logo
President Donald Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners

President Donald Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners

Chicago Tribune2 days ago
President Donald Trump's plans for 100% tariffs on computer chips that aren't made in the U.S. are stoking confusion among businesses and trading partners — boosting stocks for leading semiconductor companies while leaving smaller producers scrambling to understand the implications.
'We are still waiting for official guidance,' said Limor Fried, founder and engineer at Adafruit Industries, a small electronics maker in New York.
Wall Street drifts as stock markets worldwide take Trump's new tariffs in strideThe chips that go into Adafruit's products come through U.S. sales and distribution companies as well as direct from companies in the Philippines and Taiwan.
If those chips aren't exempt, 'it would increase the costs that go into our designs as the semiconductors are the most expensive component in our assemblies,' Fried said. 'For many of these tariffs, we often have to wait until we get a bill to know our exposure, and then we adjust our pricing to account for the increases.'
The U.S. imports a relatively small number of chips because most of the foreign-made chips in a device — from an iPhone to a car — were already assembled into a product, or part of a product, before it landed in the country.
'The real question everybody in the industry is asking is whether there will be a component tariff, where the chips in a device would require some sort of separate tariff calculation,' said Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Trump said Wednesday that companies that 'made a commitment to build' in the U.S. would be spared the import tax, even if they are not yet producing those chips in American factories.
'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.'
Wall Street investors interpreted that as good news not just for U.S. companies like Intel and Nvidia, but also for the biggest Asian chipmakers like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that have been working to build U.S. factories.
But it left greater uncertainty for smaller chipmakers in Europe and Asia that have little exposure to the artificial intelligence boom but still make semiconductors inserted into essential products like cars or washing machines.
These producers 'probably aren't large enough to get on the map for an exemption and quite probably wouldn't have the kind of excess capital and margins to be able to add investment at a large scale into the United States,' Chorzempa said.
It's also not clear how the chip-specific tariffs would apply to trading partners that already made broader deals with Trump — such as agreements with the European Union, Japan and South Korea that tax most goods at 15%.
The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to higher inflation. Chorzempa said chip tariffs could again raise prices by hundreds of dollars per vehicle if the semiconductors inside a car are not exempt.
'There's a chip that allows you to open and close the window,' Chorzempa said. 'There's a chip that is running the entertainment system. There is a chip that's kind of running all the electronics. There are chips, especially in EVs, that are doing power management, all that kind of stuff.'
Much of the investment into building U.S. chip factories began with the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022, providing more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry.
Trump has vocally opposed those financial incentives and taken a different approach, betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for electronics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ken de la Bastide column: Indiana should leave the districts alone
Ken de la Bastide column: Indiana should leave the districts alone

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ken de la Bastide column: Indiana should leave the districts alone

Will Indiana Republicans comply with the request of President Donald Trump to consider setting a precedent by redistricting again? Indiana has traditionally redrawn legislative and congressional districts after the completion of the U.S. Census every decade. The lines were redrawn in 2021 and should remain in place until at least 2031. Vice President JD Vance was in Indiana this week and met with Gov. Mike Braun and the state's GOP legislative leaders, in part, to discuss redistricting. With the Republican Party in complete control of the Legislature, all state elective offices and the majority of Congressional seats, it seems hard to believe that redistricting would be considered. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers of the Indiana General Assembly, which means no Democratic votes are needed to pass bills. The GOP currently holds seven of the state's nine congressional seats, with only districts in Indianapolis and northwest Indiana represented by Democrats. Any new map drawn for Indianapolis would have to extend the boundary from Marion County into at least a few of the so-called 'doughnut counties.' A change in that map would impact every other congressional district as currently drawn. Would Hamilton County become part of a district to water down Democratic votes in Marion County? That would impact the 5th District, which includes all of Madison County. Would any new maps require some counties to be split between congressional districts, as in the past? The same effect would take place in northwest Indiana, as the Gary and Hammond area would have to be moved to the south to secure Republican votes. Former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels has already spoken out against any effort to redistrict in the state. 'It's certainly not going to reduce the level of public cynicism or increase the level of confidence,' Daniels said. 'It may be appropriate in some places, but I don't understand that Indiana is one. I think we have pretty fairly drawn lines now, and I don't see any good reason that they should be tampered with out of cycle.' Since the Legislature doesn't meet again until next year, any effort to redistrict this year would require Braun to call a special session. Will public hearings take place around the state to get citizen input on new district boundaries, or would it all take place in the Legislature? Would an effort to redraw the congressional lines also involve the redistricting of the state legislative boundaries? Should an effort be made to redraw the lines in Indiana, there is sure to be a public outcry and the filing of lawsuits to block the effort. Braun and the GOP leadership should not comply with Trump's efforts. They should leave the districts as currently drawn. Solve the daily Crossword

Vance in UK for high-stakes diplomacy day after Trump announces Putin meeting
Vance in UK for high-stakes diplomacy day after Trump announces Putin meeting

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Vance in UK for high-stakes diplomacy day after Trump announces Putin meeting

Vice President JD Vance met with European allies and Ukrainian officials in a day of high-stakes diplomatic talks on Saturday -- less than a week before a historic meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The talks in the UK came just a day after Trump announced the face-to-face meeting with Putin set for Aug. 15 in Alaska to continue negotiations to end the war that has dragged on for more than three years. A U.S. official told ABC News the Saturday talks Vance took part in "produced significant progress toward President Trump's goal of bringing an end to the war in Ukraine." MORE: Trump says he'll meet with Putin next Friday in Alaska The talks Saturday took place at the UK foreign secretary's estate, Chevening House in Kent, England. Vance met with Foreign Secretary David Lammy and representatives from Ukraine and other European allies. The UK meeting came as the upcoming Trump-Putin summit -- set to happen without Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the table -- has raised concern among Ukrainian officials and across Europe. French President Emmanuel Macron said Saturday morning he had spoken with both Zelenskyy and other European leaders and that, "The future of Ukraine cannot be decided without the Ukrainians who have been fighting for their freedom and security for over three years now." MORE: Trump administration weighs value of Putin summit: ANALYSIS Speaking from the White House on Friday, Trump suggested discussions to end the war could include "some swapping of territories," which Zelenskyy later swiftly rejected, saying Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.' Zelenskyy and other Ukrainian officials have also insisted that any negotiations must include Ukraine at the table. "Our positions were clear: a reliable, lasting peace is only possible with Ukraine at the negotiating table, with full respect for our sovereignty and without recognizing the occupation," Andriy Yermak, head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, said in a statement Saturday that also thanked JD Vance for taking part in the UK talks. MORE: Zelenskyy rejects ceding Ukrainian territory, says Kyiv must be part of negotiations In an address Saturday evening, Zelenskyy called the talks Saturday in the UK "constructive" and said they came during an "active day of diplomacy" between Ukraine and several EU allies. "All our messages were conveyed," Zelenskyy said of the talks with Vance. "Our arguments are being heard. The risks are being taken into account. The path to peace for Ukraine must be determined together – and only together – with Ukraine. This is fundamental. And it is important that our joint approaches and shared vision work toward a genuine peace. A consolidated position. A ceasefire. An end to the occupation. An end to the war." Speaking more broadly, Zelenskyy said he believes Trump "has the leverage and the determination" to end the war, adding that "Ukraine has supported all of President Trump's proposals, starting back in February." Friday marked the deadline Trump set for Putin to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine or face "secondary sanctions" against countries that buy oil from Russia. But uncertainty remained as to whether the U.S. would hit Moscow with new economic penalties — and Trump has now agreed to meet with Putin. The meeting in Alaska will be Putin's first meeting with a major Western leader since Russia invaded Ukraine more than three years ago -- and his first visit to the U.S. in 10 years.

White House mulling Zelensky invite to Trump-Putin Alaska summit
White House mulling Zelensky invite to Trump-Putin Alaska summit

The Hill

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hill

White House mulling Zelensky invite to Trump-Putin Alaska summit

The White House is considering inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to an Alaskan summit between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, a White House official told The Hill's sister network NewsNation. It is unclear if Zelensky would attend the meeting with the two leaders as meeting details have yet to be finalized. Trump announced Friday that he will meet with Putin in Alaska next week to discuss ending the over three-years long war between Russia and Ukraine. The president has not ruled out hosting a meeting between the two Eastern European leaders — a move that was previously shot down by the Kremlin. 'The President remains open to a trilateral summit with both leaders. Right now, the White House is planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin,' a senior White House official told NewsNation's Libbey Dean on Saturday. The possible invite comes after Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin in Moscow on Wednesday, their fifth summit this year. Their meeting took place just two days before the president was set to impose new sanction s on Moscow. During their meeting, Putin reportedly shared a proposal for a complete ceasefire, which would entail Ukraine withdrawing its military from the Donetsk region, allowing it to be under the Kremlin's control, along with Luhansk. Trump said on Friday at the White House that some territorial swapping would take place for 'the betterment of both' countries. Zelensky fired back on Saturday morning, dismissing the idea of potentially ceding land to Russia. 'Of course, we will not give Russia any awards for what it has done. The Ukrainian people deserve peace,' Ukraine's leader said. Vice President Vance, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, Zelensky's top adviser, Andriy Yermak and European national security advisors took part in a meeting in Kent, England, where they weighed in on the ceasefire proposal. 'The UK's support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working towards a just and lasting peace,' Lammy wrote Saturday after the meeting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store