Trump Confirms 'Very Wealthy' Buyers Poised to Acquire TikTok
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai
U.S. former President Donald Trump has announced that a group of 'very wealthy people' is set to acquire TikTok's U.S. operations, with identities expected to be disclosed in approximately two weeks. He stated that the sale would likely require approval from China's President Xi Jinping, whom he anticipates will greenlight the transaction.
This development follows an extension of the deadline — now set for mid‑September — under a 2024 law mandating that ByteDance divest its U.S. TikTok assets or face a ban. Trump granted this third 90‑day reprieve on 19 June, citing negotiations and U.S. investors' desire to maintain the app while safeguarding American user data.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, passed in April 2024, requires a 'qualified divestiture' or risk removal from U.S. app stores. ByteDance challenged it in court, but the Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality in January 2025. TikTok was removed temporarily before Trump's administration issued executive orders delaying its enforcement.
Trump reversed his earlier stance — once favouring a complete ban — after gaining a large TikTok following during his 2024 campaign. He credited the platform with boosting his appeal among younger voters.
A consortium led by Oracle, with interest from firms such as Blackstone, Amazon and Walmart, reportedly lost momentum this spring when China refused to approve the proposed transaction. The impasse was linked to Trump's threat of tariffs, used as negotiating leverage.
Several potential bidders have emerged in the course of discussions. Notably, real‑estate magnate Frank McCourt has confirmed he remains ready to support a $20 billion bid through his group, Project Liberty. Other names associated with interest include Kevin O'Leary, former Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick, YouTuber Jimmy Donaldson — known as MrBeast — and former Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin.
Negotiations have involved U.S. Vice‑President J.D. Vance's office and TikTok, which has pledged to continue working with U.S. officials and expressed gratitude for the extensions. ByteDance has stated that any deal would require compliance with both U.S. and Chinese legal frameworks.
As the mid‑September Reuters‑mandated deadline approaches, Trump's timeline for announcing the buyer coincides with intensifying public and legal scrutiny. Critics, including Senator Mark Warner, argue that repeated extensions exceed presidential authority and compromise U.S. national security.
Trade expert Joel Thayer noted that even if the app is sold without its proprietary algorithm, the core TikTok experience could remain affordable — possibly undervalued compared to its full potential.
Approval from China remains the primary hurdle. Trump said securing Xi Jinping's consent will be vital to finalising the transaction. Analysts suggest that any concessions — including a rollback of U.S. tariffs — may be part of a broader trade‑off tied to China's agreement.
TikTok continues to operate in the U.S. ahead of the deadline, with its managers asserting commitment to user safety and asserting they have no intention of relinquishing presence in the market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
Who is buying TikTok? Trump promises answers in 'two weeks'
US President Donald Trump said his administration has identified buyers for the China-owned social media platform TikTok, although he declined to name anyone and acknowledged he still needed approval from Beijing. "I think [Chinese] President Xi [Jinping] will probably do it," Mr Trump told Fox News on Sunday. When asked who could buy TikTok, he said he would have more details in "two weeks". Prof Mark MacCarthy, a senior fellow at the Institute for Technology Law and Policy at Georgetown Law in Washington, expressed scepticism over Mr Trump's recent TikTok claims. "I'll believe it when I see it," he said, noting the ambiguity of the statement. Prof MacCarthy had previously called the battle between ByteDance and US legislators a "compelling conflict between First Amendment jurisprudence and the national security state.". Several weeks ago, for a third time, Mr Trump made a decision to extend a deadline that would have caused TikTok to go dark in the US. That deadline stems from legislation passed in 2024 by US Congress that sought to force ByteDance, the Chinese owner of TikTok, to divest from the platform and find a US-based owner. The motivations for that law are rooted in concern from some elected officials in the US that user data generated and stored by TikTok could ultimately be vulnerable to compromise by the Chinese government. TikTok has repeatedly denied accusations of user data being vulnerable, but those denials have done little to soothe the nerves of Democratic and Republican US legislators at state and federal levels. After a loss at the US Supreme Court where ByteDance tried to challenge the TikTok ban legislation, the company has not indicated that it is interested in divesting the social platform from its portfolio, nor has it mentioned that it is willing to sell to any US investor. In April it was reported that US venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz was in talks to buy a stake in TikTok, and a month earlier, former US Treasury secretary Steve Mnuchin announced he was also trying to put together a group of investors to buy the platform. TikTok has not responded to The National's requests to comment on this story. Its last correspondence with media about the company's negotiations with Mr Trump was on April 4, when he decided to give ByteDance a second deadline extension. "ByteDance has been in discussion with the US government regarding a potential solution for TikTok US," read the emailed response in April. "Any agreement will be subject to approval under Chinese law," ByteDance added. Under the new deadline, ByteDance has until September 17 to come up with a deal that satisfies the law and keeps the platform running in the US. In Mr Trump's "big, beautiful bill", there are provisions that would limit the ability of state governments to make local regulations related to AI and other areas of technology. Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell was critical of Mr Trump's handling of the issue. 'I have no idea why the President of the United States has not protected the American people or the American military from the Chinese scams that are happening on Tiktok," Ms Cantwell said.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump administration threatens to cancel all of Harvard University's federal funding
A Trump administration probe accused Harvard University on Monday of violating Jewish and Israeli students' civil rights. Officials from the Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism wrote in a letter to Harvard's president, Alan Garber, that the university violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Civil Rights Act prohibits federal funding to programmes or activities that discriminate based on race, colour or national origin. The letter said Harvard 'has been in some cases deliberately indifferent, and in others has been a willful participant in anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, faculty, and staff'. It also said that 'failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The letter comes amidst frayed relations between Harvard and the federal government, including the freezing of $2.3bn of Harvard's federal funds in April. These funds represented a portion of the nearly $9bn in federal grants and contracts to Harvard that the Trump administration is reviewing. Harvard University was hit with a $2.3bn federal funding freeze after the Ivy League institution took a stand against the Trump administration's ongoing demands. The freeze, representing 35.9 percent of Harvard's $6.4bn operating expenses, immediately followed a letter in April from Harvard University lawyers to the Trump administration, stating that it rejected the government's demands. Harvard and more than 150 universities fight back against Trump administration Read More » The letter, issued by Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and LLP King & Spalding LLP, said that 'The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.' Harvard president Garber also issued a public letter soon after, saying the university refused to capitulate to the Trump administration's demands 'to control the Harvard community' and threaten its 'values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production and dissemination of knowledge'. Harvard rejected the government's demands, including reporting foreign students for code violations, reforming its governance and leadership, discontinuing its diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes, and changing its hiring and admission policies, especially for international students. The university also initiated a lawsuit against the Trump administration in April and expanded that lawsuit in March, challenging the administration's moves to cut off billions of dollars in federal funding to the Ivy League school. Student protests Harvard's antisemitism allegations have primarily surrounded student protests against Israel's war in Gaza. More than 56,000 Palestinians have been killed as a result of Israel's war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as an act of genocide. The Trump administration's letter said Harvard's pro-Palestine student encampment, one of the five in the Boston area, 'instilled fear in, and disrupted the studies of, Jewish and Israeli students'. However, some Jewish students participated in and held Shabbat services at the encampment. Harvard has previously attempted to address accusations of antisemitism by adopting a controversial definition of antisemitism that includes Zionism as a protected class and by reportedly dismissing faculty leaders at the university's Center for Middle Eastern Studies. Harvard also suspended the student group, Palestine Solidarity Committee, in April. According to Palestine Legal, an organisation that provides legal aid to pro-Palestine activists, these actions represent 'extreme censorship of pro-Palestinian speech - which is not required by federal civil rights law and actually risks violating the civil rights of Palestinian and associated students'.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump to sign executive order lifting Syria sanctions
US President announced during his visit to Riyadh last month that he would be giving Syria near-total sanctions relief President Donald Trump on Monday will sign an executive order to lift US sanctions on Syria. Mr Trump announced during his visit to Riyadh last month that he would be giving Syria near-total sanctions relief. But unwinding the US laws and designations is a complex process and requires Congressional action in some cases. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said the executive order reaffirms the President's "belief that the Syrian people deserve a future of safety and prosperity". "This policy, reflects the President's conviction that American leadership can unlock new paths to regional stability," Ms Bruce told reporters. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the order will remove sanctions on Syria while maintaining sanctions on former president Bashar Al Assad. "His associates, human rights abusers, drug traffickers, persons linked to chemical weapons activities, ISIS and their affiliates, and Iranian policies" will remain under sanctions, she said.
