From the Grave, Jeffrey Epstein Shuts Down the House
There's no pretending otherwise: disgraced and deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein has hijacked Washington.
Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday announced he was starting the August recess a few days early to avoid the chamber having to vote on whether Congress should force the Justice Department to publish everything it has on Epstein, who was accused of running a sex ring of minors for the rich and powerful. The move amounted to Johnson veering toward an emergency off-ramp to avoid a toxic topic that has crippled President Donald Trump, and by extension most Republicans in Congress.
We are now in the second week of Trump trying and failing to get out from under Epstein's shadow. At the Capitol, disagreements about how to pursue justice for Epstein's alleged victims are erupting into screaming matches and quiet acrimony, and even some of Trump's ardent apologists are finding themselves in a circular text chain asking if the White House gets just how boxed-in the President has become.
Ever since the Department of Justice and the FBI jointly released a memo on July 7 affirming that Epstein died by suicide in 2019 and that there is no 'incriminating client list' in the government's Epstein files, almost nothing else has been able to break through here. A revolt in the MAGAverse stalled votes in the House. The White House has been unable to reclaim control of the story, let alone take a victory lap on Trump's tax- and spending-cuts law. Donors are simultaneously titillated by the tabloid fodder and disgusted that the long-promised disclosures have not been produced.
Trump and his allies have long fed the myth that Epstein's life and death alike were pieces of a coverup to protect powerful players. It became something of a cottage industry, up there with Hillary Clinton's emails and Joe Biden's mental acuity. Now, Trumpists are finding the shrapnel does not spare them when the expectations and the reality are not neatly aligned.
Among more sober-minded Hill staffers, a variation of the same meme has become ubiquitous: you live by the sword, you die by the sword.
House Rules came to a standstill on Monday as Republican troublemakers demanded Congress move to force the Justice Department to publish what it has on Epstein. Democrats were more than happy to join that push and it became clear that Leadership had lost its leash on a movement that Trump has tried for two weeks to shut down.
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have joined forces on a discharge petition to force transparency on Epstein's dossier, which would allow for a vote on the House floor over the objections of the GOP Leadership team. If that unlikely pair can cobble together 218 signatures on their petition, the measure could sidestep Johnson's veto.
At the same time, a House Oversight subcommittee on Tuesday moved ahead with a motion from Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee to subpoena Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.
Rather than keep playing with fire, Johnson sent everyone home. A hasty exit was seen as a better option than a slow-burning self-own.
This is not the summer Trump and his sycophants had planned. Epstein has pulled focus from One Big Beautiful tax- and spending-cut package the President signed on July 4 replete with a military flyover. Yet increasingly, signs in the Capitol are of a party at war with its own members. Even Trump's Congressional allies have depleted their patience.
'I am tired of making history,' Johnson told reporters last week after holding open the vote on an ultimately successful cryptocurrency bill for a record nine hours as an Epstein sideshow invaded. 'I just want a normal Congress.'
You're hardly alone, Mr. Speaker.
But with Trump at the helm and increasingly backed into a corner by an Epstein saga that has split his typically lock-stepped Republican Party, it seems like the White House is turning to the oldies in an attempt to recapture the narrative. It is not working, and that means we once again are at the mercy of Trump's whims.
Trump remains in open contempt of his base, which is peeved he promised a bombshell release of a celebrity client list of Epstein. He bemoaned that Jerome Powell was ever nominated to lead the nation's central bank, a position Trump himself put Powell in. He's even rewriting the recipe for Coke via social media posts, sending some suppliers racing to an unexpected sell-off. And, as this week began, he threatened Washington's football team and its new stadium if it didn't return to a former name that was ditched because it was demeaning to Native Americans.
Oh, and for good measure Sunday evening, he posted a video showing Democrats saying no one is above the law before cutting to what appears to be an A.I.-created clip of federal agents arresting Barack Obama in the Oval Office, pushing the former President to the ground before hauling him to a prison.
If Joe Biden were acting this way, there would be hearings.
The House is on its way home, and Senators are all but done, too. That leaves Trump here in Washington without any prospects of legislative movement until September, a stretch that typically gives administrations time to regroup and plot a push ahead of the Oct. 1 start of the next federal fiscal year. But instead of setting up a spending plan and plotting how to finish out the year, the White House is facing unending questions about Trump and his friendship with Epstein, which has never been in dispute. As GOP lawmakers rush to their flights out of Reagan, many are harboring the same hope: that their districts are not as consumed by the Epstein scandal as Washington has been. For those working in Washington, little else has seemed to matter.
Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
Bondi briefed Trump that his name was in Epstein files
When Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed President Donald Trump in May on the Justice Department's review of the documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, she told him that his name appeared in the files, sources familiar with the discussion told CNN. The conversation, which also included Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, was characterized by two White House officials as a 'routine briefing' that covered the scope of the Justice Department's findings. Trump's name appearing in the files, they said, was not the sole focus of the discussions. Bondi also raised in the meeting that several names of high-profile figures were also mentioned, and that investigators did not find evidence of a so-called client list or evidence refuting that Epstein died by suicide, the officials said. The sources familiar with the department's review said the files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims that the Justice Department found not to be credible, including those relating to Trump. It wasn't clear in what context Trump's name appeared in the files. Like many high-powered people in 1990s New York, Trump was an associate of Epstein's, who worked to cultivate celebrities to burnish his business. The revelation that his name appears in the documents does little to advance previous knowledge about his ties to the late sex offender. 'The White House is not surprised by this – Trump's name was present in the binders that Bondi produced and handed out,' one of the White House officials said, adding that many of the materials already released by the Justice Department had included mention of the president's name. 'The White House does not view this as groundbreaking or new or surprising at all,' the official said, adding that there is no evidence that Trump was involved in any wrongdoing. 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement to CNN, referring to Epstein. 'This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media, just like the Obama Russiagate scandal, which President Trump was right about.' The Wall Street Journal first reported that Bondi informed Trump in May about his name appearing in the documents. The revelations about the meeting contradict Trump's more recent denials that he was told he was in the files. Pressed last week on whether Bondi had told him he was named in the documents, he said, 'No, no. She's given us just a very quick briefing.' Trump has struggled to tamp down weeks of backlash over the administration's decision not to release more documents related to the Epstein investigation — a move that infuriated a vocal segment of the MAGA base and put the president at odds with some of his most ardent supporters. Inside the White House, officials were outraged that Bondi did not redact Trump's name from publicly available materials contained in Epstein binders distributed to influencers in February, sources said. Her failure to protect the president during the episode has been a longstanding point of contention between the DOJ and the White House. 'The DOJ and FBI reviewed the Epstein Files and reached the conclusion set out in the July 6 memo,' Bondi and Blanche said in a statement. 'Nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution, and we have filed a motion in court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts. As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings.' The White House has dismissed the ongoing focus on the Epstein files, arguing that it's distracting from the administration's accomplishments and aiding Democrats' efforts to damage the president. But a growing and bipartisan chorus of lawmakers have since called for a full release of the documents, forcing Republican leaders on Capitol Hill to cut short their legislative session to avoid taking a series of votes on the matter. A Wall Street Journal report last week – about a letter bearing Trump's name and the outline of a naked woman that was included in an album given to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2023 – has also ratcheted up the pressure on Trump. Trump denied writing the letter and has since sued the Wall Street Journal over its publication of that article.
New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin to open nation's largest immigration detention center in Texas with $1.2B contract
The Trump administration will open the nation's largest immigration detention center in Texas thanks to a massive contract worth $1.2 billion, according to a report. The feds will be able to hold up to 5,000 illegal immigrants at a time at Fort Bliss Army base in El Paso, Texas, to meet the demands of the rapidly expanding Trump administration's deportation campaign, Bloomberg reported. Shackled migrants walk toward a military transport plane before their deportation from the US. US Department of Defense/AFP via Getty Images The Department of Defense awarded the contract, which ends Sept. 30, 2027, to Virginia-based Acquisition Logistics LLC to set up a tent city on the base. The Trump administration has sought to erect temporary facilities to hold migrants as it attempts to make room for the 3,000-person quota it's seeking to collar each day. The effort has been turbocharged by a new flood of $45 billion for new detention beds from Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The massive spending bill will double Immigration and Customs Enforcement's detention capacity, with the goal of holding 100,000 illegal immigrants at a time as the Trump administration seeks to carry out 1 million deportations each year. ICE opened 'Alligator Alcatraz,' a tent detention center erected by the state of Florida in the middle of the alligator-infested swampland of the Everglades, earlier this month. The feds can currently hold up to 3,000 illegal immigrants there and hope to expand that to 5,000. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also set his sights on two additional military bases, Camp Atterbury in Indiana and Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey, for the deportation campaign, according to the Associated Press. The Trump administration has set out to deport one million illegal immigrants each year. AFP via Getty Images 'We're looking for any available bed space we can get that meets the detention standards we're accustomed to,' Trump's border czar Tom Homan said Friday. 'The faster we get the beds, the more people we can take off the street,' he added. Fort Bliss has previously been used for immigration purposes, housing unaccompanied migrant kids and Afghan refugees following the US withdrawal from the war-torn country, according to Stars and Stripes.
Chicago Tribune
27 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Supreme Court allows Trump to remove 3 Democrats on the Consumer Product Safety Commission
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the Trump administration to remove three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, who had been fired by President Donald Trump and then reinstated by a federal judge. The justices acted on an emergency appeal from the Justice Department, which argued that the agency is under Trump's control and the president is free to remove commissioners without cause. That's what Trump did in May, providing no reason for removing all three Democratic commissioners on the five-person board, despite a federal law that allows commissioners to be fired only for 'neglect of duty or malfeasance.' The court provided a brief, unsigned explanation that the case is similar to earlier ones in which it allowed Trump to fire board members of other independent agencies, whom Congress protected from arbitrary dismissals. The three liberal justices dissented. 'By means of such actions, this Court may facilitate the permanent transfer of authority, piece by piece by piece, from one branch of Government to another,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote for herself, as well as Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson. The commission helps protect consumers from dangerous products by issuing recalls, suing errant companies and more. The fired commissioners had been serving seven-year terms after being nominated by President Joe Biden. U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox in Baltimore ruled in June that the dismissals were unlawful. Maddox sought to distinguish the commission's role from those of other agencies where the Supreme Court has allowed firings to go forward. A month earlier, the high court's conservative majority declined to reinstate members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board, finding that the Constitution appears to give the president the authority to fire the board members 'without cause.' The administration has argued that all the agencies are under Trump's control as the head of the executive branch. Maddox, a Biden nominee, noted that it can be difficult to characterize the product safety commission's functions as purely executive. The fight over the president's power to fire could prompt the court to consider overturning a 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey's Executor. In that case from 1935, the court unanimously held that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause. The decision ushered in an era of powerful independent federal agencies charged with regulating labor relations, employment discrimination, the airwaves and much else. But it has long rankled conservative legal theorists who argue the modern administrative state gets the Constitution all wrong because such agencies should answer to the president. Kagan wrote that the court already has 'all but overturned Humphrey's Executor.' Other removals are making their way to the high court, including the firing of a member of the Federal Trade Commission, the very agency at issue in Humphrey's Executor. Last week, a federal judge ordered Rebecca Slaughter reinstated as a commissioner. Slaughter returned to work Friday. By Tuesday, she had been sidelined again after an appeals court temporarily blocked the judge's order. The Consumer Product Safety Commission was created in 1972. Its five members must maintain a partisan split, with no more than three representing the president's party. They serve staggered terms. That structure ensures that each president has 'the opportunity to influence, but not control,' the commission, attorneys for the fired commissioners wrote in court filings. They argued the recent terminations could jeopardize the commission's independence.
