EU antitrust regulators to rule on Universal, Downtown Music deal by July 22
BRUSSELS, June 17 (Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators will decide by July 22 whether to clear Universal Music Group's (UMG.AS), opens new tab $775 million acquisition of Downtown Music, according to a European Commission filing on Tuesday.
Virgin Music Group, the global independent music unit of Universal, announced the deal in December last year. World number one music label UMG represents global stars such as Taylor Swift and Billie Eilish.
Downtown Music collectively serves over 5,000 business clients and more than four million creators across 145 countries. Its music publishing unit counts John Lennon & Yoko Ono, George Gershwin, Miles Davis, Wu-Tang Clan and John Prine among its clients.
The EU executive, which acts as the competition enforcer in the 27-country bloc, can clear the deal with or without remedies in its preliminary review or it can open a four-month long investigation if it has serious concerns.
Analysts said a full-scale investigation seems the likeliest option in view of the market power of big music labels.
The deal has triggered criticism from European independent music labels group Impala which said the acquisition would further entrench Universal's position across European music markets and give it more control over streaming services.
Impala, which wants the deal to be blocked, said the acquisition would also reduce opportunities for independent labels.
Universal said it look forward to continuing to co-operate with the European Commission in the weeks ahead.
"We are confident that we will close this acquisition in the second half of the year, on its original timeline," the company said in an email.
A former chief economist at the UK's competition authority in a June 12 letter to EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera voiced worries about the deal.
The acquisition "represents another step in UMG's broader strategy of undermining the vitality and viability of the independent music sector – both in the EU and globally – with a view to strengthening its own position, and potentially also that of the other two majors (Warners and Sony)", Amelia Fletcher said in her letter seen by Reuters.
Fletcher co-founded a small independent label and publisher which uses Downtown's services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion United
31 minutes ago
- Fashion United
A new report links public funds to labour abuses in Pakistan's textile sector
A new report from Swedwatch, the Swedish NGO focused on business, human rights and environmental responsibility, has exposed troubling failings in Europe's procurement framework, failings that are allowing exploitative labour practices in Pakistan's textile industry to persist, despite stated commitments to sustainability and human rights. The report, Public Money, Private Harm, based on interviews with 89 workers in factories supplying hospital textiles to the European market, reveals systemic labour violations: below-minimum wages, excessive hours, union busting, and the widespread absence of formal contracts or social protections. Crucially, these factories are part of supply chains that deliver hospital linens and uniforms to Swedish public healthcare providers—institutions bound by sustainability codes of conduct, yet still vulnerable to abuse through opaque sourcing networks and weak enforcement. While textiles from Pakistan represent only a fraction of the EU's 2 trillion euro in annual public procurement spending, the implications are significant. The report illustrates how voluntary sustainability guidelines, codified in the EU's 2014 Public Procurement Directive, remain inconsistently applied and rarely enforced. As a result, contracts often go to the lowest-cost suppliers, even when there is evidence of labour rights violations in their supply chains. 'This is not a story about Pakistan alone,' said Sofia Käll, Programme Officer at Swedwatch. 'This is about structural weaknesses in European procurement policy that allow public money to fund exploitation, undermining both ethical businesses and basic human rights.' The findings come at a critical time. The European Commission is currently reviewing the Procurement Directive, and advocates, including Swedwatch, are urging lawmakers to introduce binding human rights due diligence obligations for all public contracts. Unlike the current patchwork of voluntary codes, mandatory due diligence would require buyers to engage more deeply with supplier networks, incorporate worker voice, and move beyond box-ticking compliance. For the fashion and textile sector, the message is clear: sustainability pledges must be backed by legal and operational rigour. The textile supply chain, already under pressure from environmental scrutiny and calls for greater transparency, now faces growing demands for ethical accountability—not only from consumers, but from regulators and watchdogs as well. The report serves as a pointed reminder that the tools to improve global supply chains already exist. With Europe's public sector representing nearly 15 percent of GDP, it holds considerable leverage. Whether that leverage is used to drive systemic change, or simply to secure the lowest bid, remains a pressing question for policymakers and industry stakeholders alike.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Travis Kelce completes mad dash from Cannes to Kansas City for first day of Chiefs minicamp
The distance from Cannes to Kansas City encompasses eight time zones and nearly 8,000 miles, neither of which was enough to keep Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce from the opening of mandatory minicamp on Tuesday. The 35-year-old NFL superstar and his brother Jason were among the invited guests at the Amazon Port Panel in Cannes, where the Kelces dutifully promoted their highly successful podcast, New Heights. Less than 24 hours later, Kelce was back to work at his other job preparing for the upcoming 2025 NFL campaign. Both Kelce and newly re-signed right guard Trey Smith mostly skipped organized team activities last month before making their mandatory appearances on Tuesday. The only absentee in Kansas City was tight end Tre Watson, according to local media. The mandatory minicamp will continue through Thursday. Unlike last year, when he and girlfriend Taylor Swift couldn't stay out of the spotlight, Travis has enjoyed a much quieter break from NFL duties this time around, with the couple keen to unwind together away from the cameras in recent months. Welcome back Travis Kelce! Picking up right where he left off. The boys are back! #ChiefsKingdom — Taylor Burr (@TaylorBurr10) June 17, 2025 He will be desperate to enter the 2025 season in optimum shape after putting up some of the worst individual numbers of his career in 2024, which led many to believe his career was coming to an end. However, after admitting he was weighing up his future, the Chiefs icon confirmed to Pat McAfee at the end of February that he is not hanging up his cleats just yet. Kelce recently explained his reasoning to Jason on New Heights: 'I think the biggest thing is that I f***ing love playing the game of football. I still feel I can play at a high level and possibly at a higher level than I did last year. 'I don't think it was my best outing. I think I let my guys down in a lot more moments than I helped them, especially if you look at my track record and how I've been in years past. 'I want to give it a good run. I've got a bad taste in my mouth on how I ended the year and how well I was playing and how accountable I was for the people around me. I love so many people in Kansas City, both in that facility and the community and it's home for me now. 'I don't want to leave that life yet. I put in a lot of hard work and focus into being the best I can be for Kansas City and last year it didn't end well for us. I feel there's a responsibility in me to play out the contract I initially signed to give the organization everything that I've got and that's what I'm going to do man.' Of course, when he does hang up his cleats, Kelce can always just focus on podcasting. As he and Jason explained in Cannes, the idea behind New Heights was to give their audience a window into their family dynamic. 'I think we've always wanted to show everybody our brotherhood, our family, how we're in this crazy football world together supporting each other from different sides of the country. 'It was an opportunity to honestly spend more time together,' Travis said. Jason then admitted: 'we would go months in the season without really talking to each other.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Salary secrets: pay transparency is great – until you hear what your slacker colleague earns
Name: Pay transparency. Age: Merely a twinkle in government ministers' eyes. Appearance: Potentially a bit can of worms-y. You can't have a problem with pay transparency. It's a good thing! It is! It highlights and helps tackle gender, ethnicity, age and disability pay gaps for a start, which is why the UK government is looking at ways to promote more openness around what people earn. They should make nonsensically vague salary info in job ads illegal for starters. Don't tell me it's 'competitive' – tell me if I'll be able to afford to eat. You're in luck – one suggestion is making employers include salary bracket or specific salary in job ads. Others include banning asking candidates about their pay history and making the provision of clear information on pay structures and career progression mandatory. Didn't the EU do something similar recently? Yes, the EU Pay Transparency Directive, which comes into force next year, introduces similar measures – it also bans pay secrecy clauses, which stop employees from discussing their salaries with colleagues. Good stuff. So what is the problem? Well, speaking of discussing what you earn, one of the other measures the UK is considering is 'providing employees with information on their pay level and how their pay compares with those doing the same role or work of equal value'. So? That sounds positive. You know your colleague, Darren? The wastrel who moseys in at five to 10, scrolls through his socials for an hour then disappears to the gents until 12, takes two hours for lunch and leaves at four? Yep, that Darren. Well, imagine finding out he's earning 20 grand more than you? Is he????? I don't know. But what if, under these new proposed rules, you found out that he was? I would go full Godzilla, ripping through the open space screaming, tearing out cables and kicking over bins. You see the problem. There's a certain potential for, let's say, tension, if people find out they're earning less than their colleagues (especially crap ones). But, come on, how likely is it that employers will be forced, or choose, to reveal specific individualised information on who earns exactly what? Admittedly, very unlikely – this is all still theoretical. But look what happened when the BBC published pay bracket information on presenters? All hell broke loose! You mean a scandalous gender pay gap was exposed and addressed? I see your point. But we're funny about money – a 2021 poll found 36% of British people don't even tell their spouses what they earn. Pay transparency provisions are definitely a good thing, but this could get messy. Do say: 'So how much do you earn?' Don't say: '£7,840 more than you and I'm worth every penny, Darren.'
