
Mother jailed for killing baby daughter during first Covid lockdown
Bristol Crown Court heard tests showed Lexi died following bleeding on her brain, likely caused by being violently shaken, both recently and on at least one earlier occasion.
She died at Bristol Children's Hospital, with a nurse holding her hand, on April 18 – six days after her collapse.
Wilband was found guilty of manslaughter earlier this year following a trial.
Her former partner, Jack Wheeler, 31, was acquitted of causing or allowing Lexi's death.
Mr Wheeler had also been charged with Lexi's manslaughter but this was formally withdrawn during the trial after prosecutors offered no evidence against him.
Jailing Wilband, Mr Justice Saini said he was satisfied she had caused the fatal injuries to Lexi by 'violently' shaking her.
'Lexi was about four-months-old when she died. She was a healthy baby. It is important that we recognise this is about her life being taken,' he said.
'Lexi was killed by you when the country was in the first national Covid-19 lockdown.
'Your shaking of Lexi led to severe bleeding in her brain. I am sure, on the evidence, that Lexi had been shaken by you in another, less violent incident before that Easter Sunday.
'Only you will know why you acted in the way you did.
'It is hard to imagine the pain that Lexi must have suffered both from the past violence and the violence that led to her death. She would have cried out in anguish.'
During the trial, jurors were told that Wilband and Mr Wheeler were in a relationship for about three years, but that Lexi was conceived with another man in early 2019.
But Wilband told Mr Wheeler, of Ledbury, Herefordshire, that he was the baby's biological father and presented him with a fake DNA certificate that claimed he was '100%' the 'farther' of her then-unborn child.
A genuine DNA test after Lexi's birth in November 2019 confirmed that Mr Wheeler was not biologically related to her, but he remained with Wilband and brought up Lexi as if she were his own child.
Jurors heard how Wilband, who had a volatile relationship with Mr Wheeler, took cocaine six days after Lexi was born.
After Lexi collapsed, Wilband made a 111 call from the new-build council house where she lived with Mr Wheeler and Lexi. She claimed Lexi had stopped breathing while in her bouncer chair.
Lexi was taken to Gloucestershire Royal Hospital and was intubated, with Wilband asked if she would like to hold her baby before the procedure took place. She declined to do so.
The infant was then transferred to Bristol Children's Hospital, where Wilband told medics that Mr Wheeler had been carrying Lexi in her bouncer chair and was swinging it.
A decision was made to switch off Lexi's ventilator on April 17, following the results of an MRI scan.
Jane Osborne KC, prosecuting, said Wilband was aware that her baby might die through the night but did not stay at her bedside.
'A staff nurse held Lexi's hand through the night and remained with her,' Ms Osborne said.
'She arrived just after Lexi had ceased to show any signs of life and had stopped breathing.'
A post-mortem examination gave Lexi's cause of death as bleeding to the brain, caused by a non-accidental traumatic event such as shaking.
Giving evidence, Wilband denied ever shaking Lexi and said she had a 'bad wrist' that meant she was physically unable to shake her, and sought to blame her partner.
In a victim impact statement, Mr Wheeler's mother Donnah Davies and father Paul Wheeler said they knew Lexi was not their biological granddaughter 'but it made no difference to us'.
'She was a beautiful little baby girl and we loved her,' they said.
'I can say that Lexi's death is something that Paul and I will carry with us for the rest of our lives.'
David Aubrey KC, defending, said Wilband was immature for her age and had been diagnosed with ADHD.
'The sentencing guidelines recognises that age and or lack of maturity can impact the offender's responsibility and can reduce the sentence,' he said.
'This happened at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic and the defendant found that before she had the support of her family she was now in effect alone and had to cope with the stresses she was facing at the time.
'The lack of support that was taken from her and dealing with things alone is something for the court to have proper regard to.'
Speaking afterwards, Ann Hampshire, from the CPS, said Wilband had not shown any remorse for her actions.
'Lexi's life was tragically cut short by someone who should have loved and cared for her – her own mother,' she said.
'Everyone who has been involved in this case has been deeply moved by the tragic circumstances of Lexi's death.
'Every professional she's spoken to – the Probation Service, the psychologist – she's maintained her denial and stated she wants to appeal.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Teen dad shook crying baby until newborn had brain damage - then blamed the dog
Dafydd Rutherford, 22, shook his newborn to the point of irreparable brain damage and initially blamed the dog, claiming it knocked over the baby's basket before he admitted the truth A young dad shook his crying baby until the newborn had irreparable brain damage and had the audacity to blame the family dog. Dafydd Rutherford's shaking led his weeks-old infant to suffer multiple brain bleeds that have had life-long and devastating consequences, Swansea Crown Court heard. The court was told how Rutherford confessed to shaking his baby out of frustration and said it was not done to harm the child but was done instead to "stop the baby crying." His defence lawyers said the offence was a result of "immaturity, impulsivity, and recklessness", stating that Rutherford, who was a teenager at the time, "simply wasn't ready for a child." Head scans revealed the baby suffered bleeding on the brain, which led to the involvement of police and social services. The court heard how the infant was rushed to the paediatric care unit at the University Hospital of Wales, in Cardiff. MRI scans showed bleeding on both sides of the brain around the spinal cord as well as damage to the brain due to being deprived of oxygen, Wales Online reported. Rutherford initially denied having caused the injuries to his child and claimed the dog knocked over the baby's basket. The defendant then admitted he had become frustrated with the dog barking and the baby crying before confessing to shaking the infant "three or four times." An impact statement from the baby's relatives read to the court described having felt as though they were "torn apart" while the defendant remained silent. They added that by failing to tell doctors, Rutherford had "chosen to help himself rather than help his [child.]" Rutherford, 22, previously admitted inflicting grievous bodily harm when he appeared for sentencing. Stuart John representing Rutherford, told the court that his client recognised he has inflicted "irreparable damage" upon his infant child as well as the entire family. He added the crime came from a place of "immaturity, impulsivity, and recklessness" and said the defendant would be haunted by his actions for the rest of his life. He said at the time of the incident he was a teenager who was "not ready for a child." Judge Catherine Richards told Rutherford that the baby had only been weeks old when he inflicted "devastating" injuries. She said the defendant initially refused to take responsibility for the injuries before confessing he became frustrated by the dog and baby, resulting in him losing his temper. Following a reduction for his guilty plea, Rutherford received a 28-month prison sentence. He will serve up to half of the term before being released on licence to complete the remainder in his community.


Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
The state will do anything but fix the migrant crisis
Migrant hotel protests are erupting across the country, as 'tinderbox' Britain catches fire. What began with a series of protests in Epping, Essex, over the alleged sexual assault of a teenage girl by a recently arrived Ethiopian migrant, has now spread, as Brits air long-standing grievances about asylum seekers they have been forced to host in their own communities. A powerful tendency now exists in the British state towards displacement activity Demonstrations have so far been reported in Bournemouth, Southampton and Portsmouth, Norwich, Leeds and Wolverhampton, Sutton-in-Ashfield in Nottinghamshire, Altrincham and even at Canary Wharf in London. With years of unaddressed anger rapidly making themselves felt, the police, pulled in all directions, are struggling to keep up. 'Local commanders are once again being forced to choose between keeping the peace at home or plugging national gaps', admits the head of the Police Federation. Still, it seems there is one thing the government is more than happy to devote resources to: trawling the internet for anti-migrant sentiment. The Telegraph reports that an elite team of police officers convened by the Home Office is set to monitor social media to flag up early signs of unrest. Working out of the National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC) in Westminster the new National Internet Intelligence Investigations team will 'maximise social media intelligence' gathering in order to 'help local forces manage public safety threats and risks'. If this new division was just about intelligence-gathering that would be one thing. It's true that social media is in invaluable resource for following events on the ground at such gatherings, while local Facebook groups are often where grassroots protests are organised. Yet we know that when it comes to the British state and social media, censorship and punishment for online speech is never far behind. Ever since Sir Keir Starmer repeatedly linked the Southport unrest last year with social media, the idea has firmly taken root in Whitehall that the best way to stop unrest is to aggressively police the internet. Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, already takes this view, and the link has even been drawn in Department for Education guidance on how to talk to schoolchildren about the Southport disorder. In a recent report, the police inspectorate said that that forces must be 'better prepared and resourced to monitor, analyse, use and respond to online content', which it argues was a risk to public safety. This general zeal for social-media policing is why Big Brother Watch believes the new unit is very likely to infringe on free speech. The investigations team is 'Orwellian' and 'disturbing', says interim director Rebecca Vincent, creating the possibility that it 'will attempt to interfere with online content' as other government bodies are known to have done during Covid. As if there weren't enough threats to free speech already. This week age verification provisions in the latest stage of the Online Safety Act (OSA) kicked in, meaning that some footage of protests is now inaccessible on social media for many users. Not even parliamentary privilege is safe from the censorship regime. Katie Lam's searing April speech on the rape gangs, in which she quoted court transcripts and survivors, could not be watched on X without age verification. We are beginning to look like North Korea with rainbow flags: for the public's 'safety', footage exposing grievous failures of the British state now cannot be viewed in the UK. Little wonder, given the OSA explicitly earmarks content relating to 'child sexual abuse' and 'illegal immigration and people smuggling' as the 'kinds of illegal content and activity that platforms need to protect users from'. The Conservatives, who bequeathed us this blank cheque for digital authoritarianism, certainly need to take a long, hard look at themselves. The claims that the OSA is merely about restricting access to pornography has been exposed as a mere fig leaf. And still things could still get worse. As the Free Speech Union has noted, shortly after last year's riots, the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a pro-censorship lobby group with ties to Morgan McSweeney, 'hosted a closed-door meeting under the Chatham House rule to discuss the role of social media in civil unrest'. In attendance were officials from the Home Office, the Department of Science, Information and Technology, Ofcom and other organisations. The CCDH proposals that emerged included amending the OSA to 'grant Ofcom additional 'emergency response' powers to fight 'misinformation' that poses a 'threat' to 'national security' and 'the health or safety of the public''. This would give Secretary of State Peter Kyle the ability to directly flag unapproved content to be taken down at a time of 'crisis'. Should the unrest continue this could well be coming down the track. What all this illustrates is just how ill-equipped the people in charge are to deal with Britain's problems, as The Spectator's Madeline Grant noted earlier this week. A powerful tendency now exists in the British state towards displacement activity. Spin doctors 'manage' the news. Police surveil social media. The government shuffles asylum seekers from hotel to hotel, or to HMOs, or even to privately rented accommodation (which it uses your own taxes to outbid you for). For his part, the prime minister has been tweeting about the women's football. As the unrest grows, leading politicians continue doggedly insist that Britain remains a 'a successful multi-ethnic, multi-faith country'. In reality, there are answers to the asylum hotels crisis, it's just that the government simply lacks the will to act. Large numbers of illegal migrants need to be deported, while those that are here should be placed in a secure holding facility somewhere remote. What is surely obvious by now where they should not be: in hotels, in an Essex market town 500 yards from a school; on the Bournemouth beachfront; in the London's financial district; in a Leeds suburb right next to a shopping centre. As it is, however, it seems the regime will try anything and everything before addressing people's real concerns.


Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
'Ich liebe Deutschland!' Oisin Murphy celebrates biggest win since drink-drive conviction
The four-time champion jockey surprised his hosts by giving answers in German after Group 1 success in Munich on Godolphin's Tornado Alert Oisin Murphy caught his hosts by surprise when he recorded his first Group 1 victory since he was convicted of drink-driving on Sunday. Earlier in July the four-time champion jockey was fined £70,000 and banned from driving for 20 months earlier in July after being almost twice over the legal alcohol limit in a breath test taken nearly seven hours after his arrest.. The 29-year-old pleaded guilty at Reading magistrates court to driving a motor vehicle while over the prescribed limit of alcohol after the car he was driving left the road and crashed into a tree, injuring a female passenger, in April. The conviction led to the BHA imposing stricter conditions on his licence which already included a stipulation to 'remain sober' after he completed a 14-month ban for breaking Covid rules and for two alcohol breaches in 2022. The four-time champion, who had finished second in the King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes at Ascot on Saturday, travelled to Germany on Sunday where he steered the Saeed Bin Suroor-trained Tornado Alert to victory in the Grosser Dallmayr-Preis in Munich. The Godolphin three-year-old kicked away from Map Of Stars to score by two and a half lengths, giving Murphy only his second top level success of 2025. Murphy had not registered a Group 1 triumph since landing the Lockinge Stakes on Lead Artist in May. In the post race interview, he gave his initial answers in German, saying: 'It's incredible, he's a fantastic horse and I love the atmosphere here.' He then added: 'Ich liebe Deutschland.' It's not the first time he has displayed his linguistic skills. He also learned Japanese when he rode in the country. He then said: 'It's fantastic to win on Tornado Alert. We were uncertain he would like the ground but he loved it. He ran very well in the Epsom Derby. He was second at Ascot and today he came to Munich and he was brilliant.' Bin Suroor said: 'He won well, the ground was heavy and he's never run before on this ground, but he handled it well.' 'I said to Oisin before the race 'just keep him happy and give him a chance', but he was travelling good all the way and when he came off the bridle he saw it out well.' Tornado Alert holds big-race entries in the Juddmonte International at York and the Celebration Mile at Goodwood next month, but Bin Suroor is in no rush to firm up future plans, adding: 'We'll see how he comes back after the race and then we'll make a decision. He has plenty of speed, but I think a mile and a quarter is his best trip at the moment.'