
National Crime Agency to investigate allegations police were involved in Rotherham abuse
Five grooming gang victims have come forward to claim that they were abused by police, including a victim who claimed she was raped from the age of 12 by a serving SYP officer.
The NCA's involvement came after pressure from lawyers and the author of a report into grooming gangs to distance the investigation from SYP.
Three retired officers have been arrested on suspicion of historical sex offences as part of a new criminal investigation into the involvement of police in the Rotherham grooming scandal.
The Jay report, published in 2014, found at least 1,4000 underage girls had been abused between 1997 and 2013 in the South Yorkshire town.
Prof Alexis Jay, the report's author, had previously called for investigations to be conducted by an independent police force rather than the SYP.
David Greenwood, of Switalskis Solicitors, which is representing the claimants, had also voiced concern that members of the force who knew those accused could be 'burying evidence or just not finding evidence deliberately'.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) has now agreed to lead and continue the investigation started by the SYP's Major Crime Unit, following a request by the force to do so.
Victim survivors 'number one priority'
The investigation will be carried out by officers from Operation Stovewood, the NCA's enquiry into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse in Rotherham, under the direction of the Independent Office for Police Conduct.
Asst Chief Const Hayley Barnett, SYP's gold commander for the operation, said the concerns around the force's involvement had proved too great a distraction.
She said: 'Ever since the initial launch of this incredibly sensitive investigation, the victim survivors have steadfastly remained our number one priority.
'Over many months, I have had conversations at the highest level with the IOPC and the NCA to ensure these courageous women truly remain at the heart of our work, and that the mode of investigation remains appropriate.
'Concerns around the mode of investigation have put the force, and not the victim survivors, at the centre of the narrative, and this fails to align with a truly victim-centred investigation.
'I am also mindful there is a chance that some victim survivors may be suffering in silence and unwilling to make a report as a result of SYP's involvement. It is for these reasons, and in mutual agreement with our partners, that I have asked the NCA to take ownership of this operational work.
'Today's force, including the officers and staff who have been directly involved in this investigation, are appalled by the nature of the allegations which have come to light.
'We have been determined to conduct this complex and extensive work on behalf of the victim survivors with professionalism, integrity and compassion, and this request is in no way a reflection of our confidence in our own abilities, nor those of our workforce, to deliver this.
'However, we are acutely aware that while our culture, our processes and our workforce here at SYP have transformed in the decades since the failings in Rotherham, the harm suffered by the victim survivors remains their reality every single day.
'Victim and wider public trust and confidence are treasured aspects of our policing service, and where past failings have prevented us from securing this, handing over the investigation is, simply, the right thing to do.'
Philip Marshall, head of Operation Stovewood, said: 'Though our investigation will be independent of South Yorkshire Police, we will work closely with the force and the Independent Office for Police Conduct to ensure that victims receive the best service and support as the investigation is transferred to us.'
Operation Stovewood was formed in 2014 after the NCA was formally asked by the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police to lead an independent investigation into allegations of child sexual abuse in Rotherham.
Its investigations have to date resulted in the conviction of 47 offenders who have so far received prison sentences totalling more than 1,300 years, including concurrent sentences.
One of the five alleged victims to come forward with allegations against SYP officers told the BBC she had been raped in the back of a marked car and told by the officer that she would be handed back to an Asian grooming gang if she spoke out.
She said: 'He knew where we used to hang out, he would request either oral sex or rape us in the back of the police car.
'In a world where you were being abused so much, being raped once [each time] was a lot easier than multiple rapes and I think he knew that.'
The woman claims she was later forced to have an abortion at the age of 15, which prompted a social worker to contact the police.
But she said the officer who arrived to interview her was the man who had been abusing her and he tore up her statement in front of her.
The latest witness statements form part of a civil claim being brought against South Yorkshire Police in an attempt to secure compensation for the victims.
It comes after Sir Keir Starmer bowed to pressure earlier this year and commissioned a national inquiry into the sexual exploitation of thousands of girls.
The Prime Minister's decision followed a 200-page report by Baroness Casey, which found that police and council leaders had sought to cover up the scale of Asian grooming gangs as they feared being called racist.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Independent review to examine how govt department handled prosecutions of Post Office staff
The Department for Work and Pensions will launch an independent review into its handling of prosecutions against Post Office staff, Sky News has learned. About 100 prosecutions were carried out by the DWP between 2001 and 2006 during the Horizon IT scandal. The "independent assurance review", however, is yet to be commissioned and will not look at individual cases. It comes more than a year after Sky News discovered joint investigations between the Post Office and the DWP during the scandal - leading to suggestions some may be "tainted". Hundreds of subpostmasters were wrongfully convicted of stealing by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015, due to the faulty Horizon IT system. 2:55 The DWP told Sky News they have "committed" to commissioning the review into prosecutions led by the department, where Post Office staff were investigated for "welfare-related fraud". They described cases as "complex investigations" which they said were "backed by evidence including filmed surveillance, stolen benefit books and witness statements". They also added that "to date no documentation has been identified showing that Horizon data was essential to these prosecutions". The review will look at a period of time spanning 20 years covered by the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act 2024, from September 1996 to December 2018. The Horizon Act was effectively blanket exoneration legislation which automatically quashed Post Office convictions but did not include DWP or Capture-related prosecutions. The family of Roger Allen, who was convicted in 2004 of stealing pension payments by the DWP and sentenced to six months in prison, are "frustrated" the review won't look at his or other cases. Mr Allen died in March last year, still trying to clear his name. Keren Simpson, his daughter, describes the review as a "development" but a "fob off". "I think it's just getting us off their backs," she said, "I'll believe it when I see it because they're not taking any accountability. "They're not acknowledging anything. They're denying everything. "No one's saying, look, we really need to dig in and have a look at all these cases to see if there's the same pattern here." 1:29 Mr Allen pleaded guilty to spare his wife - after his lawyer told him in a letter that there had been "an indication from the Crown that they may discontinue the proceedings against Mrs Allen were you minded to plead guilty". Despite the Criminal Cases Review Commission deciding Mr Allen had grounds to appeal against his conviction - it was upheld by the Court of Appeal in 2021. The independent review will look at the "methodology and processes" used by the DWP, and the "thoroughness and adequacy" of efforts to obtain case documents. The DWP say that the review won't be commenting on individual cases or those that have been dismissed by the Court of Appeal. 11:28 Potential reviewers will also be approached with experience "outside of the civil service". They will be asked to produce a report with recommendations for any further actions within six months of starting their review. Lawyer Neil Hudgell, instructed by some of those prosecuted, described the review as "wholly inadequate", saying the DWP "should not be marking its own homework." "Any involvement in the process of appointing reviewers undermines all confidence in the independence of the process," he added. 2:48 He also criticised the DWP's statement as "strikingly defensive and closed minded". "It cannot be anything approaching rigorous or robust without a proper case by case review of all affected cases, including those dismissed by the Court of Appeal." He said that where hundreds of convictions were quashed "at the stroke of a pen" a proper and "targeted" review is "the least these poor victims are owed." "At the moment there is a widespread feeling among the group that they have been "left behind and that is both legally and morally wrong." A Freedom of Information request to the Department of Work and Pensions by Sky News has also found that most cases they prosecuted involved encashment of stolen benefit payment order books. In response to questions over how many prosecutions involved guilty pleas with no trial, the DWP said the information had been destroyed "in accordance with departmental records management practices" and in line with data protection.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
New BBC sex scandal after top female star showed 'd*** pic' to junior member of staff sparking crisis talks
A female BBC star allegedly showed an explicit picture to a junior member of staff in the latest sex scandal to hit the broadcaster. Bosses hauled the top talent in for a series of crisis talks about the incident and made her apologise for the unsolicited 'd*** pic'. It is believed the woman is ranked in the Corporation's top 50 earners this year. She apparently asked a stunned junior employee about her preferences before brandishing the unwanted nude image, the identity of which is unknown. The story is thought to have been kept secret for some time, remaining the subject of gossip within the BBC's offices. A source told The Sun: 'As soon as the name of this woman - and details of her bad behaviour - are unleashed, it will derail entire departments and mark the first female to be formally swept up into the BBC's wrongdoing roll call. 'It was meant to be jokey, locker-room type banter, but the woman was completely horrified and cried about it. 'No one minds a bit of office banter, but this was on another level. She felt like it was an intentionally shocking move to intimidate, veiled as a joke. It was way too much.' A BBC spokesperson said: 'While we do not comment on individual cases, we take all complaints about conduct at work extremely seriously.' It's the latest saga to strike the BBC, after MasterChef star John Torode was sacked from the show for allegedly using the N-word on set and directing it towards a member of staff. The Australian-born chef, 59, lost his job at MasterChef after two decades over allegations that he used the N-word, which he claims to have 'absolutely no recollection' of. The BBC said last month that Torode's contract would not be renewed after a report found he had used an 'extremely offensive racist term' following a complaint from a member of staff. It has been previously reported that the presenter, who also hosts a cookery show with his wife Lisa Faulkner on ITV, used the N-word while singing along to a Kanye West song during a wrap party in 2019. But BBC News has since reported this was not the incident which led to the complaint upheld by the report. This instead related to another incident a year earlier, when he allegedly used the same word on set after filming an episode of Masterchef and it was directed at a member of staff. The news site added that the upheld allegation of racist language was one of nine complaints made against Torode in the report, which also related to allegations of abusive language towards junior production staff and sexual language, and which were not upheld. These allegations were not upheld as they were unsubstantiated due to a lack of evidence or witnesses. The complaint against Torode was revealed in the report into co-presenter Gregg Wallace's inappropriate behaviour. Wallace, 60, was sacked after more than 40 complaints against him were upheld. The report also included one further complaint which was upheld relating to a third unnamed person, supposedly a MasterChef senior executive who was accused of swearing, according to BBC News. The news site said it has contacted that executive but has not heard back. Meanwhile, a Banijay spokesperson said the allegation is being handled 'appropriately internally'. Torode has never defended his MasterChef colleague Wallace when allegations against him first emerged in December last year. In a statement at the time the Australian chef said the claims were 'truly upsetting' and the 'thought of anyone who has appeared on our show not having a brilliant experience is awful to hear'. Wallace was said to be 'furious' with his former co-star and unfollowed him and his wife Lisa on Instagram. Last month, Wallace was banned from working at the BBC after executives ruled they did not 'have the confidence that you can change what seems to be learned behaviour'. In a letter of dismissal from Claire Powell, head of compliance for BBC Television, the corporation made clear that Wallace would not work as a BBC presenter following an investigation into his behaviour on MasterChef. When coming to the judgement the BBC said they took into account Wallace's autism diagnosis but concluded that he 'struggled to distinguish the boundaries between appropriate and inappropriate behaviour in the workplace' despite training in 2019. The independent report by Lewis Silkins, which was commissioned by Masterchef producers Banijay in November after the initial allegations, has yet to be published but Wallace has insisted he has been cleared of the most serious allegations of groping. But it is understood that he has been found guilty of making repeated inappropriate comments which he considered 'banter'. Defending himself, Wallace recognised 'that some of my humour and language, at times, was inappropriate' for which he apologised 'without reservation'. Wallace has been blasted by disability charities for using his autism as an excuse for his alleged inappropriate behaviour. He claimed that television executives had failed to 'investigate my disability' or 'protect me from what I now realise was a dangerous environment'. Fifty people came forward this week with fresh allegations about Wallace, including inappropriate sexual comments, touching and groping, which he vehemently denies. Elsehwere in the Corporation, the BBC 's head of music stepped back from her role after the broadcaster admitted that punk duo Bob Vylan were assessed as 'high risk' before their controversial performance at Glastonbury - and yet still allowed on air. Lorna Clarke is among a small number of senior staff who have temporarily withdrawn from their day-to-day duties covering music and live events. Clarke, who is on an annual salary of £215,000, was stood down so she could focus on the investigation into why the BBC failed to cut the feed during Bob Vylan's appearance, The Times Reports. It comes after the corporation has faced a furious backlash following last Sunday's set that included the duo's frontman calling out 'Death to the IDF' and 'Free Palestine '. The performance at the West Holts Stage was livestreamed but the organisation later expressed regret for not stopping its broadcast of the set.


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Frenchman who changed name to Lucifer Of-Darkness jailed for assault
A French national who has legally changed his name to Lucifer Of-Darkness has been sentenced to nine months in jail for punching a man unconscious in a train station lavatory. The 41-year-old, previously known as Berkani Nahim, attacked Christopher Jamieson at Waverley station in Edinburgh this year before handing himself in to British Transport Police officers, claiming self-defence. Footage of his arrest, shows Of-Darkness approaching the officers on the station concourse and telling them: 'I knocked someone out, he pissed me off.' After leading the officers to the lavatory where Jamieson was lying prone on the ground, Of-Darkness said he had punched the man in self-defence. He was arrested and charged with assault and stood trial at Edinburgh sheriff court last month. He denied the offence but was found guilty. Of-Darkness returned to court for sentencing on Friday. Gordon Stewart, in mitigation, said his client had been in Scotland for about three months before the assault and lived 'a vagabond life'. He added: 'Mr Of-Darkness has ongoing issues with the Home Office and what is likely to happen is he will be transported to Dungavel [immigration removal centre] and effectively deported from there. 'What I can say is that he did the right thing by going straight to the police and explaining and directing the police to the complainer. I ask my lord to give him some credit for that.' Sheriff John Mundy sentenced Of-Darkness, from London, to nine months in prison backdated to May 30. PC James Grubb told the trial that he and a colleague were approached by Of-Darkness at about 9pm at Waverley station on May 29. He said he had 'knocked someone out, he pissed me off' and motioned to follow him to the male public lavatories. The officers tended to Jamieson after they found him lying unconscious on the floor with several bumps to his head and blood over his face. Neil Almond, interim procurator fiscal for Lothian and Borders, said: 'This was a violent, but unwitnessed assault, which left a man seriously injured in a public bathroom. 'The police body-worn video was a powerful source of evidence which helped the prosecutor prove who was responsible by capturing the admission of Berkani Nahim. Such footage has the potential to enhance public confidence in policing while also improving the quality of evidence presented during criminal proceedings.'