
Families Remember Japan's Deadliest Plane Crash 40 Years On
The Boeing 747 had been flying from Tokyo to Osaka when it crashed about 120 kilometers northwest of Tokyo, just 40 minutes into the flight. Hundreds of people, including relatives and friends of the victims, climbed the mountain to visit the cenotaph built to honor those who lost their lives.
One woman, who lost her younger brother in the crash, shared her feelings with Fuji TV: 'I want to tell him that all of his family members are alive, carrying his spirit with us. We are doing our best to live our lives.'
In the evening, a quiet ceremony was held at the foot of the mountain where people offered white chrysanthemums and lit candles in memory of the victims. Gunma Governor Ichita Yamamoto said, 'It is our responsibility to make sure this tragic event is never forgotten and that its lessons are passed on to future generations.'
The crash happened when the plane lost control shortly after takeoff. A loud noise was heard about 10 minutes into the flight, followed by an emergency call. The plane then shook violently before crashing. Most of the passengers were holiday travelers returning home during Japan's Obon festival.
Out of the 520 people on board—505 passengers and 15 crew members—only four survived. An investigation later revealed that faulty repairs done by Boeing engineers years earlier had caused critical damage to the plane's rear bulkhead, leading to the accident.
While this remains Japan's worst air disaster, it is the second deadliest single-aircraft accident worldwide. The deadliest was a 1977 collision of two planes in the Canary Islands, which killed 583 people.
Japan has since faced other aviation scares. In January 2024, a Japan Airlines Airbus nearly collided with a coast guard plane at Haneda Airport. Thankfully, all 379 passengers on the JAL flight escaped safely, but sadly five of the six people on the smaller aircraft died.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Tribune
a day ago
- Daily Tribune
Families Remember Japan's Deadliest Plane Crash 40 Years On
On August 12, 2025, family members of those who died in the world's deadliest single-aircraft accident gathered in Japan to mark the 40th anniversary of the tragedy. They hiked together to the crash site on Osutaka Mountain Ridge, where Japan Airlines Flight 123 came down in 1985, killing 520 people. The Boeing 747 had been flying from Tokyo to Osaka when it crashed about 120 kilometers northwest of Tokyo, just 40 minutes into the flight. Hundreds of people, including relatives and friends of the victims, climbed the mountain to visit the cenotaph built to honor those who lost their lives. One woman, who lost her younger brother in the crash, shared her feelings with Fuji TV: 'I want to tell him that all of his family members are alive, carrying his spirit with us. We are doing our best to live our lives.' In the evening, a quiet ceremony was held at the foot of the mountain where people offered white chrysanthemums and lit candles in memory of the victims. Gunma Governor Ichita Yamamoto said, 'It is our responsibility to make sure this tragic event is never forgotten and that its lessons are passed on to future generations.' The crash happened when the plane lost control shortly after takeoff. A loud noise was heard about 10 minutes into the flight, followed by an emergency call. The plane then shook violently before crashing. Most of the passengers were holiday travelers returning home during Japan's Obon festival. Out of the 520 people on board—505 passengers and 15 crew members—only four survived. An investigation later revealed that faulty repairs done by Boeing engineers years earlier had caused critical damage to the plane's rear bulkhead, leading to the accident. While this remains Japan's worst air disaster, it is the second deadliest single-aircraft accident worldwide. The deadliest was a 1977 collision of two planes in the Canary Islands, which killed 583 people. Japan has since faced other aviation scares. In January 2024, a Japan Airlines Airbus nearly collided with a coast guard plane at Haneda Airport. Thankfully, all 379 passengers on the JAL flight escaped safely, but sadly five of the six people on the smaller aircraft died.


Gulf Insider
12-07-2025
- Gulf Insider
Air India Crash Report Shows Pilot Confusion Over Engine Switch Movement
A preliminary report depicted confusion in the cockpit shortly before an Air India jetliner crashed and killed 260 people last month, after the plane's engine fuel cutoff switches flipped almost simultaneously and starved the engines of fuel. The Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab 787 Dreamliner bound for London from the Indian city of Ahmedabad began to lose thrust and sink shortly after takeoff, according to the report on the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade released on Saturday by Indian accident investigators. The report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) about the June 12 crash raises fresh questions over the position of the critical engine fuel cutoff switches. Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines. In the flight's final moments, one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. 'The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report said. It did not identify which remarks were made by the flight's captain and which by the first officer, nor which pilot transmitted 'Mayday, Mayday, Mayday' just before the crash. The commanding pilot of the Air India plane was Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, who had a total flying experience of 15,638 hours and, according to the Indian government, was also an Air India instructor. His co-pilot was Clive Kunder, 32, who had 3,403 hours of total experience. The fuel switches had almost simultaneously flipped from run to cutoff just after takeoff. The preliminary report did not say how the switches could have flipped to the cutoff position during the flight. 'We care for the welfare and the well-being of pilots so let's not jump to any conclusions at this stage, let us wait for the final report,' Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu told local news channels. The crash is a challenge for Tata Group's ambitious campaign to restore Air India's reputation and revamp its fleet, after taking the carrier over from the government in 2022. Air India acknowledged the report in a statement. The carrier said it was cooperating with Indian authorities but declined further comment. Experts have said a pilot would not be able to accidentally move the fuel switches. 'If they were moved because of a pilot, why?' asked U.S. aviation safety expert Anthony Brickhouse. The switches flipped a second apart, the report said, roughly the time it would take to shift one and then the other, according to U.S. aviation expert John Nance. He added that a pilot would normally never turn the switches off in flight, especially as the plane is starting to climb. Flipping to cutoff almost immediately cuts the engines. It is most often used to turn engines off once a plane has arrived at its airport gate and in certain emergency situations, such as an engine fire. The report does not indicate there was any emergency requiring an engine cutoff. At the crash site, both fuel switches were found in the run position and there had been indications of both engines relighting before the low-altitude crash, said the report, which was released around 1:30 a.m. IST on Saturday (2000 GMT on Friday). Asked about the report, the father of first officer Kunder told reporters 'I am not from the airline', declining to comment further during a prayer meeting held in the memory of the airline's crew on Saturday in Mumbai, where emotional scenes played out among grieving relatives. The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board thanked Indian officials for their cooperation in a statement and noted that there were no recommended actions in the report aimed at operators of Boeing 787 jets or the GE (GE.N) engines. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration said its priority was to follow the facts where they lead and it was committed to promptly addressing any risks identified throughout the process. Boeing said it continued to support the investigation and its customer, Air India. GE Aerospace did not respond immediately to a request for comment. The AAIB, an office under India's civil aviation ministry, is leading the probe into the crash, which killed all but one of the 242 people on board and 19 others on the ground. Most air crashes are caused by multiple factors, with a preliminary report due 30 days after the accident, according to international rules, and a final report expected within a year. The plane's black boxes, combined cockpit voice recorders and flight data recorders, were recovered in the days following the crash and later downloaded in India. The report said 'all applicable airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins were complied (with) on the aircraft as well as engines.' The airport closed-circuit TV recording from Ahmedabad had earlier shown the Air India plane rose to a height of 650 feet after it took off, but then suddenly lost altitude, crashing in a fireball into a nearby building. The investigation report said as the Dreamliner lost altitude, it initially made contact with several trees and an incineration chimney, before hitting the building. Air India has faced additional scrutiny on other fronts after the crash. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency said last week it plans to investigate its budget airline, Air India Express, after Reuters reported the carrier did not follow a directive to change engine parts of an Airbus A320 in a timely manner and falsified records to show compliance. India is banking on a boom in aviation to support wider development goals, with New Delhi saying it wants India to be a job-creating global aviation hub along the lines of Dubai.


Daily Tribune
12-07-2025
- Daily Tribune
Air India Crash: Investigators Reveal Engines Lost Power Seconds After Takeoff
Investigators have shared new details about the crash of Air India Flight 171, which killed 260 people last month. The plane was in the air for less than 40 seconds before it went down in a crowded neighbourhood in Ahmedabad. According to a new report, both engines lost power just after takeoff because the fuel switches were suddenly moved to the 'cut-off' position. This cut off fuel to the engines. Normally, pilots only move these switches after landing. The cockpit voice recording captured one pilot asking the other, 'Why did you do the cut-off?' The reply was, 'I didn't.' It's still unclear which pilot said what. At the time, the co-pilot was flying the plane, and the captain was watching the controls. The pilots quickly turned the switches back to normal, and the engines started to restart automatically. But the plane didn't have enough time. One engine was starting to gain power again, while the other hadn't fully recovered when the plane crashed. The plane had climbed to 625 feet before it lost contact with air traffic control. Weather conditions were clear, and everything seemed normal at first. Experts from India, the US, the UK, Boeing, and General Electric are all helping with the investigation. They are now trying to understand how the switches were moved, since they have special safety features to prevent this kind of mistake. The switches must be pulled up before they can be flipped, and they are protected by guard brackets. The cause of the crash is still being investigated, but this new finding has raised serious questions about what happened in those final moments.