Big Tech's new recruits are skipping out on college, and tech companies are encouraging it
You might not know who Alexandr Wang is, but you're about to. Meta effectively just spent about $15 billion to hire the 28-year-old CEO of Scale AI, BI's Peter Kafka writes.
On the agenda today:
VC's new favorite guessing game: Who is Arfur Rock, the " Gossip Girl of Silicon Valley"?
Advice from Goldman Sachs insiders for the 2025 intern class.
From buying a house to job-hopping, taking a big financial risk is scarier than ever.
Potential big changes to private-equity recruiting could benefit us all.
But first: Forget college degrees.
If this was forwarded to you, sign up here. Download Business Insider's app here.
This week's dispatch
Big Tech is turning against college
Julia Hornstein covers tech and other startups in the defense sector for Business Insider. One increasingly common refrain from some leaders in this space is their disdain for higher education.
I talked with Julia about her recent, great, in-depth article on the subject.
Is the negative view on higher education from some tech leaders more about the value of school versus experience, or what's being taught in schools?
It's both. The founders I spoke to see college as expensive and inefficient. Top four-year schools can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Some don't want to miss the AI boom while in class. Others want to become financial providers as soon as possible.
Some also perceive an ideological tilt at universities, a belief that the Trump administration has also espoused. One founder who has built a billion-dollar company told me he doesn't see value in a liberal arts education and has "yet to meet people that consistently rave about that as being super useful."
Palantir is ideologically opposed to college coursework, too. Its CEO, Alex Karp, said in his new book that colleges are "walled off from the world." The Meritocracy Fellowship, the company's internship for high school grads, tells applicants to " skip the indoctrination" of college.
Skipping college for an opportunity in tech or startups isn't uniquely a defense tech phenomenon. I interviewed non-college founders building marketing platforms, AI startups, and nuclear fusion companies. That said, many in defense tech question higher education. Palantir cofounder and investor Peter Thiel, who has both a BA and JD from Stanford, has called higher ed "the worst institution we have."
Joe Lonsdale, another Palantir cofounder and a venture capitalist, cofounded a college in Austin in 2022 out of a frustration "with how modern universities stifle free thought and academic diversity," he wrote.
Some founders I spoke with decided to ditch college in their early teens. A few dropped out of high school. The Palantir fellows are different: For now, they told me, they're taking a gap year and holding their seats in college. Their decision about college might depend on whether Palantir makes them a full-time offer they can't refuse.
Silicon Valley's little whisperer
Serena & co. had Gossip Girl, and Bridgerton has Lady Whistledown. Silicon Valley has Arfur Rock, the anonymous X user who posts scoopy info about startups and VC.
Identifying only as an "anon GP at your favorite multistage-VC," Rock has the tech industry in a twist over their true identity. Some regard Rock's transparency as a breath of fresh air, while others question their motives.
Here's what Rock told BI about the guessing game.
Dear Goldman Sachs interns …
About 2,600 students are kicking off their summer at the investment bank. Working on Wall Street can be overwhelming, though, so BI spoke with three former Goldman interns who rose through the ranks.
They encourage interns to bring a positive attitude, share fresh ideas, and take advantage of the "coffee culture."
How to land a postgrad offer.
Also read:
Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon to interns: 'The only constant is change.' See the letter.
Meet the 0.4% of students who made it into Citadel's 2025 summer intern program — the firm's lowest acceptance rate yet.
Big financial risks are scary right now
Recession worries and inflation are keeping Americans on the edge of their seats. Some are stuck in their jobs, and others are reminiscing about the days of dirt-cheap mortgage rates.
BI's Emily Stewart broke down how Americans are confronting this uncertainty — and what that means for their spending. While it may not be the best time to take a big leap, the impact on the broader economy can be even trickier to decipher.
Stuck reading tea leaves.
PE takes a pause
The path to a prestigious corner of Wall Street is hitting a roadblock.
JPMorgan and Apollo recently announced plans to slow down the ever-earlier recruitment of junior bankers to PE jobs. The decision created shockwaves among young Wall Streeters, who had spent years preparing for the well-worn recruiting cycle that's now been put on hold.
But the impact could extend well beyond those in finance.
And it's not a bad thing.
Also read:
Jamie Dimon just made good on his promise to crack down on bankers with hush-hush private equity jobs
Apollo pulls the plug on a hiring practice for junior bankers that Jamie Dimon called 'unethical.'
General Atlantic halts a recruiting practice blasted by Jamie Dimon a day after Apollo also slammed the brakes.
This week's quote:
"It's human nature to gravitate toward shortcuts."
— Cedric Bryant, the president and CEO of the American Council on Exercise, on Americans' desire for quick-fix fitness hacks.
More of this week's top reads:
Oracle appears to have named two new presidents.
Dell wanted everyone back in the office five days a week. Employees say it's been open to interpretation.
How a flood of retail investor money into private markets could stress the whole financial system.
Citi doubles down on WFH, offering two weeks of fully remote work in August. See the memo here.
Documents reveal what tool Google used to try to beat ChatGPT: ChatGPT itself.
GitHub's CEO says startups can only get so far with vibe coding.
New York's tech industry has a warning for San Francisco: We're coming for your AI crown.
Hulk Hogan wants to reimagine Hooters restaurants as his Real American Beer brand makes a new bid to save the chain.
A big shake-up at Amazon finally brings Whole Foods into the fold.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
Digital Ad Tax ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted. The ongoing legal fight is being watched by other states that are considering taxes for online ads. Maryland estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure. Maryland's law says the companies must not only pay the tax, but avoid telling customers how it affects pricing, with no line items, surcharges or fees, said the appeals court Friday in siding with trade associations fighting the tax. Judge Julius Richardson cited the Colonial-era Stamp Act, which helped spark the Revolutionary War, and wrote that 'criticizing the government — for taxes or anything else — is important discourse in a democratic society.' The plaintiffs contended Maryland lawmakers were trying to insulate themselves from criticism and political accountability by forbidding companies from explaining the tax to their customers. 'A state cannot duck criticism by silencing those affected by its tax,' the judge wrote. The unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a decision by U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby and sends the case back to her with instructions to consider an appropriate remedy in light of the panel's decision. Trade groups praised the decision. 'Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship,' said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement. The law imposes a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Under the law, the tax rate is 2.5% for businesses making more than $100 million in global gross annual revenue; 5% for companies making $1 billion or more; 7.5% for companies making $5 billion or more and 10% for companies making $15 billion or more. The law has been challenged in multiple legal venues, including Maryland Tax Court, where the case is ongoing. The Maryland General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats, overrode a veto of the legislation in 2021 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Meta faces backlash over AI policy that lets bots have 'sensual' conversations with kids
Reuters tech reporter Jeff Horwitz discusses a report that shows Meta's A.I. rules have let bots flirt with children and offer false medical information on 'America's Newsroom.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
Digital Ad Tax ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted. The ongoing legal fight is being watched by other states that are considering taxes for online ads. Maryland estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure. Maryland's law says the companies must not only pay the tax, but avoid telling customers how it affects pricing, with no line items, surcharges or fees, said the appeals court Friday in siding with trade associations fighting the tax. Judge Julius Richardson cited the Colonial-era Stamp Act, which helped spark the Revolutionary War, and wrote that 'criticizing the government — for taxes or anything else — is important discourse in a democratic society.' The plaintiffs contended Maryland lawmakers were trying to insulate themselves from criticism and political accountability by forbidding companies from explaining the tax to their customers. 'A state cannot duck criticism by silencing those affected by its tax,' the judge wrote. The unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a decision by U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby and sends the case back to her with instructions to consider an appropriate remedy in light of the panel's decision. Trade groups praised the decision. 'Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship,' said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement. The law imposes a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Under the law, the tax rate is 2.5% for businesses making more than $100 million in global gross annual revenue; 5% for companies making $1 billion or more; 7.5% for companies making $5 billion or more and 10% for companies making $15 billion or more. The law has been challenged in multiple legal venues, including Maryland Tax Court, where the case is ongoing. The Maryland General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats, overrode a veto of the legislation in 2021 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican. Solve the daily Crossword
