the settlement that ends a decades-old prohibition on schools cutting checks directly to athletes. Now, each school will be able to make payments to athletes for use of their name, image and likeness (NIL). For reference, there are nearly 200,000 athletes and 350 schools in Division I alone and 500,000 and 1,100 schools across the entire NCAA. Q: How much will the schools pay the athletes and where will the money come from? A: In Year 1, each school can share up to about $20.5 million with their athletes, a number that represents 22 per cent of their revenue from things like media rights, ticket sales and sponsorships. Alabama athletic director Greg Byrne famously told Congress 'those are resources and revenues that don't exist.' Some of the money will come via ever-growing TV rights packages, especially for the College Football Playoff. But some schools are increasing costs to fans through 'talent fees,' concession price hikes and 'athletic fees' added to tuition costs. Q: What about scholarships? Wasn't that like paying the athletes? A: Scholarships and 'cost of attendance' have always been part of the deal for many Division I athletes and there is certainly value to that, especially if athletes get their degree. The NCAA says its member schools hand out nearly $4 billion in athletic scholarships every year. But athletes have long argued that it was hardly enough to compensate them for the millions in revenue they helped produce for the schools, which went to a lot of places, including multimillion-dollar coaches' salaries. They took those arguments to court and won. Q: Haven't players been getting paid for a while now? A: Yes, since 2021. Facing losses in court and a growing number of state laws targeting its amateurism policies, the NCAA cleared the way for athletes to receive NIL money from third parties, including so-called donor-backed collectives that support various schools. Under House, the school can pay that money directly to athletes and the collectives are still in the game. Q: But will $20.5 million cover all the costs for the athletes? A: Probably not. But under terms of the settlement, third parties are still allowed to cut deals with the players. Some call it a workaround, but most simply view this as the new reality in college sports as schools battle to land top talent and then keep them on campus. Top quarterbacks are reportedly getting paid around $2 million a year, which would eat up about 10 per cent of a typical school's NIL budget for all its athletes. Q: Are there any rules or is it a free-for-all? A: The defendant conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC and Pac-12) are creating an enforcement arm that is essentially taking over for the NCAA, which used to police recruiting violations and the like. Among this new entity's biggest functions is to analyze third-party deals worth $600 or more to make sure they are paying players an appropriate 'market value' for the services being provided. The so-called College Sports Commission promises to be quicker and more efficient than the NCAA. Schools are being asked to sign a contract saying they will abide by the rules of this new structure, even if it means going against laws passed in their individual states. Q: What about players who played before NIL was allowed? A: A key component of the settlement is the $2.7 billion in back pay going to athletes who competed between 2016-24 and were either fully or partially shut out from those payments under previous NCAA rules. That money will come from the NCAA and its conferences (but really from the schools, who will receive lower-than-normal payouts from things like March Madness). Q: Who will get most of the money? A: Since football and men's basketball are the primary revenue drivers at most schools, and that money helps fund all the other sports, it stands to reason that the football and basketball players will get most of the money. But that is one of the most difficult calculations for the schools to make. There could be Title IX equity concerns as well. Q: What about all the swimmers, gymnasts and other Olympic sports athletes? A: The settlement calls for roster limits that will reduce the number of players on all teams while making all of those players – not just a portion – eligible for full scholarships. This figures to have an outsize impact on Olympic-sport athletes, whose scholarships cost as much as that of a football player but whose sports don't produce revenue. There are concerns that the pipeline of college talent for Team USA will take a hit. Q: So, once this is finished, all of college sports' problems are solved, right? A: The new enforcement arm seems ripe for litigation. There are also the issues of collective bargaining and whether athletes should flat-out be considered employees, a notion the NCAA and schools are generally not interested in, despite Tennessee athletic director Danny White's suggestion that collective bargaining is a potential solution to a lot of headaches. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been pushing Congress for a limited antitrust exemption that would protect college sports from another series of lawsuits but so far nothing has emerged from Capitol Hill. Eddie Pells, The Associated Press
